A multi-functional dynamic state estimator for error validation: measurement and parameter errors and sudden load changes

Abstract

We propose a new and efficient algorithm to detect, identify, and correct measurement errors and branch parameter errors of power systems. A dynamic state estimation algorithm is used based on the Kalman filter theory. The proposed algorithm also successfully detects and identifies sudden load changes in power systems. The method uses three normalized vectors to process errors at each sampling time: normalized measurement residual, normalized Lagrange multiplier, and normalized innovation vector. An IEEE 14-bus test system was used to verify and demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Numerical results are presented and discussed to show the accuracy of the method.

Keywords

Dynamic state estimation / Kalman filter / Measurement errors / Branch parameter errors / Sudden load changes

References

[1] Abur, A., Exposito, A.G., 2004. Power System State Estimation. Marcel & Dekker Publishers, New York.

[2] Bao, W., Guo, R.P., Han, Z.X., , 2015. A substation oriented approach to optimal phasor measurement units placement.J. Electr. Eng. Technol, 10(1):18–29.

[3] Debs, A.S., Larson, R.E., 1970. A dynamic estimator for tracking the state of the power system.IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst., PAS-89(7):1670–1678.

[4] Falcao, D.M., Cooke, P.A., Brameller, A., 1982. Power system tracking state estimation and bad data processing.IEEE Trans. Power Syst., PAS-101(2):325–333.

[5] Filho, M.B.C., Souza, J.C.S., 2009. Forecasting aided state estimation: part I: panorama.IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 24(4):1667–1677.

[6] Filho, M.B.C., Silva, A.M.L., Cantera, J.M.C., , 1989. Information debugging for real-time power systems monitoring.IET Gener. Transm. Distr., 136(3):145–152.

[7] Filho, M.B.C., Souza, J.C.S., Freund, R.S., 2009. Forecasting aided state estimation: part II: implementation.IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 24(4):1678–1685.

[8] Glazunova, A.M., 2010. Forecasting power system state variables on the basis dynamic state estimation and artificial neural networks. IEEE Region 8 Int. Conf. on Computational Technologies in Electrical and Electronics Engineering, p.470–475.

[9] Gu, C., Jirutitijaroen, P., 2015. Dynamic state estimation under communication failure using Kriging based bus load forecasting.IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 30(6):2831–2840.

[10] Gui, Y., Kavasseri, R., 2015. A particle filter for dynamic state estimation in multi-machine systems with detailed models.IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 30(6):3377–3385.

[11] Hu, L., Wang, Z., Liu, X., 2015. Dynamic state estimation of power systems with quantization effects: a recursive filter approach.IEEE Trans. Neur. Netw. Learn. Syst., 27(8): 1604–1614.

[12] Huang, S.J., Shih, K.R., 2002. Dynamic state estimation scheme including nonlinear measurement function considerations.IET Gener. Transm. Distr., 149(6):673–678.

[13] Karimipour, H., Dinavahi, V., 2015. Extended Kalman filter based parallel dynamic state estimation.IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 6(3):1539–1549.

[14] Lin, J.M., Huang, S.J., Shih, K.R., 2003. Application of sliding surface enhances fuzzy control for dynamic state estimation of a power system. IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 18(2): 570–577.

[15] Prasad, G.D., Thakur, S.S., 1998. A new approach to dynamic state estimation of power systems.Electr. Power Syst. Res., 45(3):173–180.

[16] Qing, X.Y., Karimi, H.R., Niu, N.G., , 2015. Decentralized unscented Kalman filter based on a consensus algorithm for multi-area dynamic state estimation in power systems.Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., 65:26–33.

[17] Qiu, J.B., Feng, G., Gao, H.J., 2013a. Static-output-feedback H∞ control of continuous-time T-S fuzzy affine systems via piecewise Lyapunov functions.IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., 21(2):245–261.

[18] Qiu, J.B., Tian, H., Lu, Q.G., , 2013b. Nonsynchronized robust filtering design for continuous-time T-S fuzzy affine dynamic systems based on piecewise Lyapunov functions.IEEE Trans. Cybern., 43(6):1755–1766.

[19] Qiu, J.B., Wei, Y.L., Karimi, H.R., 2015. New approach to delay dependent H∞ control for continuous time Markovian jump systems with time varying delay and deficient transition descriptions. J. Franklin Inst., 352(1): 189–215.

[20] Risso, M., Rubiales, A.J., Lotito, A.P., 2015. Hybrid method for power system state estimation. IET Gener. Transm. Distr., 9(7):636–643.

[21] Sharma, A., Srivastava, S.C., Chakrabarti, S., 2015. A multiagent-based power system hybrid dynamic state estimator. IEEE Intell. Syst., 30(3):52–59.

[22] Shih, K.R., Huang, S.J., 2002. Application of a robust algorithm for dynamic state estimation of a power system.IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 17(1):141–147.

[23] Silva, A.M.L., Filho, M.B.C., 1983. State estimation in electric power systems. IET Gener. Transm. Distr., 130:237–244.

[24] Silva, A.M.L., Filho, M.B.C., Cantera, J.M.C., 1987. An efficient dynamic state estimation algorithm including bad data processing.IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 2(4):1050–1058.

[25] Tebianian, H., Jeyasurya, B., 2015. Dynamic state estimation in power systems: modeling, and challenges.Electr. Power Syst. Res., 121:109–114.

[26] Valverde, G., Terzija, V., 2011. Unscented Kalman filter for power system dynamic state estimation.IET Gener. Transm. Distr., 5(1):29–37.

[27] Wang, S., Gao, W., Meliopoulos, A.P.S., 2012. An alternative method for power system dynamic state estimation based on unscented transform.IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 27(2):942–950.

[28] Zhu, J., Abur, A., 2010. Improvement in network parameter error identification via synchronized phasors.IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 25(1):44–50.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Zhejiang University and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg