Proliferation of district heating using local energy resources through strategic building-stock management: A case study in Fukushima, Japan

Abstract

District heating systems using cogeneration technology and renewable resources are considered as an effective approach to resources conservation and reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, wide-spread aging and depopulation problems, as well as the popularization of energy-saving technologies in buildings, are estimated to greatly decrease energy consumption, leading to inefficiency in district heating and barriers to technology proliferation. From a long-term perspective, land use changes, especially the progression of compact city plans, have the potential to offset the decrement in energy consumption that maintains the efficiency of district heating systems. An integrated model is developed in this paper based on building cohort analysis to evaluate the economic feasibility and environmental impact of introducing district heating systems to a long-term compact city plan. As applied to a case in the Soma Region of Fukushima, Japan, potential migration from the suburbs to the central station districts is simulated, where district heating based on gas-fired cogeneration is expected to be introduced. The results indicate that guided migration to produce concentrated centers of population can substantially increase the heat demand density, which supports a wider application of district heating systems and better low-carbon performance. These results are further discussed in relation to technology innovation and related policies. It is concluded that policies related to urban land use planning and energy management should be integrated and quantitatively evaluated over the long-term with the aim of supporting urban low-carbon sustainable development.

Keywords

building stock / compact city / district heating / energy use / Fukushima

References

[1] IEA. CO₂ Emissions from Fuel Combustion 2015. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2015

[2] Leung D Y C, Caramanna G, Maroto-Valer M M. An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 39: 426–443

[3] Esteban M, Zhang Q, Utama A. Estimation of the energy storage requirement of a future 100% renewable energy system in Japan. Energy Policy, 2012, 47: 22–31

[4] Ivner J, Broberg Viklund S. Effect of the use of industrial excess heat in district heating on greenhouse gas emissions: a systems perspective. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2015, 100(Suppl. C): 81–87

[5] Baldvinsson I, Nakata T. A comparative exergy and exergoeconomic analysis of a residential heat supply system paradigm of Japan and local source based district heating system using SPECO (specific exergy cost) method. Energy, 2014, 74: 537–554

[6] Sahlin J, Knutsson D, Ekvall T. Effects of planned expansion of waste incineration in the Swedish district heating systems. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2004, 41(4): 279–292

[7] Olsson L, Wetterlund E, Soderstrom M. Assessing the climate impact of district heating systems with combined heat and power production and industrial excess heat. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2015, 96: 31–39

[8] Luo X, Dong L, Dou Y, Li Y, Liu K, Ren J, Liang H, Mai X. Factor decomposition analysis and causal mechanism investigation on urban transport CO₂ emissions: comparative study on Shanghai and Tokyo. Energy Policy, 2017, 107: 658–668

[9] UNFCCC. Paris Agreement. Paris: Unite Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), 2015

[10] MOEJ. Submission of Japan’s intended nationally determined contribution (INDC). 2015,

[11] Wakiyama T, Zusman E, Monogan J E III. Can a low-carbon-energy transition be sustained in post-Fukushima Japan? Assessing the varying impacts of exogenous shocks. Energy Policy, 2014, 73: 654–666

[12] McLellan B C, Zhang Q, Utama N A, Farzaneh H, Ishihara K N. Analysis of Japan’s post-Fukushima energy strategy. Energy Strategy Reviews, 2013, 2(2): 190–198

[13] Van Berkel R, Fujita T, Hashimoto S, Geng Y. Industrial and urban symbiosis in Japan: analysis of the Eco-Town program 1997–2006. Journal of Environmental Management, 2009, 90(3): 1544–1556

[14] Berkel R V, Fujita T, Hashimoto S, Quantitative assessment of urban and industrial symbiosis in Kawasaki, Japan. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 43(5): 1271–1281

[15] Fujii M, Fujita T, Dong L, Possibility of developing low-carbon industries through urban symbiosis in Asian cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 114: 376–386

[16] Dalla Rosa A, Boulter R, Church K, Svendsen S. District heating (DH) network design and operation toward a system-wide methodology for optimizing renewable energy solutions (SMORES) in Canada: a case study. Energy, 2012, 45(1): 960–974

[17] Dalla Rosa A, Christensen J E. Low-energy district heating in energy-efficient building areas. Energy, 2011, 36(12): 6890–6899

[18] Tol H I, Svendsen S. Improving the dimensioning of piping networks and network layouts in low-energy district heating systems connected to low-energy buildings: a case study in Roskilde, Denmark. Energy, 2012, 38(1): 276–290

[19] Togawa T, Fujita T, Ashina S, Design support framework for distributed energy system considering with regional characteristics. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. G (Environmental Research), 2015, 71(6): II_139–II_149

[20] Togawa T, Fujita T, Fujii M, Design method of resource circulation and energy system with considering spatial characteristics. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. G (Environmental Research), 2014, 70(6): II_33–II_43

[21] Rezaie B, Rosen M A. District heating and cooling: review of technology and potential enhancements. Applied Energy, 2012, 93: 2–10

[22] Lund H, Werner S, Wiltshire R, Svendsen S, Thorsen J E, Hvelplund F, Mathiesen B V. 4th generation district heating (4GDH) integrating smart thermal grids into future sustainable energy systems. Energy, 2014, 68: 1–11

[23] Ziemele J, Gravelsins A, Blumberga A, Blumberga D. Combining energy efficiency at source and at consumer to reach 4th generation district heating: economic and system dynamics analysis. Energy, 2017, 137: 595–606

[24] Dodds P E, Staffell I, Hawkes A D, Li F, Grünewald P, McDowall W, Ekins P. Hydrogen and fuel cell technologies for heating: a review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2015, 40(5): 2065–2083

[25] Chow T T, Chan A L S, Song C L. Building-mix optimization in district-cooling system implementation. Applied Energy, 2004, 77(1): 1–13

[26] Best R E, Flager F, Lepech M D. Modeling and optimization of building mix and energy supply technology for urban districts. Applied Energy, 2015, 159: 161–177

[27] Persson U, Werner S. Heat distribution and the future competitiveness of district heating. Applied Energy, 2011, 88(3): 568–576

[28] Dou Y, Togawa T, Dong L, Innovative planning and evaluation system for district heating using waste heat considering spatial configuration: a case in Fukushima, Japan. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2018, 128(Suppl. C): 406–416

[29] Togawa T, Fujita T, Taniguchi T, An evaluation approach for regional energy system planning considering long-term land use transition scenarios. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. G (Environmental Research), 2013, 69(6): II_401–II_412

[30] Dou Y, Ohnishi S, Fujii M, Feasibility of developing heat exchange network between incineration facilities and industries in cities: case of Tokyo Metropolitan Area. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 170: 548–558

[31] Liang H W, Dong L, Luo X, . Balancing regional industrial development: analysis on regional disparity of China’s industrial emissions and policy implications. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 126: 223–235

[32] Chertow M R. Industrial symbiosis: literature and taxonomy. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 2000, 25(1): 313–337

[33] Dong H J, Ohnishi S, Fujita T, Geng Y, Fujii M, Dong L. Achieving carbon emission reduction through industrial & urban symbiosis: a case of Kawasaki. Energy, 2014, 64: 277–286

[34] Dong L, Liang H, Zhang L, Liu Z, Gao Z, Hu M. Highlighting regional eco-industrial development: life cycle benefits of an urban industrial symbiosis and implications in China. Ecological Modelling, 2017, 361(Suppl. C): 164–176

[35] Li H, Dong L, Ren J Z. Industrial symbiosis as a countermeasure for resource dependent city: a case study of Guiyang, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 107: 252–266

[36] Sun L, Li H, Dong L, et al. Eco-benefits assessment on urban industrial symbiosis based on material flows analysis and emergy evaluation approach: a case of Liuzhou city, China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2017, 119: 78–88

[37] Tanikawa H, Onishi A, Takahira Y, Four-dimensional mapping of building material stock and energy consumption for stock-type and low carbon society: a case study of buildings in Nagoya city. Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Japan, 2010, 6(2): 92–101

[38] Tanikawa H, Hashimoto S. Urban stock over time: spatial material stock analysis using 4D-GIS. Building Research and Information, 2009, 37(5–6): 483–502

[39] Dou Y, Fujii M, Fujita T, Potential of waste heat exchange considering industrial location changes: a case of Shinchi-Soma Region in Fukushima, Japan. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, 2017, 73(6): II_353–II_363

[40] National Institute of Population and Social Security Research.Regional Population Projections for Japan: 2010–2040. Health, Labour and Welfare Statistics Association, Tokyo, 2013

[41] Gomi K, Ashina S, Fujita T, Development of a methodology for regional future scenarios considering interaction of industry and population and application in Soma Region in Fukushima Prefecture. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Ser. G (Environmental Research), 2015, 71(6): II_151–II_162

[42] Togawa T, Fujita T, Dong L, Feasibility assessment of the use of power plant-sourced waste heat for plant factory heating considering spatial configuration. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014, 81: 60–69

[43] National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES). CO2 Technology Assessment Promotion Commissioned Program by Ministry of Environment, Japan. Report for FY2017. Tsukuba: National Institute for Environmental Studies, 2017

[44] Komatsu Y. Some theoretical studies on making a life table of buildings. Journal of Architecture, Planning and Environmental Engineering, 1992, 439: 91–99

[45] Nielsen S, Moller B. GIS based analysis of future district heating potential in Denmark. Energy, 2013, 57: 458–468

[46] Japan Heat Supply Business Association (JHSBA). Manual of heat supply business. Tokyo: Japan Heat Supply Business Association (JHSBA), 2016

[47] Ministry of Environment, Japan (MOEJ). Emission factor and calculation guide for the calculation, reporting, and disclosure systems. Tokyo: MOEJ, 2016

[48] Hoshino Y, Nagata Y, Hamanii J. Re-prediction of energy demand and supply toward 2030. SERC Discussion Paper. Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry, 2015 (in Japanese)

[49] Cabeza L F, Barreneche C, Miró L, et al. Low carbon and low embodied energy materials in buildings: a review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013, 23: 536–542

[50] Dziugaite-Tumeniene R, Jankauskas V. Energy use in the life cycle of a low-energy building. Environmental Engineering, 2011, 1–3: 740–746

[51] Loorbach D. Transition management for sustainable development: a prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, 2010, 23(1): 161–183

[52] Lund H. Renewable Energy Systems: A Smart Energy Systems Approach to the Choice and Modeling of 100% Renewable Solutions, 2nd ed. Salt Lake City: Academic Press, 2014

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature