Characteristics and mechanism of Leuconostoc citreum as a novel bioflocculant for starch granules in starch production

Xuan Wang, Pamela Owusu Osei, Lei Rao, Xiaomeng Wu, Xiaojun Liao

PDF(4378 KB)
PDF(4378 KB)
Food Innovation and Advances ›› 2023, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (4) : 291-301. DOI: 10.48130/FIA-2023-0030
ARTICLE
research-article

Characteristics and mechanism of Leuconostoc citreum as a novel bioflocculant for starch granules in starch production

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The Leuconostoc citreum SJ-57 strain isolated from the sweet potato starch production showed great potential as a microbiological flocculant, but its underlying flocculation mechanisms are yet unknown. In this study, infrared spectroscopy and thermodynamic analysis were performed to elucidate the short-range and long-range interactions between Leuc. citreum SJ-57 and starch granules, revealing that bacteria cells bond starch granules via metal-bridging ionic bonds. A high repulsive energy barrier of ~8 × 10 −18 J must be overcome to initiate the flocculation process. Heat, protease, lipase, lysozyme, dextranase, and guanidine hydrochloride were used to treat the bacterial cell, confirming that its flocculation ability originated from surface proteins, including GW structural domain proteins, DnaK, GroEL, elongation factor Tu, and lysozyme M1. The primary flocculation mechanisms of Leuc. citreum was proposed to provide a deep understanding of microbiological flocculants and a foundation for future industrial applications in starch production.

Keywords

Starch flocculation / Leuconostoc citreum / Microbial flocculant / Flocculation mechanisms / Bacterial-starch interaction

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xuan Wang, Pamela Owusu Osei, Lei Rao, Xiaomeng Wu, Xiaojun Liao. Characteristics and mechanism of Leuconostoc citreum as a novel bioflocculant for starch granules in starch production. Food Innovation and Advances, 2023, 2(4): 291‒301 https://doi.org/10.48130/FIA-2023-0030

References

[1]
Shevkani K, Singh N, Bajaj R, Kaur A. Wheat starch production, structure, functionality and applications-a review International Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2017, 52 1 38-58
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Wang X, Zhao L, Wang YT, Liao XJ, Wu XM. Improving the production efficiency of sweet potato starch using a newly designed sedimentation tank during starch sedimentation process Journal of Food Processing and Preservations. 2020, 44, e14811
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Zhang L, Yu Y, Li X, Li X, Zhang H, et al. Starch flocculation by the sweet potato sour liquid is mediated by the adhesion of lactic acid bacteria to starch Frontiers in Microbiology. 2017, 8, 1412
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Salehizadeh H, Shojaosadati SA. Extracellular biopolymeric flocculants Biotechnology Advances. 2001, 19 5 371-85
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Li H, Wu S, Du C, Zhong Y, Yang C. Preparation, performances, and mechanisms of microbial flocculants for wastewater treatment International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020, 17 4 1360
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Okaiyeto K, Ekundayo TC, Okoh AI. Global research trends on bioflocculant potentials in wastewater remediation from 1990 to 2019 using a bibliometric approach Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2020, 71 6 567-79
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Research Groups of Sour Liquid. Why can sour liquid precipitate starch? Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis. 1974, 40 S1 57-66
[8]
[9]
Liu L, Xu H, Ye Q, Zhang L. The isolation and growth characteristics of starch flocculating bacteria from mung bean sour liquid Science and Technology of Food Industry. 2018, 39 8 85-89+94
[10]
Wang X, Zhao L, Wang Y, Xu Z, Wu X, et al. A new Leuconostoc citreum strain discovered in the traditional sweet potato sour liquid fermentation as a novel bioflocculant for highly efficient starch production Food Research International. 2021, 144, 110327
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Crittenden R, Laitila A, Forssell P, Mättö J, Saarela M, et al. Adhesion of Bifidobacteria to granular starch and its implications in probiotic technologies Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2001, 67 8 3469-75
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Shipman JA, Berleman JE, Salyers AA. Characterization of four outer membrane proteins involved in binding starch to the cell surface of Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron Journal of Bacteriology. 2000, 182 19 5365-72
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Imam SH, Harry-O'Kuru RE. Adhesion of Lactobacillus amylovorus to insoluble and derivatized cornstarch granules Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1991, 57 4 1128-33
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Niderman-Meyer O, Zeidman T, Shimoni E, Kashi Y. Mechanisms involved in governing adherence of Vibrio cholerae to granular starch Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2010, 76 4 1034-43
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Lahtinen SJ, Ouwehand AC, Salminen SJ, Forssell P, Myllärinen P. Effect of starch and lipid based encapsulation on the culturability of two Bifidobacterium longum strains Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2007, 44 5 500-5
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Malamud M, Cavallero GJ, Casabuono AC, Lepenies B, de los Ángeles Serradell M, et al. Immunostimulation by Lactobacillus kefiriS-layer proteins with distinct glycosylation patterns requires different lectin partners Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2020, 295 42 14430-44
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Wang K, Niu M, Yao D, Zhao J, Wu Y, et al. Physicochemical characteristics and in vitro and in vivo antioxidant activity of a cell-bound exopolysaccharide produced by Lactobacillus fermentum S1 International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2019, 139, 252-61
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Wang K, Li W, Rui X, Chen X, Jiang M, et al. Structural characterization and bioactivity of released exopolysaccharides from Lactobacillus plantarum 70810 International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2014, 67, 71-78
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Guglielmetti S, Tamagnini I, Mora D, Minuzzo M, Scarafoni A, et al. Implication of an outer surface lipoprotein in adhesion of Bifidobacterium bifidum to Caco-2 cells Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2008, 74 15 4695-702
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Garrote GL, Delfederico L, Bibiloni R, Abraham AG, Pérez PF, et al. Lactobacilli isolated from kefir grains: evidence of the presence of S-layer proteins Journal of Dairy Research. 2004, 71 2 222-30
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Harimawan A, Rajasekar A, Ting YP. Bacteria attachment to surfaces – AFM force spectroscopy and physicochemical analyses Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2011, 364 1 213-18
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Van Oss CJ. Energetics of cell-cell and cell-biopolymer interactions Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics. 1989, 14, 1-16
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Van Oss CJ. Hydrophobicity of biosurfaces − origin, quantitative determination and interaction energies Colloids and Surfaces B:Biointerfaces. 1995, 5, 91-110
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Hong Z, Rong X, Cai P, Dai K, Liang W, et al. Initial adhesion of Bacillus subtilis on soil minerals as related to their surface properties European Journal of Soil Science. 2012, 63 4 457-66
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
[26]
Dai L, Wei Y, Sun C, Mao L, Mcclements DJ, et al. Development of protein-polysaccharide-surfactant ternary complex particles as delivery vehicles for curcumin Food Hydrocolloids. 2018, 85, 75-85
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Harney SJ, Simopoulos ND, Ikawa M. Cell wall constituents of Leuconostoc citrovorum and Leuconostoc mesenteroides Journal of Bacteriology. 1967, 93 1 273-77
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Hong Z, Chen W, Rong X, Cai P, Dai K, et al. The effect of extracellular polymeric substances on the adhesion of bacteria to clay minerals and goethite Chemical Geology. 2013, 360-361, 118-25
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
[30]
[31]
Grasso D, Subramaniam K, Butkus M, Strevett K, Bergendahl J. A review of non-DLVO interactions in environmental colloidal systems Reviews in Environmental Science & Biotechnology. 2002, 1 1 17-38
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Ferreira AM, Martins J, Carvalho LH, Magalhães FD. Biosourced disposable trays made of brewer's spent grain and potato starch Polymers. 2019, 11 5 923
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Ajao V, Fokkink R, Leermakers F, Bruning H, Rijnaarts H, et al. Bioflocculants from wastewater: insights into adsorption affinity, flocculation mechanisms and mixed particle flocculation based on biopolymer size-fractionation Journal of Colloid and Interface Science. 2021, 581, 533-44
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Cao ZX, Lu GY, Song Y, Liu ML. Further studies on the mechanism of the agglutinating action of Streptococcus lactis in starch production Acta Microbiologica Sinica. 1980, 20 3 271-75
[35]
Domingos-Lopes MFP, Lamosa P, Stanton C, Ross RP, Silva CCG. Isolation and characterization of an exopolysaccharide-producing Leuconostoc citreum strain from artisanal cheese Letters in Applied Microbiology. 2018, 67 6 570-78
CrossRef Google scholar
[36]
Marcos CM, de Oliveira HC, de Fátima da Silva J, Assato PA, Yamazaki DS, et al. Identification and characterization of elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu), a novel protein involved in Paracoccidioides brasiliensis-host interaction FEMS Yeast Research. 2016, 16 7 fow079
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Rozen R, Steinberg D, Bachrach G. Streptococcus mutans fructosyltransferase interactions with glucans FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2004, 232, 39-43
CrossRef Google scholar
[38]
Garduño RA, Garduño E, Hoffman PS. Surface-associated hsp60 chaperonin of Legionella pneumophila mediates invasion in a Hela cell model Infection and Immunity. 1998, 66 10 4602-10
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Siciliano RA, Cacace G, Mazzeo MF, Morelli L, Elli, M, et al. Proteomic investigation of the aggregation phenomenon in Lactobacillus crispatus Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2008, 1784 2 335-42
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Dhanani AS, Bagchi T. The expression of adhesin EF-Tu in response to mucin and its role in Lactobacillus adhesion and competitive inhibition of enteropathogens to mucin Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2013, 115 2 546-54
CrossRef Google scholar
[41]
Izquierdo E, Horvatovich P, Marchioni E, Aoude-Werner D, Sanz Y, et al. 2-DE and MS analysis of key proteins in the adhesion of Lactobacillus plantarum, a first step toward early selection of probiotics based on bacterial biomarkers Electrophoresis. 2009, 30 6 949-56
CrossRef Google scholar
[42]
Polak-Berecka M, Waśko A, Paduch R, Skrzypek T, Sroka-Bartnicka A. The effect of cell surface components on adhesion ability of Lactobacillus rhamnosus Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2014, 106 4 751-62
CrossRef Google scholar
[43]
Zeng Z, Zuo F, Marcotte H. Putative adhesion factors in vaginal Lactobacillus gasseri DSM 14869: Functional characterization Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2019, 85 19 e00800-19
CrossRef Google scholar
[44]
Münkel F, Bechtner J, Eckel V, Fischer A, Herbi F, et al. Detailed structural characterization of glucans produced by glucansucrases from Leuconostoc citreum TMW 2.1194 Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2019, 67, 6856-99
CrossRef Google scholar
This work was supported by Sichuan Science and Technology Program 2023NSFSC0181 and the 2115 Talent Development Program of China Agricultural University.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2023 Editorial Office of Food Innovation and Advances
PDF(4378 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/