Evaluation of sediment yield in PSIAC and MPSIAC models by using GIS at Toroq Watershed, Northeast of Iran

Abstract

Regarding the importance of watersheds in arid and semi-arid regions, it is necessary to better protect water supplies such as dam reservoirs. The most efficient way of conserving water sources is to apply proper management to decrease erosion and sedimentation. The first step of this process is to be aware of sediment yield (Q_s)/production and identify erosive zones in upper reach of reservoirs. The present study aims to evaluate Q_s and production in Pacific Southwest Inter-Agency Committee (PSIAC) and modified PSIAC (MPSIAC) models by using satellite data, GIS analysis, and field observations. According to the results, the study area can be categorized into five erosive classes: very high, high, moderate, low and negligible. The east part of the watershed is slightly eroded due to its hard surface geology and relatively flat topography characteristics, while the northern and southern parts of the basin are highly eroded because of the high erodibility potential of soil and intensive cultivation of the area. A comparison of the output maps from PSIAC and MPSIAC models showed that the calculated Q_s in most parts correspond well in both models and with field observations. The results of regression between main determining factors (surface geology, soil, topography and land cover) and Q_s derived from each model indicated moderate to strong correlation coefficient (R² = 0.436-0.996 to 0.893-0.998) after PSIAC and MPSIAC models, respectively.

Keywords

evaluation of sediment yield (Q_s) / erodible factors / Pacific Southwest Inter-Agency Committee (PSIAC) and modified PSIAC (MPSIAC) models / sediment production / GIS / Toroq Watershed / Northeast of Iran

References

[1] AideT M, CavelierJ (1994). Barriers to low land tropical forest restoration in the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta. Columbia.Restor Ecol, 2(4): 219–229

[2] AideT M, ZimmermanJ K, HerreraL, RosarioM, SeranM (1995). Forest recovery in abandoned tropical pastures in Puerto Rico.For Ecol Manage, 77(1–3): 77–86

[3] BazzoffiP (1985). Methods for net erosion measurement in watersheds as a tool for the validation of models in central Italy. In: Workshop on Soil Erosion and Hillslope Hydrology with Emphasis on Higher Magnitude Events, Leuven, Belgium

[4] ClarkK B (2001). An estimate of sediment yield for two small sub catchments in a geographic information system. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, Mexico

[5] de KoningG H J, VeldkampA, FrescoL O (1998). Land use in Ecuador: a statistical analysis at different aggregation levels.Agric Ecosyst Environ, 70(2–3): 231–247

[6] de VenteJ, PoesenJ (2005). Predicting soil erosion and Q_s at the basin scale: scale issues and semi-quantitative models.Earth Sci Rev, 71(1–2): 95–125

[7] ErskineW D, MahmoudzadehA, MyersC (2002). Land use effects on Q_s and soil loss rates in small basins of Triassic sandstone near Sydney, Australia.Catena, 49(4): 271–287

[8] FeyzniaS (1995). Rocks strength against erosion factors in different climates of Iran.Journal of the Natural Resources of Iran, 47: 95–116 (in Persian)

[9] JohnsonC W, GembhartK A (1982). Predicting sediment yields from sagebrush rangelands. In: Agricultural ResearchService, ed. Estimating Soil Erosion and Sediment Yields on Ragelands. Agricultural Reviews and Manuals-W-26. Department of Agriculture, ARS, Tucson, USA, 145–156

[10] LagerasP, SandgrenP (1994). The use of mineral analysis in identifying middle and late Holocene agriculture—a study of peat profiles in Smaland, Southern Sweden I.Arch Sci, 21(5): 687–697

[11] Le BissonaisY, MontierC, JamagneM, DaroussinJ, KingD (2002). Mapping erosion risk for cultivated soil in France.Catena, 46(2–3): 207–220

[12] LinC Y, LinW T, ChovW C (2002). Soil erosion prediction and sediment yield estimation: the Taiwan experience. Soil Tillage Res, 68: 143–152

[13] Martinez–CasasnovasJ A (2003). A spatial information technology approach for the mapping and quantification of gully erosion.Catena, 50(2–4): 293–308

[14] MatiB M, MorganR P C, GichukiF N, QuintonJ N, BrewerT R, LinigerH P (2000). Assessment of erosion hazard with the USLE and GIS: a case study of the upper Ewaso Ng’iro North Basin of Kenya.Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf, 2(2): 78–86

[15] MeadeR H, YuzykT R, DayT J (1990). Movement and storage of sediment in rivers of United States of America. In: The Geology of North America. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 255–280

[16] MillimanJ D, SyvitskiJ P M (1992). Geomorphologie/teetonic control of sediment discharge to the ocean: the importance of small mountainous rivers.J Geod, 100: 525–544

[17] MillwardA A, MerseyJ E (2001). Conservation strategies for effective land management of protected areas using an erosion prediction information system (EPIS).J Environ Manage, 61(4): 329–343

[18] PassmoreD G, MacklinM G (1994). Provenance of fine grained alluvium and late Holocene land-use change in the Tyne Basin, Northern England. Geomorphology, 9(2): 127–142

[19] Pacific Southwest Inter-Agency Committee (1968). Factors Affecting Sediment Yield in the Pacific Southwest Area and Selection and Evaluation of Measures for Reduction of Erosion and Sediment Yield. Water Management Subcommittee on ASCE, Report No. HY12, 1998

[33] QiaoY L, QiaoY (2002). Fast soil erosion investigation and dynamic analysis in the Loess Plateau of China by using information composite technique.Adv Space Res, 29(1): 85–88

[20] RafaelliS G, MontgomeryD R, GreenbergH M (2001). A comparison of thematic mapping of erosional intensity to GIS-driven process models in an Andean drainage basin.J Hydrol, 244(1–2): 33–42

[21] RaghunathJ (2002). Potential erosion map for Bagmati basin using GRASS-GIS. In: Proceeding of the Open Source GIS-GRASS Users Conference, 11th–13th September, Trena, Italy

[22] RefahiH, NemattiM (1995). Erodibility assessment of the Alamout sub catehment and its effect on the sediment yield.J Agric Sci Iran, 26: 48–56

[23] SahinS, KurumE (2002). Erosion risk analysis by GIS in environmental impact assessments: a case study—Seyhan Köprü Dam construction.J Environ Manage, 66(3): 239–247

[24] ShrimaliS S, AggarwalS P, SamraI S (2001). Prioritizing erosion-prone areas in hills using remote sensing and GIS—a case study of the Sukhna Lake catchment, Northern India.Int I Applied Earth Observ. Geoinform, 3(1): 54–60

[25] SzilassiP, JordanG, van RompaeyA, CsillagG (2006). Impacts of historical land use changes on erosion and agricultural soil properties in the Kali Basin at Lake Balaton, Hungary. Catena, 68: 96–108

[26] TangestaniM H (2001). Integrating geographic information systems in erosion and sediment yield applications using the erosion potential method (EPM). In: Proceedings of the 015 Research UK, 9th Annual Conference, 18th–20th April, University of Glamorgan, Wales, UK, 621–623

[27] TangestaniM H (2006). Comparison of EPM and PSIAC models in GIS for erosion and sediment yield assessment in a semi-arid environment: Afzar Catchment, Fars Province, Iran.J Asian Earth Sci, 27: 585–597

[28] ThorntonP K, JonesP O (1998). A conceptual approach to dynamic agricultural land use modeling.Agric Syst, 57(4): 505–521

[29] VeldkampA, FrescoL O (1996). CLUE: a conceptual model to study the conversion and its effects.Ecol Modell, 85(2–3): 253–270

[30] WilliamsJ R, BerndtH D (1972). Sediment yield computed with universal equation. J Hydraul Div ASCE, 98(HY2): 2087–2098

[31] WischmeierW H, SmithD D (1978). Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses: A Guide to Conservation Planning. Agricultural Handbook, No. 537. Department of Agriculture, Washington DC, USA

[32] WoidaK, MoinesD, ClarkK B (2001). A GIS application of PSIAC for predicting sediment-yield rates. Seventh Federal Interagency Sedimentation Conference. USGS, Report No. 25–32

Acknowledgements

We thank Islamic Azad University, Mashhad Branch for their generous support of the project. We also thank the anonymous reviewers for constructive suggestions on data analyses and interpretations.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg