Cross-modal conflict management: What can urban air mobility (UAM) learn from existing transport modes?
Lan ZHANG , Di LV , Kai WANG , Shulu CHEN
Eng. Manag ›› 2026, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (4) : 913 -931.
Recent advances in electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft, automation and intelligent transportation technologies are accelerating the emergence of urban air mobility (UAM) as a new low-altitude transport mode. As UAM operations become denser, more heterogeneous and increasingly automated, conflict management becomes essential for maintaining operational safety. However, UAM has not yet established a unified conflict management framework for future operations. This paper develops a cross-modal review framework to examine how mature transport systems can inform UAM conflict management. The review first compares conflict definitions, safety boundaries, and indicators across road, railway, maritime, commercial aviation, and UAM systems. It then reviews representative conflict management problems in mature transport modes and evaluates the transferability of their underlying mechanisms to UAM. The comparison shows that road traffic provides principles for structured corridor organization and local interaction control. Railway systems inform the allocation of constrained network resources over time. Maritime transport contributes encounter classification and responsibility assignment, while commercial aviation supports balancing demand and capacity and coordinating vertiport resources. However, these transfers must be adapted to UAM characteristics, including structured three-dimensional corridor operations, temporal occupation of ground and airspace resources, limited operational buffers, and dense automated multi-aircraft operations. A matrix based on seven criteria further classifies the mechanisms as transferable, conditionally transferable, or not transferable to UAM. These findings provide a structured basis for developing integrated UAM conflict management systems that are both safe and operationally feasible.
urban air mobility / conflict management / cross-modal transfer / transport modes
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
Cockcroft A N, Lameijer J N F (2004). A Guide to the Collision Avoidance Rules: International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea. 6th ed. Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann |
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
Federal Aviation Administration (2023). Urban Air Mobility (UAM) Version 2.0 Concept of Operations. Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration |
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
Goodrich K H, Theodore C R (2021). Description of the NASA urban air mobility maturity level (UML) scale. In: Proceedings of AIAA SciTech 2021 Forum. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, AIAA 2021–1627. doi:10.2514/6.2021-1627 |
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
International Civil Aviation Organization (2018). Manual on Collaborative Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM). 3rd ed. ICAO Doc 9971. Montreal: International Civil Aviation Organization |
| [53] |
International Maritime Organization (1972). Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972, as amended (COLREG 1972). International Maritime Organization, London |
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
Lee H, Lee A G, Guillermo L, Seah C H, Moolchandani K A (2024). Simulated evaluation of strategic conflict management capabilities for urban air mobility operations. In: Proceedings of AIAA AVIATION Forum and ASCEND 2024. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, AIAA 2024–3854 |
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
Liebchen C, Möhring R H (2007). The modeling power of the periodic event scheduling problem: Railway timetables—and beyond. In: Geraets F, Kroon L, Schöbel A, Wagner D, Zaroliagis C D, eds. Algorithmic Methods for Railway Optimization. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4359. Berlin: Springer, 3–40 |
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
Moolchandani K A, Lee H (2024). Demand-capacity balancing algorithms for urban air mobility operations. In: Proceedings of 2024 AIAA DATC/IEEE 43rd Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Piscataway: IEEE |
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
|
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
|
| [85] |
Roess R P, Prassas E S, McShane W R (2010). Traffic Engineering. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall |
| [86] |
|
| [87] |
|
| [88] |
|
| [89] |
|
| [90] |
|
| [91] |
|
| [92] |
|
| [93] |
|
| [94] |
|
| [95] |
|
| [96] |
|
| [97] |
Thompson E L, Xu Y, Wei P (2023a). A framework for operational volume generation for urban air mobility strategic deconfliction. In: Proceedings of 2023 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems. Piscataway: IEEE, 71–78 |
| [98] |
Thompson E L, Xu Y, Wei P (2023b). One-shot strategically deconflicted route and operational volume generation for urban air mobility operations. In: Proceedings of 2023 IEEE 26th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. Piscataway: IEEE, 5174–5181 |
| [99] |
|
| [100] |
|
| [101] |
Treiber M, Kesting A (2013). Traffic Flow Dynamics: Data, Models and Simulation. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer |
| [102] |
UNCTAD (2024). Review of Maritime Transport 2024: Navigating Maritime Chokepoints. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development |
| [103] |
|
| [104] |
|
| [105] |
|
| [106] |
|
| [107] |
|
| [108] |
|
| [109] |
|
| [110] |
Wu Z, Xu Y, Wu H, Cai K, Ng K K H (2025b). An approach to integrated charging, scheduling and resource allocation for UAM fleet operations. In: Proceedings of 2025 AIAA DATC/IEEE 44th Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Piscataway: IEEE |
| [111] |
|
| [112] |
|
| [113] |
|
| [114] |
|
| [115] |
|
| [116] |
|
| [117] |
|
| [118] |
|
| [119] |
|
| [120] |
|
| [121] |
|
Higher Education Press
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |