Correcting the trajectory: Establishing a universal benchmark and rebalancing research priorities for zero-carbon industrial parks

Abstract

Zero-carbon industrial parks are core demonstration carriers for global industrial deep decarbonization and a key research hotspot in climate change and sustainable development. However, three structural issues have long restricted the formation of a globally comparable research paradigm: fragmented accounting benchmarks, imbalanced research priorities, and poor generalizability of findings. This comment systematically analyzes the above deviations: divergent accounting rules across mainstream frameworks weaken cross-study comparability; studies overfocus on energy system transition while neglecting core process-level decarbonization; case-specific conclusions cannot adapt to the transition needs of developing economies. To correct these deviations, this comment proposes a universal minimum consensus benchmark, advocates a rebalanced research agenda, and outlines a differentiated globally adaptable framework with seven priority propositions, to advance the systematic development of the field.

Keywords

zero-carbon governance / energy transition / industrial park

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press 2026

Just Accepted

This article has successfully passed peer review and final editorial review, and will soon enter typesetting, proofreading and other publishing processes. The currently displayed version is the accepted final manuscript. The officially published version will be updated with format, DOI and citation information upon launch. We recommend that you pay attention to subsequent journal notifications and preferentially cite the officially published version. Thank you for your support and cooperation.