Data-driven robust location planning for UAV-assisted traffic incident management: Considering heterogeneous risk control

Chenxi YU , Zhenyu TIAN , Zhixiang QI , Yingying YU , Der-Horng LEE , Xiaomin SUN

Eng. Manag ››

PDF (6603KB)
Eng. Manag ›› DOI: 10.1007/s42524-026-5461-3
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Data-driven robust location planning for UAV-assisted traffic incident management: Considering heterogeneous risk control
Author information +
History +
PDF (6603KB)

Abstract

With the rapid expansion of urban scale, traditional Ground-Based Response Units (GBRUs) face increasing challenges in maintaining efficient response times for traffic incidents, particularly under congestion and spatiotemporal uncertainty. This study develops an application-oriented strategic planning framework for an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-Assisted Traffic Incident Management System (UATIMS). The framework combines data-driven robust facility location with simulation-based operational validation. To represent the heterogeneous attributes of urban traffic incidents, we introduce an Urgency-Importance-Ambiguity (UIA) assessment framework that translates incident severity, network impact, and early-stage information uncertainty into planning-relevant risk categories. Based on this characterization, a weighted structural uncertainty set is constructed and embedded into a min-max robust location model to support capacity allocation under long-tail demand risks. The model incorporates a congestion-aware stability constraint and is reformulated into a tractable Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) model through strong duality. Using real-world traffic incident data from Hangzhou, China, we evaluate the proposed framework through computational experiments and Discrete Event Simulation (DES). The results show that the Full UIA model provides incremental value over homogeneous and urgency-weighted robust baselines, especially in reducing high-urgency service shortages and tail response risks under resource-constrained conditions. The simulation further indicates that the resulting UAV-assisted layout can achieve high net service coverage and maintain average response times within an operationally acceptable range. These findings suggest that heterogeneous risk representation can complement existing drone-service design models by supporting strategic hangar siting and fleet allocation for traffic incident management.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

UAV-assisted traffic management system / emergency response / robust optimization on facility location / heterogeneous risk control / mixed-integer linear programming

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Chenxi YU, Zhenyu TIAN, Zhixiang QI, Yingying YU, Der-Horng LEE, Xiaomin SUN. Data-driven robust location planning for UAV-assisted traffic incident management: Considering heterogeneous risk control. Eng. Manag DOI:10.1007/s42524-026-5461-3

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Abbas Y, Al Mudawi N, Alabdullah B, Sadiq T, Algarni A, Rahman H, Jalal A, (2024). Unmanned aerial vehicles for human detection and recognition using neural-network model. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 18: 1443678

[2]

Abdel-Basset M, Mohamed R, Salam A, Sallam K M, Hezam I M, Radwan I, (2025). Intelligent joint optimization of deployment and task scheduling for mobile users in multi-UAV-assisted MEC system. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2025( 1): 7224877

[3]

Agatz N, Bouman P, Schmidt M, (2018). Optimization approaches for the traveling salesman problem with drone. Transportation Science, 52( 4): 965–981

[4]

Ahmad A, Al-Sumaiti A S, Byon Y J, Alhosani K, (2024). Multiple intelligent control strategies for travel-time reduction of connected emergency vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems,

[5]

Baron O, Milner J, Naseraldin H, (2011). Facility location: A robust optimization approach. Production and operations management, 20( 5): 772–785

[6]

Bélanger V, Ruiz A B, Soriano P, (2019). Recent optimization models and trends in location, relocation, and dispatching of emergency medical vehicles. European Journal of Operational Research, 272( 1): 1–23

[7]

Bertsimas D, Sim M, (2004). The price of robustness. Operations Research, 52( 1): 35–53

[8]

Butt M Z, Nasir N, Rashid R B A, (2024). A review of perception sensors, techniques, and hardware architectures for autonomous low-altitude UAVs in non-cooperative local obstacle avoidance. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 173: 104629

[9]

Cheng C, Adulyasak Y, Rousseau L M, (2020). Drone routing with energy function: Formulation and exact algorithm. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 139: 364–387

[10]

Clemente G P, Della Corte F, Zappa D, (2024). Hierarchical spatial network models for road accident risk assessment. Annals of Operations Research, 1–36

[11]

DJI (2025). DJI Matrice 4D Series - Unmanned Aircraft Flight Manual. Retrieved from the website of dl.djicdn.com/downloads

[12]

Dorling K, Heinrichs J, Messier G G, Magierowski S, (2016). Vehicle routing problems for drone delivery. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Systems, 47( 1): 70–85

[13]

Gan J, Li L, Zhang D, Yi Z, Xiang Q, (2020). An alternative method for traffic accident severity prediction: using deep forests algorithm. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2020( 1): 1257627

[14]

GAÑAN-CARDENAS E, (2025). Optimizing urban transportation network reliability by analyzing road traffic accidents. Archives of Transport, 73( 1):

[15]

Jin X, Wang J, Guo S, Wei T, Zhao Y, Lin Y, Wan H, (2024). Spatial temporal uncertainty-aware graph networks for promoting accuracy and reliability of traffic forecasting. Expert Systems with Applications, 238: 122143

[16]

Keeney R L R Howard (1993). Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs. Landon: Cambridge university press

[17]

Liu Y, (2023). Routing battery-constrained delivery drones in a depot network: A business model and its optimization-simulation assessment. Transportation Research Part C, Emerging Technologies, 152: 104147

[18]

Mahdi Alinaghiana H A, (2023). A robust solution for optimizing facility location and network design with diverse link capacities. Journal of Project Management, 8( 3): 199–212

[19]

Meng Z, Zhu N, Zhang G, Yang Y, Liu Z, Ke G Y, (2024). Data-driven drone pre-positioning for traffic accident rapid assessment. Transportation Research Part E, Logistics and Transportation Review, 183: 103452

[20]

Murray C C, Chu A G, (2015). The flying sidekick traveling salesman problem: Optimization of drone-assisted parcel delivery. Transportation Research Part C, Emerging Technologies, 54: 86–109

[21]

Pérez J A, Gonçalves G R, Morillo Barragan J R, Fuentes Ortega P, Caracol Palomo A A M, (2024). Low-cost tools for virtual reconstruction of traffic accident scenarios. Heliyon, 10( 9): e29709

[22]

Roberti R, Ruthmair M, (2021). Exact methods for the traveling salesman problem with drone. Transportation Science, 55( 2): 315–335

[23]

Sandamali G G N, Su R, Sudheera K L K, Zhang Y, (2021). A safety-aware real-time air traffic flow management model under demand and capacity uncertainties. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23( 7): 8615–8628

[24]

Schmid V, Doerner K F, (2010). Ambulance location and relocation problems with time-dependent travel times. European Journal of Operational Research, 207( 3): 1293–1303

[25]

Snyder L V, Daskin M S, (2005). Reliability models for facility location: the expected failure cost case. Transportation Science, 39( 3): 400–416

[26]

Wang D, Peng J, Yang H, Cheng T, Yang Y, (2023). Distributionally robust location-allocation with demand and facility disruption uncertainties in emergency logistics. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 184: 109617

[27]

Wen J, Gan W, Chu C C, Jiang L, Luo J, (2024). Robust resilience enhancement by EV charging infrastructure planning in coupled power distribution and transportation systems. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 16( 1): 491–504

[28]

Wu Y, Ye Y, Zeb A, Yu J J, Wang Z, (2023). Adaptive modeling of uncertainties for traffic forecasting. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 25( 5): 4427–4442

[29]

Yin Y, Xu X, Wang D, Yu Y, Cheng T C E, (2024). Two-stage recoverable robust optimization for an integrated location-allocation and evacuation planning problem. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 182: 102906

[30]

Zang Z, Xu X, Qu K, Chen R, Chen A, (2022). Travel time reliability in transportation networks: A review of methodological developments. Transportation Research Part C, Emerging Technologies, 143: 103866

[31]

Zhang X, Guan Z, Liu X, Zhang Z, (2025). Digital reconstruction method for low-illumination road traffic accident scenes using UAV and auxiliary equipment. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 16( 3): 171

[32]

Zhen L, Gao J, Wang S, Laporte G, Yue X, (2025). Optimizing an on-demand delivery mode based on trucks and drones. Transportation Science, 59( 5): 1008–1031

[33]

Zhu T, Boyles S D, Unnikrishnan A, (2022). Two-stage robust facility location problem with drones. Transportation Research Part C, Emerging Technologies, 137: 103563

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press

PDF (6603KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/