Driving comparative advantage in emerging industries: The interplay of location endowments and industrial agglomeration across 290 Chinese cities

Abstract

The development of emerging industries is vital for a city’s sustainable growth and represents new momentum for urban development. Most of present researches concentrate on specific industries without addressing systematic development and targeted promotion. This study uses data mining and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to examine multiple industries and identify key resources for a city’s competitive advantage. Comparing 290 cities in China, emerging industries can be divided into natural resource endowment-based industries and non-natural resource endowment-based industries. For natural resource endowment-based industries, economic capacity and natural resources play crucial roles in enabling cities to gain high industrial comparative advantages. For non-natural resource endowment-based industries, the technology innovation entity and government support capability are more valuable in forming high industrial comparative advantage. The findings aim to provide a theoretical basis for fostering emerging industries toward sustainable urban development.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

emerging industry innovation / urban development / comparative advantage / fuzzy-set qualitative

References

[1] Acs Z J, Anselin L, Varga A, (2002). Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Research Policy, 31( 7): 1069–1085

[2] Ahmad M, Jan I, Jabeen G, Alvarado R, (2021). Does energy-industry investment drive economic performance in regional China: Implications for sustainable development. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27: 176–192

[3] Arts S, Cassiman B, Gomez J C, (2018). Text matching to measure patent similarity. Strategic Management Journal, 39( 1): 62–84

[4] Awate S, Mudambi R, (2018). On the geography of emerging industry technological networks: the breadth and depth of patented innovations. Journal of Economic Geography, 18( 2): 391–419

[5] Bathelt H, Glückler J (2011). The relational economy: Geographies of Knowing and Learning. Oxford University Press

[6] Cai F, Wang D W, Wang M Y, (2003). The industrial competitiveness and comparative advantage. Management World, ( (2)): 58–63+70

[7] Cai L, Peng X Q, Wang L, (2018). The characteristics and influencing factors of entrepreneurial behaviour: The case of new state-owned firms in the new energy automobile industry in an emerging economy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 135: 112–120

[8] Chaudhuri R, Chatterjee S, Vrontis P D, Vicentini F, (2023). Effects of human capital on entrepreneurial ecosystems in the emerging economy: the mediating role of digital knowledge and innovative capability from India perspective. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 24( 1): 283–305

[9] Chen J, Yin X, Li J, (2020). Firm innovation system: Paths for enhancing corporate indigenous innovation capability. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 7( 3): 404–412

[10] Dan P, (2016). Dynamics of China’s provincial-level specialization in strategic emerging industries. Research Policy, 45( 8): 98–115

[11] Doloreux D, (2002). What we should know about regional systems of innovation. Technology in Society, 24( 3): 243–263

[12] Dong J R, Zhang W Q, & Chen Y K, (2021). The impact of environmental regulation tools and government support on green technological innovation.. Ind. Econ. Res., 112: 1–16

[13] Eriksson R H, Hansen H K, (2013). Industries, skills, and human capital: how does regional size affect uneven development. Environment and Planning A-economy and Space, 45( 3): 593–613

[14] Falcioglu P, Akgungor S (2008). Regional specialization and industrial concentration patterns in the Turkish manufacturing industry: An assessment for the 1980–2000 period. International Conference of the Regional-Studies-Association. 16 (2): 303–323

[15] Fan B N, (2003). Evaluation on the technology innovation capability of hi-tech development zones in China.. Studies in Science of Science, 667–671

[16] Fan X C, Wang W Q, (2016). Spatial patterns and influencing factors of China׳s wind turbine manufacturing. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54: 482–496

[17] Furnari S, Crilly D, Misangyi V F, Greckhamer T, Fiss P C, Aguilera R V, (2021). Capturing causal complexity: Heuristics for configurational theorizing. Academy of Management Review, 46( 4): 778–799

[18] Griliches Z, (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28( 4): 1661–1707

[19] Harris R, Khare A, (2002). Sustainable development issues and strategies for Alberta’s oil industry. Technovation, 22( 9): 571–583

[20] Huang H, Lu J, Jin L, & Ren H, (2024). The future of environmental engineering technology: a disruptive innovation perspective.. Engineering, 41: 153–160

[21] Hung S C, Chu Y Y, (2004). Stimulating new industries from emerging technologies: challenges for the public sector. Technovation, 26( 1): 104–110

[22] Kang Y Q, Xie B C, Wang J, Wang Y N, (2018). Environmental assessment and investment strategy for China’s manufacturing industry: A non-radial DEA based analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175: 501–511

[23] Kong D, Zhou Y, Liu Y, & Xue L, (2017). Using the data mining method to assess the innovation gap: A case of industrial robotics in a catching-up country. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 119: 80–97

[24] Li H W, (2007). Dynamic properties of modern theories of comparative advantage-also on “comparative advantage trap”. Economic Review (Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta), 42–47

[25] Li J, Gao F, & Gong Y, (2023). Innovation ecosystem of future industry: Structure and path. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 38( 6): 887–894

[26] Li Y B, Wei Y G, Li Y, Lei Z, Ceriani A, (2022). Connecting emerging industry and regional innovation system: Linkages, effect and paradigm in China. Technovation, 111: 102388

[27] Lin Y F, Li Y J, (2003). Between comparative advantage, competitive advantage and economic growth in developing countries. Management World, ( 7): 21–28+66–155

[28] Liu H C, (2011). Selective principles of Chinese and oriented research on cultivating policies. Science of Science and Management of S.& T., 32( 3): 87–92

[29] Malerba F, (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31( 2): 247–264

[30] Meneses C, (2023). European innovation policies and innovation systems: a literature review.. London Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Sciences, 23( 13): 35–60

[31] Misangyi V. F., Greckhamer, T., Furnari, S., Fiss, P. C., Crilly, D., & Aguilera R., (2017). Embracing causal complexity: The emergence of a neo-configurational perspective. Journal of management, 43( 1): 255–282

[32] Morrow P M, (2010). Ricardian-Heckscher-Ohlin comparative advantage Theory and evidence. Journal of International Economics, 82( 2): 137–151

[33] Murphy G, Siedschlag I, (2013). Human capital and growth of information and communication technology-intensive industries: Empirical evidence from open economies. Regional Studies, 47( 9): 1403–1424

[34] Nazir M S, Nawaz M M, Gilani U J, (2010). Relationship between economic growth and stock market development. Afican journal of business management, 4( 16): 3473–3479

[35] Palacios-Marqués D., Roig-Dobon, S., & Comeig I., (2017). Background factors to innovation performance: Results of an empirical study using fsQCA methodology. Quality & Quantity, 51( 5): 1939–1953

[36] Prokop V, Hajek P, Stejskal J, (2021). Configuration paths to efficient national innovation ecosystems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 168: 120787

[37] Qu G, Sun B, He D, & Guo X, (2022). A configurational analysis on career success of scientific and technological innovation talents in universities.. Frontiers in Psychology, 13: 1068267

[38] Ragin C C (2000). Fuzzy- Eet Social Science, University of Chicago Press

[39] Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C. C. (Eds.). (2009). Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques (Vol. 51). Sage

[40] Sankaran S, Killen C P, Pitsis A, (2023). How do project-oriented organizations enhance innovation? An institutional theory perspective. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 10( 3): 427–438

[41] Shen L, Shi Q, Parida V, Jovanovic M, (2024). Ecosystem orchestration practices for industrial firms: A qualitative meta-analysis, framework development and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 173: 114463

[42] Song M L, Wang J L, Zhao J J, (2018). Coal endowment, resource curse, and high coal-consuming industries location: Analysis based on large-scale data. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 129: 333–344

[43] Sun Y, & Gao J, (2023). Natural resource endowment and its lmpact on ecological efficiency. Resources Policy, 87: 104272

[44] Sun Y, Zhang X, Liu J, (2025). The building evaluation system of innovation vitality on enterprises: Based on an exploratory factor analysis. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 12( 3): 689–703

[45] Wang Y, & Chen X, (2020). Natural resource endowment and ecological efficiency in China: Revisiting resource curse in the context of ecological efficiency. Resources Policy, 66: 101610

[46] Xia S, Zhou Y, Wang Z, He Q, & Parry G, (2025). Enhancing green innovation through university–industry collaboration and artificial intelligence: Insights from regional innovation systems in China. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1–29

[47] Xie X, Liu X, Blanco C, (2023). Evaluating and forecasting the niche fitness of regional innovation ecosystems: A comparative evaluation of different optimized grey models. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 191: 122473

[48] Xu A T, Qiu K Y, Jin C Y, Cheng C J, Zhu Y H, (2022). Regional innovation ability and its inequality: Measurements and dynamic decomposition. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 180: 121713

[49] Xu G, Kang N, Meissner D, Zhou Y, (2025). How innovation community embeddedness impacts firms’ innovation performance: Evidence from the global 3D printing industry. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 12( 4): 1141–1156

[50] Xu G, Wu Y, Minshall T, Zhou Y, (2017). Exploring innovation ecosystems across science, technology, and business: a case of 3d printing in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136( NOV): 208–221

[51] Xu G, Zhou Y, & Ji H, (2020). How can government promote technology diffusion in manufacturing paradigm shift? Evidence from China.. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 70( 4): 1547–1559

[52] Yang Y C, Nie P Y, (2022). Subsidy for clean innovation considered technological spillover. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 184: 121941

[53] Yin Y, Yan M, & Zhan Q, (2022). Crossing the valley of death: Network structure, government subsidies and innovation diffusion of industrial clusters. Technology in Society, 71: 102119

[54] Yuan B L, Ren S G, Hu X, Yang X Y, (2016). The difference effect of environmental regulation on two stages of technology innovation in China’s manufacturing industry. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 3( 1): 24–29

[55] Zhang J X, Cheng J W, Philbin S P, Ballesteros-Perez P, Skitmore M, & Wang G, (2023). Influencing factors of urban innovation and development: a grounded theory analysis. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25( 3): 2079––2104

[56] Zhang J X, Liu Y M, Chang Y, Zhang L X, (2017). Industrial eco-efficiency in China A provincial quantification using three-stage data envelopment analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143: 238–249

[57] Zhou Y, Wang Z, & Feng Q, (2025). Shaping regional futures: how education and career imprints of officials drive the rise of emerging industries. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1––31

[58] Zhou Y, Zhang Q, Xu G, & Wang Y, (2025). Regional S&T planning and green generic technologies: A spatial differences-in-difference analysis. Energy Economics, 108815

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press