Rethinking engineering management for human–robot collaboration from technological and social perspectives
Chao MAO , He ZHOU , Tingpeng WANG
Eng. Manag ›› 2026, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (1) : 246 -257.
The rapid evolution of robotic and intelligent technologies is propelling the construction industry toward human–robot collaboration. Consequently, robots have transcended their role as mere instruments of labor to acquire the attributes of laborers, forming a human–robot hybrid workforce that jointly undertakes productive activities. The emergence of this new labor paradigm is poised to trigger unprecedented transformations in project division of labor, organizational structure, technological coordination, management models, and governance mechanisms. However, existing research lacks a systematic understanding of this transformation and its potential cascading effects. Therefore, this paper adopts a sociotechnical systems framework to analyze human–robot collaboration, examining the technological evolution of construction robots from tools to partners and the corresponding shifts in collaboration patterns. Furthermore, drawing on the Leavitt model, human–robot collaboration is conceptualized as a coupled configuration of “people–technology–task–structure.” This perspective enables an integrated analysis of how the technical and social attributes of human–robot collaboration reshape both the technical logic and managerial paradigms of engineering management. Finally, this study identifies ten key research topics reflecting the emerging characteristics of human–robot collaboration in the construction industry, aiming to illuminate future frontiers of this transformation in engineering management.
human–robot collaboration / engineering management / sociotechnical system
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
Higher Education Press
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |