Technological diffusion and cooperation in emission reduction alliances: Reshaping regional paths to low-carbon development

Dan XIA , Ling ZHANG , Xiurong HU , Pansong JIANG , Dequn ZHOU

Eng. Manag ››

PDF (8143KB)
Eng. Manag ›› DOI: 10.1007/s42524-026-5195-2
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Technological diffusion and cooperation in emission reduction alliances: Reshaping regional paths to low-carbon development
Author information +
History +
PDF (8143KB)

Abstract

Amid escalating climate pressures and uneven regional development, cross-regional technology cooperation has become essential for coordinated low-carbon transitions. This study proposes a novel “knowledge-equipment-institution” synergy framework to address gaps in understanding technology diffusion mechanisms and their emission reduction impacts within China’s regional diversity. Four regional cooperation alliances are identified, distinguishing between technology frontier and backward provinces. A multi-regional dynamic computable general equilibrium (CGE) model is constructed to assess cooperation outcomes. Two technology diffusion channels are integrated in the model: knowledge spillovers and machine and equipment (M&E) trade. Our findings reveal a fundamental trade-off between short-term efficiency and long-term resilience. Cooperation through M&E trade yields immediate energy saving and GDP growth benefits, but its long-term effectiveness is constrained. In contrast, cooperation via knowledge spillovers, despite modest short-term economic costs, fosters greater long-term adaptive capacity. The effectiveness of cooperation is highly heterogeneous across regions. For instance, the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei–North-east alliance shows fluctuating carbon productivity, while the Yangtze River Economic Belt experiences productivity losses due to heavy industry lock-in. Ultimately, we find that a win-win dynamic is achievable, where technology frontier provinces accelerate industrial upgrading (tertiary sector share + 0.15%) and backward provinces enhance production efficiency. However, a sustained partnership hinges on the backward provinces’ commitment to enhancing their own absorptive capacity to avoid “free-riding” and low-level equilibrium traps. The findings provide a quantitative basis for designing differentiated and phased regional cooperation strategies to support adaptive climate governance.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

technology diffusion / carbon emission reduction / technical cooperation alliances / knowledge capital / machinery-equipment trade

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Dan XIA, Ling ZHANG, Xiurong HU, Pansong JIANG, Dequn ZHOU. Technological diffusion and cooperation in emission reduction alliances: Reshaping regional paths to low-carbon development. Eng. Manag DOI:10.1007/s42524-026-5195-2

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Acemoglu D, Aghion P, Bursztyn L, Hemous D, (2012). The environment and directed technical change. American Economic Review, 102( 1): 131–166

[2]

Aghion P, Blundell R, Griffith R, Howitt P, Prantl S, (2009). The effects of entry on incumbent innovation and productivity. Review of Economics and Statistics, 91( 1): 20–32

[3]

An K, Wang C, Cai W, (2023). Low-carbon technology diffusion and economic growth of China: An evolutionary general equilibrium framework. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 65: 253–263

[4]

Arthur W B, (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Economic Journal (London), 99( 394): 116–131

[5]

Baldwin R E, (2016). The world trade organization and the future of multilateralism. Journal of Economic Perspectives,, 30( 1): 95–116

[6]

Barbieri N, Marzucchi A, Rizzo U, (2023). Green technologies, interdependencies, and policy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 118: 102791

[7]

Barro R J, (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106( 2): 407–443

[8]

Basu S, Weil D N, (1998). Appropriate technology and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113( 4): 1025–1054

[9]

Bortoletto W W, Pacagnella Junior A C, Cabello O G, (2023). Exploring the scientific literature on clean development mechanisms: A bibliometric analysis. Energy Policy, 183: 113806

[10]

Bosetti V, Carraro C, Massetti E, Tavoni M, (2008). International energy R&D spillovers and the economics of greenhouse gas atmospheric stabilization. Energy Economics, 30( 6): 2912–2929

[11]

Bradlow B H, Kentikelenis A, (2024). Globalizing green industrial policy through technology transfers. Nature Sustainability, 7( 6): 685–687

[12]

Buonanno P, Carraro C, Galeotti M, (2003). Endogenous induced technical change and the costs of Kyoto. Resource and Energy Economics, 25( 1): 11–34

[13]

Bye B, Jacobsen K, (2011). Restricted carbon emissions and directed R&D support; an applied general equilibrium analysis. Energy Economics, 33( 3): 543–555

[14]

Cameron R, (1975). The diffusion of technology as a problem in economic history. Economic Geography, 51( 3): 217–230

[15]

Carattini S, Kim G, Melkadze G, Pommeret A, (2024). Carbon taxes and tariffs, financial frictions, and international spillovers. European Economic Review, 170: 104883

[16]

Carraro C, De Cian E, (2013). Factor-augmenting technical change: An empirical assessment. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 18( 1): 13–26

[17]

Chen X Q, Ma C Q, Ren Y S, Lei Y T, (2023). Carbon allowance auction design of China’s ETS: A comprehensive hierarchical system based on blockchain. International Review of Economics & Finance, 88: 1003–1019

[18]

Cohen W M, Levinthal D A, (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35( 1): 128–152

[19]

Cui W, Li L, Chen G, (2022). Market-value oriented or technology-value oriented? —Location impacts of industry-university-research (IUR) cooperation bases on innovation performance. Technology in Society, 70: 102025

[20]

Long J B D, Summers L H, (1991). Equipment investment and economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106( 2): 445–502

[21]

De Paulo A F, Porto G S, (2023). Unveiling the cooperation dynamics in the photovoltaic technologies’ development. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 187: 113694

[22]

Fujimori S, Oshiro K, Hasegawa T, Takakura J, Ueda K, (2023). Climate change mitigation costs reduction caused by socioeconomic-technological transitions. npj Climate Action, 2( 1): 9

[23]

Garau G, Lecca P, (2015). The impact of regional R&D subsidy in a computable general equilibrium model. International Regional Science Review, 38( 4): 319–357

[24]

Garsous G, Worack S, (2022). Technological expertise as a driver of environmental technology diffusion through trade: Evidence from the wind turbine manufacturing industry. Energy Policy, 162: 112799

[25]

Gillingham K, Newell R G, Pizer W A, (2008). Modeling endogenous technological change for climate policy analysis. Energy Economics, 30( 6): 2734–2753

[26]

Goldstein J E, Neimark B, Garvey B, Phelps J, (2023). Unlocking “lock-in” and path dependency: A review across disciplines and socio-environmental contexts. World Development, 161: 106116

[27]

Goulder L H, Mathai K, (2000). Optimal CO2 abatement in the presence of induced technological change. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 39( 1): 1–38

[28]

Grubler A, Wilson C, Bento N, Boza-Kiss B, Krey V, McCollum D L, Rao N D, Riahi K, Rogelj J, De Stercke S, Cullen J, Frank S, Fricko O, Guo F, Gidden M, Havlík P, Huppmann D, Kiesewetter G, Rafaj P, Schoepp W, Valin H, (2018). A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5 °C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies. Nature Energy, 3( 6): 515–527

[29]

Hahn T, Morfeldt J, Höglund R, Karlsson M, Fetzer I, (2024). Estimating countries’ additional carbon accountability for closing the mitigation gap based on past and future emissions. Nature Communications, 15( 9707): 1–10

[30]

Hattori T, Nam H, Chapman A, (2022). Multilateral energy technology cooperation: Improving collaboration effectiveness through evidence from International Energy Agency Technology Collaboration Programmes. Energy Strategy Reviews, 43: 100920

[31]

Hu X, Liu J, Yang H, Meng J, Wang X, Ma J, Tao S, (2020a). Impacts of Potential China’s Environmental Protection Tax Reforms on Provincial Air Pollution Emissions and Economy. Earth’s Future, 8( 4): e2019EF001467

[32]

Hu X, Pollitt H, Pirie J, Mercure J F, Liu J, Meng J, Tao S, (2020b). The impacts of the trade liberalization of environmental goods on power system and CO2 emissions. Energy Policy, 140: 111173

[33]

Hu X, Wu H, Ni W, Wang Q, Zhou D, Liu J, (2023). Quantifying the dynamical interactions between carbon pricing and environmental protection tax in China. Energy Economics, 126: 106912

[34]

Hübler M, Baumstark L, Leimbach M, Edenhofer O, Bauer N, (2012). An integrated assessment model with endogenous growth. Ecological Economics, 83: 118–131

[35]

Idisi P O, Ogwu I J, Zorto M N, (2018). Kaldor-hicks compensation criterion: A measure of social welfare. International Journal of Management and Commerce Innovations, 6( 2): 623–628

[36]

Jaffe A B, Newell R G, Stavins R N, (2005). A tale of two market failures: Technology and environmental policy. Ecological Economics, 54( 2-3): 164–174

[37]

Jia L, Zhang J, Li R, Wang L, Wu H, Wang P, (2025). Spatial correlation investigation of carbon emission efficiency in the yangtze river delta of China: The role of low-carbon pilot cities. Ecological Indicators, 172: 113282

[38]

Jia Z, Lin B, (2020). Rethinking the choice of carbon tax and carbon trading in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 159: 120187

[39]

Jiang H D, Dong K, Qing J, Teng Q, (2023). The role of technical change in low-carbon transformation and crises in the electricity market: A CGE analysis with R&D investment. Energy Economics, 125: 106897

[40]

Jiang Y (2021). The dynamic evolution analysis of regional development differences of high-tech industries: Based on China’s data from 1997 to 2019. In: 2021 5th Annual International Conference on Data Science and Business Analytics , 343–348

[41]

Jin W, (2012). Can technological innovation help China take on its climate responsibility? An intertemporal general equilibrium analysis. Energy Policy, 49: 629–641

[42]

Jin W, (2015). Can China harness globalization to reap domestic carbon savings? Modeling international technology diffusion in a multi-region framework. China Economic Review, 34: 64–82

[43]

Jin W, (2016). International technology diffusion, multilateral R&D coordination, and global climate mitigation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 102: 357–372

[44]

Jin W, Zhang Z, (2016). On the mechanism of international technology diffusion for energy technological progress. Resource and Energy Economics, 46: 39–61

[45]

Jin Y, Xu Y, (2024). Carbon reduction of urban form strategies: Regional heterogeneity in yangtze river delta, China. Land Use Policy, 141: 107154

[46]

Knez K, (2023). Technology diffusion and uneven development. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 33( 4): 1171–1195

[47]

Křístková Z, (2012). Impact of R&D investment on economic growth of the Czech Republic: A recursively dynamic CGE approach. Prague Economic Papers, 21( 4): 412–433

[48]

Krugman P, (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99( 3): 483–499

[49]

Leibowicz B D, Krey V, Grubler A, (2016). Representing spatial technology diffusion in an energy system optimization model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 103: 350–363

[50]

Li L, Ye F, Li Y, Tan K H, (2018). A bi-objective programming model for carbon emission quota allocation: Evidence from the Pearl River Delta region. Journal of Cleaner Production, 205: 163–178

[51]

Li X, Xing H, (2024). Regional carbon emission pathways under central-local coordination: Objective constraints and collaborative incentives. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 47: 156–165

[52]

Li Y, Chen J, Li L, Huang X, (2024). Government innovation awards, innovation funds acquisition and enterprise innovation. Economic Analysis and Policy, 82: 846–864

[53]

Liu H, Cui C, Chen X, Xiu P, (2023). How can regional integration promote corporate innovation? A peer effect study of R&D expenditure. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8( 4): 100444

[54]

Liu X, Wang W, Wu W, Zhang L, Wang L, (2022). Using cooperative game model of air pollution governance to study the cost sharing in yangtze river delta region. Journal of Environmental Management, 301: 113896

[55]

Los B, Timmer M P, (2005). The ‘appropriate technology’ explanation of productivity growth differentials: An empirical approach. Journal of Development Economics, 77( 2): 517–531

[56]

Ma Z, Mao T, Ma W, Niu X, Yang J, (2025). The green trade benefits and horizontal ecological compensation from the perspective of embodied carbon emissions: A case study of the yellow river basin, China. Research in Cold and Arid Regions, 17( 1): 55–64

[57]

Mercure J F, Pollitt H, Chewpreecha U, Salas P, Foley A M, Holden P B, Edwards N R, (2014). The dynamics of technology diffusion and the impacts of climate policy instruments in the decarbonisation of the global electricity sector. Energy Policy, 73: 686–700

[58]

Nicholas B, Mark S, John Van R, (2013). Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. Econometrica, 81( 4): 1347–1393

[59]

Pan X, Wei Z, Han B, Shahbaz M, (2021). The heterogeneous impacts of interregional green technology spillover on energy intensity in China. Energy Economics, 96: 105133

[60]

Parrado R, De Cian E, (2014). Technology spillovers embodied in international trade: Intertemporal, regional and sectoral effects in a global CGE framework. Energy Economics, 41: 76–89

[61]

Popp D, (2011). International technology transfer, climate change, and the clean development mechanism. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 5( 1): 131–152

[62]

Rodrik D, (2016). Premature deindustrialization. Journal of Economic Growth, 21( 1): 1–33

[63]

Rodrik D, (2018). Populism and the economics of globalization. Journal of International Business Policy, 1( 1-2): 12–33

[64]

Rohe S, Mattes J, (2022). What about the regional level? Regional configurations of technological innovation systems. Geoforum, 129: 60–73

[65]

Romer P M, (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98( 5, Part 2): S71–S102

[66]

Ronayne D, Sgroi D, Tuckwell A, (2021). Evaluating the sunk cost effect. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 186: 318–327

[67]

Sachs J D, Warner A M, (2001). The curse of natural resources. European Economic Review, 45( 4-6): 827–838

[68]

Safarzyńska K, Frenken K, Van den Bergh J C J M, (2012). Evolutionary theorizing and modeling of sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 41( 6): 1011–1024

[69]

Sagar A D, Van der Zwaan B, (2006). Technological innovation in the energy sector: R&D, deployment, and learning-by-doing. Energy Policy, 34( 17): 2601–2608

[70]

Shao Z, Zheng X, Zhao J, Liu Y, (2025). Evaluating the health impact of air pollution control strategies and synergies among PM2.5 and O3 pollution in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China. Environmental Research, 274: 121348

[71]

Shi B, Lin S, Shi M, (2025). When differentiated carbon tax policy meets LBD of renewable energy and electrification of energy end-use: Policy implications of sectoral differentiation of carbon productivity and carbon emission. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 110: 107724

[72]

Stern N, (2022). Towards a carbon neutral economy: How government should respond to market failures and market absence. Journal of Government and Economics, 6: 100036

[73]

Sue Wing I, (2008). The synthesis of bottom-up and top-down approaches to climate policy modeling: Electric power technology detail in a social accounting framework. Energy Economics, 30( 2): 547–573

[74]

Sun Y, Jiang L, Cao C, (2025). Multiple proximities and inter-agency collaboration within a policy network: The case of innovation policymaking in China. Technovation, 141: 103169

[75]

Tian Y, Jiang G, Zhou D, Ding K, Su S, Zhou T, Chen D, (2019). Regional industrial transfer in the jingjinji urban agglomeration, China: An analysis based on a new “transferring area-undertaking area-dynamic process” model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235: 751–766

[76]

Touboul S, Glachant M, Dechezleprêtre A, Fankhauser S, Stoever J, (2023). Invention and global diffusion of technologies for climate change adaptation: A patent analysis. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 17( 2): 316–335

[77]

Verdolini E, Galeotti M, (2011). At home and abroad: An empirical analysis of innovation and diffusion in energy technologies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 61( 2): 119–134

[78]

Wang K, Wang C, Chen J, (2009). Analysis of the economic impact of different Chinese climate policy options based on a CGE model incorporating endogenous technological change. Energy Policy, 37( 8): 2930–2940

[79]

Wang Y, Li W, Li G, Tan S, (2024). Assessing the impact of regional coordinated development on a low-carbon future: Evidence from the beijing-tianjin-hebei coordinated development strategy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 481: 144140

[80]

Weidenfeld A, Makkonen T, Clifton N, (2021). From interregional knowledge networks to systems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 171: 120904

[81]

Wen S, Jia Z, (2023). A penny saved is a penny earned: Exploring the synergistic effect between carbon trading and energy carbon-content tax. Journal of Cleaner Production, 430: 139618

[82]

Weyant J P, Olavson T, (1999). Issues in modeling induced technological change in energy, environmental, and climate policy. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 4( 2-3): 67–85

[83]

Witajewski-Baltvilks J, (2025). Endogenous technological change adapted to the CGE framework. Journal of Global Economic Analysis, 10( 1): 106–174

[84]

Xie Q, Wang D, Bai Q, (2024). “Cooperation” or “Competition”: Digital finance enables green technology innovation—a new assessment from dynamic spatial spillover perspectives. International Review of Economics & Finance, 93: 587–601

[85]

Yang F, Sattar U, (2024). COP29: Technology development and transfer framework. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12: 1349843

[86]

Zhang H, Feng C, Zhou X, (2022a). Going carbon-neutral in China: Does the low-carbon city pilot policy improve carbon emission efficiency. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 33: 312–329

[87]

Zhang Y, Qi L, Lin X, Pan H, Sharp B, (2022b). Synergistic effect of carbon ETS and carbon tax under China’s peak emission target: A dynamic CGE analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 825: 154076

[88]

Zhang Z, Wang J, Feng C, Chen X, (2023). Do pilot zones for green finance reform and innovation promote energy savings? Evidence from China. Energy Economics, 124: 106763

[89]

Zheng H, Bai Y, Wei W, Meng J, Zhang Z, Song M, Guan D, (2021). Chinese provincial multi-regional input-output database for 2012, 2015, and 2017. Scientific Data, 8( 244): 1–13

[90]

Zheng Y, Collins A, Yao S, (2024). Promoting sustainable and high‐quality economic development in China via regional innovation poles. Journal of Regional Science, 64( 3): 671–699

[91]

Zickfeld K, MacIsaac A J, Canadell J G, Fuss S, Jackson R B, Jones C D, Lohila A, Matthews H D, Peters G P, Rogelj J, Zaehle S, (2023). Net-zero approaches must consider earth system impacts to achieve climate goals. Nature Climate Change, 13( 12): 1298–1305

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press

PDF (8143KB)

Supplementary files

Supplementary materials

888

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/