Pathways to achieve the dual targets of carbon neutrality and air quality in Southern China

Xiaorui LIU , Kai WU , Fabian WAGNER , Shaohui ZHANG , Meng XU , Yongzhe LIU , Xin WANG , Yanru FANG , Silu ZHANG , Hancheng DAI

Front. Eng ›› 2025, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (2) : 238 -254.

PDF (4255KB)
Front. Eng ›› 2025, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (2) : 238 -254. DOI: 10.1007/s42524-025-4043-0
Urban Management: Developing Sustainable, Resilient, and Equitable Cities Co-edited by Wei-Qiang CHEN, Hua CAI, Benjamin GOLDSTEIN, Oliver HEIDRICH, and Yu LIU
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Pathways to achieve the dual targets of carbon neutrality and air quality in Southern China

Author information +
History +
PDF (4255KB)

Abstract

Realizing the 2060 carbon neutrality target and air quality goals simultaneously is a common challenge for provinces in China aiming for sustainable development. This study examines the costs and benefits of achieving these dual targets in six southern Chinese provinces. Using a multi-model assessment approach—comprising the economic IMED|CGE model, the environmental GAINS model, and the IMED|HEL health risk assessment model—this study captures the uneven air quality and health burdens associated with inter-regional economic connections. We found that achieving carbon neutrality significantly improves air quality and provides health co-benefits through rapid energy system transformation. However, there is substantial provincial heterogeneity in the pathways chosen to reduce pollution and carbon emissions. As the potential of end-of-pipe control measures diminishes, stricter air quality standards will depend increasingly on profound transformations in energy and economic systems driven by carbon neutrality goals. Carbon reduction policies will reshape trade structures, altering the flow of embodied carbon dioxide (CO2) and air pollutants. Additionally, provincial carbon quotas significantly influence the health-related net benefits of carbon reduction, as GDP losses are sensitive to the allocation of these quotas. Our study demonstrates the feasibility of simultaneously achieving CO2 emission reduction and air quality improvement. Policymakers should integrate air quality targets with low-carbon development objectives when creating regional blueprints for green transformation, thereby aligning air pollution and carbon reduction management organically.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

carbon neutrality / air quality / co-benefits / IMED model / GAINS model

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xiaorui LIU, Kai WU, Fabian WAGNER, Shaohui ZHANG, Meng XU, Yongzhe LIU, Xin WANG, Yanru FANG, Silu ZHANG, Hancheng DAI. Pathways to achieve the dual targets of carbon neutrality and air quality in Southern China. Front. Eng, 2025, 12(2): 238-254 DOI:10.1007/s42524-025-4043-0

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Burnett R, Chen H, Szyszkowicz M, . (2018). Global estimates of mortality associated with long-term exposure to outdoor fine particulate matter. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115( 38): 9592–9597

[2]

CaiBLiQ ZhangX (2021). Annual Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS) in China (2021), Environmental Planning Institute of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment (in Chinese)

[3]

China Carbon Neutral and Clean Air Synergistic Pathways Annual Report Working Group (2021). China Carbon Neutral and Clean Air Synergistic Pathways. Beijing, China Clean Air Policy Partnership (in Chinese)

[4]

China’s State Council (2019). The Outline of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Planning. Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and State Council

[5]

Dong H, Dai H, Dong L, Fujita T, Geng Y, Klimont Z, Inoue T, Bunya S, Fujii M, Masui T, (2015). Pursuing air pollutant co-benefits of CO2 mitigation in China: A provincial leveled analysis. Applied Energy, 144: 165–174

[6]

Fan S, An K, Zhang S, Wang C, (2024). Cost-effective energy development pathway considering air quality co-benefits under climate target: A case study of Anhui Province in China. Applied Energy, 353: 122039

[7]

Jiang X, Hong C, Zheng Y, Zheng B, Guan D, Gouldson A, Zhang Q, He K, (2015). To what extent can China’s near-term air pollution control policy protect air quality and human health? A case study of the Pearl River Delta region. Environmental Research Letters, 10( 10): 104006

[8]

Liang X, Zhang S, Wu Y, Xing J, He X, Zhang K M, Wang S, Hao J, (2019). Air quality and health benefits from fleet electrification in China. Nature Sustainability, 2( 10): 962–971

[9]

LinJQiY CaiW JWang C (2018). A review on the studies of equitable sharing in national mitigation contributions to achieve the Paris Agreement ambitions. Climate Change Research

[10]

Liu X, Guo C, Ma X, Wu K, Wang P, Huang Z, Zhou Z, Huang C, Zhang S, Wang M, Dai H, (2022). Uncovering the key mechanisms of how deep decarbonization benefits air pollution alleviation in China. Environmental Research Letters, 17( 11): 115002

[11]

Liu Z, Deng Z, He G, Wang H, Zhang X, Lin J, Qi Y, Liang X, (2021). Challenges and opportunities for carbon neutrality in China. Nature Reviews. Earth & Environment, 3( 2): 141–155

[12]

Lu X, Chen Y, Huang Y, Lin C, Li Z, Fung J C, Lau A K, (2019). Differences in concentration and source apportionment of PM2.5 between 2006 and 2015 over the PRD region in Southern China. Science of the Total Environment, 673: 708–718

[13]

Markandya A, Sampedro J, Smith S J, Van Dingenen R, Pizarro-Irizar C, Arto I, González-Eguino M, (2018). Health co-benefits from air pollution and mitigation costs of the Paris Agreement: A modelling study. Lancet. Planetary Health, 2( 3): e126–e133

[14]

Murray C J, Aravkin A Y, Zheng P, . (2020). Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet, 396( 10258): 1223–1249

[15]

National Bureau of Statistics of China (2018). China Statistical Yearbook. Beijing

[16]

Pope III C A, Burnett R T, Thun M J, Calle E E, Krewski D, Ito K, Thurston G D, (2002). Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287( 9): 1132–1141

[17]

Shindell D, Ru M, Zhang Y, Seltzer K, Faluvegi G, Nazarenko L, Schmidt G A, Parsons L, Challapalli A, Yang L, Glick A, (2021). Temporal and spatial distribution of health, labor, and crop benefits of climate change mitigation in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118( 46): e2104061118

[18]

Stanaway J D, Afshin A, Gakidou E, . (2018). Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet, 392( 10159): 1923–1994

[19]

Tang R, Zhao J, Liu Y, Huang X, Zhang Y, Zhou D, Ding A, Nielsen C P, Wang H, (2022). Air quality and health co-benefits of China’s carbon dioxide emissions peaking before 2030. Nature Communications, 13( 1): 1008

[20]

Tong F, Azevedo I M L, (2020). What are the best combinations of fuel-vehicle technologies to mitigate climate change and air pollution effects across the United States. Environmental Research Letters, 15( 7): 074046

[21]

World Health Organization (2021). WHO global air quality guidelines. Particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide. Geneva

[22]

Wu K, Liu X, Dai H, Zhang S, Zhou Z, Ma T, Guo C, He X, Fang Y R, (2022). Mutual effects of CO2 emission reduction and air pollution control policies in beijing-tianjin-hebei region. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10: 1006142

[23]

Xie Y, Dai H, Dong H, Hanaoka T, Masui T, (2016). Economic impacts from PM2.5 pollution-related health effects in China: A provincial-level analysis. Environmental Science & Technology, 50( 9): 4836–4843

[24]

Xie Y, Dai H, Xu X, Fujimori S, Hasegawa T, Yi K, Masui T, Kurata G, (2018). Co-benefits of climate mitigation on air quality and human health in Asian countries. Environment International, 119( OCT): 309–318

[25]

Xie Y, Dai H, Zhang Y, Wu Y, Tatsuya H, Toshihiko M, (2019). Comparison of health and economic impacts of PM2.5 and ozone pollution in China. Environment International, 130: 104881

[26]

Xie Y, Wu Y, Xie M, Li B, Zhang H, Ma T, Zhang Y, (2020). Health and economic benefit of China’s greenhouse gas mitigation by 2050. Environmental Research Letters, 15( 10): 104042

[27]

Xu C, Hong J, Chen J, Han X, Lin C, Li X, (2016). Is biomass energy really clean? An environmental life-cycle perspective on biomass-based electricity generation in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133: 767–776

[28]

YangXHan-Cheng DTatsuyaHToshihikoM (2016). Health and economic impacts of PM2.5 pollution in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Area. China Population, Resources and Environment

[29]

Zhang Q, Yin Z, Lu X, . (2023). Synergetic roadmap of carbon neutrality and clean air for China. Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 16: 100280

[30]

Zhang S, An K, Li J, Weng Y, Zhang S, Wang S, Cai W, Wang C, Gong P, (2021). Incorporating health co-benefits into technology pathways to achieve China’s 2060 carbon neutrality goal: A modelling study. Lancet. Planetary Health, 5( 11): e808–e817

[31]

Zhang S, Wu Y, Liu X, Qian J, Chen J, Han L, Dai H, (2021). Co-benefits of deep carbon reduction on air quality and health improvement in Sichuan Province of China. Environmental Research Letters, 16( 9): 095011

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (4255KB)

Supplementary files

FEM-24043-OF-HCD_suppl_1

745

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/