How do project-oriented organizations enhance innovation? An institutional theory perspective

Abstract

A project-oriented organization is a hybrid form of organization where a functional hierarchy is augmented with structures to manage projects strategically across the organization. Six project-oriented organizations from diverse industries that emphasize innovation in their strategies were selected for this study. We use the three pillars of institutional theory — regulative, normative and cultural-cognitive — and institutional entrepreneurship to analyze interview data from executive and project, program and portfolio management personnel in the project-oriented organizations to investigate how innovation is facilitated through external influences and internal responses. Our findings indicate that processes and new structures provide effective ways for innovation and, while individuals are important, processes are more effective than individuals at enabling innovation. We put forward some lessons for practice that emerge directly from the findings, including suggestions on improving allocation of resources, a need to focus on processes, reconceptualization of “failure”, and dedicated investment in market knowledge, customer knowledge, performance metrics and flexible governance structures.

Keywords

project-oriented organizations / innovation / institutional entrepreneurship / institutional theory

References

[1] Aldrich, H E (2010). Beam me up, Scott(ie)! Institutional theorists’ struggles with the emergent nature of entrepreneurship. Research in the Sociology of Work, 21: 329–364

[2] Aldrich, H E (2011). Heroes, villains, and fools: Institutional entrepreneurship, NOT institutional entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 1( 2): 20122003

[3] Assink, M (2006). Inhibitors of disruptive innovation capability: A conceptual model. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9( 2): 215–233

[4] Biesenthal, C Clegg, S Mahalingam, A Sankaran, S (2018). Applying institutional theories to managing megaprojects. International Journal of Project Management, 36( 1): 43–54

[5] Biygautane, M Neesham, C Al-Yahya, K O (2019). Institutional entrepreneurship and infrastructure public-private partnership (PPP): Unpacking the role of social actors in implementing PPP projects. International Journal of Project Management, 37( 1): 192–219

[6] Bresnen, M (2016). Institutional development, divergence and change in the discipline of project management. International Journal of Project Management, 34( 2): 328–338

[7] Bresnen, M Marshall, N (2010). Partnering in construction: A critical review of issues, problems and dilemmas. Construction Management and Economics, 18( 2): 229–237

[8] Cui, A S Wu, F (2016). Utilizing customer knowledge in innovation: Antecedents and impact of customer involvement on new product performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44( 4): 516–538

[9] Dacin, M T Goodstein, J Scott, W R (2002). Institutional theory and institutional change: Introduction to the special research forum. Academy of Management Journal, 45( 1): 43–57

[10] DaviesA (2014). Innovation and project management. In: Dodgson M, Gann D M, Phillips N, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 625–647

[11] Di Muro, P Lecoeuvre, L Turner, R (2021). Ambidextrous strategy and execution in entrepreneurial project-oriented organizations: The case of Pagani supercars. International Journal of Project Management, 39( 1): 45–58

[12] DiMaggio, P J Powell, W W (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48( 2): 147–160

[13] Donada, C Mothe, C Alegre, J (2021). Managing skunkworks to achieve ambidexterity: The Robinson Crusoe effect. European Management Journal, 39( 2): 214–225

[14] DoughertyD (2006). Organizing for innovation in the 21st century. In: Clegg S R, Hardy C, Lawrence T, Nord W R, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications Ltd., 598–617

[15] Dougherty, D Borrelli, L Munir, K O’Sullivan, A (2000). Systems of organizational sensemaking for sustained product innovation. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 17( 3–4): 321–355

[16] Eisenhardt, K M (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14( 4): 532–550

[17] Gann, D M Salter, A J (2000). Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: The construction of complex products and systems. Research Policy, 29( 7–8): 955–972

[18] Gareis, R (1991). Management by projects: The management strategy of the new project-oriented company. International Journal of Project Management, 9( 2): 71–76

[19] Garud, R Tuertscher, P Van de Ven, A H (2013). Perspectives on innovation processes. Academy of Management Annals, 7( 1): 775–819

[20] Hall, D M Scott, W R (2019). Early stages in the institutionalization of integrated project delivery. Project Management Journal, 50( 2): 128–143

[21] HardyCMaguire S (2008). Institutional entrepreneurship. In: Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin K, Suddaby R, eds. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. London: Sage Publications Ltd., 198–217

[22] Henisz, W J Levitt, R E Scott, W R (2012). Toward a unified theory of project governance: Economic, sociological and psychological supports for relational contracting. Engineering Project Organization Journal, 2( 1–2): 37–55

[23] Hobday, M (2000). The project-based organisation: An ideal form for managing complex products and systems?. Research Policy, 29( 7–8): 871–893

[24] Hu, Y Chan, A P Le, Y Jin, R (2015). From construction megaproject management to complex project management: Bibliographic analysis. Journal of Management Engineering, 31( 4): 04014052

[25] HuemannM (2014). Managing the project-oriented organization. In: Turner R, ed. Gower Handbook of Project Management. 5th ed. London: Routledge, 493–506

[26] JacksonKBazeley P (2019). Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo. 3rd ed. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

[27] Javernick-Will, A N Scott, W R (2010). Who needs to know what? Institutional knowledge and global projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136( 5): 546–557

[28] Johnson, S B (2013). Technical and institutional factors in the emergence of project management. International Journal of Project Management, 31( 5): 670–681

[29] Kostis, P C Kafka, K I Petrakis, P E (2018). Cultural change and innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, 88: 306–313

[30] Kotter, J (2012). How the most innovative companies capitalize on today’s rapid-fire strategic challenges-and still make their numbers. Harvard Business Review, 90( 11): 43–58

[31] LawrenceT BShadnam M (2008). Institutional theory. In: Donsbach W, ed. The International Encyclopedia of Communication. 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2289–2293

[32] Liu, Y Houwing, E J Hertogh, M Yuan, Z Liu, H (2022). Explorative learning in infrastructure development megaprojects: The case of the Hong Kong–Zhuhai–Macao Bridge. Project Management Journal, 53( 2): 113–127

[33] Locatelli, G Mariani, G Sainati, T Greco, M (2017). Corruption in public projects and megaprojects: There is an elephant in the room!. International Journal of Project Management, 35( 3): 252–268

[34] Loosemore, M Alkilani, S Z Murphy, R (2021). The institutional drivers of social procurement implementation in Australian construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 39( 7): 750–761

[35] MaguireS (2007). Institutional entrepreneurship. In: Clegg S, Bailey J R, eds. International Encyclopedia of Organization Studies. London: Sage Publications Ltd., 674–678

[36] Mahalingam, A Levitt, R E (2007). Institutional theory as a framework for analyzing conflicts on global projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 133( 7): 517–528

[37] Morris, P W Geraldi, J (2011). Managing the institutional context for projects. Project Management Journal, 42( 6): 20–32

[38] MüllerR (2016). Governance and Governmentality for Projects: Enablers, Practices, and Consequences. New York: Routledge

[39] OrrR JScott W RLevittR EArttoKKujalaJ (2011). Global projects: Distinguishing features, drivers, and challenges. In: Scott W R, Levitt R E, Orr R J, eds. Global Projects: Institutional and Political Challenges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 15–51

[40] Pinto, J K Winch, G (2016). The unsettling of “settled science”: The past and future of the management of projects. International Journal of Project Management, 34( 2): 237–245

[41] Qiu, Y Chen, H Sheng, Z Zhang, J Cheng, S (2022). Institutional entrepreneurship and megaproject: A case of the Hong Kong–Zhuhai–Macao Bridge. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 69( 6): 3053–3067

[42] Reischauer, G (2015). Combining artefact analysis, interview and participant observation to study the organizational sensemaking of knowledge-based innovation. Historical Social Research, 40( 3): 279–298

[43] Scott, W R (2008). Approaching adulthood: The maturing of institutional theory. Theory and Society, 37( 5): 427–442

[44] ScottW R (2014). Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.

[45] Sergeeva, N Winch, G M (2020). Narrative interactions: How project-based firms respond to government narratives of innovation. International Journal of Project Management, 38( 6): 379–387

[46] Storey, J (2000). The management of innovation problem. International Journal of Innovation Management, 4( 3): 347–369

[47] SydowJSöderlund J (2022). Organizing complex projects from neo-institutional perspectives. In: Winch G, Brunet M, Cao D, eds. Research Handbook on Complex Project Organizing. Camberley: Edward Elgar Publishing, 89–98

[48] Turner, J R (2018). The management of the project-based organization: A personal reflection. International Journal of Project Management, 36( 1): 231–240

[49] Turner, R Müller, R (2003). On the nature of project as a temporary organization. International Journal of Project Management, 21( 1): 1–8

[50] YinR K (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.

[51] Zhang, Y Wei, H H Zhao, D Han, Y Chen, J (2021). Understanding innovation diffusion and adoption strategies in megaproject networks through a fuzzy system dynamic model. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 8( 1): 32–47

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s). This article is published with open access at link.springer.com and journal.hep.com.cn