Decentralised energy and its performance assessment models

Abstract

Energy development concerns not only the development of renewable energies but also the shift from centralised to clean, decentralised power generation. The development of decentralised energy (DE) is a core part of the energy and economic strategies being adopted around the world that drives the progress toward a highly sustainable future. This paper reviews the concepts, development status, trends, benefits and challenges of DE systems and analyses the existing models and methods for assessing the performance of these systems. A hierarchical decision model for evaluating the performance of DE systems is also constructed based on the framework of multiple criteria decision analysis, which considers the identification, definition and assessment grade of decision criteria. The evidential reasoning approach is applied to aggregate assessment information in a case study of the implementation of an intelligent decision system. Sensitivity and trade-off analyses are also conducted to show how the proposed model can be used to support decision making in DE systems.

Keywords

decentralised energy / assessment model / MCDA / evidential reasoning / sensitivity analysis

References

[1] Ahmad S, Tahar R M (2014). Selection of renewable energy sources for sustainable development of electricity generation system using analytic hierarchy process: A case of Malaysia. Renewable Energy, 63: 458–466

[2] Aiken G (2012). Community transitions to low carbon futures in the transition towns network (TTN). Geography Compass, 6(2): 89–99

[3] Akella A K, Saini R P, Sharma M P (2009). Social, economic and environmental impacts of renewable energy systems. Renewable Energy, 34(2): 390–396

[4] Alstone P, Gershenson D, Kammen D M (2015). Decentralised energy systems for clean electricity access. Nature Climate Change, 5(4): 305–314

[5] Amjady N (2004). A framework of reliability assessment with consideration effect of transient and voltage stabilities. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 19(2): 1005–1014

[6] Aragonés-Beltrán P, Chaparro-González F, Pastor-Ferrando J P, Rodríguez-Pozo F (2010). An ANP-based approach for the selection of photovoltaic solar power plant investment projects. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 14(1): 249–264

[7] Aras H, Erdoğmuş Ş, Koç E (2004). Multi-criteria selection for a wind observation station location using analytic hierarchy process. Renewable Energy, 29(8): 1383–1392

[8] Baumann M, Weil M, Peters J F, Chibeles-Martins N, Moniz A B (2019). A review of multi-criteria decision making approaches for evaluating energy storage systems for grid applications. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 107: 516–534

[9] Bauwens T, Gotchev B, Holstenkamp L (2016). What drives the development of community energy in Europe? The case of wind power cooperatives. Energy Research & Social Science, 13: 136–147

[10] Beccali M, Cellura M, Mistretta M (2003). Decision-making in energy planning—Application of the Electre method at regional level for the diffusion of renewable energy technology. Renewable Energy, 28(13): 2063–2087

[11] Brand B, Missaoui R (2014). Multi-criteria analysis of electricity generation mix scenarios in Tunisia. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 39: 251–261

[12] Brans J P, Vincke P, Mareschal B (1986). How to select and how to rank projects: The Promethee method. European Journal of Operational Research, 24(2): 228–238

[13] Burton J, Hubacek K (2007). Is small beautiful? A multicriteria assessment of small-scale energy technology applications in local governments. Energy Policy, 35(12): 6402–6412

[14] Carson N, Davies S, Shields G, Jones P, Hillgarth T (2008). Decentralised energy: Business opportunity in resource efficiency and carbon management. The UK Government’s Business Taskforce on Sustainable Consumption and Production

[15] Cavallaro F, Ciraolo L (2005). A multicriteria approach to evaluate wind energy plants on an Italian island. Energy Policy, 33(2): 235–244

[16] Chatzimouratidis A I, Pilavachi P A (2008). Multicriteria evaluation of power plants impact on the living standard using the analytic hierarchy process. Energy Policy, 36(3): 1074–1089

[17] Chatzimouratidis A I, Pilavachi P A (2009). Technological, economic and sustainability evaluation of power plants using the analytic hierarchy process. Energy Policy, 37(3): 778–787

[18] Directorate-General for Energy and Transport (European Commission) (2008). Interconnecting Europe: New Perspective for Trans-European Energy Networks. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities

[19] Directorate-General for Environment (European Commission) (2009). Study concerning the report on the application and effectiveness of the EIA Directive. Final Report. Lyngby

[20] Dong J, Chi Y, Zou D, Fu C, Huang Q, Ni M (2014). Energy-environment-economy assessment of waste management systems from a life cycle perspective: Model development and case study. Applied Energy, 114: 400–408

[21] Doukas H C, Andreas B M, Psarras J E (2007). Multi-criteria decision aid for the formulation of sustainable technological energy priorities using linguistic variables. European Journal of Operational Research, 182(2): 844–855

[22] Ezbakhe F, Perez-Foguet A (2020). Decision analysis for sustainable development: The case of renewable energy planning under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research, in press, doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.02.037

[23] Fowler K R, Silver C L (2015). Developing and Managing Embedded Systems and Products: Methods, Techniques, Tools, Processes, and Teamwork. London: Newnes

[24] Guidehouse Insights (2020). Global DER Deployment Database 3Q20. Available at: guidehouseinsights.com/reports

[25] Haralambopoulos D A, Polatidis H (2003). Renewable energy projects: Structuring a multi-criteria group decision-making framework. Renewable Energy, 28(6): 961–973

[26] Hatziargyriou N (2014). Microgrids: Architectures and Control. New York: John Wiley & Sons

[27] Heller D (2017). The implications of digital currencies for monetary policy. Directorate-General for Internal Policies—Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy

[28] Kahraman C, Kaya İ (2010). A fuzzy multicriteria methodology for selection among energy alternatives. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(9): 6270–6281

[29] Karakosta C, Pappas C, Marinakis V, Psarras J (2013). Renewable energy and nuclear power towards sustainable development: Characteristics and prospects. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 22: 187–197

[30] Kaya T, Kahraman C (2010). Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR & AHP methodology: The case of Istanbul. Energy, 35(6): 2517–2527

[31] Köne A Ç, Büke T (2007). An analytical network process (ANP) evaluation of alternative fuels for electricity generation in Turkey. Energy Policy, 35(10): 5220–5228

[32] Latinopoulos D, Kechagia K (2015). A GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation for wind farm site selection—A regional scale application in Greece. Renewable Energy, 78: 550–560

[33] Lawrence D P (2007). Impact significance determination—back to basics. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27(8): 755–769

[34] Lee S K, Mogi G, Kim J W (2009). Decision support for prioritizing energy technologies against high oil prices: A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 22(6): 915–920

[35] Linkov I, Bates M E, Canis L J, Seager T P, Keisler J M (2011). A decision-directed approach for prioritizing research into the impact of nanomaterials on the environment and human health. Nature Nanotechnology, 6(12): 784–787

[36] Lo K (2014). A critical review of China’s rapidly developing renewable energy and energy efficiency policies. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 29: 508–516

[37] Lund H (2007). Renewable energy strategies for sustainable development. Energy, 32(6): 912–919

[38] Madlener R, Kowalski K, Stagl S (2007). New ways for the integrated appraisal of national energy scenarios: The case of renewable energy use in Austria. Energy Policy, 35(12): 6060–6074

[39] Mahdy M, Bahaj A S (2018). Multi criteria decision analysis for offshore wind energy potential in Egypt. Renewable Energy, 118: 278–289

[40] Mamlook R, Akash B A, Nijmeh S (2001). Fuzzy sets programming to perform evaluation of solar systems in Jordan. Energy Conversion and Management, 42(14): 1717–1726

[41] Menegaki A (2008). Valuation for renewable energy: A comparative review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12(9): 2422–2437

[42] Mitchell R K, Agle B R, Wood D J (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4): 853–886

[43] Morris A S, Langari R (2012). Measurement reliability and safety systems. In: Morris A S, Langari R, eds. Measurement and Instrumentation: Theory and Application. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 291–316

[44] Mourmouris J C, Potolias C (2013). A multi-criteria methodology for energy planning and developing renewable energy sources at a regional level: A case study Thassos, Greece. Energy Policy, 52: 522–530

[45] Myllyviita T, Holma A, Antikainen R, Lahtinen K, Leskinen P (2012). Assessing environmental impacts of biomass production chains—Application of life cycle assessment (LCA) and multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). Journal of Cleaner Production, 29–30: 238–245

[46] Narula K, Nagai Y, Pachauri S (2012). The role of decentralized distributed generation in achieving universal rural electrification in South Asia by 2030. Energy Policy, 47: 345–357

[47] Nigim K, Munier N, Green J (2004). Pre-feasibility MCDM tools to aid communities in prioritizing local viable renewable energy sources. Renewable Energy, 29(11): 1775–1791

[48] Oberschmidt J, Geldermann J, Ludwig J, Schmehl M (2010). Modified PROMETHEE approach for assessing energy technologies. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 4(2): 183–212

[49] Omer A (2008). Energy, environment and sustainable development. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 12(9): 2265–2300

[50] Önüt S, Tuzkaya U R, Saadet N (2008). Multiple criteria evaluation of current energy resources for Turkish manufacturing industry. Energy Conversion and Management, 49(6): 1480–1492

[51] Papadopoulos A, Karagiannidis A (2008). Application of the multi-criteria analysis method Electre III for the optimisation of decentralised energy systems. Omega, 36(5): 766–776

[52] Pilavachi P A, Roumpeas C P, Minett S, Afgan N H (2006). Multi-criteria evaluation for CHP system options. Energy Conversion and Management, 47(20): 3519–3529

[53] Roy B (1990). The outranking approach and the foundations of Electre Methods. In: Bana e Costa C A, ed. Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid. Berlin: Springer, 155–183

[54] Ruppert-Winkel C, Hauber J (2014). Changing the energy system towards renewable energy self-sufficiency—Towards a multi-perspective and interdisciplinary framework. Sustainability, 6(5): 2822–2831

[55] San Cristóbal J R (2011). Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in Spain: The VIKOR method. Renewable Energy, 36(2): 498–502

[56] Stein E W (2013). A comprehensive multi-criteria model to rank electric energy production technologies. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 22: 640–654

[57] Twidell J, Weir T (2015). Renewable Energy Resources. 3rd ed. London: Routledge

[58] UK Department of Trade and Industry (2006). The Energy Challenge —Energy Review Report 2006

[59] Walker J F, Jenkins N (1997). Wind Energy Technology. Wiley

[60] Wanderer T, Herle S (2015). Creating a spatial multi-criteria decision support system for energy related integrated environmental impact assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 52: 2–8

[61] Wang J J, Jing Y Y, Zhang C F, Zhao J H (2009). Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(9): 2263–2278

[62] Wątróbski J, Ziemba P, Wolski W (2015). Methodological aspects of decision support system for the location of renewable energy sources. In: Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems. IEEE, 1451–1459

[63] Wu J, Zuidema C, Gugerell K (2018). Experimenting with decentralized energy governance in China: The case of New Energy Demonstration City program. Journal of Cleaner Production, 189: 830–838

[64] Wu T, Xu D L, Yang J B (2017). A review on multiple criteria performance analysis of renewable energy systems. In: 13th IEEE International Conference on Control & Automation (ICCA). Ohrid, 822–827

[65] Wu T, Xu D L, Yang J B (2019). Multiple criteria performance assessment for decentralized energy systems: A case study. In: 5th International Conference on Information Management (ICIM). Cambridge, 257–261

[66] Xu D L, Yang J B (2003). Intelligent decision system for self-assessment. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 12(1): 43–60

[67] Yang J B (2001). Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multi-attribute decision analysis under uncertainties. European Journal of Operational Research, 131(1): 31–61

[68] Yang J B, Xu D L (2002). On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multiple attribute decision analysis under uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Part A—Systems and Humans, 32(3): 289–304

[69] Yang J B, Xu D L (2013). Evidential reasoning rule for evidence combination. Artificial Intelligence, 205: 1–29

[70] Yu W, Sheblé G B, Lopes J A P, Matos M A (2006). Valuation of switchable tariff for wind energy. Electric Power Systems Research, 76(5): 382–388

[71] Zhao H, Guo S (2015). External benefit evaluation of renewable energy power in China for sustainability. Sustainability, 7(5): 4783–4805

[72] Zhao J, Yang Z, Chen S (2009). Multi-criteria evaluation of alternative power supply using analytic hierarchy process. In: International Conference on Sustainable Power Generation and Supply. Nanjing, 1–7

[73] Zhou P, Ang B W, Poh K L (2006). Decision analysis in energy and environmental modelling: An update. Energy, 31(14): 2604–2622

[74] Zou C (2020). New Energy. Singapore: Springer

Open Access

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2020 The Author(s) 2020. This article is published with open access at link.springer.com and journal.hep.com.cn