Research on the ecological compensation standard of the basin pollution control project based on evolutionary game theory and by taking Xiangjiang River as a case

Dongbin HU, Huiwu LIU, Xiaohong CHEN, Yang CHEN

PDF(310 KB)
PDF(310 KB)
Front. Eng ›› 2019, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (4) : 575-583. DOI: 10.1007/s42524-019-0044-1
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Research on the ecological compensation standard of the basin pollution control project based on evolutionary game theory and by taking Xiangjiang River as a case

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Ecological compensation is a new resource and environment management model. As one of the main areas for implementing ecological compensation policies, basin ecological compensation has become an important measure for encouraging basin pollution control projects and improving the quality of regional economic development. By applying the basic game analysis of evolutionary game theory and building an evolutionary game model with a “reward–punishment” mechanism, this paper compares the interest-related decision-making behaviors of the upstream and downstream stakeholders of basin ecological compensation. By using data on the water quality of Xiangjiang River Basin, this paper calculates the rewards and penalties in different intervals by building a parametric regression mathematical model and employing the local linear regression method. Results show that a decline in water quality should be fined RMB 925500 yuan, an improvement in water quality should be awarded RMB 1227800 yuan, and a deteriorating water quality should be severely fined RMB 5087600 yuan.

Keywords

evolutionary game / ecological compensation standard / Xiangjiang River Basin

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Dongbin HU, Huiwu LIU, Xiaohong CHEN, Yang CHEN. Research on the ecological compensation standard of the basin pollution control project based on evolutionary game theory and by taking Xiangjiang River as a case. Front. Eng, 2019, 6(4): 575‒583 https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-019-0044-1

References

[1]
Amigues J P, Boulatoff C, Desaigues B, Gauthier C, Keith J E (2002). The benefits and costs of riparian analysis habitat preservation: a willingness to accept/willingness to pay contingent valuation approach. Ecological Economics, 43(1): 17–31
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Biénabe E, Hearne R R (2006). Public preferences for biodiversity conservation and scenic beauty within a framework of environmental services payments. Forest Policy and Economics, 9(4): 335–348
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Chen Y P, Zhou Y (2016). Estimation of watershed ecological compensation standard based on water quality and water volume: Taking Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region in the Yellow River Basin as an example. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 37(4): 119–126
[4]
Costanza R, D’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neil R V, Paruelo J, Raskin R G, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(15): 253–260
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Daily G C (1997). Nature’s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington DC: Island Press
[6]
Du Q Q, Zhang R H, Ma B (2017). Study on the estimation of ecosystem service value and ecological compensation mechanism: Taking Huairou District of Beijing as an example. Ecological Economics, 33(11): 146–152, 176
[7]
Guan X J, Liu W K, Chen M Y (2016). Study on the ecological compensation standard for river basin water environment based on total pollutants control. Ecological Indicators, 69: 446–452
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Kong F B (2010). China’s Ecological Compensation Mechanism: Theory, Practice and Policy Design. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press
[9]
Li C F, Zhang Y Y, Zhao G C, Mo L J (2014). Study on watershed ecological compensation based on evolutionary game theory: taking Taihu Lake Basin as an example. China Population Resources and Environment, 24(1): 171–176
[10]
Li Y, Peng X C, Zhou L X (2012). Exploration of Watershed Ecological Compensation and Pollution Compensation Policies and Mechanisms: Taking Dongjiang River Basin as An Example. Beijing: Economy & Management Publishing House
[11]
Li Y S, Hu Y (2007). Analysis of interregional ecological benefit compensation standard in Minjiang River Basin. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 28(3): 327–329 (in Chinese)
[12]
Moran D, Mcvittie A, Allcroft D J, Elston D A (2007). Quantifying public preferences for agri-environmental policy in Scotland: a comparison of methods. Ecological Economics, 63(1): 42–53
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Robert N, Stenger A (2013). Can payments solve the problem of undersupply of ecosystem services? Forest Policy and Economics, 35(4): 83–91
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Tian Y X, Dai Y (2016). Research on performance evaluation of watershed ecological compensation mechanism: taking Xiangjiang River as an Example. Business (Atlanta, GA), 2016(28): 104–105
[15]
Villarroya A, Puig J (2010). Ecological compensation and environmental impact assessment in Spain. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30(6): 357–362
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Wang L, Liu T (2017). Research on compensation of ecological protection in Dongting Lake. China Economic and Trade Guide (Theoretical Edition), 2017(35): 15–17
[17]
Xu D W, Chang L, Hou T S, Zhao Y F (2012). Calculation of watershed ecological compensation standard based on WTP and WTA: a case study in Liaohe River Basin. Journal of Resources Science, 34(7): 1354–1361
[18]
Yang G S, Huang J S, Li J, Yin W (2016). Study on ecological compensation standard of green water management based on SWAT model. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 47(6): 809–815

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2019 Higher Education Press
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(310 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/