Generic and SME-specific factors that influence the BIM adoption process: An overview that highlights gaps in the literature
Elodie HOCHSCHEID, Gilles HALIN
Generic and SME-specific factors that influence the BIM adoption process: An overview that highlights gaps in the literature
Building information modeling/management (BIM) is an emerging technological and procedural shift in the architecture, engineering, construction and operation industry. In this study, we use an extensive state-of-the-art method to clarify the BIM adoption process and the factors that can influence the success or failure of BIM adoption, particularly during the implementation stage, which are not frequently found in the literature. As an innovation, the lexical field allocated to the spread of innovations is assigned to BIM (diffusion, adoption, and implementation). After recalling the definition of relevant terms and then removing the resulting inconsistencies in vocabularies, we investigate various studies to identify factors that influence BIM adoption and then unify all these studies in one coherent and consistent BIM adoption process model. We focus on factors that play a role in the adoption of BIM in small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) because SMEs constitute the majority of companies in the construction sector. This research highlights and intends to fill in some gaps found in the current BIM adoption literature.
BIM / adoption / diffusion / implementation / change management / SMEs / literature review / architecture firms
[1] |
Abuelmaatti A A, Ahmed V S, Baban H S (2014). Collaborative technologies for small and medium-sized architecture, engineering and construction enterprises: implementation survey. Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 19: 210–224
|
[2] |
Ahmed A L, Kassem M (2018). A unified BIM adoption taxonomy: conceptual development, empirical validation and application. Automation in Construction, 96: 103–127
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Ahmed A, Kawalek P, Kassem M (2017). A conceptual model for investigating BIM adoption by organisations. In: Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Computing in Construction (JC3), Heraklion, Greece, 447–455
|
[4] |
Al-Bahar J F, Crandall K C (1990). Systematic risk management approach for construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 116(3): 533–546
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Aldrich H (2008). Organizations and Environments. Palo Alto, California: Stanford University Press
|
[6] |
Arayici Y, Coates P, Koskela L, Kagioglou M, Usher C, O’reilly K (2011). Technology adoption in the BIM implementation for lean architectural practice. Automation in Construction, 20(2): 189–195
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Autissier D, Vandangeon-Derumez I, Vas A (2014). Change management, key concepts: 50 years of research from major authors. Paris: Dunod (in French)
|
[8] |
Barba-Sánchez V, Martínez-Ruiz M, Jiménez-Zarco A I (2007). Drivers, benefits and challenges of ICT adoption by small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs): a literature review. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 5(1): 103–114
|
[9] |
Bataw A, Burrows M, Kirkham R (2014). The challenges of adopting Building Information Modelling (BIM) principles within Small to Medium sized Enterprises (SMEs). In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Construction Applications of Virtual Reality (CONVR2014), Sharjah, UAE., CONVR, 318–324
|
[10] |
Bonanomi M, Paganin G, Talamo C (2016). BIM implementation in design firms. Risk-Response Strategies to Support Change Management, 1–9
|
[11] |
Burgelman R A, Mittman B S (1994). An intraorganizational ecological perspective on managerial risk behavior, performance, and survival: individual, organizational and environmental effects. In: Baum J, Singh J, eds. Evolutionary Dynamics in Organizations. New York: Oxford University Press
|
[12] |
Caille E (2017). Ranking of the first 300 architecture firms in France by sales revenue. D’Architectures,166–180 (in French)
|
[13] |
Chien K F, Wu Z H, Huang S C (2014). Identifying and assessing critical risk factors for BIM projects: empirical study. Automation in Construction, 45: 1–15
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Davis F D (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 13(3): 319–340
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
DiMaggio P J, Powell W W (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields.American Sociological Review, 48(2): 147–160
|
[16] |
Edwards T, Delbridge R, Munday M (2005). Understanding innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises: a process manifest. Technovation, 25(10): 1119–1127
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Georgiadou M C (2016). Building Information Modelling in UK construction projects: a state of the art review. In: COBRA 2016, Toronto, Canada
|
[18] |
Ghaffarianhoseini A, Doan D T, Zhang T, Ghaffarianhoseini A, Naismith N, Tookey J (2016). A BIM readiness & implementation strategy for SME construction companies in the UK. In: Proceedings of the 33rd CIB W78 Conference
|
[19] |
Gledson B, Henry D, Bleanch P (2012). Does size matter? Experiences and perspectives of BIM implementation from large and SME construction contractors In: 1st UK Academic Conference on Building Information Management (BIM) 2012, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
|
[20] |
Greenwood R, Hinings C R (1988). Organizational design types, tracks and the dynamics of strategic change. Organization Studies, 9(3): 293–316
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[21] |
Gu N, London K (2010). Understanding and facilitating BIM adoption in the AEC industry. Automation in Construction, 19(8): 988–999
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Hannan M T, Freeman J (1977). The population ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology , 82(5): 929–964
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Hannan M T, Freeman J (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. A merican Sociological Review , 49(2): 149–164
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Hochscheid E, Halin G (2018a). BIM implementation in architecture firms: interviews, case studies and action research used to build a method that facilitates implementation of BIM processes and tools. In: Proceedings of the 36th ECAADe Annual Conference, Lodz, Poland, 10
|
[25] |
Hochscheid E, Halin G (2018b). A model to approach BIM adoption process and possible BIM implementation failures. In: Proceedings of the Creative Construction Conference 2018 (CCC), Ljubljana, Slovenia
|
[26] |
Hochscheid E, Ribereau-Gayon M, Halin G, Hanser D (2016). BIM implementation in SMEs: an experience of cooperation between an architect agency and a carpentry firm. In: Proceedings of ICCCBE2016, Osaka, Japan
|
[27] |
Holzer D (2015). The BIM Manager’s Handbook, Part 2: Change Management. New York: John Wiley & Sons
|
[28] |
Hong Y, Sepasgozar S M, Ahmadian A F F, Akbarnezhad A (2016). Factors influencing BIM adoption in small and medium sized construction organizations. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University,
|
[29] |
Hosseini M R, Namzadi M O, Rameezdeen R, Banihashemi S, Chileshe N (2016). Barriers to BIM adoption: Perceptions from Australian small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). In: AUBEA 2016: Proceedings of the 40th Australasian Universities Building Education Association Annual Conference, Central Queensland University, 271–280
|
[30] |
Hosseini R, Pärn E, Edwards D, Papadonikolaki E, Oraee M (2018) Roadmap to mature BIM use in Australian SMEs: competitive dynamics perspective. Journal of Management Engineering, 34(5): 05018008
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[31] |
Insee (2015). The national institute of statistics and economic studies collects, analyses and disseminates information on the French economy and society, Construction sector–Companies in France. Insee References (in French), free access in Insee website
|
[32] |
Insee (2016). The national institute of statistics and economic studies collects, Decree n°2008–1354 article 3. Definition of Enterprise Categories (in French), free access in Insee website
|
[33] |
Insee (2017). The national institute of statistics and economic studies collects, analyses and disseminates information on the French economy and society, economic outlook. Insee References (in French), free access in Insee website
|
[34] |
Karlsson C (1988). Innovation adoption and the product life cycle. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Umeå: Umeå a universitet
|
[35] |
Kassem M, Succar B (2017). Macro BIM adoption: comparative market analysis. Automation in Construction, 81: 286–299
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[36] |
Klein K J, Sorra J S (1996). The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review, 21(4): 1055–1080
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[37] |
Kotter J P, Cohen D S (2002). The Heart of Change: Real-Life Stories of How People Change Their Organizations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press
|
[38] |
Kouider T, Paterson J J G (2014). Architectural technology and the BIM acronym: 2. Reviewing evolving paradigms for BIM implementation among SMEs. In: Architectural Technology, Towards Innovative Professional Practice: Conference Proceedings of the 5th International Congress of Architectural Technology, Aberdeen 2014 (ICAT2014), Robert Gordon University
|
[39] |
Laforet S (2013). Organizational innovation outcomes in SMEs: effects of age, size, and sector. Journal of World Business, 48(4): 490–502
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[40] |
Lines B C, Sullivan K T, Smithwick J B, Mischung J (2015). Overcoming resistance to change in engineering and construction: change management factors for owner organizations. International Journal of Project Management, 33(5): 1170–1179
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[41] |
Machado M, Underwood J, Fleming A J (2016). Implementing BIM to streamline a design, manufacture, and fitting workflow: a case study on a fit-out SME in the UK. International Journal of 3-D Information Modeling, 5(3): 31–46
|
[42] |
Malleson A, Kato H, Popíšilová B, Watson D, Friborg G (2016). NBS International BIM Report 2016. NBS Report
|
[43] |
McGraw Hill Construction (2010). The business value of BIM in Europe: getting building information modelling to the bottom line the United Kingdom, France and Germany
|
[44] |
McGraw Hill Construction (2014). The business value of BIM for construction in major global markets: how contractors around the world are driving innovations with Building Information Modelling. Smart Mark
|
[45] |
Mintzberg H, Westley F (1992). Cycles of organizational change. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S2): 39–59
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[46] |
Murguia S D E, Demian P, Soetanto R (2017). A systemic BIM innovation model in the construction supply chain. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ARCOM Conference, Cambridge, UK 15–24
|
[47] |
Pettigrew A M (1987). Context and action in the transformation of the firm. Journal of Management Studies, 24(6): 649–670
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[48] |
Poirier E, Staub-French S, Forgues D (2015). Embedded contexts of innovation: BIM adoption and implementation for a specialty contracting SME. Construction Innovation, 15(1): 42–65
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[49] |
PTNB (2017). Barometer-BIM in the construction sector. PTNB (in French)
|
[50] |
Rogers E M (2003). Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. New York: Simon and Schuster
|
[51] |
Sainsaulieu R, Segrestin D (1986). Towards a sociological theory of business. Sociology of Labor, 28(3): 335–352 (in French)
|
[52] |
Singh J V, House R J, Tucker D J (1986). Organizational change and organizational mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(4): 587–611
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[53] |
Smith P (2014). BIM Implementation—Global Strategies. Procedia Engineering, 85, 482–492
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[54] |
Stoneman P, Diederen P (1994). Technology diffusion and public policy. Economic Journal (London), 104(425): 918–930
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[55] |
Succar B (2009). Building information modelling framework: a research and delivery foundation for industry stakeholders. Automation in Construction , 18(3): 357–375
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[56] |
Succar B, Kassem M 2015. Macro-BIM adoption: conceptual structures. Automation in Construction, 57: 64–79
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[57] |
Tétard F, Collan M (2009). Lazy user theory: a dynamic model to understand user selection of products and services. In: 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Conferences, 1–9
|
[58] |
Turk Ž (2000). Construction IT: definition, framework and research issues. In: Fischiner M, ed. Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering on the Doorstep of the Millennium: On the Occasion of Its 80th Anniversary, 17–32
|
[59] |
Venkatesh V, Davis F D (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2): 186–204
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[60] |
Waarts E, van Everdingen Y M, van Hillegersberg J (2002). The dynamics of factors affecting the adoption of innovations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(6): 412–423
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[61] |
Waterhouse R, Parkinson K, Malleson A (2017). National BIM Report 2017. NBS Report
|
[62] |
Winch G, McDonald J (1999). SMEs in an environment of change: computer-based tools to aid learning and change management. Industrial and Commercial Training, 31(2): 49–56
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |