Usury, Market Power and Poverty Traps: A Study of Rural Credit in 1930s’ China

Zhiwu Chen, Kaixiang Peng, Weipeng Yuan

PDF(478 KB)
PDF(478 KB)
Front. Econ. China ›› 2018, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (3) : 369-396. DOI: 10.3868/s060-007-018-0019-6
Orginal Article
Orginal Article

Usury, Market Power and Poverty Traps: A Study of Rural Credit in 1930s’ China

Author information +
History +

Abstract

This paper studies the cross-regional variation of interest rates in China in the 1930s. Based on county-level data from the Buck (1941) rural surveys, we examine factors that may have influenced rural interest rates in pre-1949 China. Since the quality of institutions that define property rights and facilitate contract enforcement is important for such transactions as land tenancy arrangements, we treat land tenancy rate (or percentage of owner-farmers) as a proxy for institutional quality. Contrary to the popular belief among historians and economists that usury or high interest rates caused persistent poverty, we find that while the monopoly-exploitation hypothesis has little explanatory power, a region’s institutional quality and income level are persistent and significant determinants of interest rates. Thus, poverty is a key driver of high rates of interest. Economic growth and the development of market institutions are crucial for lowering high interest rates and combating usury.

Keywords

usury / rural credit / monopoly power / poverty trap / tenancy

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zhiwu Chen, Kaixiang Peng, Weipeng Yuan. Usury, Market Power and Poverty Traps: A Study of Rural Credit in 1930s’ China. Front. Econ. China, 2018, 13(3): 369‒396 https://doi.org/10.3868/s060-007-018-0019-6

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2018 Higher Education Press
PDF(478 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/