REVIEW

Effects of Bt transgenic crops on soil ecosystems: a review of a ten-year research in China

  • Wenke LIU
Expand
  • Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture,Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment & Climate Change, MOA, Beijing 100081, China

Received date: 25 Sep 2008

Accepted date: 26 Nov 2008

Published date: 05 Jun 2009

Copyright

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

Abstract

Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) transgenic cotton is the unique Bt transgenic crop planted on a large scale in China, and its commercialized varieties and hectareage had increased rapidly in China during the past decade (1997-2006) with broad geographic distribution for the economic, environmental, and health benefits. In 2004, the planting area of Bt transgenic cotton in China ranked first worldwide with up to 370 × 106 hm2. In addition, Bt transgenic rice varieties in field tests have been close to approval for commercialization. However, ecological risks, a complex issue of Bt transgenic crops on soil ecosystem is urgently faced in China due to more than 60 varieties transferred single or bivalent Bt genes grown under diverse geographic regions. Two main pathways, biomass incorporation and root exudates, are involved in the effects of Bt transgenic crops on soil ecosystems. In this paper, the research results in recent years in China involved in the effects of Bt transgenic crops (Bt transgenic cottons and rice) on soil ecosystems were summarized with special attentions paid to the release and persistence of Bt toxins, and the toxicology to microorganisms, as well as the change of soil biochemical properties in soils where Bt transgenic crops were planted or incubated with their biomass. In addition, the complexity and current research defaults of ecological risk evaluation of Bt transgenic crops in China were highlighted.

Cite this article

Wenke LIU . Effects of Bt transgenic crops on soil ecosystems: a review of a ten-year research in China[J]. Frontiers of Agriculture in China, 2009 , 3(2) : 190 -198 . DOI: 10.1007/s11703-009-0027-9

1
Angle J S (1994). Release of transgenic plants: biodiversity and population-level considerations. Molecular Ecology, 3: 45-50

DOI

2
Bai Y Y, Jiang M X, Cheng J A (2007). Impacts of environmental factors on degradation of Cry1Ab insecticial protein in leaf-blade powders of transgenic Bt rice. Agricultural Sciences in China, 6(2): 167-174 (in Chinese)

DOI

3
Bai Y Y, Jiang M X, Cheng J A, Shen H M, Yang P, Chen Z X, Jiang Y H, Shu Q Y (2004). Degradation of Cry1Ab toxin protein expressed by Bt transgenic rice in paddy soils. Chinese J Rice Science, 18(3): 255-261 (in Chinese)

4
Brookes G, Barfoot P (2006). Global impact of biotech crops: socio-economic and environmental effects in the first ten years of commercial use. AgBioForum, 9(3): 139-151

5
Bruinsma M, Kowalchuk G A, van Veen J A (2003). Effects of genetically modified plants on microbial communities and processes in soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 37: 329-337

6
Bruns H A, Abel C A (2003). Nitrogen fertility effects on Bt-andotoxin and nitrogen concentrations of maize during early growth. Agron J, 95: 207-211

7
Castaldini M, Turrini A, Sbrana C, Benedetti A, Marchionni M, Fabiani A, Landi S, Santomassimo F, Pietrangeli B, Nuti M P, Miclaus N, Giovannetti M (2005). Impact of Bt maize on rhizospheric and soil eubacterial communities and on beneficial mycorrhizal symbiosis in experimental microcosms. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 71: 6719-6729

DOI

8
Crecchio C, Stotzky G (1998). Insecticidal activity and biodegradation of the toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki bound to humic acids from soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 30: 463-470

DOI

9
Crecchio C, Stotzky G (2001). Biodegradation and insecticidal activity of the toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki bound to complexes of montmorillonite-humic acids-Al hydroxypolymers. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 33: 573-581

DOI

10
Cui J J, Xia J Y (1999). Studies on the resistance dynamic of the Bt transgenic cotton on cotton bollworm. Acta Gossypii Sinica, 11: 141-146 (in Chinese)

11
Donegan K K, Palm C J, Fieland V J (1995). Changes in levels, species, and DNA fingerprints of soil microorganism associated with cotton expressing the Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki endotoxin. Applied Soil Ecology, 2(2): 111-124

DOI

12
Donegan K K, Seidler R J, Doyle J D, Porteous L A, Digiovanni G, Widmer F, Watrud L S (1999). A field study with genetically engineered alfalfa inoculated with recombinant Sinorhizobium meloloti: Effects on soil ecosystems. J Applied Ecol, 36: 920-936

DOI

13
Dong Z Q, Zhao M, Shu W H, Zhang B M, Hao H J (2006). The subcellular localization of the Bt crystal protein in transgenic Bt cotton cell. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 32(12): 1924-1926 (in Chinese)

14
Escher N, Kach B, Nentwig W (2000). Decomposition of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis maize by microorganisms and woodlice Porcello scaber (Crustacea:Isopoda). Bas Appl Ecol, 1, 161-169

DOI

15
Ferry N, Edwards M G, Gatehouse J, Capell T, Christou P, Gatehouse A M R (2006). Transgenic plants for insect pest control: a forward looking scientific perspective. Transgenic Research, 15: 13-19

DOI

16
Firbank L, Lonsdale M, Poppy G (2005). Reassessing the environmental risks of GM crops. Nature Biotechnology, 12: 1475-1476

DOI

17
Flores S, Saxena D, Stotzky G (2005). Transgenic Bt plants decompose less in soil than non-Bt plants. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 37: 1073-1082

DOI

18
Grayston S J, Wang S, Campbell C D (1998). Selective influence of plant species on microbial diversity in the rhizosphere. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 30: 369-378

DOI

19
Hails R S (2000). Genetically modified plants—the debate continues. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 15: 14-18

DOI

20
Heritage J (2004). The fate of transgenes in the human gut. Nature Biotechnology, 22: 170-173

DOI

21
Hilbeck A, Moar,W J, Pusztai-Carey M, Filippini A, Bigler F (1998). Toxicity of Bacillus thuringensis Cry1Ab toxin to the predator Chrysoperla carnea. Environmental Entomology, 27: 1255-1263

22
Huang J K, Hu F R, Pray C, Qiao F B, Rozelle S (2003). Biotechnology as an alternative to chemical pesticides: a case study of Bt cotton in China. Agricultural Economics, 29: 55-67

DOI

23
Huang J K, Rozelle S, Pray C, Wang Q F (2002). Plant biotechnology in China. Nature, 295: 674-676

24
Jepson, P C, Croft, B A, Pratt, G E (1994). Test systems to determine the ecological risks posed by toxin release from Bacillus thuringiensis genes in crop plants. Molecular Ecology, 3: 81-89

DOI

25
Li Y H, Zhang Y J, Wu K M, Yuan G H, Guo Y Y (2005). Degradation dynamics of Cry1Ac insecticidal protein in leaves of Bt cotton under different environments. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 38(4): 714-718 (in Chinese)

26
Liu B, Zeng Q W, Yan F M, Xu H G, Xu C R (2005). Effects of transgenic plants on soil microorganisms. Plant and Soil, 271: 1-13

DOI

27
Liu W K, Du L F (2007). Effects of P fertilization on growth of Bt transgenic cotton seedlings. China Cotton, (8): 14-15 (in Chinese)

28
Liu W K, Du L F (2008). Interactions between Bt transgenic crops and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: a new urgent soil ecology issue in agro-ecosystems. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B-Plant Soil Science, 58(2): 187-192

29
Losey J E, Rayor L S, Carter M E (1999). Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae. Nature, 399: 214

DOI

30
Netherwood T, Matin-Orue S M, O’Donnell A G (2004). Assessing the survival of transgenic plant DNA in the human gastrointestinal tract. Nature Biotechnology, 22: 204-209

DOI

31
Palm C J, Schaller D L, Donegan K K, Seidler R J (1996). Persistence in soil of transgenic plant produced Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki δ-endotoxin. Canadian J Microbiology, 42: 1258-1262

32
Rui Y K (2005). Dynamics of Bt toxin and plant hormones in rhizosphere system of transgenic insecticidal cotton (Gossy posium L.). Letters in Biotechnology, 16(5): 515-517 (in Chinese)

33
Rui Y K, Yi G X, Guo J, Guo X, Luo Y B, Wang B M, Li Z H (2007). Transgenic cotton could safely be grown since CpTI toxin rapidly degrades in the rhizosphere soil. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B-Plant Soil Science, 57(2): 122-125

34
Rui Y K, Yi G X, Zhao J, Wang B M, Li Z H, Zhai Z X, He Z P, Li Q X (2005). Changes of Bt toxin in the rhizosphere of transgenic Bt cotton and its influence on soil functional bacteria. World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 21: 1279-1284

DOI

35
Sachs E S, Benedict J H, Stelly D M, Taylor J F, Altman D W, Berberich S A, Davis S K (1998). Expression and segregation of genes encoding CryIA insecticidal proteins in cotton. Crop Science, 38: 1-11

36
Saxena D, Flores S, Stotzky G (1999). Insecticidal toxin in root exudates from Bt corn. Nature, 402: 480

37
Saxena D, Stotzky G (2000). Insecticidal toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis is released from roots of transgenic Bt corn in vitro and in situ. FEMS Microbiological Ecology, 33: 35-39

DOI

38
Saxena D, Stotzky G (2001a). Bacillus thuringiensis toxin released from root exudates and biomass of Bt corn has no apparent effect on earthworms, nematodes, protozoa, bacteria, and fungi in soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 33: 1225-1230

DOI

39
Saxena D, Stotzky G (2001b). Bt corn has a higher lignin content than non-Bt corn. Am J Bot, 88: 1704-1706

DOI

40
Saxena D, Stotzky G (2001c). Bt toxin uptake from soil by plants. Nature Biotechnology, 19: 199

DOI

41
Saxena D, Stotzky G (2002). Bt toxin is not taken up from soil or hydroponic by maize, radish, or turnip. Plant and Soil, 239: 165-172

DOI

42
Shen R F, Cai H, Gong W H (2006). Transgenic Bt cotton has no apparent effect on enzymatic activities or functional diversity of microbial communities in rhizosphere soil. Plant and Soil, 285: 149-159

DOI

43
Sims S R, Holden L R (1996). Insect bioassay for determining soil degradation of Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki CryIA (b) protein in corn tissues. Environ Entomology, 25: 659-664

44
Sims S R, Ream J E (1997). Soil inactivation of the Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki CryIIA insecticidal protein within transgenic cotton tissue: laboratory microcosm and field studies. Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry, 45: 1502-1505

DOI

45
Snow A, Palma P M (1997). Commercialization of transgenic plants: potential ecological risks. BioScience, 47: 86-96

DOI

46
Stotzky G (2000). Persistence and biological activity in soil of insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis and of bacterial DNA bound on clays and humic acids. J Environmental Quality, 29: 691-705

47
Sun C X, Chen L J, Wu Z J (2005). Bt toxin distribution in transgenic Bt cotton and soil system. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 16(9): 1765-1768 (in Chinese)

48
Sun C X, Chen L J, Wu Z J, Wu Q, Chen C R (2004). Photosynthetic characters and Bt toxin content of different transgenic Bt cotton. Chinese J of Applied Ecology, 15(10): 1878-1882 (in Chinese)

49
Sun C X, Chen L J, Wu Z J, Zhou L K (2007a). Soil persistence of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) toxin from transgenic Bt cotton tissues and its effect on soil enzyme activities. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 43: 617-620

DOI

50
Sun C X, Zhang L L,Wu Q, Miao L, Wang G W, Li S J (2007b). Nitrogen metabolism of transgenic Bt cotton and transgenic Bt CpTI cotton at seedling stage. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 26(2): 187-191 (in Chinese)

51
Tabashnik B E (1994). Evolution of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis. Annual Review of Entomology, 39: 47-49

DOI

52
Tapp H, Stotzky G (1995). Insecticidal activity of the toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis subspecies kurstaki and tenebrionis adsorbed and bound on pure and soil clays. Appl Environ Microbiol, 61(5): 1786-1790

53
Tapp H, Stotzky G (1998). Persistence of the insecticidal toxin from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki in soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 30: 471-476

DOI

54
Traore S B, Carlson R E, Pilcher C D (2000). Bt and non-Bt maize growth and development as affected by temperature and drought stress. Agron J, 92: 1027-1035

55
Turrini A, Sbrana C, Nuti M P, Pietrangeli B M, Giovannetti M (2005). Development of a model system to assess the impact of genetically modified maize and aubergine plants on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Plant and Soil, 1(2): 69-75

DOI

56
Wang H Y, Ye Q F, Wang W, Wu L C, Wu W X (2006). Cry1Ab protein from Bt transgenic rice does not residue in rhizosphere soil. Environmental Pollution, 143: 449-455

DOI

57
Wang Y Q, Johnston S (2007). The status of GM rice R&D in China. Nature Biotechnology, 25(7): 717-718

DOI

58
Watrud L S, Seidler R J, Huang P M, Adriano D C, Logan T J, Checkai R T (1998). Nontarget ecological effects of plant, microbial and chemical introductions to terrestrial system. In: Huang P M, ed. Soil Chemistry and Ecosystem Health. Madison, Special Publication, Vol 52. Wisconsin: Soil Science Society of America, 313-340

59
Wolfenbarger L L, Phifer P R (2000). The ecological risks and benefits of genetically engineered plants. Science, 290: 2088-2093

DOI

60
Wu L C, Li X F, Ye Q F, Wang H Y (2004). Expression and root exudation of Cry1Ab toxin protein in cry1Ab transgenic rice and its residue in rhizosphere soil. Environmental Science, 25(5): 116-121

61
Wu W X, Ye Q F, Min H (2004a). Effect of straws from Bt-transgenic rice on selected biological activities in water-flooded soil. European Journal of Soil Biology, 40: 15-22

DOI

62
Wu W X, Ye Q F, Min H, Duan X J, Jin W M (2004b). Bt-transgenic rice straw affects the culturable microbiota and dehydrogenase and phosphatase activities in a flooded paddy soil. Soil Biol Biochem, 36: 289-295

DOI

63
Zhang B H, Liu F, Yao C B, Wang K B (2000). Recent progress in cotton biotechnology and genetic engineering in China. Current Science, 79(1): 37-44

64
Zhang B H, Wang Q L (2001). Bt-cotton in China. Current Science, 81(4): 332-333

65
Zhang L L, Wu Z J, Chen L J, Sun C X (2006). Effects of transgenic cotton planting on soil hydrolase activity. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 25(11): 1348-1351 (in Chinese)

Outlines

/