Frontiers of Agriculture in China >
A proteomic approach to investigating the promotive effects of brassinolide on root growth of rice seedlings
Received date: 11 Jun 2010
Accepted date: 23 Nov 2010
Published date: 05 Jun 2011
Copyright
Brassinolide influenced rice (Oryza sativa L.) root growth in a concentration-dependent manner. Roots grown in 0.1 nmol/L BL were 28% longer than those in the control. On the other hand, the roots grown in 1000 nmol/L BL were 65% shorter in comparison with those in the control. To investigate how BL influences rice root growth, proteome analysis techniques were applied. After BL treatments, total proteins from rice root were extracted separately. Extracted proteins were separated by two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and analyzed using an automated protein sequencer and mass spectrometer. There were 33 proteins that showed differences in the accumulation levels as a result of treatments with BL. Proteins related to stress tolerance, enzymes, and cell structure were mainly found in the root. There were many proteins regulated by other hormone or light also. Results suggest that the physiologic functions of these proteins detected using powerful proteome analysis are implicated in root elongation triggered by BL. High-level brassinosteriod (BR) indicated that IAA amidohydrolase, which can release active IAA from IAA pool was increased, and the IAA level was so high that the root length was inhibited.
Key words: rice; proteomics; brassinolide; root growth
Shenghui LI , Fengru WANG , Jingao DONG . A proteomic approach to investigating the promotive effects of brassinolide on root growth of rice seedlings[J]. Frontiers of Agriculture in China, 2011 , 5(2) : 146 -151 . DOI: 10.1007/s11703-011-1081-7
1 |
Bartel B (1997). Auxin biosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol, 48(1): 51–66
|
2 |
Chou J C, Kuleck G A, Cohen J D, Mulbry W W (1996). Partial purification and characterization of an inducible indole-3- acetyl-L-aspartic acid hydrolase from Enterobacter agglomerans. Plant Physiol, 112(3): 1281–1287
|
3 |
Cohen J D, Bandurski R S (1982). Chemistry and physiology of the bound auxins. Annu Rev Plant Physiol, 33(1): 403–430
|
4 |
Davies P J (1995). Plant Hormones. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers
|
5 |
Feung C S, Hamilton R H, Mumma R O (1977). Metabolism of indole-3-acetic acid: IV. Biological Properties of Amino Acid Conjugates. Plant Physiol, 59(1): 91–93
|
6 |
Hall P J, Bandurski R S (1986). [3H]Indole-3-acetyl-myo-inositol hydrolysis by extracts of Zea mays L. vegetative tissue. Plant Physiol, 80(2): 374–377
|
7 |
Hangarter R P, Peterson M D, Good N E (1980). Biological activities of indoleacetylamino acids and their use as auxins in tissue culture. Plant Physiol, 65(5): 761–767
|
8 |
Kowalczyk S, Bandurski R S (1990). Isomerization of 1-O-indol-3-ylacetyl-beta-D-glucose. Enzymatic hydrolysis of 1-O, 4-O, and 6-O-indol-3-ylacetyl-beta-D-glucose and the enzymatic synthesis of indole-3-acetyl glycerol by a hormone metabolizing complex. Plant Physiol, 94(1): 4–12
|
9 |
Li L, Xu J, Xu Z H, Xue H W (2005). Brassinosteroids stimulate plant tropisms through modulation of polar auxin transport in Brassica and Arabidopsis. Plant Cell, 17(10): 2738–2753
|
10 |
Ludwig-Müller J, Epstein E, Hilgenberg W (1996). Auxinconjugate hydrolysis in Chinese cabbage: Characterization of an amidohydrolase and its role during infection with clubroot disease. Physiologia Plantarum, 97(4): 627–634
|
11 |
Mandava N B (1988). Plant growth-promoting brassinosteriods. Annu Rev Plant Physiol. Plant Mol Biol, 39(1): 23–52
|
12 |
Normanly J (1997). Auxin metabolism. Physiologia Plantarum, 100(3): 431–442
|
13 |
Pandey A, Mann M (2000). Proteomics to study genes and genomes. Nature, 405(6788): 837–846
|
14 |
Šoškić M, Klaić B, MagnusV, Sabljić A (1995). Quantitative structure–activity relationships for N-(indol-3-ylacetyl) amino acids used as sources of auxin in plant tissue culture. Plant Growth Regul, 16(2): 141–152
|
15 |
Sztein A E, Cohen J D, Slovin J P, Cooke T J (1995). Auxin metabolism in representative land plants. American Journal of Botany, 82(12): 1514–1521
|
16 |
van Wijk K J (2001). Challenges and prospects of plant proteomics. Plant Physiol, 126(2): 501–508
|
/
〈 | 〉 |