Analysis on water requirement and water-saving amount of wheat and corn in typical regions of the North China Plain

Lihua LV , Huijun WANG , Xiuling JIA , Zhimin WANG

Front. Agric. China ›› 2011, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (4) : 556 -562.

PDF (111KB)
Front. Agric. China ›› 2011, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (4) : 556 -562. DOI: 10.1007/s11703-011-1149-4
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Analysis on water requirement and water-saving amount of wheat and corn in typical regions of the North China Plain

Author information +
History +
PDF (111KB)

Abstract

This paper studied the variation characters on wheat and corn water consumption and irrigation water-saving amount under different water conditions (ample irrigation level, farmers conventional irrigation level and optimizing irrigation level). The water use efficiency and water saving potential of optimizing treatment and farmers’ conventional irrigation treatment were analyzed respectively. The objective of this study was to provide theoretical supporting for popularization and application of optimizing irrigation measures. Crop water requirement under sufficient water supply was calculated by Penman equation. We obtained crop water consumption under conventional treatment and optimizing treatment by field experiment. The main results showed that the irrigation amount of wheat and corn was too much under farmers’ conventional irrigation level and basically satisfied their water requirement, therefore, the water-saving amount was smaller while water-saving potential was bigger compared with the optimizing irrigation treatment. The grain yield under optimizing irrigation treatment was improved or appreciably reduced compared with that under conventional irrigation treatment, while the water consumption and irrigation amount of optimizing irrigation treatment was lower, with a higher water use efficiency. Therefore, the optimizing irrigation treatment could achieve a stable yield and high water efficiency at the same time. Moreover, when the optimizing irrigation measure was adopted, the grain yield reached 5940 kg/hm2, water-saving amount reached 91mm for winter wheat, and the grain yield reached 7743 kg/hm2, with water-saving amount of 49 mm for summer corn in the piedmont region of Taihang Mount. The grain yield got 7710 kg/hm2, with water-saving amount of 20 mm for winter wheat in Heilonggang Plain. Therefore, the water-saving amount in the piedmont region of Taihang Mountain was obviously higher than that in Heilonggang Plain. Thus, the piedmont region of Taihang Mountain in the North China Plain is viewed as the key district for water-saving.

Keywords

winter wheat / summer corn / water requirement / water-saving amount

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Lihua LV, Huijun WANG, Xiuling JIA, Zhimin WANG. Analysis on water requirement and water-saving amount of wheat and corn in typical regions of the North China Plain. Front. Agric. China, 2011, 5(4): 556-562 DOI:10.1007/s11703-011-1149-4

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Introduction

Winter wheat and summer corn are two most important crops in North China Plain (NCP), where 70% of the arable land is under double cropping system of winter wheat and summer corn. Wheat and corn are also high water-demonding crops, especially for wheat. In Hebei Province of NCP, the irrigation amount was about 3000 m3/hm2 for winter wheat and about 1200 m3/hm2 for summer corn (Liu et al., 2004), and water use efficiency (WUE) was only 1.38 kg/m3 for wheat and corn (Wang, 2010). The NCP highly depends on over exploitation of groundwater to satisfy the water use of agricultural and economic development, and over 70% of groundwater is used for irrigation. According to statistic data, the amount of groundwater exploitation increases along with yield increase of wheat and corn. Crop rotation system of winter wheat and summer corn is the main reason for the over extraction of ground water. In Taihang Mount-foot Plain of NCP, the ground water decreases rapidly (Zhang et al., 2003a). Water shortage has become the key limiting factor of sustainable agriculture development in the region. Therefore, the research and application of water saving measures in order to reduce irrigation rate and water consumption for winter wheat and summer corn will be particularly important. Many researches have been conducted in water consumption of wheat and corn (Mao et al., 1995; Wu et al., 1998; Li et al., 1999; Chen et al., 2007). Zhang et al. (2003b) concluded that in the cropping system of winter wheat and corn in Taihang Mountain areas, water requirement for whole growing season of winter wheat was 375 mm, while the average rainfall in Shijazhuang City was only 130 mm, with a shortage of 240 mm, thus large amount of irrigation was required. Water requirement for whole summer corn growing season was 365 mm, while rainfall during the same period of time was 276 mm, with a shortage of 89 mm, and therefore, controlled irrigation was required. However, there is a tendency that in NCP the rainfall will be decreasing further (Huang et al., 1999; Liu et al., 2002), and Hu (2005) proved that 100 mm precipitation reduction would cause 0.37 m groundwater dropdown. Because of the frequent droughts, water consumption and irrigation rate will be needed by wheat and corn. Under such a circumstance of decreasing rainfall and increasing water consumption and irrigation rate, the piedmont region of Taihang Mountain and Heilonggang Plain were studied, which are seriously overexploited in groundwater. In this paper, the temporal and spatial change of crop water requirement and water saving irrigation under different water conditions, as well as the advantages of optimizing irrigation system of winter wheat and summer corn in different regions were investigated and studied. The objective of this study was to provide theoretical supporting for popularization and application of optimizing irrigation measures.

Materials and methods

Data source

Data of winter wheat and summer corn were from the Center for Agricultural Resources Research, Institute of Genetic and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and China Agricultural University. Meteorological data were provided by the Meteorological Bureau of Hebei Province.

Research basis

The experiment was conducted at Luancheng Experimental Station of the Agriculture Resource Centre and Wuqiao Experimental Station of China Agricultural University. Luancheng Experimental Station is situated at the altitude of 50 m above sea level in the Taihang piedmont plain in the middle of NCP (37°53′N, 114°41′E), where wheat and summer corn cropping system is implemented with a loamy soil with a deep profile, soil organic matter of 1.7 g/kg, total N of 1.11 g/kg, and available N, P and K of 80, 21 and 120 mg/kg, respectively, for the top tillage soil layer. The Wuqiao Experimental Station at the altitude of 14–22 m above sea level, is located in the Heilonggang region of the NCP (37°41′02″N, 116°37′23″E), where winter wheat and summer corn cropping system was practiced with a saline flavo-aquic soil, 1.0 g/kg soil organic matter, 0.9 g/kg total N, and available P and K of 23 and 45 mg/kg, respectively, for the top tillage soil layer.

Based on the research results of the two experimental stations, optimizing irrigation systems have been developed for both Taihang piedmont plain and Heilonggang plain under sufficient soil moisture condition before seeding (Table 1). These irrigation systems produced a higher yield and maintained a high level of water using efficiency (WUE).

Trial arrangements

At the piedmont area, according to farmer’s conventional practice, the treatment of conventional irrigation was set up as check and the treatment with optimizing irrigation was set up under sufficient soil moisture condition before seeding (Table 2). Winter wheat irrigation experiment was conducted from 2001 to 2003, with a plot area of 40-50 m2 and 4 duplicates each. Summer corn irrigation experiment was conducted from 1999 to 2001, treatments of conventional irrigation and optimizing irrigation were set up under sufficient soil moisture condition before seeding, with a plot area of 40 m2 with 4 duplicates each. Winter wheat and maize varieties were “4185” and “Zhengdan958”, respectively. Fertilizers were the same for all treatments. Chemical fertilizers were applied before cultivation of winter wheat at a base rate of 145 kg/hm2 for N, 108 kg/hm2 for P2O5 and 66 kg/hm2 for K. Nitrogen was applied again at the jointing stage at a rate of 107 kg/hm2. In the middle of July, maize was fertilized with N at a rate of 180 kg/hm2. Winter wheat was harvested on the 10th of June. Wheat straw was evenly mulched on the corn field at rate of 8250 kg/hm2. Corn was interplanted in the wheat field in early June at the density of 7.5 plants/m2. Corn was harvested on 22nd–24th of September. A two-meter deep neutron probe was installed in each plot. IH-II neutron probe was used to measure soil moisture at different layer every week.

At Heilonggang plain, according to farmer’s conventional practice, the treatment of conventional irrigation was set up as check and the treatment with optimizing irrigation was set up under sufficient soil moisture condition before seeding (Table 3). Experiment was conducted from 2007 to 2008, with a plot area of 50 m2 and three duplicates each. Winter wheat variety was “Shijiazhuang 8”. Chemical fertilizers were applied before cultivation at a base rate of 158 kg/hm2 for N, 138 kg/hm2 for P2O5 and 101 kg/hm2 for K. Winter wheat was a typical late-seeding crop in the region, and seeded on October 19th and harvested on June 10th next year.

Methods

Potential ET (ETp)

The crop water requirement was calculated by the Penmen-Monteith method under ample water condition, sufficient fertilizer supply and without insects and diseases. Theoretically, it is not the ecological water requirement which maintains crop growth without leaf wilt.
ETp=ET0×Kc,
ET0 is the reference evapotranspiration, and was estimated using FAO Penman–Monteith (Allen et al., 1998) equation, which was recommended using the FAO. Kc is the crop coefficient derived from Chen et al. (1995).

Soil water balance

Total water use or evapotranspiration (ET) was calculated using the soil water balance equation for the growing season as follows:
ET=P+I+ΔW-R-D+CR,
where ET is the total water use during a certain growing period, P = precipitation, I = irrigation, ΔW = soil water content at sowing minus the soil water contents at the harvesting for the 2 m root zone, R = runoff, D = drainage from the root zone and CR = capillary rise to the root zone. When the groundwater table is lower than 4 m below the ground surface, the capillary rising of groundwater is negligible (Liu and Wei, 1989). The runoff is also ignored because there usually is no runoff in the NCP.

Water use efficiency(WUE)

Crop water use efficiency was calculated as follows:
WUE=GY/ET,
where WUE is the water use efficiency of ET calculated from Eq. (2) for the grain yield (kg/m3), and GY is the grain yield.

Results

The balance of water requirement and natural rainfall

The balance between crop water requirement and natural rainfall is mainly judged by water deficit amount. The deficit is the difference between crop water requirement (ETp) and natural rainfall of the same period. In this study, winter wheat water requirement for the whole growing season in different types of rainfall year from 1980 to 1999 at 13 counties in NCP were analyzed (Table 4). The results showed that there was no significant difference among the 3 types of rainfall year between Taihang piedmont plain and Heilonggang plain. The water requirement of winter wheat for the two regions was similar. The wheat water requirement of different year type was in the following sequence: drought year>normal year>wet year.

Rainfall during winter wheat growing season in Taihang piedmont area was higher than that in Heilonggang area, indicating that the Taihang piedmont area was relatively richer in water resources than the Heilonggang area. In the three year-types, rainfall during the wheat growing season was significantly lower than water requirement of winter wheat, especially in drought year and normal year. Because of small rainfall, large amount of irrigation was required.

It was obvious that as drought year occured more frequently, the irrigation for winter wheat increased significantly, which produced an increasing pressure on ground water resources.

The water deficit in piedmont plain during wheat growing season was lower than that in Heilonggang region in all the three year-types, indicating that the deficit in Heilonggang region was larger and more irrigation was required. In addition, the water deficit in three different year-types was all positive, indicating that the water requirement of wheat significantly exceeded the rainfall of the same period, thus supplementary irrigation was needed, even in the wet year. The water deficit of Heilonggang and Taihang piedmont regions in the dry year, normal year and wet year were 403 mm, 361 mm and 276 mm, respectively. Based on the calculation in 70 mm per irrigation, 5-6 times of irrigation in drought year, 4-5 times of irrigations in normal year and 3-4 times of irrigations in wet year were required during the whole growing season when soil water supply was ignored.

Table 5 shows that the water requirement of corn in Heilonggang plain was remarkably higher than that in Taihang piedmont plain in the three different year types. The corn water requirement of the two regions was 496 mm and 480 mm, respectively. The gap between the two regions was bigger in corn than that in wheat. The corn water requirement in different year-types was in the sequence of drought year>normal year>wet year. This indicated that in the dryer region and dryer year, more irrigation was needed.

Rainfall during the corn growing season in the piedmont region was higher than that in Heilonggang region. Except for the wet year, neither of the other two year-types could meet corn water requirement. In the drought year, both of the two regions needed irrigation, while in normal years, controlled irrigation was needed. In wet year, the rainfall in both of two regions was higher than the water requirement of corn, thus no irrigation was required. Water conservation should be the main practice.

Water deficit in Heilonggang region was bigger than that in the piedmont region for both wheat and corn. During the corn growing season, water deficit in Heilonggang and piedmont regions was 199 mm in drought year, 60 mm in normal year and -59 mm in wet year. Based on the calculation in 70 mm per irrigation, 3 times of irrigation in drought year, once irrigation in each normal year, and no irrigation were required in a wet year during the corn growing season when soil water supply was ignored.

Water consumption and water saving of winter wheat and summer corn in Taihang piedmont region

In the normal year of 2001 to 2002, water deficit was 387 mm and thus the conventional irrigation needed 5 times of irrigation to meet the water requirement of wheat with ignoring soil water supply. In our study, irrigation was supplied 3 times for the conventional treatment (Table 6). Water consumption in the conventional treatment was 3.0% lower than that of ample water supply condition, and in practice, the irrigation rate during wheat growing season basically met its requirement. The optimizing irrigation treatment required less irrigation with small water consumption, however, it produced a higher yield and higher WUE. The water consumption in optimizing treatment was 21.5% lower than that in conventional treatment, while the yield and WUE were 2.4% and 31.0% higher respectively than those in the conventional treatment. For the optimizing irrigation treatment, reducing once irrigation than the conventional treatment, saving water of 102 mm, achieving a high yield, and high water efficiency at same time.

The wet year of 2002 to 2003, the water deficit of 276 mm and 4 times of irrigation based on the traditional irrigation rate, if ignoring soil water supply. In this study, irrigation was twice applied for the conventional treatment, water consumption was 20.6% lower than that in the ample water treatment, saving 92 mm. The optimizing irrigation treatment required even less irrigation (no flowering irrigation) than conventional treatment, however it produced a higher yield and higher WUE mainly due to the increase in the mobilization of assimilate stored in vegetative tissues to grains by moderate water deficit during grain filling, resulting in greater grain yield and WUE, which was in agreement with the findings of Zhang et al. (2008). Water consumption of the optimizing irrigation was 22.8% lower than that of conventional treatment, however, the yield and WUE were 1.6% and 23.8% higher than those of conventional treatment, saving water by 80 mm more than the conventional treatment. The above results indicated that, from 2002 to 2003, the water consumption of the conventional treatment was much smaller than the ample water treatment, but higher than that of optimizing treatment. The conventional treatment required more irrigation which was a waste of water resource. Optimizing irrigation had an obvious water-saving effect, only once irrigation was enough to produce high yield. Therefore, the pressure of irrigation on water resource could be mitigated in a certain degree by application of suitable water saving irrigation technologies.

There were many cloudy days in April and May in the year from 2002 to 2003, and the total water consumption and yield were lower than those in the year from 2001 to 2002, which revealed that in the rainy season, more irrigation did not bring yield-increasing effect, while limited irrigation was the most effective practice to maintain a higher yield and higher WUE.

Table 7 showes that the water deficit in drought years was 184 mm, which required 3 times of irrigation to meet the water requirement of corn when soil water supply was ignored, based on the calculation by conventional irrigation rate. In this study, the conventional treatment required 3–4 times of irrigation, and find that the water requirement was only reduced by 4.8% lower than that of adequate water supply condition. High irrigation amount could basically meet the water requirement but reduce the amount of water saved. Optimizing treatment consumed less water and the water consumption was 11.9% lower than that of the conventional treatment. Because the field water consumption with the maximum WUE is always lower than the field water consumption at the highest yield, therefore, to evaluate the irrigation system, WUE should be given more consideration, especially in severe water shortage regions. In our experiment, conventional treatment produced 7.2% higher yield than the optimizing treatment, but the WUE was 5.1% lower. Therefore, in view of sustainable agriculture, the optimizing irrigation had a better result. Although the yield was slightly lower, the WUE was higher, which saved 49 mm of water than the conventional treatment.

Water consumption and water saving of winter wheat and summer corn in Heilonggang plain

In wet year, the water deficit under ample water supply was 305 mm. Calculated in conventional irrigation rate, 4 times of irrigation was required if ignoring soil water supply. In this study, twice irrigation was conducted for the conventional treatment. From Table 8, it can be seen that the conventional treatment water requirement was 9.3% lower than that of ample water supply condition and 4.9% higher than that of optimizing irrigation treatment, indicating that in the field condition water supply was less than wheat water requirement, but higher than that of optimizing irrigation treatment and reduced the amount of water saved. Optimizing irrigation treatment reduced once irrigation compared to the conventional treatment, saving water by 20 mm. With the increasing of water supply, the yield was also increased, but the yield increasing effect was not obvious. The yield of the optimizing treatment was only 3.5% lower than that of conventional treatment, indicating that controlled irrigation in spring would not have negative effects on yield. The optimizing irrigation had a better WUE, reaching 2.0 kg/m3, with 5.3% increasing than conventional treatment. The above results showed that the optimizing irrigation treatment reduced once irrigation, and increased WUE and maintain almost the same yield. It can be clearly seen that appropriate irrigation can maintain high yields and water saving.

Discussion and conclusion

Zhang et al. (2003a; 2006; 2008) and Liu et al. (2002) studied the effects of water conditions on wheat yield and WUE in the Taihang piedmont region and suggested that 250-420 mm water supply in the wheat growing season could maintain a high yield and high WUE, which was in agreement with our experiment. Besides, according to the previous study, considering situation of severe water shortage in NCP, both yield and WUE were supposed to be important factors in the evaluation of irrigation system. Compared with farmer’s traditional irrigation method, the optimizing irrigation either increased the yield or slightly reduced the yield, but had a higher WUE. With less water consumption, it required less supplementary irrigation, therefore, it was an effective technique to achieve high yield, water saving and high efficiency at same time.

In Heilonggang and piedmont plains, high irrigation rate was needed in the conventional treatment for both wheat and corn, which basically met the water requirement. Compared with optimizing irrigation, the conventional irrigation had a larger capacity of saving water. In Heilonggang plain, the optimizing irrigation could save once irrigation for wheat in the wet year compared with conventional irrigation, yielding 7710 kg/hm2, and saving water by 20 mm, while in Taihang piedmont plain, the optimizing irrigation could reduce 1-2 times irrigation. with a yield of 6615 kg/hm2, 5265 kg/hm2 and 7743 kg/hm2 for wheat and water saving by 102 mm, 80 mm and 49 mm in normal year, wet year, and drought year respectively. If the optimizing irrigation system is widely extended in Heilonggang plain and piedmont plain of Hebei Province, 201 million m3 water in the Heilonggang plain for wheat, and 1599 billion m3 water in the Taihang piedmont plain for wheat and corn can be saved. The water-saving effect of the optimizing irrigation system will be of great significance to the mitigation of water crisis in NCP.

With the optimizing irrigation technique, the water-saving effect in the Taihang piedmont region was significantly higher than that in the Heilonggang plain, indicating that farmer’s irrigation rate in the piedmont plain was too high, which may result in a large amount of water waste. Therefore, it can be concluded that the Taihang piedmont plain, as the key area for reducing irrigation rate in NCP, has a great potential of water saving.

References

[1]

Allen R G, Pereira L S and Raes D S (1998). Crop Evapotranspiration Guidelines for Estimating Crop Water Requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper, No.56, FAO Rome.300

[2]

Chen S Y, Zhang X Y, Pei D, Sun H Y, Chen S L (2007). Effects of straw mulching on soil temperature, evaporation and yield of winter wheat: field experiments on the North China Plain. Annals of Applied Biology, 150(3): 261-268

[3]

Chen Y M, Guo G S, Wang G X, Kang S Z, Luo H B, Zhang D Z (1995). Water Requirement and Irrigation for Main Crops in China. Beijing: Water Resource and Hydropower Press, 77, 87 (in Chinese)

[4]

Hu C S, Zhang X Y, Cheng Y S, Pei D (2005). An analysis on dynamics of water table and overdraft of groundwater in the piedmont of Mt.Taihang. System Sciences and Comprehensive Studies in Agriculture, 18(2): 89-91 (in Chinese)

[5]

Huang R H, Xu Y H, Zhou L T (1999). Fluctuation of summer rainfall in China and the tendency of drought in North-China. Plateau Meteorology, 18(4): 465-476 (in Chinese)

[6]

Li J M, Wang P, Zhou D X, Lan L W (1999). Effects of irrigation system on the water consumption and the yield of winter wheat. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 7(4): 23-26 (in Chinese)

[7]

Liu C M, Wei Z Y (1989). Agricultural Hydrology and Water Resources in the North China Plain. Beijing: Chinese Scientific Press, 108 (in Chinese)

[8]

Liu C M, Zhang X Y, Zhang Y Q (2002). Determination of daily evaporation and evapotranspiration of winter wheat and maize by large-scale weighing lysimeter and micro-lysimeter. Agric Meteorol, 111(2): 109-120

[9]

Liu C S, Chen X, Qiao J H (2004). Investigation of farms water use condition in well irrigation area of north China. Water Resources Development Research, 10: 38-40 (in Chinese)

[10]

Mao R H, Yan J F (1995). Soil moisture dynamics in winter wheat fields and soil moisture balance in farmlands in the rainfed area on Weibei rainfed highland. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 13(4): 52-57 (in Chinese)

[11]

Wang H J (2010). Research of Grains Comprehensive Productivity in Hebei Province. Shijiazhuang: Science And Technology Press of Hebei, 110 (in Chinese)

[12]

Wu K, Xie X Q, Liu E M (1998). Schedules and managements of irrigation in the high yielding cultivation of winter wheat and summer maize in Yucheng City of Shandong Province. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 14(2): 150-154 (in Chinese)

[13]

Zhang X Y, Chen S Y, Sun H Y, Pei D, Wang Y M (2008). Dry matter, harvest index, grain yield and water use efficiency as affected by water supply in winter wheat. Irrig Sci, 27(1): 1-10

[14]

Zhang X Y, Pei D, Chen S Y, Sun H Y, Yang Y H (2006). Performance of double-cropped winter wheat-summer maize under minimum irrigation in the North China Plain. Agron J, 98(6): 1620-1626

[15]

Zhang X Y, Pei D, Hu C S (2003a). Conserving groundwater for irrigation in the North China Plain. Irrig Sci, 21: 159-166

[16]

Zhang Z B, Cui Y T, Chen Z B, Xu P, Huang L, Liu M Y, Liu J (2003b). Discussions on water balance of North-China and development of water-saving agriculture. Journal of Chinese Agriculture Science and Technology, 5(4): 42-47 (in Chinese)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (111KB)

1039

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/