Effects of rumen-degradable protein balance on rumen fermentation in continuous culture fermenters

Qiufeng LI, Yanxia GAO, Yufeng CAO, Zhihua FENG, Jianguo LI

PDF(121 KB)
PDF(121 KB)
Front. Agric. China ›› 2011, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (4) : 598-604. DOI: 10.1007/s11703-011-1138-7
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effects of rumen-degradable protein balance on rumen fermentation in continuous culture fermenters

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Twelve dual-flow continuous culture fermenters (culture 8 d with 5 d for adjustment and 3 d for sample collection) were used to evaluate the effects of rumen-degradable protein balance (RDPB) on rumen fermentation. The different RDPB levels in six diets were as follows: -16.84, -8.87, -0.87, +7.13, +15.13, and +23.12 g RDPB /kg DM. Results indicated that RDPB had a significant effect on fermenter NH3-N (P<0.0001), but had less effect on the fermenter pH (P = 0.058), total VFA concentration (P = 0.57), or acetate molar proportion (P = 0.70). The decrease in rumen-available N in the diets with the RDPB levels at +15.13, +7.13, -0.87, -8.87, -16.84 g RDPB/kg DM resulted in NH3-N concentration decreasing at 9%, 52%, 104% and 118% in rumen compared with the diet of +23.12 g RDPB/kg DM. Total VFA concentration, acetic acid and valeric acid at different time points was altered (P<0.05) by the treatment. With the increase of dietary RDPB, the total NH3-N flowing out of fermenters linearly increased, and the N losses also increased.

Keywords

rumen-degradable protein balance / artificial rumen / rumen fermentation

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Qiufeng LI, Yanxia GAO, Yufeng CAO, Zhihua FENG, Jianguo LI. Effects of rumen-degradable protein balance on rumen fermentation in continuous culture fermenters. Front Agric Chin, 2011, 5(4): 598‒604 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11703-011-1138-7

References

[1]
AOAC (1990). Official Methods of Analysis. 15th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists International, Arlington, VA
[2]
Bach A, Ruiz Moreno M, Thrune M, Stern M D (2008). Evaluation of the fermentation dynamics of soluble crude protein from three protein sources in continuous culture fermenters. J Anim Sci, 86(6): 1364–1371
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[3]
Børsting C F, Kristensen T, Misciattelli L, Hvelplund T, Weisbjerg M R (2003). Reducing nitrogen surplus from dairy farms. Effects of feeding and management. Livest Prod Sci, 83(2-3): 165–178
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Britton R A, Stock R A (1987). Acidosis, rate of starch digestion and intake. Feed Intake by Beef Cattle Symposium. Proc. MP 121:125–137
[5]
Casper D P, Maiga H A, Brouk M J, Schingoethe D J (1999). Synchronization of carbohydrate and protein sources on fermentation and passage rates in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci, 82(8): 1779–1790
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[6]
Casper D P, Schingoethe D J, Eisenbeisz W A (1990). Response of early lactation dairy cows fed diets varying in source of nonstructural carbohydrate and crude protein. J Dairy Sci, 73(4): 1039–1050
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[7]
Chaney A L, Marbach E P (1962). Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. Clin Chem, 8: 130–132
Pubmed
[8]
Colin-Schoellen O, Jurjanz S, Laurent F (2000). Metabolizable protein supply (PDIE) and restricted level of ruminally degradable nitrogen (PDIN) in total mixed rations: Effect on milk production and composition and on nitrogen utilization by dairy cows. Livest Prod Sci, 67(1-2): 41–53
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
de Veth M J, Kolver E S (2001). Digestion of ryegrass pasture in response to change in pH in continuous culture. J Dairy Sci, 84(6): 1449–1457
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[10]
Hristov A N, Etter R P, Ropp J K, Grandeen K L (2004). Effect of dietary crude protein level and degradability on ruminal fermentation and nitrogen utilization in lactating dairy cows. J Anim Sci, 82(11): 3219–3229
Pubmed
[11]
Hristov A N, Ropp J K, Grandeen K L, Abedi S, Etter R P, Melgar A, Foley A E (2005). Effect of carbohydrate source on ammonia utilization in lactating dairy cows. J Anim Sci, 83(2): 408–421
Pubmed
[12]
Ipharraguerre I R, Clark J H, Freeman D E (2005). Varying protein and starch in the diet of dairy cows. I. Effects on ruminal fermentation and intestinal supply of nutrients. J Dairy Sci, 88(7): 2537–2555
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[13]
Ipharraguerre I R, Shabi Z, Clark J H, Freeman D E (2002). Ruminal fermentation and nutrient digestion by dairy cows fed varying amounts of soyhulls as a replacement for corn grain. J Dairy Sci, 85(11): 2890–2904
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[14]
Jouany J P (1982). Volatile fatty acids and alcohol determination in digestive contents, silage juice, bacterial cultures and anaerobic fermentor contents. Sci Aliments, 2: 131–144
[15]
Klusmeyer T H, McCarthy R D Jr, Clark J H, Nelson D R (1990). Effects of source and amount of protein on ruminal fermentation and passage of nutrients to the small intestine of lactating cows. J Dairy Sci, 73(12): 3526–3537
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[16]
Kolver E S, Muller L D (1998). Performance and nutrient intake of high producing Holstein cows consuming pasture or a total mixed ration. J Dairy Sci, 81(5): 1403–1411
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[17]
Littell R C, Henry P R, Ammerman C B (1998). Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using the SAS procedures. J Anim Sci, 76:1216–1231
[18]
McCarthy R D Jr, Klusmeyer T H, Vicini J L, Clark J H, Nelson D R (1989). Effects of source of protein and carbohydrate on ruminal fermentation and passage of nutrients to the small intestine of lactating cows. J Dairy Sci, 72(8): 2002–2016
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[19]
Milton C T, Brandt R T Jr, Titgemeyer E C (1997). Urea in dry-rolled corn diets: finishing steer performance, nutrient digestion, and microbial protein production. J Anim Sci, 75(5): 1415–1424
Pubmed
[20]
NRC (2001). Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle: Seventh Revised Edition, Washington, DC: Natl Acad Press
[21]
Rotger A, Ferret A, Calsamiglia S, Manteca X (2006). Effects of nonstructural carbohydrates and protein sources on intake, apparent total tract digestibility, and ruminal metabolism in vivo and in vitro with high-concentrate beef cattle diets. J Anim Sci, 84(5): 1188–1196
Pubmed
[22]
Royes J B, Brown W F, Martin F G, Bates D B (2001). Source and level of energy supplementation for yearling cattle fed ammoniated hay. J Anim Sci, 79(5): 1313–1321
Pubmed
[23]
Satter LD, Klopfenstein T J, Erickson G E (2002). The role of nutrition in reducing nutrient output fromruminants. J Anim Sci, 80(E. Suppl 2): E143–E156.
[24]
Satter L D, Roffler R E (1975). Nitrogen requirement and utilization in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci, 58(8): 1219–1237
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[25]
Sukhija P S, Palmquist D L (1988). Rapid method for determination of total fatty acid content and composition of feedstuffs and feces. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 36(6): 1202–1206
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Tamminga S, Van Straalen W N, Subnel A P J, Meijer R G M, Steg A, Wener C J G, Block M C (1994). The Dutch protein evaluation system: The DVE/OEB system. Livest Prod Sci, 40: 139–155
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Valkeners D A Théwis M, Van Laere, Beckers Y (2008). Effect of rumen-degradable protein balance deficit on voluntary intake, microbial protein synthesis, and nitrogen metabolism in growing double-muscled Belgian Blue bulls fed corn silage-based diet. J Anim Sci, 86: 680–690
[28]
Van Soest P J, Robertson J B, Lewis B A (1991). Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci, 74(10): 3583–3597
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[29]
Weller R A, Pilgrim A F (1974). Passage of protozoa and volatile fatty acids from the rumen of the sheep and from a continuous in vitro fermentation system. Br J Nutr, 32 (02): 341–351
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[30]
Yu P, Christensen D A, McKinnon J J (2003). Comparison of the NRC 2001 model with the Dutch System (DVE/OEB) in the prediction of nutrient supply to dairy cows from forages. J Dairy Sci, 86: 2178–2192
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the earmarked fund for Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System, China (No. CARS-37).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
PDF(121 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/