Effects of regulators on the respiratory enzyme of pear branches during dormant period

Lei BI, Yuxing ZHANG, Bharat Kumar POUDYAL, Xiaolei WU, Jie LIU

Front. Agric. China ›› 2011, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (4) : 538-542.

PDF(166 KB)
Front. Agric. China All Journals
PDF(166 KB)
Front. Agric. China ›› 2011, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (4) : 538-542. DOI: 10.1007/s11703-011-1127-x
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effects of regulators on the respiratory enzyme of pear branches during dormant period

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The effects of regulators on the respiratory enzymes of Qiyuesu’s pear branches during dormant period were studied. The results showed that enzyme activities of SDH, G-6-PDH and 6-PGDH were increased by 0.02 mmol/L SA and 120 mg/L GA3. The enzyme activities of phosphohexoisomerase were reduced by 0.02 mmol/L SA and 120 mg/L GA3. Compared with the control, the PGI activity was reduced by 20.5% and 13.6% using 0.02 mmol/L SA and 120 mg/L GA3. Similarly, the SDH activity was increased by 6.1% and 29.2%, respectively. Likewise, the activity of G-6-PDH and 6-PGDH was increased by 93.9% and 24.8%. Changes of respiratory enzymes were consistent with respiratory pathway of regulators, which indicated that SA and GA3 were helpful to break the dormancy by enhancing activities of SDH, G-6-PDH and 6-PGDH.

Keywords

pear / dormancy / respiratory enzyme

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Lei BI, Yuxing ZHANG, Bharat Kumar POUDYAL, Xiaolei WU, Jie LIU. Effects of regulators on the respiratory enzyme of pear branches during dormant period. Front Agric Chin, 2011, 5(4): 538‒542 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11703-011-1127-x
This is a preview of subscription content, contact us for subscripton.

References

[1]
Bewley J D, Black M (1994). Seeds: Physiology of Development and Germination. 2nd ed. New York: Plenum, 462
[2]
Bogatek R, Rychter A (1984). Respiratory activity of apple seeds during dormancy removal and germination. Physiol Veg, 22: 181–191
[3]
Brown A P, Wary J L (1968). Correlated change of some enzyme activities and cofactor and substrate contents of pea cotyledon tissue during germination. Biochem J, 108: 437–444
[4]
Erez A (1971). Improved methods for breaking rest in peach and other deciduous fruit species. Jour Am Soc Hort Sci, 96: 519–522
[5]
Faust M, Erez A, Rowland L J (1997). Bud dormancy in perennial fruit trees; physiological basis for dormancy induction maintenance and release. HortScience, 32: 623–629
[6]
Fiehn O, Kopka J, Dormann P, Altmann T, Trethewey R N, Willmitzer L (2000). Metabolite profiling for plant functional genomics. Nat Biotechnol, 18(11): 1157–1161
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Finch-Savage W E, Leubner-Metzger G (2006). Seed dormancy and the control of germination. New Phytol, 171(3): 501–523
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Fuchigami L H, Wisniewski M (1997). Quantifying bud dormancy: physiological approaches. HortScience, 32: 618–632
[9]
Hiatt A J (1961). Preparation and some properties of soluble succinic dehydroge- nase from higher plants. Plant Physiol, 36(5): 552–557
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Hilhorst H W M (1995). A critical update on seed dormancy. I. Primary dormancy. Seed Sci Res, 5(02): 61–73
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Jamieson D J (1998). Oxidative stress responses of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast, 14(16): 1511–1527
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Karssen C M, Zagorski Z, Kepczynski J, Groot S P C (1989). Key role for gibbere11ins in the control of seed germination. Ann Bot (Lond), 63: 71–80
[13]
Kong F X, Hu W, Chao S Y, Sang W L, Wang L S (1999). Physiological responses of lichen Xanthoparmelia Mexicana to oxidative stress of SO2. Environ Exp Bot, 42(3): 201–209
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Kuroda H, Sagisaka S, Asada M, Chiba K (1991). Seasonal variation in the activities of NADH-cytochrome c reductase and cytochrome c oxidase in plastids, mitochon-dria and microsomes in apple trees. J Japan Soc Hort Sci, 60(2): 457–466
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Lang G A (1994). Dormancy-The missing links: Molecular studies and integration of regulatory plant and environmental interactions. HortScience, 29: 1255–1263
[16]
Leslie C A, Romani R J (1986). Salicylic acid: a new inhibitor of ethylene biosynthesis. Plant Cell Rep, 5(5): 144–146
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Li B, Foley M E (1995). Cloning and characterization of differentially expressed genes in imbibed dormant and after ripened. Avena fatua embryos. Plant Mol Biol, 29(4): 823–831
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Li Q, Wu Y Y (2004). Biochemistry. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 143–165 (in Chinese)
[19]
Li X (2004). Control of respiratory metabolism on sweat cherry and studies on technical of dormancy release. The Master's Dissertation. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University (in Chinese)
[20]
Li X L, Yuan Z Y, Gao D S (2001). Factors that influence bud dormancy in deciduous fruit trees. J Shandong Univ Nat Sci, 32(3): 386–392 (in Chinese)
[21]
Neales T F, Incoll I D (1968). The control of leaf photosynthesis rate by the level of assimilate concentration in the leaf: a review of the hypothesis. Bot Rev, 34(2): 107–125
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Nir G, Lavee S (1993). Metabolic changes during cyanimide induced dormancy release in grapevines. Acta Hortic, 329: 271–274
[23]
Wang S Y, Jiao J, Faust M (1991). Changes in metabolic enzyme activities during thidiazuron-induced lateral bud break of apple. HortScience, 26: 171–173

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
PDF(166 KB)

571

Accesses

0

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/