Exploring influential plant traits for enhancing upland cotton yield under salt stress

Abstract

This research was conducted to explore genetic material that can yield better under salt stress conditions. The experiment was laid out using 27 upland cotton genotypes in a RCBD 2 factorial arrangement with two replications. Saline water (NaCl at 20 dS/m) was applied after satisfactory emergence was achieved. The crop was raised to maturity and data relating to yield, fiber quality and ionic traits were recorded. Analysis of variance showed significant variations in the germplasm. Plant height, bolls per plant, boll weight, GOT%, staple length, staple strength, K⁺ and K⁺/Na⁺ ratio under salinity stress showed a highly significant correlation with seed-cotton yield. The highest direct effect on seed-cotton yield per plant was exhibited by bolls per plant and boll weight. The results from the correlation and path coefficient analyses revealed that although the K⁺/Na⁺ ratio had a strong positively significant association with seed-cotton yield, its direct effect on the seed-cotton yield was negative and thus selection on the basis of K⁺/Na⁺ may not be fruitful. Hence, only indirect selection through bolls per plant and boll weight may be effective in increasing the seed-cotton yield per plant under salinity stress.

Keywords

cotton / genotypic correlation / path coefficients / yield traits / fibre traits / ionic traits

References

[1] Ali Z, Khan A S, Khan I A, Azhar F M (2005). Heritability (h²b) estimates for NaCl tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J Agri Soc Sci, 1(2): 126–128

[2] Ali Z, Salam A, Azhar F M, Khan I A (2007). Genotypic variation in salinity tolerance among spring and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) accessions. S Afr J Bot, 73(1): 70–75

[3] Anonymous (2010). Economic Survey of Pakistan. Govt. of Pakistan, Finance Division, Economic Advisory Wing, Islamabad

[4] Ashraf M (2002). Salt tolerance of cotton: Some new advances. Crit Rev Plant Sci, 21(1): 1 -30

[5] Ashraf M, Ahmad S (2000). Influence of sodium chloride on ion accumulation, yield components and fibre characteristics in salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive lines of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Field Crops Res, 66(2): 115–127

[6] Bhatti M A, Azhar F M (2002). Salt tolerance of nine Gossypium hirsutum L. varieties to NaCl salinity at early stage of plant development. Int J Agri Biol, 4: 544–546

[7] Cha-um S, Supaibulwatana K, Kirdmanee C (2006). Water relation, photosynthetic ability and growth of Thai Jasmine rice (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica cv. KDML 105) to salt stress by application of exogenous glycinebetaine and choline. J Agron Crop Sci, 192(1): 25 -36

[8] Dewey O R, Lu K H (1959). A correlation and path co-efficient analysis of components of crested wheat grass and seed production. Agron J, 51(9): 515–517

[9] Flowers T J, Yeo A R (1995). Breeding for salinity resistance in crop plants; where next. Aust J Plant Physiol, 22(6): 875–884

[10] Gorai M, Ennajeh M, Khemira H, Neffati M (2010). Combined effect of NaCl-salinity and hypoxia on growth, photosynthesis, water relations and solute accumulation in Phragmites australis plants. Flora-Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants, 205(7): 462–470

[11] Grewal H S (2010). Water uptake, water use efficiency, plant growth and ionic balance of wheat, barley, canola and chickpea plants on a sodic vertosol with variable subsoil NaCl salinity. Agric Water Manage, 97(1): 148 -156

[12] Jampeetong A, Brix H (2009). Effects of NaCl salinity on growth, morphology, photosynthesis and proline accumulation of Salvinia natans. Aquat Bot, 91(3): 181–186

[13] Kent L A, Lauchli A (1985). Germination and seedling growth of cotton: salinity calcium interactions. Plant Cell Environ, 8(2): 115–159

[14] Khan A A, McNeilly T, Azhar F M (2001). Stress tolerance in crop plants. Int J Agri Biol, 3: 250–255

[15] Khan A N, Qureshi R H, Ahmad N, Rashid A (1995). Response of cotton cultivars to salinity in various growth development stages. Sarhad J Agric Res, 11: 729–731

[16] Maas E V, Hoffman G J (1977). Crop salt tolerance-current assessment. J Irri Drain Div Civ Eng, 103: 115–134

[17] Nadarajan N, Gunasekaran M (2005). Quantitative Genetics and Biometrical Techniques in Plant Breeding. New Delhi: Kalyani Publ.

[18] Noor E, Azhar F M, Khan A A (2001). Diffeerences in responses of Gossypium hirsutum L. varieties to NaCl salinity at seedling stage. Int J Agri Biol, 3: 345–347

[19] PCST (2003). Report of National Committee on Water Resources Development and Management. Pakistan Council of Science and Technology, Islamabad

[20] Pervaiz Z, Afzal M, Xi S, Xiaoe Y, Ancheng L (2002). Physiological parameters of salt tolerance in wheat. Asian J Plant Sci, 1(4): 478–481

[21] Qadir M, Shams M (1997). Some agronomic and physiological aspects of salt tolerance in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). J Agron Crop Sci, 179(2): 101–106

[22] Qayyum M A, Malik D (1988). Farm production losses in salt affected soils. In managing soil resources proc. 1st. Nat. Cong on soil Sci, Oct: 6-8, 1985. Lahore, Pakistan, 356–364

[23] Qureshi R H, Barrett-Lennard E G (1998). Saline Agriculture for Irrigated Land in Pakistan. A Handbook. ACIAR Monograph No.50. Canberra, Australia. 142

[24] Saqib M, Akhtar J, Pervaiz S, Qureshi R H, Aslam M (2002). Comparative growth performance of five cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) genotypes against different levels of salinity. Pak J Agri Sci, 39(2): 69–75

[25] Steel R G D, Torrie J H, Dickey D A (1997). Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. New York: McGraw Hill Book Co., 204–251

[26] Zhu J K (2001). Over expression of a delta-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase gene and analysis of tolerance to water and salt stress in transgenic rice. Trends Plant Sci, 6: 66–72

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg