Effects of folic acid supplementation on growth performance and hepatic folate metabolism-related gene expressions in weaned piglets

Bing YU , Guangbo YANG , Jingbo LIU , Daiwen CHEN

Front. Agric. China ›› 2010, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (4) : 494 -500.

PDF (131KB)
Front. Agric. China ›› 2010, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (4) : 494 -500. DOI: 10.1007/s11703-010-1047-1
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effects of folic acid supplementation on growth performance and hepatic folate metabolism-related gene expressions in weaned piglets

Author information +
History +
PDF (131KB)

Abstract

The present study was conducted to evaluate the effects of different folic acid supplemental levels on growth performance, serum biochemical indicators, and hepatic folate metabolism-related gene expressions in weaned piglets. There were 160 piglets with initially average bodyweight of 7.33 kg randomly assigned to diets containing five levels of folic acid: basal diets (C), 0.5 mg·kg-1 folic acid (FS 0.5), 2.5 mg·kg-1 folic acid (FS 2.5), 5.0 mg·kg-1 folic acid (FS 5.0), or 10.0 mg·kg-1 folic acid (FS 10.0). Blood samples were collected from a subset (n = 20; 4 pigs per treatment) of the piglets on day 0, 14, and 28. Liver samples were collected from the blood-taken piglets on day 28 of the experiment. Pigs fed basal diet supplemented with 2.5 mg·kg-1 folic acid grew faster (P<0.05) and consumed more feed (P<0.01) than groups of C, FS 5.0, and FS 10.0 during the last two weeks. Dietary treatment had no effect on F/G throughout the experiment. Pigs in the FS 2.5 group showed greater concentrations of Growth Hormone (GH) (P<0.05) and Insulin-like Growth Factors (IGF-1) (P<0.01) in serum than C and FS 10.0 on day 28. RT-PCR analysis revealed that FS 0.5, FS 2.5, and FS 5.0 had a greater abundance of the mRNA encoding 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase than C and FS 10.0 (P<0.01). The mRNA expressions of folate binding protein in FS 0.5 and FS 2.5 were upregulated compared with pigs fed with basal diet (P<0.05). These results demonstrated that folate supplemental level of 2.5 mg·kg-1 significantly enhanced the growth performance of piglets. Folic acid had an impact on folate metabolism and the homocysteine concentrations. No folate supplementation or folate supplemental level of 10 mg·kg-1 could not increase the growth performance to the greatest degree.

Keywords

folic acid / growth performance / folate binding protein (FOLBP) / 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) / piglets

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Bing YU, Guangbo YANG, Jingbo LIU, Daiwen CHEN. Effects of folic acid supplementation on growth performance and hepatic folate metabolism-related gene expressions in weaned piglets. Front. Agric. China, 2010, 4(4): 494-500 DOI:10.1007/s11703-010-1047-1

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

Introduction

Folic acid, which exists naturally in green vegetables as a synthetic form of vitamin B, plays a significant role in one-carbon metabolism and is essential for the synthesis of precursors of nucleic acids, and, hence, the synthesis of DNA (Lucock, 2000).

The liver is an important organ for folic acid metabolism. Methyl-tetrahydrofolate (CH3-THF) is the active form of folic acid that connects the relationship between folic acid and methionine cycle. The maintenance of balance between folate and methionine cycle is vital for growth and development since folic acid is involved in the assistance of methylation action (Niculescu and Zeisel, 2002). Unfortunately, mammalian cells themselves are unable to couple the pteridine ring to other compounds for folate biosynthesis and are dependent on dietary folic acids (Birn, 2006).

The important role of folate cycle in cell metabolism could also be reflected by the close relationship with growth performance. Lévesque et al. (1993) reported that a diet supplemented with folic acid improved growth rate with no effect on feed intake of white veal calves. Matte et al. (1993) demonstrated that folic acid could influence growth performance of gilts at the end of the growing period. Few studies are documented on the effects of folic acid on weaned piglets’ growth performance.

Folic acid was traditionally considered safe due to its water-soluble character. However, some researches showed that high-level folate supplementation would decrease bodyweight and vertex-coccyx length in rat fetuses (Achón et al., 1999). It remains unclear whether the possible deleterious effects of high folic acid outweigh the known potential benefits in piglets.

In our study, the effects of different folic acid intake on growth performance of weanling piglets were investigated.

Materials and methods

Animals and experimental design

The experiment was designed by single factor random allotment. A total of 160 pigs (80 of Landrace and 80 of Yorkshire), initially 7.33±0.67 kg and 25 days of age, were divided into five dietary treatment groups: (1) basal diet, (2) basal diet supplemented with 0.5 mg·kg-1 folic acid, (3) basal diet supplemented with 2.5 mg·kg-1 folic acid, (4) basal diet supplemented with 5.0 mg·kg-1 folic acid, and (5) basal diet supplemented with 10.0 mg·kg-1 folic acid.

Pigs and housing

All experimental procedures were approved by the Animal Care Advisory Committee of Sichuan Agricultural University. The pigs were reared in a nursery facility in groups of eight pigs per pen, with four replications per dietary treatment. All pigs had ad libitum access to feed and water through a self-feeder and a nipple water system.

Diets

All diets without antibiotics were formulated to meet or exceed the established nutrient requirements for weanling pigs. The pigs were fed for two dietary phases, with the pigs being switched to the second phase after the initial two weeks (Table 1).

Pig bodyweight and blood and liver sampling

Pigs were weighed on days 0, 14, and 28 and slaughtered at 8:00 in the morning at the end of the experiment. The pigs fasted for 8 h before blood sampling were weighed. Blood samples were collected from the precaval vein on days 0, 14, and 28. All blood samples were centrifuged at 3000 × g for 15 min immediately after collection and stored at -20°C for analysis. After dissection, the liver samples were removed and cut into small pieces, washed with 0.9% physiologic saline, and immediately put into liquid nitrogen. Subsequently, the liver samples were stored at -80°C for RNA isolation.

Analysis

Folate in serum and feed were determined using radioimmunoassay (SimulTRAC-SNB Folate Radioassay Kit from MP Biomedicals, Germany). Serum creatinine (CRE) concentration was analyzed using a Hitachi 7020 automated analyzer. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity was measured at 405 nm by the formation of paranitrophenol from paranitrophenylphosphate as a substrate. Serum homocysteine concentration was determined by chemiluminescence method using a commercially available kit (Abbott Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., USA) and performed by AXSYM automatic chemiluminescence instrument. Serum growth hormone (GH) and insulin (INS) concentration was measured by chemiluminescence method using a commercial assay kit (Tosoh Corporation, Japan) and performed by AIA-1800 automatic fluorescent magnetic particle enzyme immunoassay analyzer. Serum insulin-like growth factor 1(IGF-1) concentrations were determined by extraction and RIA procedures.

RNA isolation and reverse transcription

RNAs were isolated from the liver of each piglets using Trizol Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The mRNA expression levels of folate binding protein (FOLBP) and 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) in liver were determined because the liver is the main site for folate metabolism and storage. Villanueva et al. (1998) demonstrated that FOLBP involved in folate homeostasis was regulated uniquely in pig liver plasma membranes and its transcriptional level was three times in liver than in kidney, and MTHFR was one of the most important enzymes in folate metabolism (Bailey and Gregory, 1999). Primers used for PCR and nested PCR for the detection of MTHFR, FOLBP, and H2A position on cDNA are shown in Table 2.

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed using SPSS 13.0 by one-way ANOVA and multiple comparisons of Duncan analysis to determine statistical differences between groups. In all experiments, pen was considered as an experimental unit. An alpha level of P<0.05 was used for the determination of statistical significance. The results were presented as the mean±SD.

Results

Growth performance

During the first phase of the test, there was no significant difference in growth performance between different folate supplemental levels, but pigs in FS 2.5 grew faster and consumed more feed than the other four groups numerically (Table 3). However, the effect of folic acid supplementation on ADG and ADFI began to be obvious in the phase 2 of the experiment. During which, adding 2.5 mg·kg-1 folic acid had a greater ADG (P<0.05) and ADFI (P<0.01) than C, FS 5.0 and FS 10.0. ADG over the entire four-week experimental period was greater (P<0.05) in FS 2.5 than pigs fed with either C or FS 10.0. Consequently, body weight at the end of experiment was higher in FS 2.5 than the other groups (P = 0.06). Feed to Gain ratio was not affected in different groups.

Serum biochemical indicators

The effects of dietary folic acid supplemental levels on serum biochemical indicators were presented in Table 4. The concentration of GH in FS 2.5 was higher (P<0.05) compared with C and FS 10.0 on day 28 of the test. In addition, FS 2.5 showed a greater (P<0.05) IGF-1 concentration than C and FS 10.0 on day 14 of experiment. Furthermore, at the end of the test, the level of IGF-1 was extremely higher (P<0.01) in FS 2.5 and was greater (P<0.05) in FS 0.5 than C and FS 10.0. Serum insulin and creatinine and alkaline phosphatase concentrations were not affected by different folate supplemental levels (P>0.05).

Serum folate and homocysteine

With the increased folic acid supplementation, serum folate concentration was enhanced apparently (Fig. 1). On day 14 of the test, FS 10.0 resulted in a significant higher folic acid level than C (P<0.01), FS 0.5 (P<0.01), and FS 2.5 (P<0.05). At the end of the experiment, FS 2.5 showed greater folate concentration than C (P<0.05) and FS 0.5 (P<0.05). The homocysteine levels showed a negative correlation with the supplementation of folic acid (Fig. 2). At the end of experiment, the homocysteine concentrations in FS 2.5, FS 5.0 and FS10.0 were significantly lower than C and FS 0.5 (P<0.01). However, there were no differences among FS 2.5, FS 5.0, and FS 10.0.

Figure1 showed that serum folic acid concentrations were increased with the folic acid supplemental levels.

Figure 2 showed that serum homocysteine concentrations decreased with folic acid supplementation from 0.5 to 10 mg·kg-1 at day 14 and from 0 to 2.5 mg·kg-1 at day 28, but no further decline was observed for FS 2.5, FS 5.0, and FS 10.0 at the end of the experiment.

Expression of hepatic FOLBP and MTHFR

FOLBP

As shown in Fig. 3, dietary folic acid supplemental levels significantly affected (P<0.05) the expression of FOLBP. The transcript expression level of FOLBP was higher (P<0.05) in FS 0.5 and FS 2.5 than C.

MTHFR

There were significant differences (P<0.01) in MTHFR expression among treatment groups (Fig. 4). The expression of MTHFR was higher (P<0.01) in FS 0.5, FS 2.5 and FS 5.0 than C and FS 10.0.

Discussion

Folic acid is an essential nutrient for animal growth and development as an important member of the vitamin B family. Limited reports of folic acid influencing growth performance of weaned-piglets showed no consistency. Newcomb et al. (1986) and Easter et al. (1983) found that there was no significant effect on growth performance of piglets, which was in consistent with Lindemann and Kornegay’s (1986) study that adding 0.5 mg·kg-1 folic acid could improve ADG of piglets. However, as presented in Table 3, basal diet supplemented with 2.5 mg·kg-1 folic acid could increase ADG and ADFI in the final two weeks compared with other treatments. Either inadequate or excessive intake of folic acid was not good for achieving the maximal growth potential of weaned piglets.

The growth of an organism depends on an increase in the number and size of existing cells. The rapid growth of the weaned piglets requires high rate of cell turnover that has to meet with synchronization of DNA metabolism. Folic acid participates in one-carbon metabolism and plays a vital role in the synthesis of DNA precursors. Therefore, sufficient folic acid must be provided into animal diet to guarantee fundamental requirement for body metabolism. However, the overintake of folic acid might bring about unfavorable effects on normal folate cycle. Folic acid is transported into the cell through a receptor-mediated process by FOLBP, which is a high-affinity folate binding protein. In the present study, we observed that the mRNA expression of FOLBP were downregulated in response to 5 mg·kg-1 and 10 mg·kg-1 of folic acid supplemental level. Decreased expression of FOLBP might result in the reduction of folic acid entering the cell to take part in folate metabolism. MTHFR is one of the most important enzymes catalyzing 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate to synthesize 5-methyltetrahydrofolate, which is the major carbon donor in remethylation of homocysteine to methionine that is involved in DNA synthesis and cell metabolism. In this study, the mRNA expression of MTHFR was upregulated in response to 0.5 mg·kg-1, 2.5 mg·kg-1, and 5 mg·kg-1 of folic acid supplemental level. There was a significant quadratic relationship (P<0.05) between MTHFR mRNA expression and folate supplemental levels. Earlier studies found that high-dose folic acid reduced the activity of MTHFR because of dihydrofolate serving as a folate antagonist and a potent inhibitor of MTHFR (Matthews and Baugh, 1980). Similar results were observed in human studies. Ashokkumar et al. (2007) reported that the downregulation in folate uptake in the folate-oversupplemented cells was associated with a decrease in the mRNA and protein levels of folate receptor. The present study demonstrated that folic acid supplementation should be at appropriate dosage, since folate inadequacy or overconsumption would disturb folic acid cycle and, hence, cell metabolism.

In the present study, homocysteine concentrations were reduced with increased folic acid supplemental levels, but at the end of the experiment, serum homocysteine concentrations were not significantly reduced. Homocysteine Lowering Trialists’ Collaboration (2005) also found that daily doses of folic acid greater than 0.8 mg could achieve the maximal reduction in plasma homocysteine concentration of humans. This is partly due to the attenuated folate cycle represented by a downregulated expression of FOLBP and MTHFR. Other mechanisms cannot be ruled out because the low expression of FOLBP and MTHFR should have reduced cellular folic acid and hence lead to higher homocysteine concentration. Convincing experiments are needed to elucidate this issue.

The rapid growth rate of piglets after weaning mainly depends on protein deposit rather than adipose tissue. To date, there were few studies that addressed the direct relationship between folic acid and protein metabolism. However, indirect evidences suggested that folic acid might be associated with protein synthesis. First, folic acid is involved in the interconversion of several amino acids, such as serine and glycine, histidine and glutamic acid, methionine, and homocysteine. Folic acid, mainly in the active form of tetrahydrofolate, plays a role as one-carbon carrier to contribute to the synthesis of pyrimidine and purine, and, thereby, protein synthesis through central dogma. Second, Stern et al. (2004) elucidated that homocysteine had detrimental effects on protein metabolism, and it would accelerate protein degradation rates, and homocysteine might interact with nucleic acid thus disturbed protein synthesis. Herein, we observed that GH and IGF-1, hormones that maintain protein synthesis, differed in response to folate supplemental levels. In particular, serum IGF-1 concentration was significantly negatively correlated (P<0.05) with excessive dietary folate supplemental levels. The reason of the changed hormone secretion appeared to be linked to homocysteine homeostasis. Sesmilo et al. (2001) revealed that the acceleration of homocysteine metabolism resulted in increased levels of methionine and cysteine that was associated with protein synthesis, thus enhancing GH concentration. Besides, variations in homocysteine were negatively related to changes in IGF-1. Another hypothesis is that folic acid could act directly as the ancillary agonist of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor stimulating growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) gene expression in hypothalamus, promoting GHRH synthesis and secretion, then accelerating GH synthesis and secretion in adenohypophysis, since a positive correlation was found to exist between GH and NMDA receptor (Le Greves et al., 2002). N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor agonists protecting homocysteine-induced developmental abnormalities also support this opinion (Rosenquist et al., 1999).

Conclusion

The folate supplemental level of 2.5 mg·kg-1 significantly enhanced the growth performance of piglets. Folic acid had an impact on folate metabolism and the homocysteine concentrations. None folate supplementation or folate supplemental level of 10.0 mg.kg-1 could not increase the growth performance to the greatest degree.

References

[1]

Achón M, Reyes L, Alonso-Aperte E, Úbeda N, Varela-Moreiras G (1999). High dietary folate supplementation affects gestational development and dietary protein utilization in rats. The Journal of Nutrition, 129: 1204-1208

[2]

Ashokkumar B, Mohammed Z M, Vaziri N D, Said H M (2007). Effect of folate oversupplementation on folate uptake by human intestinal and renal epithelial cells. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 86: 159-166

[3]

Bailey L B, Gregory J F (1999). Polymorphisms of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase and other enzymes: metabolic significance, risks and impact on folate requirements. The Journal of Nutrition, 129: 919-922

[4]

Birn H (2006). The kidney in vitamin B12 and folate homeostasis: characterization of receptors for tubular uptake of vitamins and carrier proteins. American Journal of Physiology, 291: F22-F36

[5]

Easter R A, Anderson P A, Michel E J, Corley J R (1983). Response of gestating gilts and starter grower and finisher swine to biotin pyridoxine folacin and thiamine additions to a corn-soybean meal diet. Nutrition Reports International, 28: 945-953

[6]

Homocysteine Lowering Trialists’ Collaboration (2005). Dose-dependent effects of folic acid on blood concentrations of homocysteine: a meta-analysis of the randomized trials. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 82: 806-812

[7]

Le Greves M, Steensland P, Le Greves P, Nyberg F (2002). Growth hormone induces age-dependent alteration in the expression of hippocampal growth hormone receptor and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor subunits gene transcripts in male rats. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99: 7119-7123

[8]

Lévesque J, Girard C L, Matte J J, Brisson G J (1993). Dietary supplements of folic acid: blood and growth responses of white veal calves. Livestock Production Science, 34: 71-82

[9]

Lindemann M D, Kornegay E T (1986). Folic acid additions to weanling pig diets. Journal of Animal Science, 63 (Suppl 1): 35 (Abstr)

[10]

Lucock M (2000). Folic acid: nutritional biochemistry, molecular biology, and role in disease processes. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism, 71:121-138

[11]

Matte J J, Girard C L, Tremblay G F (1993). Effect of long-term addition of folic acid on folates status, growth performance, puberty attainment, and reproductive capacity of gilts. Journal of animal scicence, 71: 151-157

[12]

Matthews R G, Baugh C M (1980). Interactions of pig liver methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase with methylenetetrahydropteroylpolyglutamate substrates and with dihydropteroylpolyglutamate inhibitors. Biochemistry, 19: 2040-2045

[13]

Newcomb M D, Allee G L (1986). Water-soluble vitamins for weanling pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 63 (Suppl 1): 108 (Abstr)

[14]

Niculescu M D, Zeisel S H (2002). Diet, methyl donors and DNA methylation: Interactions between dietary folate, methionine and choline. The Journal of Nutrition, 132: 2333S-2335S

[15]

Rosenquist T H, Schneider A M, Monaghan D T (1999). N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor agonists modulate homocysteine-induced developmental abnormalities. Journal of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 13: 1523-1531

[16]

Sesmilo G, Biller B M, Llevadot J, Hayden D, Hanson G, Rifai N, Klibanski A (2001). Effects of growth hormone (GH) administration on homocyst(e)ine levels in men with GH deficiency: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 86: 1518-1524

[17]

Stern F, Berner Y N, Polyak Z, Komarnitsky M, Sela B A, Hopp M, Dror Y (2004). Homocysteine effect on protein degradation rates. Clinical Biochemistry, 37: 1002-1009

[18]

Villanueva J, Ling E H, Chandler C J, Halsted C H (1998). Membrane and tissue distribution of folate binding protein in pig. American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 275: 1503-1510

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (131KB)

1088

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/