Agreement between remote and in-person assessments of mobility and balance tests for children with cerebral palsy. A pilot study

Aspasia Mavronasou , Georgia Kechagia , Panagiotis Dalamarinis , Eleni A. Kortianou

Exploration of Medicine ›› 2026, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (1) : 1001419

PDF (1733KB)
Exploration of Medicine ›› 2026, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (1) :1001419 DOI: 10.37349/emed.2026.1001419
Original Article
research-article
Agreement between remote and in-person assessments of mobility and balance tests for children with cerebral palsy. A pilot study
Author information +
History +
PDF (1733KB)

Abstract

Aim: To determine the level of agreement between remote and in-person assessment for the Timed Up and Go test (TUG), the Lateral Step-Up test (LSU), the Five-Times-Sit-To-Stand test (FTSTS), and the Pediatric Balance Scale (PBS) in children with cerebral palsy (CP).

Methods: Fifteen children diagnosed with unilateral and bilateral spastic CP and Gross Motor Function Classification System levels I–II underwent these four tests in two distinct environments. These assessments were conducted 24 to 48 hours apart, first in person at the physiotherapy clinic and then remotely at home via the VSee platform. Before the remote assessment, all parents attended a preliminary training session that covered technical proficiency with VSee, the proper setup of home equipment, and essential safety protocols.

Results: Children had a median age of 7 (IQR = 6–10) years old. All children successfully finished all four tests in both the home and clinic settings without any reported safety issues. The agreement was good for the time of repetitions in the FTSTS: ICC = 0.884 (95% CI: 0.654 to 0.961; MD = –1.26 seconds, 95% CI: –2.81 to 0.28, p = 0.102), and excellent for the total time of the TUG: ICC = 0.998 (95% CI: 0.990 to 0.999; MD = –0.42 seconds, 95% CI: –0.76 to –0.08, p = 0.017), the total score in the PBS: ICC = 0.998 (95% CI: 0.992 to 0.999; MD = 0.26 units, 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.52, p = 0.041), and the total number of steps in the LSU: ICC = 0.988 (95% CI: 0.965 to 0.996; MD = 0.53 steps, 95% CI: –0.68 to 1.75, p = 0.364).

Conclusions: Remote evaluation of the FTSTS, TUG, LSU, and PBS demonstrates good-to-excellent agreement with in-person assessment. However, wide limits of agreement indicated individual variability.

Keywords

cerebral palsy / children / Five-Times-Sit-To-Stand / Lateral Step-Up / pediatric balance scale / remote assessment / Timed Up and Go

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Aspasia Mavronasou, Georgia Kechagia, Panagiotis Dalamarinis, Eleni A. Kortianou. Agreement between remote and in-person assessments of mobility and balance tests for children with cerebral palsy. A pilot study. Exploration of Medicine, 2026, 7 (1) : 1001419 DOI:10.37349/emed.2026.1001419

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Morgan P, McGinley JL. Cerebral palsy. Handb Clin Neurol. 2018; 159: 323-36.

[2]

Cetin SY, Erel S. Investigation of the validity and reliability of the L test in children with cerebral palsy. Physiother Theory Pract. 2020; 38: 182-8.

[3]

Das SP, Ganesh GS. Evidence-based Approach to Physical Therapy in Cerebral Palsy. Indian J Orthop. 2019; 53: 20-34.

[4]

VAN Tittelboom V, Alemdaroğlu-Gürbüz I, Hanssen B, Plasschaert F, Heyrman L, Feys H, et al. Reliability of functional tests of the lower limbs and core stability in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2021; 57: 738-46.

[5]

Zheng J, Hou M, Liu L, Wang X. Knowledge Structure and Emerging Trends of Telerehabilitation in Recent 20 Years: A Bibliometric Analysis via CiteSpace. Front Public Health. 2022; 10: 904855.

[6]

Button AM, Webster EK, Kracht CL, Hendrick C, Okely A, Chong KH, et al. Validation of remote assessment of preschool children's anthropometrics and motor skills. Front Digit Health. 2023; 5: 1168618.

[7]

Rodríguez Mariblanca M, Cano de la Cuerda R. Aplicaciones móviles en la parálisis cerebral infantil. Neurología. 2021; 36: 135-48.

[8]

Saether R, Helbostad JL, Riphagen II, Vik T. Clinical tools to assess balance in children and adults with cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013; 55: 988-99.

[9]

Kumban W, Amatachaya S, Emasithi A, Siritaratiwat W. Five-times-sit-to-stand test in children with cerebral palsy: Reliability and concurrent validity. NeuroRehabilit: Int Interdiscip J. 2013; 32: 9-15.

[10]

Chrysagis N, Skordilis EK, Tsiganos G, Koutsouki D. Validity evidence of the Lateral Step Up (LSU) test for adolescents with spastic cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil. 2012; 35: 875-80.

[11]

Romin E, Lindgren A, Rodby-Bousquet E, Cloodt E. Sit-to-stand performance in children with cerebral palsy: a population-based cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25: 460.

[12]

Nicolini-Panisson RD, Donadio MV. Normative values for the Timed ‘Up and Go’ test in children and adolescents and validation for individuals with Down syndrome. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013; 56: 490-7.

[13]

Alsakhawi RS, Elshafey MA. Effect of Core Stability Exercises and Treadmill Training on Balance in Children with Down Syndrome: Randomized Controlled Trial. Adv Ther. 2019; 36: 2364-73.

[14]

Kembhavi G, Darrah J, Magill-Evans J, Loomis J. Using the Berg Balance Scale to Distinguish Balance Abilities in Children with Cerebral Palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2002; 14: 92-9.

[15]

Her J, Woo J, Ko J. Reliability of the Pediatric Balance Scale in the Assessment of the Children with Cerebral Palsy. J Phys Ther Sci. 2012; 24: 301-5.

[16]

Martín-Díaz P, Carratalá-Tejada M, Molina-Rueda F, Cuesta-Gómez A. Reliability and agreement of the timed up and go test in children and teenagers with autism spectrum disorder. Eur J Pediatr. 2023; 182: 3577-85.

[17]

Lai B, Wadsworth D, Spring K, Jones CS, Mintz M, Malone LA, et al. Validity and Reliability of a Telehealth Physical Fitness and Functional Assessment Battery for Ambulatory Youth With and Without Mobility Disabilities: Observational Measurement Study. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024; 11: e50582.

[18]

Ros-DeMarize R, Chung P, Stewart R. Pediatric behavioral telehealth in the age of COVID-19: Brief evidence review and practice considerations. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2021; 51: 100949.

[19]

Lima CRG, Verdério BN, de Abreu RWF, Brugnaro BH, Dos Santos AN, Dos Santos MM, et al. Telemonitoring of motor skills using the Alberta Infant Motor Scale for at-risk infants in the first year of life. J Telemed Telecare. 2022; 30: 885-94.

[20]

Ogourtsova T, Boychuck Z, O'Donnell M, Ahmed S, Osman G, Majnemer A. Telerehabilitation for Children and Youth with Developmental Disabilities and Their Families: A Systematic Review. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2022; 43: 129-75.

[21]

Kortianou E, Tsimouris D, Mavronasou A, Lekkas S, Kazatzis N, Apostolara Z, et al. Application of a home-based exercise program combined with tele-rehabilitation in previously hospitalized patients with COVID-19: A feasibility, single-cohort interventional study. Pneumon. 2022; 35: 1-10.

[22]

Mavronasou A, Asimakos A, Vasilopoulos A, Katsaounou P, Kortianou EA. Remote administration of the short physical performance battery, the 1-minute sit to stand, and the Chester step test in post-COVID-19 patients after hospitalization: establishing inter-reliability and agreement with the face-to-face assessment. Disabil Rehabil. 2023; 46: 5334-44.

[23]

Panagiotopoulou E, Mavronasou A, Spanos S, Kortianou EA. Tele-assessment of Berg balance scale, timed-up, go and box and block test in patients with chronic stroke: establishing agreement with the face-to-face assessment. Int J Clin Trials. 2024; 11: 84-90.

[24]

Dhote SN, Khatri PA, Ganvir SS. Reliability of "Modified timed up and go" test in children with cerebral palsy. J Pediatr Neurosci. 2012; 7: 96-100.

[25]

Yi SH, Hwang JH, Kim SJ, Kwon JY. Validity of Pediatric Balance Scales in Children with Spastic Cerebral Palsy. Neuropediatrics. 2012; 43: 307-13.

[26]

Eagles D, Perry JJ, Sirois MJ, Lang E, Daoust R, Lee J, et al. Timed Up and Go predicts functional decline in older patients presenting to the emergency department following minor trauma. Age Ageing. 2016; 46: 214-8.

[27]

Laspa V, Besios T, Xristara A, Tsigaras G, Milioudi M, Mauromoustakos S, et al. Reliability and Clinical Significance of the Pediatric Balance Scale (PBS) in the Greek Language in Children Aged 4 to 18 Years. Open J Prev Med. 2020; 10: 73-81.

[28]

Güngör F, Ovacık U, Ertan Harputlu Ö, Yekdaneh AA, Kurt İ, Ertürk Uzunoğlu G, et al. Tele-assessment of core performance and functional capacity: Reliability, validity, and feasibility in healthy individuals. J Telemed Telecare. 2022; 30: 1017-25.

[29]

Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016; 15: 155-63.

[30]

Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999; 8: 135-60.

[31]

Weir JP. Quantifying Test-Retest Reliability Using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res. 2005; 19: 231-40.

[32]

Lu WS, Wang CH, Lin JH, Sheu CF, Hsieh CL. The minimal detectable change of the simplified stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement measure. J Rehabil Med. 2008; 40: 615-9.

[33]

Bottcher L, Flachs EM, Uldall P. Attentional and executive impairments in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010; 52: e42-7.

[34]

Sadowska M, Sarecka-Hujar B, Kopyta I. Cerebral Palsy: Current Opinions on Definition, Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Classification and Treatment Options. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020; 16: 1505-18.

[35]

Üneş S, Tunçdemir M, Özal C, Delioğlu K, Seyhan Bıyık K, Kerem Günel M. Tele-assessment of trunk control in children with cerebral palsy: Intra- and inter-rater reliability, and validity of the trunk control measurement scale. J Telemed Telecare. 2025; 32: 266-74.

[36]

Heyrman L, Molenaers G, Desloovere K, Verheyden G, De Cat J, Monbaliu E, et al. A clinical tool to measure trunk control in children with cerebral palsy: The Trunk Control Measurement Scale. Res Dev Disabil. 2011; 32: 2624-35.

[37]

Kwong PWH, Ng SSM. Reliability of the Lateral Step-Up Test and Its Correlation with Motor Function and Activity in Chronic Stroke Survivors. BioMed Res Int. 2020; 2020: 7859391.

[38]

Vaz S, Falkmer T, Passmore AE, Parsons R, Andreou P. The Case for Using the Repeatability Coefficient When Calculating Test-Retest Reliability. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8: e73990.

[39]

Rebold MJ, Kobak MS, Croall CA, Cumberledge EA, Hall M, Raumikaitis L. The Experimental Effect of Parental Attentiveness on Children’s Physical Activity Behavior. Asian J Kinesiol. 2021; 23: 12-20.

PDF (1733KB)

14

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/