Comparative analysis of chlorination byproduct formation in galvanized iron and high-density polyethylene pipes using low-cost filtration techniques

Abstract

Two prominent chlorination disinfection byproducts (DBPs)—trihalomethanes and trihaloacetic acids—are formed in drinking water when chlorine reacts with other constituents. The production of these DBPs has emerged as a significant public health concern. At the same time, disinfection of potable water remains essential as a safety measure to effectively combat waterborne diseases by eliminating pathogenic microorganisms. To regulate the formation of these two major DBPs in the water distribution network, one of the key factors is the nature of the pipe material used, along with the implementation of cost-effective abatement techniques. This study compared two types of potable water supply pipe materials—galvanized iron and high-density polythene pipes—for their role in the production of chlorine DBPs. Both materials showed different weightage ratios of DBP formation when chlorinated water came into contact with the inner surface of distribution pipes. Two filtration setups, i.e., granular activated carbon (GAC) and sand filtration media, were evaluated as abatement techniques for removing DBPs, depending on the water source and pipe material used. The findings contribute to understanding the differences in the generation of major DBP species under known supply media, as well as the removal efficiency of DBP precursors by GAC and sand filtration. Overall, the results reveal that GAC and sand filtration media can serve as low-cost and sustainable alternatives to costly, complex filtration membranes for DBP removal.

Keywords

Controlled chlorination / Chromatograms / Mass spectrometry / Granular activated carbon / Silica medium / Dissolved organic matter

Funding

None.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

[1] Rabeie B, Mahmoodi NM, Hayati B, Dargahi A, Rezakhani Moghaddam H. Chitosan adorned with ZIF-67 on ZIF-8 biocomposite: A potential LED visible light-assisted photocatalyst for wastewater decontamination. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024; 282:137405. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.137405

[2] Mazhar MA, Khan NA, Ahmed S, et al. Chlorination disinfection by-products in municipal drinking water - a review. J Clean Prod. 2020; 273:123159. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123159

[3] Al-Jasser AO. Chlorine decay in drinking-water transmission and distribution systems: Pipe service age effect. Water Res. 2007; 41(2):387-396. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2006.08.032

[4] Clark RM, Wymer LJ. Effect of the Distribution System on Drinking Water Quality Water Supply and Water Resources Management View Project Protecting Critical Infrastructure View Project; 1993. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281374494

[5] Jahin HS, Hesham A, Awad YM, El-Korashy S, Khairy G. THMs removal from aqueous solution using hydrochar enhanced by chitosan nanoparticles: Preparation, characterization, kinetics, equilibrium studies. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2024; 21(3):2811-2826. doi: 10.1007/s13762-023-05150-x

[6] Youngwilai A, Khan E, Phungsai P, et al. Comparative investigation of known and unknown disinfection by-product precursor removal and microbial community from biological biochar and activated carbon filters. Water Res. 2024; 261:121994. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2024.121994

[7] Kali S, Khan M, Ghaffar MS, et al. Occurrence, influencing factors, toxicity, regulations, and abatement approaches for disinfection by-products in chlorinated drinking water: A comprehensive review. Environ Pollut. 2021; 281:116950. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116950

[8] Maul A, El-Shaarawi AH, Block JC. Bacterial distribution and sampling strategies for drinking water networks. In: McFeters GA,editor. Drinking Water Microbiology: Progress and Recent Developments. New York: Springer; 1990. p. 207-223. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-4464-6_10.

[9] Rossman L, Clark R, Grayman W. Modeling chlorine residuals in drinking-water distribution systems. J Environ Eng. 1994; 120:803-820. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1994)120:4(803)

[10] Jiang J, Zhang X, Zhu X, Li Y. Removal of intermediate aromatic halogenated DBPs by activated carbon adsorption: A new approach to controlling halogenated DBPs in chlorinated drinking water. Environ Sci Technol. 2017; 51(6):3435-3444. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.6b06161

[11] Dong F, Li C, Ma X, Lin Q, He G, Chu S. Degradation of estriol by chlorination in a pilot-scale water distribution system: Kinetics, pathway and DFT studies. Chem Eng J. 2020; 383:123187. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123187

[12] Charisiadis P, Andra SS, Makris KC, et al. Spatial and seasonal variability of tap water disinfection by-products within distribution pipe networks. Sci Total Environ. 2015;506-507:26-35. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.071

[13] He G, Li C, Dong F, et al. Chloramines in a pilot-scale water distribution system: Transformation of 17β-estradiol and formation of disinfection byproducts. Water Res. 2016; 106:41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.09.047

[14] Ye X, Wang P, Wu Y, Zhou Y, Sheng Y, Lao K. Microplastic acts as a vector for contaminants: The release behavior of dibutyl phthalate from polyvinyl chloride pipe fragments in water phase. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2020; 27:42082-42091. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10136-0

[15] Chen H, Wei Z, Sun G, et al. Formation of biofilms from new pipelines at both ends of the drinking water distribution system and comparison of disinfection by-products formation potential. Environ Res. 2020; 182:109150. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109150

[16] Li T, Guo Y, Hu H, et al. Determination of volatile chlorinated hydrocarbons in water samples by static headspace gas chromatography with electron capture detection. J Sep Sci. 2016; 39:358-366. doi: 10.1002/jssc.201500771

[17] Padhi RK, Subramanian S, Mohanty AK, Satpathy KK. Comparative assessment of chlorine reactivity and trihalomethanes formation potential of three different water sources. J Water Process Eng. 2019; 29:100769. doi: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.02.009

[18] Benson NU, Akintokun OA, Adedapo AE. Disinfection byproducts in drinking water and evaluation of potentialhealth risks of long-term exposure in Nigeria. J Environ Public Health. 2017; 2017:7535797. doi: 10.1155/2017/7535797

[19] Krasner SW. The formation and control of emerging disinfection by-products of health concern. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2009; 367( 1904):4077-4095. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2009.0108

[20] Huang H, Zhu H, Gan W, Chen X, Yang X. Occurrence of nitrogenous and carbonaceous disinfection byproducts in drinking water distributed in Shenzhen, China. Chemosphere. 2017; 188:257-264. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.08.172

[21] Li B, Liu R, Liu H, Gu J, Qu J. The formation and distribution of haloacetic acids in copper pipe during chlorination. J Hazard Mater. 2008; 152(1):250-258. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.06.090

[22] Dong F, Pang Z, Yu J, et al. Spatio-temporal variability of halogenated disinfection by-products in a large-scale two-source water distribution system with enhanced chlorination. J Hazard Mater. 2022; 423:127113. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127113

[23] Zhou X, Zheng L., Chen S, et al. Factors influencing DBPs occurrence in tap water of Jinhua Region in Zhejiang Province, China. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2019; 171:813-822. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.12.106

[24] Pang Z, Zhang P, Chen X, et al. Occurrence and modeling of disinfection byproducts in distributed water of a megacity in China: Implications for human health. Sci Total Environ. 2022; 848:157674. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157674

[25] Amjad H, Hashmi I, Rehman MSU, Ali Awan M, Ghaffar S, Khan Z. Cancer and non-cancer risk assessment of trihalomethanes in urban drinking water supplies of Pakistan. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2013; 91:25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.01.008

[26] Karim Z, Qureshi BA, Ghouri I. Spatial analysis of human health risk associated with trihalomethanes in drinking water: A case study of Karachi, Pakistan. J Chem. 2013; 2013:805682. doi: 10.1155/2013/805682.

[27] Pejman AH, Bidhendi GRN, Karbassi AR, Mehrdadi N, Bidhendi ME. Evaluation of spatial and seasonal variations in surface water quality using multivariate statistical techniques. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2009; 6(3):467-476. doi: 10.1007/Bf03326086.

[28] Clark RM, Adams JQ, Sethi V, Sivaganesan M. Control of microbial contaminants and disinfection by-products for drinking water in the US: Cost and performance. J Water Supply Res Technol-Aqua. 1998; 47(6):255-265. doi: 10.2166/aqua.1998.30

[29] Chaukura N, Marais SS, Moyo W, et al. Contemporary issues on the occurrence and removal of disinfection byproducts in drinking water - a review. J Environ Chem Eng. 2020; 8(2):103659. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2020.103659

[30] Xu D, Bai L, Tang X, et al. A comparison study of sand filtration and ultrafiltration in drinking water treatment: Removal of organic foulants and disinfection by-product formation. Sci Total Environ. 2019; 691:322-331. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.071

[31] Kennedy A, Flint L, Aligata A, Hoffman C, Arias-Paić M. Regulated disinfection byproduct formation over long residence times. Water Res. 2021; 188:116523. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116523

[32] Liao P, Zhang T, Fang L, Jiang R, Wu G. Chlorine decay and disinfection by-products transformation under booster chlorination conditions: A pilot-scale study. Sci Total Environ. 2022; 851:158115. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158115

[33] U.S. EPA. Method 551. 1: Determination of Chlorination Disinfection Byproducts, Chlorinated Solvents, and Halogenated Pesticides/Herbicides in Drinking Water by Liquid-Liquid Extraction and Gas Chromatography With Electron-Capture Detection, Revision 1.0. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. EPA; 1995

[34] Chakraborty I, Banik S, Biswas R, Yamamoto T, Noothalapati H, Mazumder N. Raman spectroscopy for microplastic detection in water sources: A systematic review. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2023; 20:10435-10448. doi: 10.1007/s13762-022-04505-0.

[35] Seyed Khademi SM, Ilbeigi V, Valadbeigi Y, Tabrizchi M, Telgheder U. Solid phase microextraction arrow-ion mobility spectrometry for determination of selected pesticides in water. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2024; 21(10):6925-6934. doi: 10.1007/s13762-024-05469-z

[36] Mompremier R, Fuentes Mariles OA, Becerril Bravo JE, Ghebremichael K. Study of the variation of haloacetic acids in a simulated water distribution network. Water Supply. 2018; 19(1), 88-96. doi: 10.2166/ws.2018.055

[37] González García AP, Carlos Hernández S, Díaz Jiménez L. Agave lechuguilla waste can be applied as biochar-adsorbent to remove arsenic from water. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2024; 22:9193-9208. doi: 10.1007/s13762-024-06226-y

[38] Marais SS, Ncube EJ, Msagati TAM, Mamba BB, Nkambule TTI. Comparison of natural organic matter removal by ultrafiltration, granular activated carbon filtration and full scale conventional water treatment. J Environ Chem Eng. 2018; 6(5):6282-6289. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2018.10.002

[39] Yoom H, Shin J, Ra J, et al. Transformation of methylparaben during water chlorination: Effects of bromide and dissolved organic matter on reaction kinetics and transformation pathways. Sci Total Environ. 2018; 634:677-686. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.330

[40] Yu Y, Huang X, Chen R, Pan L, Shi B. Control of disinfection byproducts in drinking water treatment plants: Insight into activated carbon filter. Chemosphere. 2021; 280:130958. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130958

[41] Esmati F, Holliday MC, Zein SH, Jabbar KJ, Tan F, Putranto A. Enhancing hexavalent chromium removal from textile effluent with low-cost adsorbent: Simulation and a techno-economic study. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2024; 22:6345-6364. doi: 10.1007/s13762-024-05958-1