Pilot climate suitability investigation of alternate wetting and drying irrigation practice for improving water management in paddy rice fields in Uganda

Abstract

Although susceptible to the negative consequence of climate change, rice production using continuous flooding in paddy fields contributes significantly to food security in Uganda. Alternate wetting and drying practice (AWD) is a sustainable irrigation technique with water-saving potential without reducing yields. Adopting this technique requires technical knowledge and understanding of AWD’s influence and its interaction with hydrological conditions - components of water balance including percolation and precipitation in paddy fields. This study investigated the climate suitability of AWD for improving water management with paddy rice farming in Uganda. The climate suitability analysis was conducted for Eastern Uganda considering the rainy (March - May) and dry seasons (June - July, November - February). First, we conducted a field survey from Kibimba and Doho, major rice growing schemes, and obtained FAO-WaPOR climatic data for climate suitability analysis. Ecological niche modeling in QGIS and Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt), a machine learning model, was used to evaluate AWD viability in paddy fields. Then, a hydrological assessment of paddy fields was performed using a water balance equation considering the ecological requirements of the paddy rice, climatic conditions, and soil properties. Results from the MaxEnt and Jackknife tests gave >92% and 90% high-performing metrics of area under the curves and percentage correctly classified, respectively. The significant environmental predictors identified include organic carbon stock (OCS) and available water, with OCS as the most influential factor. The percolation rate of 1 - 5 mm/day was unsuitable for AWD during the rainy season (when precipitation >20 mm/day since the increase in precipitation decreases percolation rates). Otherwise, AWD was suitable in dry and rainy seasons if the precipitation was <20 mm/day for all percolation rates, and over 70% of significant areas in Eastern Uganda favor AWD practice. These findings provide valuable quantitative insights based on climate suitability evaluation of AWD irrigation in Uganda to (i) upscale AWD technique for improving water management in paddy fields and (ii) support Uganda’s rice production goal.

Keywords

Paddy rice / Machine learning in agriculture / Ecological niche modeling / Sustainable irrigation / Food security / Climate adaptation

Funding

None.

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest among the authors.

References

[1] Rosell MC, Marco C. Rice. In: Gluten-Free Cereal Products and Beverages: Food Science and Technology. Amsterdam Netherlands: Academic Press; 2008. p. 81-100, II-III. doi: 10.1016/B978-012373739-7.50006-X

[2] Tsuboi T. Warda-Nerica Rice Workshop. Ivory Coast: WARDA; 2005.

[3] Africa Rice Center (WARDA)/FAO/SAA. In: SomadoEA, GueiRG, KeyaSO, editors. NERICA®: The New Rice for Africa-A Compendium. Cotonou, Benin, Rome, Italy, Tokyo, Japan: Africa Rice Center (WARDA), FAO, Sasakawa Africa Association; 2008. p. 210.

[4] Ministry of Agriculture Animal Industry and Fisheries (MAAIF). Uganda National Rice Development Strategy (UNRDS), 2nd Draft. Ministry of Agriculture Animal Industry and Fisheries; 2009. Available from: https://www.jica.go.jp/resource/english/our_work/thematic_issues/agricultural/pdf/uganda_en.pdf [2024 Mar 15.].

[5] Hong S, Hwang S, Lamo J, Nampamya D, Park T. The current status of opportunities for rice production in Uganda. J Korean Soc Int Agric. 2021; 33(1):67-74. doi: 10.12719/KSIA.2021.33.1.67

[6] Bwire D, Saito H, Sidle RC, Mugisha M. Water management for rice production: A key component of food security in east africa. Discov Water. 2025; 5(1):7. doi: 10.1007/s43832-025-00196-z

[7] Bwire D, Saito H, Mugisha M, Nabunya V. Water productivity and harvest index response of paddy rice with alternate wetting and drying practice for adaptation to climate change. Water. 2022;14:3368. doi: 10.3390/w14213368

[8] Bwire D, Saito H, Sidle RC, Nishiwaki J. Water management and hydrological characteristics of paddy-rice fields under alternate wetting and drying irrigation practice as climate smart practice: A review. Agronomy. 2024;14:1421. doi: 10.3390/agronomy14071421

[9] FAO. The Future of Foods and Agriculture Trends and Challenges. FAO; 2017. Available from: https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/2e90c833-8e84-46f2-a675-ea2d7afa4e24/content [2024 May 05].

[10] Xiao X, Boles S, Frolking S, Li C, Babu J Y, Salas W. Mapping paddy rice agriculture in South and Southeast Asia using multi-temporal MODIS images. Remote Sens Environ. 2006; 100:95-113. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2005.10.004

[11] MWE. National Irrigation Policy. Uganda: MWE; 2017. Available from: https://www.mwe.go.ug/sites/default/files/library/uganda%20national%20irrigation%20policy.pdf [2024 May10.].

[12] Wang H, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, et al. Water-saving irrigation is a ‘win-win’ management strategy in rice paddies-With both reduced greenhouse gas emissions and enhanced water use efficiency. Agric Water Manag. 2020;228:105889. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105889

[13] Uganda Bureau of Statistics. The National Population and Housing Census 2014-Main Report. Kampala, Uganda: Uganda Bureau of Statistics; 2016. Available from: https://www.ubos.org/wpcontent/uploads/publications/03_20182014_national_census_main_report.pdf [2024 Sep 20].

[14] Bwire D, Watanabe F, Suzuki S. The Current Status and Issues of Irrigation Agriculture in Uganda. In: Proceedings, Japanese Association of Arid Lands. Tokyo, Japan; 2017. p. 56. doi: 10.13140/rg.2.2.32998.47680

[15] Akpoti K, Dossou-Yovo RE, Zwart JS, Kiepe K. The potential for expansion of irrigated rice under alternate wetting and drying in Burkina Faso. Agric Water Manag. 2021;247:106758. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106758

[16] Peterson AT. Uses and requirements of ecological niche models and related distributional models. Biodivers Inform. 2006; 3:59-72. doi: 10.17161/bi.v3i0.29

[17] Crimmins MS, Dobrowski SZ, Mynsberge AR, Safford HS. Can fire atlas data improve species distribution model projections? Ecol Appl. 2014; 24(5):1057-1069. doi: 10.1890/13-0924.1

[18] Morisette JT, Jarnevich CS, Holcombe TR, et al. VisTrails SAHM: Visualization and workflow management for species habitat modeling. Ecography. 2013; 36(2):129-135. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07815.x

[19] Evangelista PH, Kumar S, Stohlgren TJ, et al. Modelling invasion for a habitat generalist and a specialist plant species. Divers Distrib. 2008; 14:808-817. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00486.x

[20] Akpoti K, Kabo-Bah AT, Dossou-Yovo E, Groen T, Zwart SJ. Mapping suitability for rice production in inland valley landscapes in Benin and Togo using environmental niche modeling. Sci Total Environ. 2020;709:136165. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136165

[21] Ramirez-Gila JG, Morales JG, Peterson TA. Potential geography and productivity of “Hass” avocado crops in Colombia estimated by ecological niche modelling. Sci Hortic. 2018; 237:287-295. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2018.04.021

[22] Nelson A, Wassmann R, Sander OB, KrisPalao L. Climate-determined suitability of the water saving technology “alternate wetting and drying” in rice systems: A scalable methodology demonstrated for a province in the Philippines. PLoS One. 2015; 10(12):e0145268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145268

[23] Schmitter P, Kibret S K, Lefore N, Barron J. Suitability mapping framework for solar photovoltaic pumps for smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa. Appl Geogr. 2018; 98:41-57. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.02.008

[24] Liu C, White M, and Newell G. Selecting thresholds for the prediction of species occurrence with presence-only data. J Biogeogr. 2013; 40(4):778-789. doi: 10.1111/jbi.12058

[25] Liu Q. Paddy Soil C Turnover Affected by Fertilization and Water Management. PhD Dissertation, University of Bayreuth; 2022. Available from: https://epub.uni-bayreuth.de/id/eprint/6795/1/dissertation_Liu_2022-12-06.pdf [2025 Mar 11].

[26] Heng S, Li N, Yang Q, Liang J, Liu X, Wang Y. Effects of environment and human activities on rice planting suitability based on MaxEnt model. Int J Biometeorol. 2024;68:2413-2429. doi: 10.1007/s00484-024-02757-8

[27] Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions Ecol Model. 2006; 190(3-4):231-259. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026

[28] Phillips SJ, Dudik M. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: New extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography. 2008; 32(2):161175. doi: 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.5203.x

[29] Hengl T, Heuvelink GBM, Kempen B, et al. Mapping soil properties of Africa at 250 m resolution: Random forests significantly improve current predictions. PLoS One. 2015; 10(6):e0125814. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125814

[30] Hamoud AY, Guoa X, Wanga Z, et al. Effects of irrigation regime and soil clay content and their interaction on the biological yield, nitrogen uptake and nitrogen-use efficiency of rice grown in southern China Agric. Water Manag. 2019; 213:934-946. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.12.017

[31] Bouman BAM, Lampayan RM, Tuong TP. Water Management in Irrigated Rice: Coping with Water Scarcity. Los Banos, Philipines: International Rice Research Institute; 2007. p. 54.

[32] FAO. WaPOR-The FAO Portal to Monitor Water Productivity through Open Access or Remotely Sensed Derived Data. FAO; 2020 Available from: https://wapor.apps.fao.org/home/WAPOR_2/1 [2023 Apr 05].

[33] Allen GR, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M. Crop Evapotranspiration (Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements). FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. Vol300. Food and Agriculture Organization; 1998. p. 300. Available from: https://www.fao.org/4/x0490e/x0490e00.htm [2023 May 20].

[34] Richards M, Sander BO. Alternate Wetting and Drying in Irrigated Rice. Practice Brief, Climate-Smart Agriculture, CGIAR; 2014. Available from: https://cgspace.cgiar.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/b84fb569-3edf-4058-ba4b-73d4804d7412/content [2025 Mar 11].

[35] Okello DM, Bonabana-Wabbi J, Mugonola B. Farm level allocative efficiency of rice production in Gulu and Amuru districts, Northern Uganda. Agric Food Econ. 2019; 7(1):1-19. doi: 10.1186/s40100-019-0140-x

[36] Setyanto P, Pramono A, Adriany TA, et al. Alternate wetting and drying reduces methane emission from a rice paddy in Central Java, Indonesia without yield loss. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2018; 64(1):23-30. doi: 10.1080/00380768.2017.1409600

[37] Chidthaisong A, Cha-un N, Rossopa B, et al. Evaluating the effects of alternate wetting and drying (AWD) on methane and nitrous oxide emissions from a paddy field in Thailand. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2017; 64(1):31-38. doi: 10.1080/00380768.2017.1399044

[38] Sander BO, Wassmann R, Palao LK, Nelson A. Climate-based suitability assessment for alternate wetting and drying water management in the Philippines: A novel approach for mapping methane mitigation potential in rice production. Carbon Manag. 2017;8:4. doi: 10.1080/17583004.2017.1362945

[39] MWE. Uganda National Climate Change Policy. MWE; 2015 Available from: https://www.mwe.go.ug/sites/default/files/library/national%20climate%20change%20policy%20april%202015%20final.pdf [2024 Sep 20].

[40] Chen T, Yang X, Zuo Z, et al. Shallow wet irrigation reduces nitrogen leaching loss rate in paddy fields by microbial regulation and lowers rate of downward migration of leaching water: A 15N-tracer study. Front Plant Sci. 2024;15:1340336. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1340336

[41] Kamruzzamana M, Hwang S, Choid S, et al. Prediction of the effects of management practices on discharge and mineral nitrogen yield from paddy fields under future climate using APEX-paddy model. Agric Water Manage. 2020;241:106345. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106345

[42] Deacon C, Samways JM, Pryke SJ. Artificial reservoirs complement natural ponds to improve pondscape resilience in conservation corridors in a biodiversity hotspot. PLoS One. 2018; 13(9):e0204148. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204148

[43] Choi RJ, Gwang-Jin J, Min-Soo H, et al. Benthic macroinvertebrate biodiversity improved with irrigation ponds linked to a rice paddy field. Entomol Res. 2016;46:70-79. doi: 10.1111/1748-5967.12150

[44] Warren DL, Seifert NS. Ecological niche modeling in Maxent: The importance of model complexity and the performance of model selection criteria. Ecol Appl. 2011; 21(2):335-342. doi: 10.1890/10-1171.1

[45] Merow C, Smith JM, Silander AJ Jr. A practical guide to MaxEnt for modeling species’ distributions: What it does, and why inputs and settings matter. Ecography. 2013; 36:1058-1069. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.07872.x

[46] Huang Z, Haung A, Dawson PT, Cong L. The effects of the spatial extent on modelling giant panda distributions using ecological niche models. Sustainability. 2021; 13(21):11707. doi: 10.3390/su132111707

[47] Oo AZ, Sudo S, Inubushi K, et al. Mitigation potential and yield-scaled global warming potential of early-season drainage from a rice paddy in Tamil Nadu, India. Agron. 2018; 8(10):202. doi: 10.3390/agronomy8100202

[48] Carrijo DR, Lundy ME, Linquist BA. Rice yields and water use under alternate wetting and drying irrigation: A meta-analysis. Field Crops Res. 2017; 203:173-180. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2016.12.002

[49] Mehta C, Senthilkumar T, Imran S. Automation of agricultural operations for sustainable rice production in the era of climate change: Automation of farm operations in rice cultivation. ORYZA Int J Rice. 2024; 61(4):426-432. doi: 10.35709/ory.2024.61.4.17

[50] Khan AA, Chaudhari O, Chandra R. A review of ensemble learning and data augmentation models for class imbalanced problems: Combination, implementation and evaluation. Expert Syst Appl. 2023;244:122778. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122778