Consensus statements on the definition, diagnosis, and management of oligoprogressive disease: results of an expert survey of Kazakhstan Cancer Society

Dilyara Kaidarova , Indira Omarova , Samat Kaldarbekov , Nazgul Omarbayeva , Maia Dzhugashvili , Elena Ulrikh , Dina Alisheva , Bakhadyr Bereketov , Ilya Tsimafeyeu , Timur Mitin

Exploration of Targeted Anti-tumor Therapy ›› 2026, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (1) : 1002392

PDF (646KB)
Exploration of Targeted Anti-tumor Therapy ›› 2026, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (1) :1002392 DOI: 10.37349/etat.2026.1002392
Original Article
research-article
Consensus statements on the definition, diagnosis, and management of oligoprogressive disease: results of an expert survey of Kazakhstan Cancer Society
Author information +
History +
PDF (646KB)

Abstract

Aim: Oligoprogressive disease (OPD) has emerged as a clinically relevant and common scenario in oncology, reflecting progression in a limited number of metastatic sites while systemic therapy continues to control the majority of disease. Despite its increasing recognition, the definition, diagnostic approach, and management of OPD remain poorly standardized.

Methods: A multidisciplinary expert panel from Kazakhstan and international faculty, including ten medical oncologists, radiation, and surgical oncologists, participated in a structured survey. The questionnaire consisted of 15 items divided into three domains: definition of OPD, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment strategies. Responses were analyzed, and consensus was defined as ≥ 70% agreement, relative agreement as 50–69%, and lack of consensus as < 50%.

Results: Consensus was reached that OPD is defined as progression in a limited number of lesions while other sites remain controlled, regardless of lesion size or localization. No consensus was achieved regarding the maximum number of progressive lesions, with experts divided between “≤ 5 lesions” and “any number amenable to local therapy.” Imaging with CT or PET-CT was considered sufficient. Biopsy and molecular testing were recommended only in selected contexts. Systemic therapy continuation during OPD was endorsed if effective, with strong support for local therapy, particularly stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SBRT/SABR). Divergence remained regarding the management of repeat OPD.

Conclusions: This Kazakhstan Cancer Society consensus defines the fundamental clinical features of OPD and provides practical recommendations for diagnosis and treatment. Comparison with international guidelines reveals broad alignment on systemic continuation and local therapy, as well as persistent variation regarding lesion number, biopsy, and repeat OPD management.

Keywords

oligoprogressive disease / management / consensus / Kazakhstan Cancer Society

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Dilyara Kaidarova, Indira Omarova, Samat Kaldarbekov, Nazgul Omarbayeva, Maia Dzhugashvili, Elena Ulrikh, Dina Alisheva, Bakhadyr Bereketov, Ilya Tsimafeyeu, Timur Mitin. Consensus statements on the definition, diagnosis, and management of oligoprogressive disease: results of an expert survey of Kazakhstan Cancer Society. Exploration of Targeted Anti-tumor Therapy, 2026, 7 (1) : 1002392 DOI:10.37349/etat.2026.1002392

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Palma DA, Olson R, Harrow S, Gaede S, Louie AV, Haasbeek C, et al. Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for the Comprehensive Treatment of Oligometastatic Cancers: Long-Term Results of the SABR-COMET Phase II Randomized Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020; 38: 2830-8.

[2]

Tsimafeyeu I, Dengina N, Mitin T. A randomized phase 2 study of the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma and oligoprogression on maintenance therapy with avelumab (VOLGA 2). J Clin Oncol. 2025; 43: TPS4620.

[3]

Gulati S, Martinez P, Joshi T, Birkbak NJ, Santos CR, Rowan AJ, et al. Systematic Evaluation of the Prognostic Impact and Intratumour Heterogeneity of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Biomarkers. Eur Urol. 2014; 66: 936-48.

[4]

Chroni A, Miura S, Hamilton L, Vu T, Gaffney SG, Aly V, et al. Clone Phylogenetics Reveals Metastatic Tumor Migrations, Maps, and Models. Cancers. 2022; 14: 4326.

[5]

Tsimafeyeu I, Guliyev F, Ongarbayev B, Musaeva G, Abdrakhmanov R, Chubenko V, et al. Distinct pathways of disease progression with dual checkpoint blockade versus immunotargeted therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Urol Oncol: Semin Orig Investig. 2026; 44: 110989.

[6]

Tsimafeyeu I, Makhov P, Ovcharenko D, Smith J, Khochenkova Y, Olshanskaya A, et al. A novel anti-FGFR1 monoclonal antibody OM-RCA-01 exhibits potent antitumor activity and enhances the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in lung cancer models. Immuno-Oncol Technol. 2024; 23: 100725.

[7]

Imano N. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastatic disease: current evidence and future perspectives. Int J Clin Oncol. 2025; 30: 1505-21.

[8]

Peng P, Gong J, Zhang Y, Zhou S, Li Y, Han G, et al. EGFR-TKIs plus stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for stage IV Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled phase II study. Radiother Oncol. 2023; 184: 109681.

[9]

Dengina N, Mitin T, Gamayunov S, Safina S, Kreinina Y, Tsimafeyeu I. Stereotactic body radiation therapy in combination with systemic therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a prospective multicentre study. ESMO Open. 2019; 4: e000535.

[10]

Chmura SJ, Winter KA, Woodward WA, Borges VF, Salama JK, Al-Hallaq HA, et al. NRG-BR002: A phase IIR/III trial of standard of care systemic therapy with or without stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and/or surgical resection (SR) for newly oligometastatic breast cancer (NCT02364557). J Clin Oncol. 2022; 40: 1007.

[11]

Iyengar P, All S, Berry MF, Boike TP, Bradfield L, Dingemans AC, et al. Treatment of Oligometastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: An ASTRO/ESTRO Clinical Practice Guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2023; 13: 393-412.

[12]

Lievens Y, Guckenberger M, Gomez D, Hoyer M, Iyengar P, Kindts I, et al. Defining oligometastatic disease from a radiation oncology perspective: An ESTRO-ASTRO consensus document. Radiother Oncol. 2020; 148: 157-66.

[13]

Marvaso G, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Zaffaroni M, Vincini MG, Corrao G, Andratschke N, et al. Delphi consensus on stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for oligometastatic and oligoprogressive renal cell carcinoma-a European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology study endorsed by the European Association of Urology. Lancet Oncol. 2024; 25: e193-204.

[14]

Cardoso F, Paluch-Shimon S, Schumacher-Wulf E, Matos L, Gelmon K, Aapro MS, et al. 6th and 7th International consensus guidelines for the management of advanced breast cancer (ABC guidelines 6 and 7). Breast. 2024; 76: 103756.

[15]

Laurie SA, Banerji S, Blais N, Brule S, Cheema PK, Cheung P, et al. Canadian Consensus: Oligoprogressive, Pseudoprogressive, and Oligometastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Curr Oncol. 2019; 26: e81-93.

[16]

Radiation Oncology Physician Branch, Chinese Medical Doctor Association; Radiation Oncology Branch, Chinese Medical Association; Professional Commitee of Radiation Oncology, China Anti-Cancer Association; Expert Committee of Esophageal Cancer, Chinese Cancer Radiotherapy Alliance; Radiotherapy Sub-Committee, Professional Commitee of Elderly Oncology, Gerontological Society of China. Expert consensus on radiotherapy for oligometastatic esophageal cancer (2025 edition). Radiat Med Prot. 2025; 6: 119-31.

PDF (646KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/