Comparison of weekly docetaxel regimens in prostate cancer: a systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis

Shree Rath , Fatima Sajjad , Khawaja Abdul Rehman , Zaryab Bacha , Ahmad Omar Saleh , Umair Hayat , Umama Alam , Waseef Ullah , Fareeda Brohi , Osama Ahmad , Muzamil Khan , Amar Lal

Exploration of Targeted Anti-tumor Therapy ›› 2026, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (1) : 1002360

PDF (1547KB)
Exploration of Targeted Anti-tumor Therapy ›› 2026, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (1) :1002360 DOI: 10.37349/etat.2026.1002360
Systematic Review
research-article
Comparison of weekly docetaxel regimens in prostate cancer: a systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis
Author information +
History +
PDF (1547KB)

Abstract

Background: Docetaxel is a cornerstone chemotherapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive and castration-resistant prostate cancer. Although the standard triweekly regimen is widely used, weekly and biweekly schedules are often employed to improve tolerability, particularly in elderly or frail patients. The comparative efficacy and safety of these dosing strategies remain unclear. This study aimed to systematically compare weekly, biweekly, and triweekly docetaxel regimens using a network meta-analysis.

Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to February 2025. Randomized controlled trials and observational retrospective studies comparing weekly, biweekly, and triweekly docetaxel regimens were included. Outcomes assessed were prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate, time to treatment failure or progression, and adverse events. A frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis was conducted using R software.

Results: Eleven studies involving 1,238 patients were included. PSA response rates did not differ significantly among regimens; triweekly docetaxel showed a numerically lower response compared with weekly dosing (RR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.52–1.22;I2 = 41.1%). Time to treatment failure was significantly longer with triweekly dosing compared with weekly dosing (mean difference = 10.91 months, 95% CI 6.94–14.87;I2 = 96.8%). Biweekly and triweekly regimens were associated with significantly higher hepatotoxicity compared with weekly dosing (RR = 3.71 and RR = 3.21, respectively; I2 = 0%). Vomiting was more frequent with triweekly docetaxel (RR = 2.47, 95% CI 1.31–4.63). No significant differences were observed for overall adverse events, hematologic toxicity, neuropathy, fatigue, febrile neutropenia, nausea, anorexia, or diarrhea.

Discussion: Docetaxel dosing schedules show comparable PSA response rates. Triweekly dosing prolongs time to treatment failure but is associated with greater toxicity, whereas weekly dosing offers better tolerability. Treatment decisions should balance efficacy and safety based on individual patient characteristics.

Keywords

docetaxel / prostate cancer / network meta-analysis / dosing

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Shree Rath, Fatima Sajjad, Khawaja Abdul Rehman, Zaryab Bacha, Ahmad Omar Saleh, Umair Hayat, Umama Alam, Waseef Ullah, Fareeda Brohi, Osama Ahmad, Muzamil Khan, Amar Lal. Comparison of weekly docetaxel regimens in prostate cancer: a systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis. Exploration of Targeted Anti-tumor Therapy, 2026, 7 (1) : 1002360 DOI:10.37349/etat.2026.1002360

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Rath S, Lal A, Hasan A, Ali M, Sultan L, Khan M, et al. Long-Term Mortality Trends From Prostate Cancer and Associated Second Malignancies in the U.S., 1999 to 2023: Implications for Survivorship Care. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2025; 23: 102428.

[2]

Sayegh N, Swami U, Agarwal N. Recent Advances in the Management of Metastatic Prostate Cancer. JCO Oncol Pract. 2022; 18: 45-55.

[3]

Van Poppel H. Recent docetaxel studies establish a new standard of care in hormone refractory prostate cancer. Can J Urol. 2005; 12 Suppl 1: 81-5.

[4]

Tannock IF, de Wit R, Berry WR, Horti J, Pluzanska A, Chi KN, et al.; TAX 327 Investigators. Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351: 1502-12.

[5]

Lendorf ME, Petersen PM, Svendsen AS, Lindberg H, Brasso K. Effectiveness of Docetaxel for Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer in Clinical Practice. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2021; 24: 25-33.

[6]

Sinibaldi VJ. Docetaxel treatment in the elderly patient with hormone refractory prostate cancer. Clin Interv Aging. 2007; 2: 555-60.

[7]

Martinez-Recio S, Perez-Wert JP, Martinez-Fdez S, Jimenez-Bou D, Ruiz-Gutierrez I, Peña J, et al. Comparison of 2-Weekly and 3-Weekly Dosing of Docetaxel in Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2022; 20: 363-70.

[8]

Yuk HD, Kim M, Keam B, Ku JH, Kwak C, Jeong CW. Weekly versus 2-weekly versus 3-weekly docetaxel to treat metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Prostate Int. 2024; 12: 219-23.

[9]

Kellokumpu-Lehtinen P, Harmenberg U, Joensuu T, McDermott R, Hervonen P, Ginman C, et al. 2-Weekly versus 3-weekly docetaxel to treat castration-resistant advanced prostate cancer: a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013; 14: 117-24.

[10]

Wang L, Li C, Zhao Z, Li X, Tang C, Guan Z, et al. Comparison of doublet and triplet therapies for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Front Oncol. 2023; 13: 1104242.

[11]

Salanti G, Higgins JPT, Ades AE, Ioannidis JPA. Evaluation of networks of randomized trials. Stat Methods Med Res. 2008; 17: 279-301.

[12]

Feyerabend S, Saad F, Li T, Ito T, Diels J, Sanden SV, et al. Survival benefit, disease progression and quality-of-life outcomes of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone versus docetaxel in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: A network meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2018; 103: 78-87.

[13]

Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [Internet]. The Cochrane Collaboration; c2026 [cited 2025 Jan 11]. Available from: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook

[14]

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372: n71.

[15]

Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019; 366: l4898.

[16]

The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses [Internet]. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; c2025 [cited 2026 Jan 3]. Available from: https://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp

[17]

Hervonen P, Joensuu H, Joensuu T, Ginman C, McDermott R, Harmenberg U, et al. Biweekly docetaxel is better tolerated than conventional three-weekly dosing for advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Anticancer Res. 2012; 32: 953-6.

[18]

Lehtonen M, Sormunen J, Luukkaala T, Marttila T, McDermott R, Joensuu T, et al. 2-weekly versus 3-weekly docetaxel for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: complete quality of life results from the randomised, phase-III PROSTY trial. Acta Oncol. 2022; 61: 963-71.

[19]

Petrioli R, Pascucci A, Conca R, Chiriacò G, Francini E, Bargagli G, et al. Docetaxel and epirubicin compared with docetaxel and prednisone in advanced castrate-resistant prostate cancer: a randomised phase II study. Br J Cancer. 2011; 104: 613-9.

[20]

Berthold DR, Pond GR, de Wit R, Eisenberger M, Tannock IF; Investigators T3; TAX 327 Investigators. Survival and PSA response of patients in the TAX 327 study who crossed over to receive docetaxel after mitoxantrone or vice versa. Ann Oncol. 2008; 19: 1749-53.

[21]

Kim HS, Lee JY, Lee SJ, Lim HY, Sung HH, Jeon HG, et al. A retrospective feasibility study of biweekly, reduced-dose docetaxel in Asian patients with castrate-resistant, metastatic prostate cancer. BMC Urol. 2017; 17: 63.

[22]

Samar A, Tiwari S, Subramanian S, Joshi N, Sejpal J, Khan MA, et al. A Multicentric, Retrospective Efficacy and Safety Study of Nanosomal Docetaxel Lipid Suspension in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Prostate Cancer. 2020; 2020: 4242989.

[23]

Sayin M, Celenkoglu G. Comparison of Weekly Low Dose Docetaxel with the Standard Protocol in Hormone-resistant Metastatic Prostate Cancer. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2022; 32: 1026- 32.

[24]

Shimura Y, Suga Y, Itai S, Iwamoto H, Takezawa Y, Yaegashi H, et al. Comparison of Tolerability Between 2-Weekly and 3-Weekly Docetaxel Regimen in Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer. Anticancer Res. 2020; 40: 4291-7.

[25]

Neto AS, Tobias-Machado M, Kaliks R, Wroclawski ML, Pompeo ACL, Giglio AD. Ten years of docetaxel-based therapies in prostate adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 2244 patients in 12 randomized clinical trials. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2011; 9: 115-23.

[26]

Francini E, Petrioli R, Rossi G, Laera L, Roviello G. PSA response rate as a surrogate marker for median overall survival in docetaxel-based first-line treatments for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: an analysis of 22 trials. Tumour Biol. 2014; 35: 10601-7.

[27]

Petrylak DP, Tangen CM, Hussain MHA, jr PNL, Jones JA, Taplin ME, et al. Docetaxel and estramustine compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone for advanced refractory prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351: 1513-20.

[28]

Taplin M. Biochemical (Prostate-Specific Antigen) Relapse: An Oncologist’s Perspective. Rev Urol. 2003; 5 Suppl 2: S3-13.

[29]

Gajra A, Zemla TJ, Jatoi A, Feliciano JL, Wong ML, Chen H, et al. Time-to-Treatment-Failure and Related Outcomes Among 1000+ Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: Comparisons Between Older Versus Younger Patients (Alliance A151711). J Thorac Oncol. 2018; 13: 996-1003.

[30]

Kushnir I, Mallick R, Ong M, Canil C, Bossé D, Koczka K, et al. Docetaxel dose-intensity effect on overall survival in patients with metastatic castrate-sensitive prostate cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2020; 85: 863-8.

[31]

van Eijk M, Vermunt MAC, van Werkhoven E, Wilthagen EA, Huitema ADR, Beijnen JH. The influence of docetaxel schedule on treatment tolerability and efficacy in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Cancer. 2022; 22: 104.

PDF (1547KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/