Rapid report of seismic damage and consequence analysis in the 2025 M 6.8 Dingri earthquake

Qingxue Shang , Zhongyi Zhou

Earthquake Research Advances ›› 2025, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (4) : 100394

PDF (30335KB)
Earthquake Research Advances ›› 2025, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (4) :100394 DOI: 10.1016/j.eqrea.2025.100394
research-article
Rapid report of seismic damage and consequence analysis in the 2025 M 6.8 Dingri earthquake
Author information +
History +
PDF (30335KB)

Abstract

On January 7, 2025, a M 6.8 earthquake occurred at Dingri County, Shigatse City, Xizang Autonomous Region, which is the most largest earthquake in this region in the most recent five years. The maximum recorded peak ground acceleration in this earthquake is 0.43 g, which is significantly higher than the local design basis earthquake intensity level. This report focuses on the post-earthquake seismic damage investigation of rural self-built houses and local public buildings, which shows quite different seismic performance. Collapse and heavy damage of rural self-built houses without seismic resistant measures were observed, while the masonry houses with seismic resistant measures show good seismic performance against collapse. The structural systems of public buildings with proper seismic design suffered slight seismic damage. Different form slight structural damage, the seismic damages of non-structural components, which resulted in the interruption of public building functionality were highlighted in this report. With the investigation results of seismic damage suffered by local houses and buildings, the casualty distribution and causes were analyzed in detail.

Keywords

Seismic damage / Self-built houses / Public buildings / Non-structural components / Reinforced concrete frame structures / Casualty

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Qingxue Shang, Zhongyi Zhou. Rapid report of seismic damage and consequence analysis in the 2025 M 6.8 Dingri earthquake. Earthquake Research Advances, 2025, 5(4): 100394 DOI:10.1016/j.eqrea.2025.100394

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Qingxue Shang: Writing - review & editing, Writing - original draft, Visualization, Software, Resources, Project administration, Methodology, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. Zhongyi Zhou: Writing - review & editing, Writing - original draft, Resources, Methodology, Investigation, Data curation, Conceptualization.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

[1]

Di Sarno L., Magliulo G., D'Angela D., Cosenza E., 2019. Experimental assessment of the seismic performance of hospital cabinets using shake table testing. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam. 48, 103-123.

[2]

GB 18306-2001, 2001. Seismic Ground Motion Parameter Zonation Map of China. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, Beijing.

[3]

GB 18306-2015, 2016. Seismic Ground Motion Parameters Zonation Map of China. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, Beijing.

[4]

GB 50011-2010, 2016. Code for Seismic Design of Buildings. Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, Beijing.

[5]

GB/T 17742-2020,2020 The Chinese Seismic Intensity Scale. Beijing: China Standards Press, Beijing.

[6]

GB/T 24335-2009,2009. Classification of Earthquake Damage to Buildings and Special Structures. Beijing: China Standard Press, Beijing.

[7]

Liang M., Dong Y., Hong Z., 2025. Surface deformation charactersties and causes of the Dengmecuo segment in the Xizang Dingri Ms 6.8 earhquake. Seismal. Gedl. 47, 80 - 89 (in Chinese).

[8]

Ministry of Emergency Management of the People ’ s Republic of China, 2025. Intensity map of the M 6.8 Dingri earthquake in Xizang. URL: https://www.mem.gov.cn/xw/yjglbgzdt/202501/t20250110_517756.shtml.

[9]

Miranda E., Mosqueda G., Retamales R., Pekcan G., 2012. Performance of nonstructural components during the 27 February 2010 Chile earthquake. Earthq. Spectra 28, 453-471.

[10]

Qu Z., Zhu B., Cao Y., Fu H., 2023. Rapid report of seismic damage to buildings in the 2022 M 6.8 Luding earthquake, China. Earthquake Res. Advan. 3, 100180.

[11]

Shang Q., Li J., Wang T., 2022. Floor acceleration response spectra of elastic reinforced concrete frames. J. Build. Eng. 45, 103558.

[12]

Shang Q., Li J., Du C., Wang T., 2023. Seismic fragility analysis of freestanding hospital cabinets based on shaking table tests. J. Earthq. Eng. 27, 1993-2012.

[13]

Sun B., Deng H., 2015. Study on seismic behavior of bottom frame structure building. J. Build. Struct. 36, 131 - 137 (in Chinese).

[14]

Wang D., Dai J., Qu Z., Ning X., 2016. Shake table tests of suspended ceilings to simulate the observed damage in the Ms 7.0 Lushan earthquake, China. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 15, 239-249.

[15]

Wang T., Shang Q., Li J., 2021. Seismic force demands on acceleration-sensitive nonstructural components: a state-of-the-art review. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 20, 39-62.

[16]

Xie X., Zhang L., Qu Z., 2022. A critical review of methods for determining the damage states for the in-plane fragility of masonry infill walls. J. Earthq. Eng. 26, 4523-4544.

[17]

Zhao B., Taucer F., Rossetto T., 2009. Field investigation on the performance of building structures during the 12 May 2008 wenchuan earthquake in China. Eng. Struct. 31, 1707-1723.

PDF (30335KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/