Preliminary analysis of emergency production and source parameters of the M 4.7 earthquake on September 18, 2024 in Feidong, Anhui

Jiajing Xu , Guangjie Han , Nan Xi , Li Sun

Earthquake Research Advances ›› 2025, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (3) : 1 -6.

PDF
Earthquake Research Advances ›› 2025, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (3) :1 -6. DOI: 10.1016/j.eqrea.2025.100360
research-article

Preliminary analysis of emergency production and source parameters of the M 4.7 earthquake on September 18, 2024 in Feidong, Anhui

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

At 20:08 on September 18, 2024, Beijing time, an earthquake of magnitude 4.7 occurred in Feidong, Anhui Province (31.98°N, 117.6°E). The China Earthquake Early Warning Network presented the first early warning results 8.9 s after the earthquake. The China Earthquake Networks Center (CENC) released the automatic rapid report results 163 s after the earthquake and the official rapid report results 8 min after the earthquake. At the same time, the CENC reported a series of emergency products, including source parameters, seismic tectonics, historical earthquakes, focal mechanism, instrument seismic intensity and predicted intensity. The results showed that the earthquake was located at the junction of the southern section of the Tanlu Fault and the Feizhong Fault, with aftershocks distributed in the NEE direction. The focal mechanism solution indicates that the earthquake is essentially a strike-slip event. The predicted intensity in the vicinity of the epicenter reaches up to VI, involving 23 towns that cover an area of about 1 359 km2. Only one station near the epicenter shows a peak acceleration value greater than the fortification standard of the area, which may cause slight damage to some adjacent houses, consistent with the actual damage to buildings.

Keywords

Anhui Feidong earthquake / Earthquake rapid report / Data products / Focal mechanism / Seismic intensity

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jiajing Xu, Guangjie Han, Nan Xi, Li Sun. Preliminary analysis of emergency production and source parameters of the M 4.7 earthquake on September 18, 2024 in Feidong, Anhui. Earthquake Research Advances, 2025, 5(3): 1-6 DOI:10.1016/j.eqrea.2025.100360

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Jiajing Xu: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Validation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Guangjie Han: Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Writing - review & editing. Nan Xi: Resources, Software, Visualization, Writing review & editing. Li Sun: Validation, Methodology, Writing - review & editing.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Author agreement and acknowledgment

I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. We are grateful to the Emergency Product Output Service Working Group of the Early Warning and Rapid Reporting Department of CENC, and along with the Institute of Geophysics, China Earthquake Adminis-tration, have provided a plethora of data products, emergency maps and information for this article. We would like to express our deep gratitude to the managing editor for his gracious support. We thank the editor, Ms. Qin Xu, and two anonymous reviewers for construcive comments. This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (52122811).

Data and resources

Seismic waveform data were requested with a preauthorized account from the Data Management Center of China Earthquake Networks Center (https://data.earthquake.cn). GMT software was used to draw all maps related to geological structures and faults in this paper (Wessel et al., 2013).

References

[1]

Cui T.F., 2019. Three-dimensional Electrical Structure of the Crust in Tanlu-Dabie Tectonic Area and its Dynamic Significance[D]. Institute of Geology, China Earthquake Administration.

[2]

Dai D.Q., Xi N., 2023. Fast inversion of the rupture process of the M5.5 earthquake in Shandong Plain on August 6, 2023. Earthquake in China 39 (3), 689-694 (in Chinese).

[3]

Deng W.Z., Yang Z.G., Xi N., et al., 2021. Rapid measurement and data production of M7. 4 earthquake in maduo, Qinghai province, 22 may 2021. Earthq. Res. China 37 (2), 541-550 (in Chinese).

[4]

Han G.J., Xu T.R., Dai D.Q., et al., 2024. Output and service platform construction of major earthquake emergency response products. Earthq. Res. China 40 (1), 208-222 (in Chinese).

[5]

Han Y., 2016. Chronology of Deformed Dike in the Feidong Section of Tanlu Fault Zone and its Tectonic Significance[D]. Hefei University of Technology, Anhui.

[6]

Herrmann R.B., 2013. Computer programs in seismology: an evolving tool for instruction and research. Seismol Res. Lett. 84 (6), 1081-1088.

[7]

Kanamori H., Rivera L., 2008. Source inversion of W phase: speeding up seismic tsunami warning. Geophys. J. Int. 175 (1), 222-238.

[8]

Li J.L., Chao H.T., Cui Z.W., et al., 1994. Segmentation of Tanlu active fault and its major earthquake risk analysis. Seismological Geology 16 (2), 121-126 (in Chinese).

[9]

Li J.W., Wu Z.L., 2016. Problem of "blind area" control in earthquake early warning system: a case study of prototype earthquake early warning system in the capital region. Earthq. Res. China 32 (4), 584-594 (in Chinese).

[10]

Li T.X., Wang Y., Guo X.Y., et al., 2017. Segmentation characteristics and small earthquake sequence activity analysis of Tanlu seismic belt. J. Disas Preven. Mitigat. 33 (2), 78-84.

[11]

Liang H., Dai D.Q., Yang Z.G., et al., 2022. Preliminary analysis of emergency response products and source parameters of M6.1 earthquake in Lushan, Sichuan on June 1, 2022. Earthq. Res. China 38 (2), 360-369 (in Chinese).

[12]

Liu B., Zhu G., Zhai M., et al., 2015. Quaternary faulting of the Jiangsu part of the tanLu Fault Zone, East China: Evidence from field investigations and OSL dating. J. Asian Earth Sci. 114 (1), 89-102.

[13]

Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China, 2010. Code for Seismic Design of Buildings(GB 50011-2010). China Architecture and Architecture Press, Beijing.

[14]

Wessel P., Smith W.H.F., Scharroo R., et al., 2013. Generic mapping tools: improved version released. Eos, Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 94 (45), 409-410.

[15]

Wu J.H., 2014. Analysis on seismic geological structure and building aseismic resistance in Hefei. Anhui Archite 21 (5), 335-337.

[16]

Xie S.W., Han C.C., Yu J.F., et al., 2016. One-dimensional crustal velocity model in Anhui based on Hyposat positioning method. Prog. Geophys. 31 (6), 2429-2437 (in Chinese).

[17]

Xu H., Sun Y.J., Wu H.L., 2016. Effect of the M8.5 Tancheng earthquake in 1668 on seismic activity in the vicinity from coseismic and post-seismic deformation. Chinese J. Geomech. 22 (3), 568-576.

[18]

Xu J.J., Han G.J., Xi N., et al., 2024. Preliminary analysis of source parameters of the M7. 1 Wushi earthquake in Xinjiang on January 23, 2024. Earthq. Res. China 40 (1), 260-270 (in Chinese).

[19]

Xu J.W., Ma G.F., 1992. Review of Tanlu fault zone research in the past decade. Geol. Rev. 38 (4), 316-324 (in Chinese).

[20]

Xu T.R., Dai D.Q., Yang Z.G., et al., 2022. Preliminary results of the luding M6.8 earthquake on 5 september 2022, Sichuan province. Earthquake in China 38 (3), 412-424 (in Chinese).

[21]

Yang Z., Xu T., Liang J., 2024. Towards fast focal mechanism inversion of shallow crustal earthquakes in the Chinese mainland. Earthquake Res. Adv. 4 (2), 100273.

[22]

Yuan F., 2021. Analysis of Structural Style, Metamorphic Deformation Characteristics and Evolution Process of Feidong Section of Tanlu Fault Belt. Anhui: Hefei University of Technology.

[23]

Zhai H.T., Zhang Y., Sun B.T., 2006. Seismicity and seismogeological structure background analysis in Hefei area. South China Earthquake 26 (3), 68-76 (in Chinese).

[24]

Zhi M., Sun L., Yang Z.G., et al., 2022. Rapid measurement and data production of the M6.9 earthquake in Menyuan, Qinghai province, 8 January 2022. Earthq. Res. China 38 (1), 30-41.

[25]

Zhang Y.H., Guo B., Wang B., et al., 2013. Comparison of moderate-strong seismic activity in the southern section of Tanlu fault zone and in the middle section before the Tancheng 8.5 earthquake in 1668. Plateau Earthquake 25 (1), 22-26 (in Chinese).

[26]

Zhang Y.Q., Dai D.Q., Yang Z.G., et al., 2023. Preliminary analysis of source parameters of the M5.5 earthquake in Shandong Plain on August 6, 2023. Earthq. Res. China 39 (4), 902-912 (in Chinese).

[27]

Zhao T., 2016. Deformation Pattern, Evolution Law and Formation Mechanism of Orogenic Period in the Southern Segment of Tanlu Fault Belt[D]. Hefei University of Technology, Anhui.

[28]

Zhao X., Duputel Z., Yao Z., 2017. Regional W-phase source inversion for moderate to large earthquakes in China and neighboring areas. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 122 (12), 10, 052-010,068.

[29]

Zhu G., Jiang D., Zhang B., et al., 2012. Destruction of the eastern North China Craton in a backarc setting: evidence from crustal deformation kinematics. Gondwana Res.: Int. Geosci. J. 22 (1), 86-103.

[30]

Zhu G., Liu C., Gu C.C., et al., 2018. The late Mesozoic evolution of the Tanlu fault zone as an indication of the subduction history of the Western Pacific. Sci. China Earth Sci. 48 (4), 415-435.

[31]

Zou L.Y., Huang Z.B., Zhou J., et al., 2019. Rapid measurement and data production of the M6.0 earthquake in Changning, Sichuan province, June 17, 2019. Earthq. Res. China 35 (3), 573-583 (in Chinese).

PDF

132

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/