Efficacy of switching from originator adalimumab to biosimilar adalimumab-AACF in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: a 12-month observational study

Fanny Alcira Reyes Neira , Barbara Bayeh , Karina Rossi Bonfiglioli , Nadia Emi Aikawa , Ana Paula Luppino Assad , Renata Miossi , Fernando Henrique Carlos de Souza , Carlos Emilio Insfrán , Henrique Ayres Mayrink Giardini , Emily Figueiredo Vieira Neves Yuki , Eloisa Bonfa , Carla Gonçalves Schahin Saad , Ana Cristina de Medeiros-Ribeiro , Julio Cesar Bertacini de Moraes , Andrea Yukie Shimabuco

Exploration of Musculoskeletal Diseases ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) : 100783

PDF (1378KB)
Exploration of Musculoskeletal Diseases ›› 2025, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (1) :100783 DOI: 10.37349/emd.2025.100783
Original Article
research-article
Efficacy of switching from originator adalimumab to biosimilar adalimumab-AACF in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: a 12-month observational study
Author information +
History +
PDF (1378KB)

Abstract

Aim: The use of anti-TNF drugs is well-established for treating axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). The introduction of biosimilars offers a more accessible alternative, but data on the switching of adalimumab biosimilars in the axSpA population remain somewhat controversial and are limited to SB5 and ABP 501 and to the European population. This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy of switching from originator adalimumab to the biosimilar adalimumab-AACF in Latin American axSpA patients over a 12-month period in a real-life analysis.

Methods: This observational study included patients with axSpA who had been treated with originator adalimumab for at least three months and switched to the biosimilar. Disease activity parameters and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were assessed at baseline (T0) and compared at 6 (T6) and 12 months (T12) following the switch.

Results: Twenty-eight patients were included, with a mean duration of originator adalimumab use of 87.6 months. Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)-CRP remained stable when comparing T0 to T6 [1.56 (± 0.88) vs. 1.50 (± 0.82), P = 0.73] and T12 [1.56 (± 0.88) vs. 1.26 (± 0.86), P = 0.13]. A similar pattern was observed for ASDAS-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR; P > 0.05) and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI; P > 0.05). The rate of remission/low disease activity was consistent, recorded at 71.4% at baseline, 78.6% at T6 (P = 0.62) and 78.6% at T12 (P = 0.68). CRP levels did not show significant variation (P > 0.05) across time points. Notably, the one-year drug retention rate was 94.6%.

Conclusions: This real-world study highlights for the first time the feasibility and efficacy of transitioning from originator adalimumab to biosimilar AACF in axSpA, providing support for its use in long-term management and offering enhanced accessibility without compromising therapeutic outcomes. These results add valuable Latin American data to the body of evidence on biosimilar integration into clinical practice.

Keywords

Anti-TNF biologics / biosimilar / originator / adalimumab / axial spondyloarthritis

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Fanny Alcira Reyes Neira, Barbara Bayeh, Karina Rossi Bonfiglioli, Nadia Emi Aikawa, Ana Paula Luppino Assad, Renata Miossi, Fernando Henrique Carlos de Souza, Carlos Emilio Insfrán, Henrique Ayres Mayrink Giardini, Emily Figueiredo Vieira Neves Yuki, Eloisa Bonfa, Carla Gonçalves Schahin Saad, Ana Cristina de Medeiros-Ribeiro, Julio Cesar Bertacini de Moraes, Andrea Yukie Shimabuco. Efficacy of switching from originator adalimumab to biosimilar adalimumab-AACF in patients with axial spondyloarthritis: a 12-month observational study. Exploration of Musculoskeletal Diseases, 2025, 3 (1) : 100783 DOI:10.37349/emd.2025.100783

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Ramiro S, Nikiphorou E, Sepriano A, Ortolan A, Webers C, Baraliakos X, et al. ASAS-EULAR recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis: 2022 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023; 82: 19-34.

[2]

Webers C, Ortolan A, Sepriano A, Falzon L, Baraliakos X, Landewé RBM, et al. Efficacy and safety of biological DMARDs: a systematic literature review informing the 2022 update of the ASAS-EULAR recommendations for the management of axial spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023; 82: 130-41.

[3]

Smolen JS, Caporali R, Doerner T, Fautrel B, Benedetti F, Pieper B, et al. Treatment journey in rheumatoid arthritis with biosimilars: from better access to good disease control through cost savings and prevention of nocebo effects. RMD Open. 2021; 7: e001637.

[4]

Jha A, Upton A, Dunlop WCN, Akehurst R. The Budget Impact of Biosimilar Infliximab (Remsima®) for the Treatment of Autoimmune Diseases in Five European Countries. Adv Ther. 2015; 32: 742-56.

[5]

García-Beloso N, Altabás-González I, Samartín-Ucha M, Gayoso-Rey M, De Castro-Parga ML, Salgado-Barreira Á, et al. Switching between reference adalimumab and biosimilars in chronic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: A systematic literature review. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022; 88: 1529-50.

[6]

Schmalzing M, Kellner H, Askari A, Santos JDT, Perez-Coleman JCV, Foti R, et al. Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of SDZ ETN, an Etanercept Biosimilar, in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases: Final Results from Multi-Country COMPACT Study. Adv Ther. 2024; 41: 315-30.

[7]

Kapoor S, Kaushik VV, Jain R, Rao VKR, Gharia M. Real-life Tolerability and Effectiveness of Adalimumab Biosimilar in Ankylosing Spondylitis: the Adalimumab Biosimilar Patient Registry Data. ACR Open Rheumatol. 2019; 1: 480-4.

[8]

Baji P, Péntek M, Szántó S, Géher P, Gulácsi L, Balogh O, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of biosimilar infliximab and other biological treatments in ankylosing spondylitis: systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Eur J Health Econ. 2014; 15: 45-52.

[9]

Glintborg B, Loft AG, Omerovic E, Hendricks O, Linauskas A, Espesen J, et al. To switch or not to switch: results of a nationwide guideline of mandatory switching from originator to biosimilar etanercept. One-year treatment outcomes in 2061 patients with inflammatory arthritis from the DANBIO registry. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019; 78: 192-200.

[10]

Park W, Hrycaj P, Jeka S, Kovalenko V, Lysenko G, Miranda P, et al. A randomised, double-blind, multicentre, parallel-group, prospective study comparing the pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of CT-P13 and innovator infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: the PLANETAS study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013; 72: 1605-12.

[11]

Glintborg B, Sørensen IJ, Loft AG, Lindegaard H, Linauskas A, Hendricks O, et al. A nationwide non-medical switch from originator infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 in 802 patients with inflammatory arthritis: 1-year clinical outcomes from the DANBIO registry. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017; 76: 1426-31.

[12]

Li J, Xue Z, Wu Z, Bi L, Liu H, Wu L, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of the adalimumab biosimilar TQ-Z2301 and adalimumab for the treatment of Chinese patients with active ankylosing spondylitis: a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, phase III clinical trial. Clin Rheumatol. 2022; 41: 3005-16.

[13]

Xu H, Li Z, Wu J, Xing Q, Shi G, Li J, et al. IBI303, a biosimilar to adalimumab, for the treatment of patients with ankylosing spondylitis in China: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 equivalence trial. Lancet Rheumatol. 2019; 1: e35-43.

[14]

Becciolini A, Parisi S, Caccavale R, Bravi E, Lumetti F, Andracco R, et al. Adalimumab and ABP 501 in the Treatment of a Large Cohort of Patients with Inflammatory Arthritis: A Real Life Retrospective Analysis. J Pers Med. 2022; 12: 335.

[15]

Müller-Ladner U, Dignass A, Gaffney K, Jadon D, Matucci-Cerinic M, Lobaton T, et al. The PROPER Study: A 48-Week, Pan-European, Real-World Study of Biosimilar SB5 Following Transition from Reference Adalimumab in Patients with Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Disease. BioDrugs. 2023; 37: 873-89.

[16]

Adrichem RCSv, Voorneveld HJE, Waverijn GJ, Kok MR, Bisoendial RJ. The Non-medical Switch from Reference Adalimumab to Biosimilar Adalimumab is Highly Successful in a Large Cohort of Patients with Stable Inflammatory Rheumatic Joint Diseases: A Real-Life Observational Study. Rheumatol Ther. 2022; 9: 1109-18.

[17]

Bruni C, Bitti R, Nacci F, Cometi L, Tofani L, Bartoli F, et al. Efficacy and safety of switching from reference adalimumab to SB5 in a real-life cohort of inflammatory rheumatic joint diseases. Clin Rheumatol. 2021; 40: 85-91.

[18]

Scrivo R, Castellani C, Mancuso S, Sciarra G, Giardina F, Bevignani G, et al. Effectiveness of non-medical switch from adalimumab bio-originator to SB5 biosimilar and from ABP501 adalimumab biosimilar to SB5 biosimilar in patients with chronic inflammatory arthropathies: a monocentric observational study. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2023; 41: 613-9.

[19]

Sieper J, Rudwaleit M, Baraliakos X, Brandt J, Braun J, Burgos-Vargas R, et al. The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) handbook: a guide to assess spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009; 68: ii1-44.

[20]

Machado PMMC, Landewé RBM, Heijde DMvd. Endorsement of definitions of disease activity states and improvement scores for the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score: results from OMERACT 10. J Rheumatol. 2011; 38: 1502-6.

[21]

Machado PM, Landewé R, Heijde DV; Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS). Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS): 2018 update of the nomenclature for disease activity states. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018; 77: 1539-40.

[22]

Poddubnyy D, Sommerfleck F, Navarro-Compán V, Bundy C, Makri S, Akerkar S, et al. Regional differences in clinical phenotype of axial spondyloarthritis: results from the International Map of Axial Spondyloarthritis (IMAS). Rheumatology (Oxford). 2024; 63: 2328-35.

[23]

Kaneko K, Prieto-Alhambra D, Jacklin C, Bosworth A, Dickinson S, Berry S, et al. Influence of information provided prior to switching from Humira to biosimilar adalimumab on UK patients’ satisfaction: a cross-sectional survey by patient organisations. BMJ Open. 2022; 12: e050949.

[24]

Cantini F, Niccoli L, Franchi G, Damiani A, Benucci M. The Nocebo Effect in Rheumatology: An Unexplored Issue. Isr Med Assoc J. 2020; 22: 185-90.

PDF (1378KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/