Evaluation of continued 2-monthly or annual urate monitoring in gout: an extension of the GoutSMART randomised controlled feasibility trial

Abstract

Aim: Improved outcomes for patients with gout are associated with reduced urate levels and many guidelines recommend regular urate monitoring. There is no consensus on how frequently monitoring should be performed, and so we have used a supported self-management approach which incorporates urate self-testing to evaluate 2-monthly urate monitoring compared to annual monitoring.

Methods: This study was an extension of a 12-month feasibility trial in 60 gout patients randomised 2:1 to support gout self-management or usual care. Participants exiting the self-management arm were offered 2-monthly urate monitoring, with usual care participants offered annual monitoring. Additional participants were randomised 1:1 to either arm. All participants were offered initial dose titration to a urate target of 0.3 mmol/L. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with urate ≤ 0.36 mmol/L at 24 months with an intention-to-treat analysis.

Results: Between September 2020, and September 2021, 67 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 55.5 (SD 14.0) years. 61 (91%) self-reported as cisgender male, 5 (7.5%) as cisgender female and 1 (1.5%) as transgender female. 62 (92.5%) were White, 4 (6.0%) were Asian and 1 (1.5%) was Black. 40 participants were allocated to 2-monthly monitoring (including 10 new participants), and 27 participants to annual monitoring (including 12 new participants). The primary study outcome of urate ≤ 0.36 mmol/L at 24 months was achieved by 38 (95%) 2-monthly monitoring participants, compared to 17 (62.9%) annual monitoring participants (risk difference 0.32 [95% CI 0.13 to 0.52]; p = 0.0021). 5 (7.5%) participants withdrew with 4 allocated to annual monitoring. 2 annual monitoring participants died.

Conclusions: 2-monthly monitoring of urate is associated with improved maintenance of urate targets after 2 years compared to annual monitoring, a result influenced by an increased withdrawal rate amongst annual monitoring participants. Further trials evaluating the cost-effectiveness and optimal frequency of urate monitoring are now needed (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03274063).

Keywords

Gout / urate monitoring / self-management / treat-to-target / point-of-care

References

[1] Safiri S, Kolahi A, Cross M, Carson-Chahhoud K, Hoy D, Almasi-Hashiani A, et al. Prevalence, Incidence, and Years Lived With Disability Due to Gout and Its Attributable Risk Factors for 195 Countries and Territories 1990-2017: A Systematic Analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72: 1916-27.

[2] Hui M, Carr A, Cameron S, Davenport G, Doherty M, Forrester H, et al.; British Society for Rheumatology Standards, Audit and Guidelines Working Group. The British Society for Rheumatology Guideline for the Management of Gout. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017; 56: 1246.

[3] Richette P, Doherty M, Pascual E, Barskova V, Becce F, Castañeda-Sanabria J, et al. 2016 updated EULAR evidence-based recommendations for the management of gout. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017; 76: 29-42.

[4] FitzGerald JD, Dalbeth N, Mikuls T, Brignardello-Petersen R, Guyatt G, Abeles AM, et al. 2020 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Management of Gout. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020; 72: 744-60.

[5] Mackenzie IS, Ford I, Nuki G, Hallas J, Hawkey CJ, Webster J, et al.; FAST Study Group. Long-term cardiovascular safety of febuxostat compared with allopurinol in patients with gout (FAST): a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2020; 396: 1745-57.

[6] Doherty M, Jenkins W, Richardson H, Sarmanova A, Abhishek A, Ashton D, et al. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of nurse-led care involving education and engagement of patients and a treat-to-target urate-lowering strategy versus usual care for gout: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018; 392: 1403-12.

[7] Dehlin M, Jacobsson L, Roddy E. Global epidemiology of gout: prevalence, incidence, treatment patterns and risk factors. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2020; 16: 380-90.

[8] Briesacher BA, Andrade SE, Fouayzi H, Chan KA. Comparison of drug adherence rates among patients with seven different medical conditions. Pharmacotherapy. 2008; 28: 437-43.

[9] Qaseem A, Harris RP, Forciea MA; Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians, Denberg TD; Denberg TD, Barry MJ, Boyd C, Chow RD, Humphrey LL, Kansagara D, et al. Management of Acute and Recurrent Gout: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2017; 166: 58-68.

[10] Hammersley V, Parker R, Paterson M, Hanley J, Pinnock H, Padfield P, et al. Telemonitoring at scale for hypertension in primary care: An implementation study. PLoS Med. 2020; 17: e1003124.

[11] Paraskos J, Berke Z, Cook J, Miner JN, Braddock M, Platt A, et al. An analytical comparison between point-of-care uric acid testing meters. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2016; 16: 373-82.

[12] Riches PL, Sing K, Berg K. Point-of-care uric acid testing is useful in routine clinical care of gout. Arthritis Res Ther. 2019; 21: 117.

[13] Riches PL, Alexander D, Hauser B, Kuske B, Krause A. Evaluation of supported self-management in gout (GoutSMART): a randomised controlled feasibility trial. Lancet Rheumatol. 2022; 4: e320-8.

[14] Gaffo AL, Dalbeth N, Saag KG, Singh JA, Rahn EJ, Mudano AS, et al. Brief Report: Validation of a Definition of Flare in Patients With Established Gout. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018; 70: 462-7.

[15] Perez-Ruiz F, Calabozo M, Pijoan JI, Herrero-Beites AM, Ruibal A. Effect of urate-lowering therapy on the velocity of size reduction of tophi in chronic gout. Arthritis Rheum. 2002; 47: 356-60.

[16] Yin R, Li L, Zhang G, Cui Y, Zhang L, Zhang Q, et al. Rate of adherence to urate-lowering therapy among patients with gout: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2018; 8: e017542.

[17] Abhishek A, Jenkins W, La-Crette J, Fernandes G, Doherty M. Long-term persistence and adherence on urate-lowering treatment can be maintained in primary care-5-year follow-up of a proof-of-concept study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2017; 56: 529-33.

[18] Sheppard JP, Tucker KL, Davison WJ, Stevens R, Aekplakorn W, Bosworth HB, et al. Self-monitoring of Blood Pressure in Patients With Hypertension-Related Multi-morbidity: Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis. Am J Hypertens. 2020; 33: 243-51.