Review on Self-Humidifying Fuel Cell Systems: Materials, Systems, and Challenges

Abstract

Self-humidifying fuel cell systems achieve automatic internal humidification through optimized materials, structures, and fuel cell control strategies. Due to their potentials for reducing system complexity and cost, they have become a prominent area of research. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the development of self-humidifying fuel cells in terms of materials, components, and systems and discusses potential applications of these cells in next-generation fuel cell systems. To enhance the performance of self-humidifying fuel cells, researchers are continuously exploring new technologies, materials, and methods including membrane design improvements, catalyst layer innovations, gas diffusion layer structure optimizations, membrane electrode assembly advancements, and flow field design enhancements along with system control optimizations. However, some challenges remain such as proton exchange membrane modifications, catalyst layer/microporous layer structure designs, bipolar plate flow-field innovations, and intelligent controls. Additionally, future directions are proposed that comprise machine learning-assisted material development, optimization of additive and catalyst compatibility, and dynamic simulation and fault prediction for system analysis. This review not only summarizes the main research directions highlighting recent progress in self-humidifying fuel cell technology, but also addresses technical problems faced during practical implementation of this technology. It is highly significant in clarifying the strategic position held by self-humidifying fuel cell technology and indicating frontier areas for further research and innovation.

Graphic Abstract

Keywords

PEM fuel cells / Self-humidifying / Membrane electrode assembly / Flow field design / Intelligent control strategy

References

[1] Debe MK. Electrocatalyst approaches and challenges for automotive fuel cells. Nature, 2012, 486: 43-51

[2] Kim C, Cho SH, Cho SM, et al. . Review of hydrogen infrastructure: the current status and roll-out strategy. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2023, 48: 1701-1716

[3] Hjeij D, Biçer Y, Koç M. Hydrogen strategy as an energy transition and economic transformation avenue for natural gas exporting countries: Qatar as a case study. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2022, 47: 4977-5009

[4] Chakraborty S, Elangovan D, Palaniswamy K, et al. . A review on the numerical studies on the performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) flow channel designs for automotive applications. Energies, 2022, 15 9520

[5] Buttner W, Rivkin C, Burgess R, et al. . Hydrogen monitoring requirements in the global technical regulation on hydrogen and fuel cell vehicles. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2017, 42: 7664-7671

[6] Haslam GE, Jupesta J, Parayil G. Assessing fuel cell vehicle innovation and the role of policy in Japan, Korea, and China. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2012, 37: 14612-14623

[7] Jiao K, Li XG. Water transport in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 2011, 37: 221-291

[8] Jiao K, Xuan J, Du Q, et al. . Designing the next generation of proton-exchange membrane fuel cells. Nature, 2021, 595: 361-369

[9] Liu FQ, Mauzerall DL, Zhao FQ, et al. . Deployment of fuel cell vehicles in China: greenhouse gas emission reductions from converting the heavy-duty truck fleet from diesel and natural gas to hydrogen. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2021, 46: 17982-17997

[10] Kast J, Vijayagopal R, Gangloff JJ, et al. . Clean commercial transportation: medium and heavy duty fuel cell electric trucks. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42: 4508-4517

[11] Nguyen HL, Kim Y, Park J, et al. . Operating strategy optimization by response surface analysis for durable operation of a heavy-duty fuel cell truck. Energy Convers. Manag., 2023, 291 117295

[12] Rudolf T, Schürmann T, Schwab S, et al. . Toward holistic energy management strategies for fuel cell hybrid electric vehicles in heavy-duty applications. Proc. IEEE, 2021, 109: 1094-1114

[13] Cullen DA, Neyerlin KC, Ahluwalia RK, et al. . New roads and challenges for fuel cells in heavy-duty transportation. Nat. Energy, 2021, 6: 462-474

[14] Zhang GB, Qu ZG, Tao WQ, et al. . Porous flow field for next-generation proton exchange membrane fuel cells: materials, characterization, design, and challenges. Chem. Rev., 2023, 123: 989-1039

[15] Madadi F, Rezaeian A, Edris H, et al. . Improving performance in PEMFC by applying different coatings to metallic bipolar plates. Mater. Chem. Phys., 2019, 238 121911

[16] Sakthivel V, Yoo DJ. Enhanced solid-electrolyte interface efficiency for practically viable hydrogen-air fuel cell systems. J. Energy Chem., 2025, 100: 356-368

[17] Yin C, Yang HY, Gong XF, et al. . Experimental and numerical investigation of the reverse current evolution during the start-up of a fuel cell. Appl. Energy, 2025, 377 124470

[18] Song YJ, Wang C, Wang L, et al. . Design criterion of critical mode ejector for PEMFC hydrogen supply and recycle system. Appl. Energy, 2025, 377 124566

[19] Cahalan T, Rehfeldt S, Bauer M, et al. . Experimental set-up for analysis of membranes used in external membrane humidification of PEM fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2016, 41: 13666-13677

[20] Migliardini F, Unich A, Corbo P. Experimental comparison between external and internal humidification in proton exchange membrane fuel cells for road vehicles. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2015, 40: 5916-5927

[21] Mirfarsi SH, Parnian MJ, Rowshanzamir S. Self-humidifying proton exchange membranes for fuel cell applications: advances and challenges. Processes, 2020, 8 1069

[22] Park CH, Lee SY, Hwang DS, et al. . Nanocrack-regulated self-humidifying membranes. Nature, 2016, 532: 480-483

[23] Zhang Y, Zhang HM, Bi C, et al. . An inorganic/organic self-humidifying composite membranes for proton exchange membrane fuel cell application. Electrochim. Acta, 2008, 53: 4096-4103

[24] Watanabe M, Uchida H, Seki Y, et al. . Self-humidifying polymer electrolyte membranes for fuel cells. J. Electrochem. Soc., 1996, 143: 3847-3852

[25] Yang HN, Lee WH, Choi BS, et al. . Self-humidifying Pt-C/Pt-TiO₂ dual-catalyst electrode membrane assembly for proton-exchange membrane fuel cells. Energy, 2017, 120: 12-19

[26] Choi I, Lee H, Lee KG, et al. . Characterization of self-humidifying ability of SiO₂-supported Pt catalyst under low humidity in PEMFC. Appl. Catal. B Environ., 2015, 168: 220-227

[27] Zhang GB, Xie B, Bao ZM, et al. . Multi-phase simulation of proton exchange membrane fuel cell with 3D fine mesh flow field. Int. J. Energy Res., 2018, 42: 4697-4709

[28] Li WK, Zhang QL, Wang C, et al. . Experimental and numerical analysis of a three-dimensional flow field for PEMFCs. Appl. Energy, 2017, 195: 278-288

[29] Yoshida T, Kojima K. Toyota MIRAI fuel cell vehicle and progress toward a future hydrogen society. Interface magazine, 2015, 24: 45-49

[30] Carignano M, Costa-Castelló R. Toyota Mirai: powertrain model and assessment of the energy management. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 2023, 72: 7000-7010

[31] Nonobe Y. Development of the fuel cell vehicle Mirai. IEEJ Trans. Electr. Electron. Eng., 2017, 12: 5-9

[32] Kojima K, Fukazawa K. Current status and future outlook of fuel cell vehicle development in Toyota. ECS Trans., 2015, 69: 213-219

[33] O’Hayre R, Barnett DM, Prinz FB. The triple phase boundary. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2005, 152 A439

[34] Lian YT, Zheng WB, Mei CY, et al. . Key factors impacting liquid water behaviors across the interfaces of the multiple-scale porous transport layers in PEMFCs. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 2025, 247 127144

[35] Wan Y, Qiu DK, Yi PY, et al. . Design and optimization of gradient wettability pore structure of adaptive PEM fuel cell cathode catalyst layer. Appl. Energy, 2022, 312 118723

[36] Chen L, Kang QJ, Tao WQ. Pore-scale numerical study of multiphase reactive transport processes in cathode catalyst layers of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2021, 46: 13283-13297

[37] Pan SF, Wen QL, Dan X, et al. . Enhanced triple-phase interface in PEMFC by proton conductor absorption on the Pt catalyst. ACS Appl. Energy Mater., 2023, 6: 763-772

[38] Kong CS, Kim DY, Lee HK, et al. . Influence of pore-size distribution of diffusion layer on mass-transport problems of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J. Power Sources, 2002, 108: 185-191

[39] Nam JH, Kaviany M. Effective diffusivity and water-saturation distribution in single- and two-layer PEMFC diffusion medium. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 2003, 46: 4595-4611

[40] Serincan MF, Pasaogullari U, Molter T. Modeling the cation transport in an operating polymer electrolyte fuel cell (PEFC). Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2010, 35: 5539-5551

[41] Berning T, Lu DM, Djilali N. Three-dimensional computational analysis of transport phenomena in a PEM fuel cell. J. Power Sources, 2002, 106: 284-294

[42] Verbrugge MW, Hill RF. Ion and solvent transport in ion-exchange membranes. II. A radiotracer study of the sulfuric-acid, Nation-117 system. J. Electrochem. Soc., 1990, 137: 893-899

[43] Verbrugge MW, Hill RF. Analysis of promising perfluorosulfonic acid membranes for fuel-cell electrolytes. J. Electrochem. Soc., 1990, 137: 3770-3777

[44] Ijaodola OS, El-Hassan Z, Ogungbemi E, et al. . Energy efficiency improvements by investigating the water flooding management on proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC). Energy, 2019, 179: 246-267

[45] Springer TE, Zawodzinski TA, Gottesfeld S. Polymer electrolyte fuel cell model. J. Electrochem. Soc., 1991, 138: 2334-2342

[46] Zawodzinski TA, Davey J, Valerio J, et al. . The water content dependence of electro-osmotic drag in proton-conducting polymer electrolytes. Electrochim. Acta, 1995, 40: 297-302

[47] Weppner W, Huggins RA. Determination of the kinetic parameters of mixed-conducting electrodes and application to the system Li₃Sb. J. Electrochem. Soc., 1977, 124: 1569-1578

[48] Zawodzinski TAJrNeeman M, Sillerud LO, et al. . Determination of water diffusion coefficients in perfluorosulfonate ionomeric membranes. J. Phys. Chem., 1991, 95: 6040-6044

[49] Ju H, Wang CY, Cleghorn S, et al. . Nonisothermal modeling of polymer electrolyte fuel cells. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2005, 152 A1645

[50] Motupally S, Becker AJ, Weidner JW. Diffusion of water in Nafion 115 membranes. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2000, 147: 3171

[51] Duan QJ, Wang HP, Benziger J. Transport of liquid water through Nafion membranes. J. Membr. Sci., 2012, 392: 88-94

[52] Xu YM, Fan RJ, Chang GF, et al. . Investigating temperature-driven water transport in cathode gas diffusion media of PEMFC with a non-isothermal, two-phase model. Energy Convers. Manag., 2021, 248 114791

[53] Dai W, Wang HJ, Yuan XZ, et al. . A review on water balance in the membrane electrode assembly of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34: 9461-9478

[54] Kim S, Mench MM. Investigation of temperature-driven water transport in polymer electrolyte fuel cell: phase-change-induced flow. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2009, 156 B353

[55] Santamaria AD, Das PK, MacDonald JC, et al. . Liquid-water interactions with gas-diffusion-layer surfaces. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2014, 161: F1184-F1193

[56] Owejan JP, Gagliardo JJ, Sergi JM, et al. . Water management studies in PEM fuel cells. Part I. Fuel cell design and in situ water distributions. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34: 3436-3444

[57] Jiao DK, Jiao K, Zhong SH, et al. . Investigations on heat and mass transfer in gas diffusion layers of PEMFC with a gas–liquid–solid coupled model. Appl. Energy, 2022, 316 118996

[58] Zhang LB, Liu S, Wang Z, et al. . Experimental and simulation analysis of liquid capillary fingering process in the gas diffusion layer. J. Power Sources, 2023, 554 232276

[59] Wang H, Yang GG, Li SA, et al. . Pore-scale modeling of liquid water transport in compressed gas diffusion layer of proton exchange membrane fuel cells considering fiber anisotropy. Membranes, 2023, 13 559

[60] Xiao LS, Bian MQ, Sun YS, et al. . Transport properties evaluation of pore-scale GDLs for PEMFC using orthogonal design method. Appl. Energy, 2024, 357 122445

[61] Sun SF, Sun ZY. Water distribution and transmission within perforated gas diffusion layer and layered gas diffusion layer of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell. J. Power Sources, 2025, 643 237024

[62] Lai T, Qu ZG, Zhang JF. Pore-scale study of liquid water transport in gas diffusion layers with in-plane non-uniform distributed pore size of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell. Appl. Energy, 2025, 379 124933

[63] Xu YM, Zhang Y, Zhang LL, et al. . Experimental study of water transport in gas diffusion layer of PEMFC considering the phase-change-induced flow. Energy, 2025, 328 136534

[64] Nishida K, Murakami T, Tsushima S, et al. . Microscopic visualization of state and behavior of liquid water in a gas diffusion layer of PEFC. Electrochemistry, 2007, 75: 149-151

[65] Yang XG, Zhang FY, Lubawy AL, et al. . Visualization of liquid water transport in a PEFC. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett., 2004, 7: A408

[66] Li QF, Sun K, Suo MS, et al. . Water transport in PEMFC with metal foam flow fields: visualization based on AI image recognition. Appl. Energy, 2024, 365 123273

[67] Li JG, Ke YZ, Yuan W, et al. . Enhancement of two-phase flow and mass transport by a two-dimensional flow channel with variable cross-sections in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Renew. Energy, 2023, 219 119500

[68] Liu J, Li JS, Bai JS, et al. . Optimizing proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance at low-humidity via constructing additional anodic water-retaining membrane layer containing sulfonated multi-walled carbon nanotubes. J. Power Sources, 2023, 557 232526

[69] Poh CK, Tian ZQ, Bussayajarn N, et al. . Performance enhancement of air-breathing proton exchange membrane fuel cell through utilization of an effective self-humidifying platinum–carbon catalyst. J. Power Sources, 2010, 195: 8044-8051

[70] Zhang XF, Liu YT, Song HY, et al. . Single-walled carbon nanotube interlayer modified gas diffusion layers to boost the cell performance of self-humidifying proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2023, 48: 30899-30908

[71] Ganesan A, Narayanasamy M, Shunmugavel K. Self-humidifying manganese oxide-supported Pt electrocatalysts for highly-durable PEM fuel cells. Electrochim. Acta, 2018, 285: 47-59

[72] Zawodzinski TA, Derouin C, Radzinski S, et al. . Water uptake by and transport through Nafion^® 117 membranes. J. Electrochem. Soc., 1993, 140: 1041-1047

[73] Hallinan DTJrDe Angelis MG, Giacinti Baschetti M, et al. . Non-fickian diffusion of water in Nafion. Macromolecules, 2010, 43: 4667-4678

[74] Chadha K, Martemianov S, Thomas A. Estimation of the effective water diffusion coefficient in Nafion^® membrane by water balance measurements. Fuel Cells, 2021, 21: 139-148

[75] Galitskaya E, Privalov AF, Weigler M, et al. . NMR diffusion studies of proton-exchange membranes in wide temperature range. J. Membr. Sci., 2020, 596 117691

[76] Misran E, Hassan NSM, Daud WRW, et al. . Water transport characteristics of a PEM fuel cell at various operating pressures and temperatures. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38: 9401-9408

[77] Zhao Q, Majsztrik P, Benziger J. Diffusion and interfacial transport of water in nafion. J. Phys. Chem. B, 2011, 115: 2717-2727

[78] Van Trinh N, Nguyen XL, Kim Y, et al. . Characteristics of water transport of membrane electrolyte over selected temperature for proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Polymers, 2022, 14 2972

[79] Yan QG, Toghiani H, Wu JX. Investigation of water transport through membrane in a PEM fuel cell by water balance experiments. J. Power Sources, 2006, 158: 316-325

[80] Weng D, Wainright JS, Landau U, et al. . Electro-osmotic drag coefficient of water and methanol in polymer electrolytes at elevated temperatures. J. Electrochem. Soc., 1996, 143: 1260-1263

[81] Luo ZP, Chang ZY, Zhang YX, et al. . Electro-osmotic drag coefficient and proton conductivity in Nafion^® membrane for PEMFC. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2010, 35: 3120-3124

[82] Ge SH, Yi BL, Ming PW. Experimental determination of electro-osmotic drag coefficient in Nafion membrane for fuel cells. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2006, 153 A1443

[83] Koh BS, Yoo JH, Jang EK, et al. . Fabrication of highly effective self-humidifying membrane electrode assembly for proton exchange membrane fuel cells via electrostatic spray deposition. Electrochem. Commun., 2018, 93: 76-80

[84] Liu FQ, Yi BL, Xing DM, et al. . Development of novel self-humidifying composite membranes for fuel cells. J. Power Sources, 2003, 124: 81-89

[85] Kudashova DS, Falina IV, Kononenko NA, et al. . Physicochemical properties and performance characteristics of perfluorinated membranes bulk modified with platinum during operation in proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Membr. Membr. Technol., 2023, 5: 18-26

[86] Lee DC, Yang HN, Park SH, et al. . Self-humidifying Pt–graphene/SiO₂ composite membrane for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell. J. Membr. Sci., 2015, 474: 254-262

[87] Huang HH, Xu SY, Zhang L, et al. . A self-humidifying proton exchange membrane embedded with phosphonic acid-functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles that has excellent dispersion and water retention. Sustainable Energy Fuels, 2021, 5: 230-245

[88] Roy T, Wanchoo SK, Pal K. Novel sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone)/rGONR@TiO₂ nanohybrid membrane for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Solid State Ionics, 2020, 349 115296

[89] Deng, R., Yeung, K.L.: Novel confined PFSA/Pt-zeolite composite membrane for self-humidifying PEMFC. Paper presented at 255th ACS National Meeting, 1 Mar 2018

[90] Angayarkanni R, Ganesan A, Dhelipan M, et al. . Self-humidified operation of a PEM fuel cell using a novel silica composite coating method. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2022, 47: 4827-4837

[91] Choi B, Ko Y, Kim W. Low-humidifying Nafion/TiO₂ composite membrane prepared via in-situ sol–gel process for proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Appl. Chem. Eng., 2019, 30: 74-80

[92] Oh K, Son B, Sanetuntikul J, et al. . Polyoxometalate decorated graphene oxide/sulfonated poly(arylene ether ketone) block copolymer composite membrane for proton exchange membrane fuel cell operating under low relative humidity. J. Membr. Sci., 2017, 541: 386-392

[93] Sayadi P, Rowshanzamir S, Parnian MJ. Study of hydrogen crossover and proton conductivity of self-humidifying nanocomposite proton exchange membrane based on sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone). Energy, 2016, 94: 292-303

[94] Yang HN, Lee WH, Choi BS, et al. . Preparation of Nafion/Pt-containing TiO₂/graphene oxide composite membranes for self-humidifying proton exchange membrane fuel cell. J. Membr. Sci., 2016, 504: 20-28

[95] Pandey RP, Shukla G, Manohar M, et al. . Graphene oxide based nanohybrid proton exchange membranes for fuel cell applications: an overview. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 2017, 240: 15-30

[96] Suhag A, Goel P, Eswaraswamy B, et al. . Surface-modified nanoclay incorporated anion exchange membrane facilitating performance in self-humidifying bipolar membrane fuel cell. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 55: 704-717

[97] Lee W, Kim H, Kim T, et al. . Nafion based organic/inorganic composite membrane for air-breathing direct methanol fuel cells. J. Membr. Sci., 2007, 292: 29-34

[98] Han W, Kwan SM, Yeung KL. Zeolite applications in fuel cells: water management and proton conductivity. Chem. Eng. J., 2012, 187: 367-371

[99] Han W, Lun Yeung K. Confined PFSA–zeolite composite membrane for self-humidifying fuel cell. Chem. Commun., 2011, 47: 8085-8087

[100] Li XY, Zhang ZX, Xie Z, et al. . High performance and self-humidifying of novel cross-linked and nanocomposite proton exchange membranes based on sulfonated polysulfone. Nanomaterials, 2022, 12 841

[101] Nauman Javed RM, Al-Othman A, Nancarrow P, et al. . Zirconium silicate-ionic liquid membranes for high-temperature hydrogen PEM fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2024, 52: 894-908

[102] Miyake J, Watanabe T, Shintani H, et al. . Reinforced polyphenylene ionomer membranes exhibiting high fuel cell performance and mechanical durability. ACS Mater. Au, 2021, 1: 81-88

[103] Lee DC, Yang HN, Park SH, et al. . Nafion/graphene oxide composite membranes for low humidifying polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell. J. Membr. Sci., 2014, 452: 20-28

[104] Liu YH, Yi BL, Shao ZG, et al. . Pt/CNTs-Nafion reinforced and self-humidifying composite membrane for PEMFC applications. J. Power Sources, 2007, 163: 807-813

[105] Whiston MM, Azevedo IL, Litster S, et al. . Expert assessments of the cost and expected future performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells for vehicles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2019, 116: 4899-4904

[106] Gomez A, Thompson WH, Laage D. Neural-network-based molecular dynamics simulations reveal that proton transport in water is doubly gated by sequential hydrogen-bond exchange. Nat. Chem., 2024, 16: 1838-1844

[107] Peighambardoust SJ, Rowshanzamir S, Amjadi M. Review of the proton exchange membranes for fuel cell applications. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35: 9349-9384

[108] Mossayebi Z, Parnian MJ, Rowshanzamir S. Effect of the sulfated zirconia nanostructure characteristics on physicochemical and electrochemical properties of SPEEK nanocomposite membranes for PEM fuel cell applications. Macromol. Mater. Eng., 2018, 303 1700570

[109] Lü WZ, Liu Z, Wang C, et al. . Preparation and evaluation of a large superficial self-humidifying Pt-PFSA composite membrane for H₂/air PEMFC. ECS Trans., 2010, 26: 117-122

[110] Yang HN, Lee DC, Park SH, et al. . Preparation of Nafion/various Pt-containing SiO₂ composite membranes sulfonated via different sources of sulfonic group and their application in self-humidifying PEMFC. J. Membr. Sci., 2013, 443: 210-218

[111] Goossens PJ, Vallaey B, Verlinden J, et al. . Interfacial water drives improved proton transport in siliceous nanocomposite nafion thin films. ChemPhysChem, 2018, 19: 538-546

[112] Lee SH, Choi SH, Gopalan SA, et al. . Preparation of new self-humidifying composite membrane by incorporating graphene and phosphotungstic acid into sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) film. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2014, 39: 17162-17177

[113] Zhang Y, Zhang HM, Zhu XB, et al. . A low-cost PTFE-reinforced integral multilayered self-humidifying membrane for PEM fuel cells. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett., 2006, 9: A332

[114] Watanabe M, Uchida H, Emori M. Analyses of self-humidification and suppression of gas crossover in Pt-dispersed polymer electrolyte membranes for fuel cells. J. Electrochem. Soc., 1998, 145: 1137-1141

[115] Han, W., Liu, Z., Sim, V., et al.: Self-humidifying PFSA-zeolite proton exchange membrane effects of Nafion confinement and zeolite thickness. Paper presented at 250th American Chemical Society National Meeting, 1 Aug 2015

[116] Poon, H.Y., Han, W., Yeung, K.L.: Zeolite-confined Nafion membrane for self-humidifying fuel cell: the effects of confinement and thickness. Paper presented at 244th American Chemical Society National Meeting, 1 Aug 2012

[117] Nicotera I, Enotiadis A, Angjeli K, et al. . Evaluation of smectite clays as nanofillers for the synthesis of nanocomposite polymer electrolytes for fuel cell applications. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2012, 37: 6236-6245

[118] Zhang WJ, Li MKS, Yue PL, et al. . Exfoliated Pt-clay/Nafion nanocomposite membrane for self-humidifying polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Langmuir, 2008, 24: 2663-2670

[119] Wang C, Wan NF, Mao ZQ, et al. . Novel-SiO₂-doped proton exchange membrane for self-humidifying fuel cell. Key Eng. Mater., 2007, 336: 537-540

[120] Wang L, Yi BL, Zhang HM, et al. . Cs_2.5H_0.5PWO₄₀/SiO₂ as addition self-humidifying composite membrane for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Electrochim. Acta, 2007, 52: 5479-5483

[121] Bi C, Zhang HM, Zhang Y, et al. . Fabrication and investigation of SiO₂ supported sulfated zirconia/Nafion^® self-humidifying membrane for proton exchange membrane fuel cell applications. J. Power Sources, 2008, 184: 197-203

[122] Lee HK, Kim JI, Park JH, et al. . A study on self-humidifying PEMFC using Pt–ZrP–Nafion composite membrane. Electrochim. Acta, 2004, 50: 761-768

[123] Xing DM, Yi BL, Fu YZ, et al. . Pt-C/SPEEK/PTFE self-humidifying composite membrane for fuel cells. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett., 2004, 7 A315

[124] Wang C, Liu ZX, Mao ZQ, et al. . Preparation and evaluation of a novel self-humidifying Pt/PFSA composite membrane for PEM fuel cell. Chem. Eng. J., 2005, 112: 87-91

[125] Hagihara H, Uchida H, Watanabe M. Preparation of highly dispersed SiO₂ and Pt particles in Nafion^® 112 for self-humidifying electrolyte membranes in fuel cells. Electrochim. Acta, 2006, 51: 3979-3985

[126] Liu YH, Nguyen T, Kristian N, et al. . Reinforced and self-humidifying composite membrane for fuel cell applications. J. Membr. Sci., 2009, 330: 357-362

[127] Kwak SH, Yang TH, Kim CS, et al. . The effect of platinum loading in the self-humidifying polymer electrolyte membrane on water uptake. J. Power Sources, 2003, 118: 200-204

[128] Yang B, Fu YZ, Manthiram A. Operation of thin Nafion-based self-humidifying membranes in proton exchange membrane fuel cells with dry H₂ and O₂. J. Power Sources, 2005, 139: 170-175

[129] Liu ZX, Yang Y, Lü WZ, et al. . Durability test of PEMFC with Pt-PFSA composite membrane. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2012, 37: 956-960

[130] Cha D, Yang W, Kim Y. Performance improvement of self-humidifying PEM fuel cells using water injection at various start-up conditions. Energy, 2019, 183: 514-524

[131] Huang HH, Xu JY, Feng Q, et al. . Poly-hydroxyethylidene-1,1-diphosphonic acid (PHEDP) as a highly effective water-retentive and proton-conductive material for low-humidity proton exchange membranes. J. Membr. Sci., 2020, 606 118144

[132] Wang RJ, Zhang WJ, He GH, et al. . Controlling fuel crossover and hydration in ultra-thin proton exchange membrane-based fuel cells using Pt-nanosheet catalysts. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2014, 2: 16416-16423

[133] Li M, Shao ZG, Zhang H, et al. . Self-humidifying Cs_2.5H_0.5PW₁₂O₄₀/Nafion/PTFE composite membrane for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett., 2006, 9: A92-A95

[134] Yang HN, Cho SH, Kim WJ. The preparation of self-humidifying Nafion/various Pt-containing SiO₂ composite membranes and their application in PEMFC. J. Membr. Sci., 2012, 421: 318-326

[135] Park CH, Kim TH, Nam SY, et al. . Water channel morphology of non-perfluorinated hydrocarbon proton exchange membrane under a low humidifying condition. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2019, 44: 2340-2348

[136] Long Z, Miyake J, Miyatake K. Partially fluorinated polyphenylene ionomers as proton exchange membranes for fuel cells: effect of pendant multi-sulfophenylene groups. ACS Appl. Energy Mater., 2019, 2: 7527-7534

[137] Long Z, Miyake J, Miyatake K. Proton exchange membranes containing densely sulfonated quinquephenylene groups for high performance and durable fuel cells. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2020, 8: 12134-12140

[138] Cha D, Jeon SW, Yang W, et al. . Comparative performance evaluation of self-humidifying PEMFCs with short-side-chain and long-side-chain membranes under various operating conditions. Energy, 2018, 150: 320-328

[139] Anu Karthi Swaghatha AI, Cindrella L. Self-humidifying novel chitosan-geopolymer hybrid membrane for fuel cell applications. Carbohydr. Polym., 2019, 223 115073

[140] Wang Y, Zeng R, Yang JY, et al. . Study on silica sol and perfluorosulfonic ionomer composite self-humidified membranes. Chin. J. Power Sources, 2007, 31: 368-371

[141] Uchida H, Ueno Y, Hagihara H, et al. . Self-humidifying electrolyte membranes for fuel cells. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2003, 150: A57

[142] Jiang SF, Yi BL, Zhao Q, et al. . Palladium–nickel catalysts based on ordered titanium dioxide nanorod arrays with high catalytic peformance for formic acid electro-oxidation. RSC Adv., 2017, 7: 11719-11723

[143] Jiang SF, Yi BL, Zhao Q, et al. . A PtPdCu thin-film catalyst based on titanium nitride nanorod arrays with high catalytic performance for methanol electro-oxidation. RSC Adv., 2016, 6: 82370-82375

[144] Jiang SF, Yi BL, Zhang HJ, et al. . Vertically aligned titanium nitride nanorod arrays as supports of platinum–palladium–cobalt catalysts for thin-film proton exchange membrane fuel cell electrodes. ChemElectroChem, 2016, 3: 734-740

[145] Jiang SF, Yi BL, Cao LS, et al. . Development of advanced catalytic layer based on vertically aligned conductive polymer arrays for thin-film fuel cell electrodes. J. Power Sources, 2016, 329: 347-354

[146] Jiang SF, Yi BL, Zhang CK, et al. . Vertically aligned carbon-coated titanium dioxide nanorod arrays on carbon paper with low platinum for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J. Power Sources, 2015, 276: 80-88

[147] Zhang CK, Yu HM, Fu L, et al. . A novel ultra-thin catalyst layer based on wheat ear-like catalysts for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. RSC Adv., 2014, 4: 58591-58595

[148] Lo AY, Huang CY, Sung LY, et al. . Low humidifying proton exchange membrane fuel cells with enhanced power and Pt–C–h-SiO₂ anodes prepared by electrophoretic deposition. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2016, 4: 1303-1310

[149] Lin CL, Hsu SC, Ho WY. Addition of sulfonated silicon dioxide on an anode catalyst layer to improve the performance of a self-humidifying proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Funct. Mater. Lett., 2016, 9 1650025

[150] Lin CL, Liu CW, Yen GH, et al. . Effect of electrospun titanium oxide nanofibers on the performance of the gas diffusion electrode and catalyst coated membrane of a self-humidifying proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. Lett., 2015, 7: 906-910

[151] Liang HG, Xu RY, Chen KC, et al. . Self-humidifying membrane electrode assembly with dual cathode catalyst layer structure prepared by introducing polyvinyl alcohol into the inner layer. RSC Adv., 2016, 6: 1333-1338

[152] Liang HG, Zheng LP, Liao SJ. Self-humidifying membrane electrode assembly prepared by adding PVA as hygroscopic agent in anode catalyst layer. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37: 12860-12867

[153] Hou SY, Liao SJ, Dang D, et al. . Self-humidifying membrane electrode assembly prepared by adding microcrystalline cellulose in anode catalyst layer as preserve moisture. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2014, 39: 12842-12848

[154] Rahnavard A, Rowshanzamir S, Parnian MJ, et al. . The effect of sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) as the electrode ionomer for self-humidifying nanocomposite proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Energy, 2015, 82: 746-757

[155] Hou SY, Wang HQ, Ren JW, et al. . Enhanced low-humidity performance of proton-exchange membrane fuel cell by introducing hydrophilic CNTs in membrane electrode assembly. Prog. Nat. Sci. Mater. Int., 2022, 32: 150-156

[156] Xie Z, Tian LL, Zhang WQ, et al. . Enhanced low-humidity performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cell by incorporating phosphoric acid-loaded covalent organic framework in anode catalyst layer. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2021, 46: 10903-10912

[157] Chao WK, Lee CM, Tsai DC, et al. . Improvement of the proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) performance at low-humidity conditions by adding hygroscopic γ-Al₂O₃ particles into the catalyst layer. J. Power Sources, 2008, 185: 136-142

[158] Huang RH, Chiu TW, Lin TJ, et al. . Improvement of proton exchange membrane fuel cells performance by coating hygroscopic zinc oxide on the anodic catalyst layer. J. Power Sources, 2013, 227: 229-236

[159] Zhang BY, Liu BH, Li YH, et al. . Binary oxide modified catalyst preparation and self-humidifying performance. Energy Storage Sci. Technol., 2021, 10: 2013-2019

[160] Wang Y, Xie Z, Zhang WQ, et al. . Dual-functional phosphoric acid-loaded covalent organic framework for PEMFC self-humidification: optimization on membrane electrode assembly. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2023, 48: 32068-32076

[161] Senthil Velan V, Velayutham G, Hebalkar N, et al. . Effect of SiO₂ additives on the PEM fuel cell electrode performance. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2011, 36: 14815-14822

[162] Hung TF, Liao SH, Li CY, et al. . Effect of sulfonated carbon nanofiber-supported Pt on performance of Nafion^®-based self-humidifying composite membrane for proton exchange membrane fuel cell. J. Power Sources, 2011, 196: 126-132

[163] Hou SY, Xiong ZA, Liao SJ. Progress of R&D of self-humidifying membrane electrode assembly for fuel cell application. Chem. Ind. Eng. Prog., 2015, 34: 80-85

[164] Liang HG, Dang D, Xiong W, et al. . High-performance self-humidifying membrane electrode assembly prepared by simultaneously adding inorganic and organic hygroscopic materials to the anode catalyst layer. J. Power Sources, 2013, 241: 367-372

[165] Li JX, Zou JM, Hou SY, et al. . Preparation of self-humidifying membrane electrode assembly for fuel cell and performance study. Mod. Chem. Ind., 2020, 40: 143-147

[166] Tsai CH, Yang FL, Chang CH, et al. . Microwave-assisted synthesis of silica aerogel supported pt nanoparticles for self-humidifying proton exchange membrane fuel cell. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37: 7669-7676

[167] Zhao ZG, Guo P, Shen LX, et al. . Triple-phase interfacial engineering Pt-CeO₂-nitrogen-doped carbon electrocatalysts for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Appl. Surf. Sci., 2023, 609 155302

[168] Stühmeier BM, Damjanović AM, Rodewald K, et al. . Selective anode catalyst for the mitigation of start-up/shut-down induced cathode degradation in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J. Power Sources, 2023, 558 232572

[169] Lin ZJ, Liu JY, Li SZ, et al. . Anti-corrosive SnS₂/SnO₂ heterostructured support for Pt nanoparticles enables remarkable oxygen reduction catalysis via interfacial enhancement. Adv. Funct. Mater., 2023, 33 2211638

[170] Su HN, Xu LM, Zhu HP, et al. . Self-humidification of a PEM fuel cell using a novel Pt/SiO₂/C anode catalyst. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35: 7874-7880

[171] Lo AY, Huang CY, Sung LY, et al. . Electrophoretic deposited Pt/C/SiO₂ anode for self-humidifying and improved catalytic activity in PEMFC. Electrochim. Acta, 2015, 180: 610-615

[172] Zheng LP, Zeng Q, Liao SJ, et al. . Highly performed non-humidification membrane electrode assembly prepared with binary RuO₂–SiO₂ oxide supported Pt catalysts as anode. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37: 13103-13109

[173] Lin R, Chen L, Zheng T, et al. . Interfacial water management of gradient microporous layer for self-humidifying proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 2021, 175 121340

[174] Hou SY, Ye YK, Liao SJ, et al. . Enhanced low-humidity performance in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell by developing a novel hydrophilic gas diffusion layer. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2020, 45: 937-944

[175] Kong IM, Jung A, Kim MS. Investigations on the double gas diffusion backing layer for performance improvement of self-humidified proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Appl. Energy, 2016, 176: 149-156

[176] Kong IM, Choi JW, Kim SI, et al. . Experimental study on the self-humidification effect in proton exchange membrane fuel cells containing double gas diffusion backing layer. Appl. Energy, 2015, 145: 345-353

[177] Kannan AM, Cindrella L, Munukutla L. Functionally graded nano-porous gas diffusion layer for proton exchange membrane fuel cells under low relative humidity conditions. Electrochim. Acta, 2008, 53: 2416-2422

[178] Cindrella L, Kannan AM, Ahmad R, et al. . Surface modification of gas diffusion layers by inorganic nanomaterials for performance enhancement of proton exchange membrane fuel cells at low RH conditions. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2009, 34: 6377-6383

[179] Cindrella L, Kannan AM. Membrane electrode assembly with doped polyaniline interlayer for proton exchange membrane fuel cells under low relative humidity conditions. J. Power Sources, 2009, 193: 447-453

[180] Hou SY, Su HN, Zou HB, et al. . Enhanced low-humidity performance in a proton exchange membrane fuel cell by the insertion of microcrystalline cellulose between the gas diffusion layer and the anode catalyst layer. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2015, 40: 15613-15621

[181] Kitahara T, Nakajima H, Mori K. Hydrophilic and hydrophobic double microporous layer coated gas diffusion layer for enhancing performance of polymer electrolyte fuel cells under no-humidification at the cathode. J. Power Sources, 2012, 199: 29-36

[182] Lim IS, Kang B, Park JY, et al. . Performance improvement of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell by gas diffusion layer with atomic-layer-deposited HfO₂ on microporous layer. Energy Convers. Manag., 2021, 236 114070

[183] Shen GR, Liu J, Wu HB, et al. . Multi-functional anodes boost the transient power and durability of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Nat. Commun., 2020, 11 1191

[184] Ko YD, Yang HN, Züttel A, et al. . Membrane electrode assembly fabricated with the combination of Pt/C and hollow shell structured-Pt-SiO₂@ZrO₂ sphere for self-humidifying proton exchange membrane fuel cell. J. Power Sources, 2017, 367: 8-16

[185] Peng SK, Xu X, Lu SF, et al. . A self-humidifying acidic–alkaline bipolar membrane fuel cell. J. Power Sources, 2015, 299: 273-279

[186] Lee SY, Chae JE, Choi J, et al. . Dual exchange membrane fuel cell with sequentially aligned cation and anion exchange membranes for non-humidified operation. J. Membr. Sci., 2020, 596 117745

[187] Mayerhöfer B, McLaughlin D, Böhm T, et al. . Bipolar membrane electrode assemblies for water electrolysis. ACS Appl. Energy Mater., 2020, 3: 9635-9644

[188] Yan ZF, Wycisk RJ, Metlay AS, et al. . High-voltage aqueous redox flow batteries enabled by catalyzed water dissociation and acid–base neutralization in bipolar membranes. ACS Cent. Sci., 2021, 7: 1028-1035

[189] Siritanaratkul B, Forster M, Greenwell F, et al. . Zero-gap bipolar membrane electrolyzer for carbon dioxide reduction using acid-tolerant molecular electrocatalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2022, 144: 7551-7556

[190] Daud SNSS, Jaafar J, Norddin MNAM, et al. . A review on process design and bilayer electrolyte materials of bipolar membrane fuel cell. Int. J. Energy Res., 2022, 46: 11620-11639

[191] Francia C, Ijeri VS, Specchia S, et al. . Estimation of hydrogen crossover through Nafion^® membranes in PEMFCs. J. Power Sources, 2011, 196: 1833-1839

[192] Li ZJ, Chen SA, Cui LT, et al. . Interfacial water distribution behaviors in high performance bipolar membrane fuel cell. J. Power Sources, 2022, 542 231754

[193] Lian YS, Zhu ZC, You CT, et al. . Structural optimization of fiber porous self-humidifying flow field plates applied to proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Energy, 2023, 271 127034

[194] Zhang RF, Yang BW, Lei XZ, et al. . Droplets dynamics theory and micro-flow field experiments of improving self-humidifying feature and maximum power density in fuel cells. Chem. Eng. J., 2022, 429 131974

[195] Lian YS, You CT, Zhu ZC, et al. . Preparation and performance of a self-humidifying fuel cell using a fiber sintered sheet as flow field. J. Power Sources, 2022, 536 231513

[196] Nefedkin SI, Klimova MA, Glasov VS, et al. . Effect of the corrugated bipolar plate design on the self-humidification of a high power density PEMFC stack for UAVs. Fuel Cells, 2021, 21: 234-253

[197] Wang CL, Chen XS, Xiang X, et al. . Study on self-humidification in PEMFC with crossed flow channels and an ultra-thin membrane. Polymers, 2023, 15 4589

[198] Tong GY, Xu XM, Yuan QQ, et al. . Simulation study of proton exchange membrane fuel cell cross-convection self-humidifying flow channel. Int. J. Energy Res., 2021, 45: 4036-4047

[199] Qi ZG, Kaufman A. PEM fuel cell stacks operated under dry-reactant conditions. J. Power Sources, 2002, 109: 469-476

[200] Ge SH, Yi BL. A mathematical model for PEMFC in different flow modes. J. Power Sources, 2003, 124: 1-11

[201] Jithesh PK, Sundararajan T, Das SK. Experimental investigation of dry feed operation in a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell. J. Power Sources, 2014, 260: 243-250

[202] Wu Y, Cho JIS, Whiteley M, et al. . Characterization of water management in metal foam flow-field based polymer electrolyte fuel cells using in-operando neutron radiography. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2020, 45: 2195-2205

[203] Deng SP, Li YS. Constructing region-specific porous flow field to enhance heat, mass and charge transports in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Energy Convers. Manage., 2022, 274 116459

[204] Park JE, Lim J, Lim MS, et al. . Gas diffusion layer/flow-field unified membrane-electrode assembly in fuel cell using graphene foam. Electrochim. Acta, 2019, 323 134808

[205] Bao ZM, Niu ZQ, Jiao K. Analysis of single- and two-phase flow characteristics of 3-D fine mesh flow field of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J. Power Sources, 2019, 438 226995

[206] Litster S, Santiago JG. Dry gas operation of proton exchange membrane fuel cells with parallel channels: non-porous versus porous plates. J. Power Sources, 2009, 188: 82-88

[207] Yang T, Shi PF, Du CY. Study on self-humidified PEMFC with reactant circulation. Electrochim. Acta, 2006, 51: 5618-5625

[208] Migliardini F, Di Palma TM, Gaele MF, et al. . Hydrogen purge and reactant feeding strategies in self-humidified PEM fuel cell systems. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42: 1758-1765

[209] Wang XH, Lu YK, Liu JL, et al. . Effects of flow pattern and hydrogen recirculation on consistency of current density distribution in a self-humidified polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell analyzed by a segmented model. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2021, 46: 32612-32629

[210] Wang BW, Wu KC, Yang ZR, et al. . A quasi-2D transient model of proton exchange membrane fuel cell with anode recirculation. Energy Convers. Manag., 2018, 171: 1463-1475

[211] Wang BW, Wu KC, Xi FQ, et al. . Numerical analysis of operating conditions effects on PEMFC with anode recirculation. Energy, 2019, 173: 844-856

[212] Subin K, Jithesh PK. Experimental study on self-humidified operation in PEM fuel cells. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess., 2018, 27: 17-22

[213] Xu LF, Fang C, Hu JM, et al. . Self-humidification of a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell system with cathodic exhaust gas recirculation. J. Electrochem. Energy Convers. Storage, 2018, 15 021003

[214] Zhang QG, Tong ZM, Tong SG, et al. . Self-humidifying effect of air self-circulation system for proton exchange membrane fuel cell engines. Renew. Energy, 2021, 164: 1143-1155

[215] Shao YB, Xu LF, Zhao XW, et al. . Comparison of self-humidification effect on polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell with anodic and cathodic exhaust gas recirculation. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2020, 45: 3108-3122

[216] Liu Z, Xu SC, Guo SD. High-potential control for durability improvement of the vehicle fuel cell system based on oxygen partial pressure regulation under low-load conditions. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2022, 47: 32607-32627

[217] Asghari S, Ashraf Khorasani MR, Dashti I. Investigation of self-humidified and dead-ended anode proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2016, 41: 12347-12357

[218] You ZY, Cheng WR, Peng Y, et al. . Temperature control of high-power self-humidifying PEMFC with air cooling. J. Southwest Jiaotong Univ., 2015, 50: 44-50

[219] Jiao JR, Chen FX. Adaptive sliding mode Kalman observer for the estimation of vehicle fuel cell humidity. SAE Tech. Pap. Ser., 2022, 1 2022–1–0690

[220] Fan LH, Zhang GB, Jiao K. Characteristics of PEMFC operating at high current density with low external humidification. Energy Convers. Manag., 2017, 150: 763-774

[221] Jo A, Gwak G, Moazzam M, et al. . Analysis of water film formation and low-humidity operation characteristics of a polymer electrolyte fuel cell (PEFC). Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2017, 42: 3731-3747

[222] Shin S, Maiyalagan T, Jothi VR, et al. . Numerical analysis on transport properties of self-humidifying dual catalyst layer via 3-D reconstruction technique. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2021, 46: 14639-14650

[223] Zhou S, Lu YD, Bao DT, et al. . Real-time data-driven fault diagnosis of proton exchange membrane fuel cell system based on binary encoding convolutional neural network. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2022, 47: 10976-10989

[224] Zuo B, Zhang ZH, Cheng JS, et al. . Data-driven flooding fault diagnosis method for proton-exchange membrane fuel cells using deep learning technologies. Energy Convers. Manag., 2022, 251 115004

[225] Sethi A, Verstraete D. A comparative study of wavelet-based descriptors for fault diagnosis of self-humidified proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Fuel Cells, 2020, 20: 131-142

[226] Li SD, Wei XZ, Jiang SF, et al. . Hydrogen crossover diagnosis for fuel cell stack: an electrochemical impedance spectroscopy based method. Appl. Energy, 2022, 325 119884

[227] Arama FZ, Mammar K, Laribi S, et al. . Implementation of sensor based on neural networks technique to predict the PEM fuel cell hydration state. J. Energy Storage, 2020, 27 101051

[228] Dib A, Maizia R, Martemianov S, et al. . Statistical short time analysis for proton exchange membrane fuel cell diagnostic-application to water management. Fuel Cells, 2019, 19: 539-549

[229] Rubio MA, Bethune K, Urquia A, et al. . Proton exchange membrane fuel cell failure mode early diagnosis with wavelet analysis of electrochemical noise. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41: 14991-15001

[230] Yuan H, Du RB, Wang XY, et al. . Advanced online broadband impedance spectrum acquisition of fuel cells by S-transform. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 2023, 70: 3740-3750

[231] Astaf’ev EA. Electrochemical noise measurement of polymer membrane fuel cell under load. Russ. J. Electrochem., 2018, 54: 554-560

[232] Ziane MA, Join C, Benne M, et al. . A new concept of water management diagnosis for a PEM fuel cell system. Energy Convers. Manag., 2023, 285 116986

[233] Mao L, Liu ZY, Low D, et al. . Evaluation method for feature selection in proton exchange membrane fuel cell fault diagnosis. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 2022, 69: 5277-5286

[234] Won J, Oh H, Hong J, et al. . Hybrid diagnosis method for initial faults of air supply systems in proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Renew. Energy, 2021, 180: 343-352

[235] Yan CZ, Chen J, Liu H, et al. . Model-based fault tolerant control for the thermal management of PEMFC systems. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 2020, 67: 2875-2884

[236] Génevé T, Turpin C, Régnier J, et al. . Voltammetric methods for hydrogen crossover diagnosis in a PEMFC stack. Fuel Cells, 2017, 17: 210-216

[237] Wu HW. A review of recent development: transport and performance modeling of PEM fuel cells. Appl. Energy, 2016, 165: 81-106

[238] Ünlü M, Zhou JF, Kohl PA. Hybrid anion and proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113: 11416-11423

[239] Manohar M, Kim D. Advantageous of hybrid fuel cell operation under self-humidification for energy efficient bipolar membrane. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2019, 7: 16493-16500

[240] Cai X, Liu X, Wei XZ, et al. . Effect of nitrogen-doped carbon support on the performance of catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction. ACS Appl. Energy Mater., 2024, 7: 8705-8714

[241] Tang MH, Yan HL, Zhang XM, et al. . Materials strategies tackling interfacial issues in catalyst layers of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Adv. Mater., 2025, 37: 2306387

[242] Sabharwal M, Secanell M. Understanding the effect of porosity and pore size distribution on low loading catalyst layers. Electrochim. Acta, 2022, 419 140410

[243] Kang DG, Lee DK, Choi JM, et al. . Study on the metal foam flow field with porosity gradient in the polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell. Renew. Energy, 2020, 156: 931-941

[244] Kermani MJ, Moein-Jahromi M, Hasheminasab MR, et al. . Development of a variable-porosity metal-foam model for the next fuel cells flow-distributors. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47: 4772-4792

[245] Shin DK, Yoo JH, Kang DG, et al. . Effect of cell size in metal foam inserted to the air channel of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell for high performance. Renew. Energy, 2018, 115: 663-675

[246] Gong ZC, Wang BW, Wu KC, et al. . A 1 + 1-D multiphase proton exchange membrane fuel cell model for real-time simulation. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif., 2022, 8: 2928-2944

[247] Dou ML, Hou M, Liang D, et al. . Behaviors of proton exchange membrane fuel cells under oxidant starvation. J. Power Sources, 2011, 196: 2759-2762

[248] Parnian MJ, Rowshanzamir S, Gashoul F. Comprehensive investigation of physicochemical and electrochemical properties of sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone) membranes with different degrees of sulfonation for proton exchange membrane fuel cell applications. Energy, 2017, 125: 614-628

[249] Grew KN, McClure JP, Chu D, et al. . Understanding transport at the acid-alkaline interface of bipolar membranes. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2016, 163: F1572-F1587

[250] Min K, Al Munsur AZ, Paek SY, et al. . Development of high-performance polymer electrolyte membranes through the application of quantum dot coatings to nafion membranes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 2023, 15: 15616-15624

[251] Wu J, Melo LGA, Zhu XH, et al. . 4D imaging of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell catalyst layers by soft X-ray spectro-tomography. J. Power Sources, 2018, 381: 72-83

[252] Ding R, Yin WJ, Cheng G, et al. . Boosting the optimization of membrane electrode assembly in proton exchange membrane fuel cells guided by explainable artificial intelligence. Energy AI, 2021, 5 100098

[253] Niri MF, Liu KL, Apachitei G, et al. . Quantifying key factors for optimised manufacturing of Li-ion battery anode and cathode via artificial intelligence. Energy and AI, 2022, 7 100129

[254] Ding R, Ding YQ, Zhang HY, et al. . Applying machine learning to boost the development of high-performance membrane electrode assembly for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J. Mater. Chem. A, 2021, 9: 6841-6850

[255] Niu ZQ, Zhao WH, Deng H, et al. . Generative artificial intelligence for designing multi-scale hydrogen fuel cell catalyst layer nanostructures. ACS Nano, 2024, 18: 20504-20517

[256] Zhao CF, Yuan S, Cheng XJ, et al. . The effect of catalyst layer design on catalyst utilization in PEMFC studied via stochastic reconstruction method. Energy and AI, 2023, 13 100245

[257] Wang BW, Xie B, Xuan J, et al. . AI-based optimization of PEM fuel cell catalyst layers for maximum power density via data-driven surrogate modeling. Energy Convers. Manage., 2020, 205 112460

[258] Bong HJ, Lee J, Kim JH, et al. . Two-stage forming approach for manufacturing ferritic stainless steel bipolar plates in PEM fuel cell: experiments and numerical simulations. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2017, 42: 6965-6977

[259] Park WY, Han JH, Moon J, et al. . Mechanically robust self-organized crack-free nanocellular graphene with outstanding electrochemical properties in sodium ion battery. Adv. Mater., 2024, 36 2311792

[260] Tang B, Xiong ZY, Yun XW, et al. . Rolling up graphene oxide sheets through solvent-induced self-assembly in dispersions. Nanoscale, 2018, 10: 4113-4122

[261] Ma TC, Kang JJ, Lin WK, et al. . Highly integrated online multi-channel electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measurement device for fuel cell stack. Energies, 2022, 15 3414

[262] Xie JP, Yuan H, Wu YF, et al. . Impedance acquisition of proton exchange membrane fuel cell using deeper learning network. Energies, 2023, 16 5556

[263] Du RB, Wang XY, Dai HF, et al. . Online impedance spectrum measurement of fuel cells based on Morlet wavelet transform. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46: 24339-24352

[264] Wang XY, Kou Y, Wang B, et al. . Fast calculation of broadband battery impedance spectra based on S transform of step disturbance and response. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif., 2022, 8: 3659-3672

Funding

Major Science and Technology Projects of Xiamen City(3502Z20231055)

Fujian Provincial Natural Science Foundation Genernal Project(2024J011199))

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Shanghai University and Periodicals Agency of Shanghai University