Recent Advances in Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cells for Solar Energy Conversion

Chen-Ge Chen , Chenyu Xu , Peng-Fei Sui , Guangyu Deng , Yi-Cheng Wang , Jinhao Mei , Entao Zhang , Yanwei Zhang , Jing-Li Luo

Electrochemical Energy Reviews ›› 2025, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1) : 11

PDF
Electrochemical Energy Reviews ›› 2025, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (1) :11 DOI: 10.1007/s41918-025-00246-z
Review Article
review-article
Recent Advances in Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cells for Solar Energy Conversion
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

To implement global energy transitions, the efficient utilization of clean energy plays a central role in the process and has become an imperative task. Among various approaches, solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOECs) stand out as exceptional energy conversion devices because of their ability to transform thermal and electrical energy into chemical energy. For example, solar energy is a clean and renewable energy source and can be effectively harnessed to power SOECs, thereby facilitating efficient conversion from solar to chemical energy. In light of the growing interest in leveraging SOECs for solar energy conversion, a systematic collation and comprehensive review of the relevant studies reported thus far have yet to be conducted. This review summarizes and analyzes recent advances in the field of SOECs, including their fundamentals, performance metrics, current status, and methods of integration with solar energy. It also proposes various optimization strategies for the existing integration of solar energy with SOEC systems, with a specific emphasis on full-spectrum utilization. Finally, this study provides a perspective on the future development and challenges for SOECs in the context of solar energy conversion.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

SOEC / Solar energy / Energy efficiency / Energy conversion / Solar energy integration / Hydrogen

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Chen-Ge Chen, Chenyu Xu, Peng-Fei Sui, Guangyu Deng, Yi-Cheng Wang, Jinhao Mei, Entao Zhang, Yanwei Zhang, Jing-Li Luo. Recent Advances in Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cells for Solar Energy Conversion. Electrochemical Energy Reviews, 2025, 8(1): 11 DOI:10.1007/s41918-025-00246-z

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Gaikwad PS, Mondal K, Shin YKet al. . Enhancing the Faradaic efficiency of solid oxide electrolysis cells: progress and perspective. Npj Comput. Mater.. 2023, 9: 149.

[2]

Gao FY, Yu PC, Gao MR. Seawater electrolysis technologies for green hydrogen production: challenges and opportunities. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng.. 2022, 36100827.

[3]

Zhou Y, Li R, Lv Zet al. . Green hydrogen: a promising way to the carbon-free society. Chin. J. Chem. Eng.. 2022, 432-13.

[4]

Zang Y, Wei P, Li Het al. . Catalyst design for electrolytic CO2 reduction toward low-carbon fuels and chemicals. Electrochem. Energy Rev.. 2022, 5: 29.

[5]

Liu F, Fang L, Diercks Det al. . Rationally designed negative electrode for selective CO2-to-CO conversion in protonic ceramic electrochemical cells. Nano Energy. 2022, 102107722.

[6]

Kou Z, Li X, Wang Tet al. . Fundamentals, on-going advances and challenges of electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction. Electrochem. Energy Rev.. 2022, 582-111.

[7]

Ding S, Li M, Pang Wet al. . A-site deficient perovskite with nano-socketed Ni-Fe alloy particles as highly active and durable catalyst for high-temperature CO2 electrolysis. Electrochim. Acta. 2020, 335: 135683.

[8]

Lv XW, Tian WW, Yuan ZY. Recent advances in high-efficiency electrocatalytic water splitting systems. Electrochem. Energy Rev.. 2023, 623.

[9]

Duan N, Gao M, Hua Bet al. . Exploring Ni(Mn1/3Cr2/3)2O4 spinel-based electrodes for solid oxide cells. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2020, 83988-3998.

[10]

Li M, Hua B, Chen Jet al. . Charge transfer dynamics in RuO2/perovskite nanohybrid for enhanced electrocatalysis in solid oxide electrolyzers. Nano Energy. 2019, 57: 186-194.

[11]

Wang W, Gan L, Lemmon JPet al. . Enhanced carbon dioxide electrolysis at redox manipulated interfaces. Nat. Commun.. 2019, 10: 1550.

[12]

Samavati M, Santarelli M, Martin Aet al. . Thermodynamic and economy analysis of solid oxide electrolyser system for syngas production. Energy. 2017, 12237-49.

[13]

Ye Y, Lee W, Pan Jet al. . Tuning the product selectivity of CO2/H2O co-electrolysis using CeO2-modified proton-conducting electrolysis cells. Energy Environ. Sci.. 2023, 16: 3137-3145.

[14]

Pan Z, Duan C, Pritchard Tet al. . High-yield electrochemical upgrading of CO2 into CH4 using large-area protonic ceramic electrolysis cells. Appl. Catal. B Environ. Energy. 2022, 307: 121196.

[15]

Zhu C, Hou S, Hu Xet al. . Electrochemical conversion of methane to ethylene in a solid oxide electrolyzer. Nat. Commun.. 2019, 101173.

[16]

Xi X, Liu J, Fan Yet al. . Reducing d-p band coupling to enhance CO2 electrocatalytic activity by Mg-doping in Sr2FeMoO6−δ double perovskite for high performance solid oxide electrolysis cells. Nano Energy. 2021, 82105707.

[17]

Patcharavorachot Y, Chatrattanawet N, Arpornwichanop Aet al. . Comparative energy, economic, and environmental analyses of power-to-gas systems integrating SOECs in steam-electrolysis and co-electrolysis and methanation. Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog.. 2023, 42101873.

[18]

Gao R, Zhang L, Wang Let al. . Efficient utilization of CO2 in power-to-liquids/power-to-gas hybrid processes: an economic-environmental assessment. J. CO2 Util.. 2023, 68102376.

[19]

Du N, Roy C, Peach Ret al. . Anion-exchange membrane water electrolyzers. Chem. Rev.. 2022, 12211830-11895.

[20]

Duan C, Kee R, Zhu Het al. . Highly efficient reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells for power generation and fuel production. Nat. Energy. 2019, 4: 230-240.

[21]

Zhu L, Cadigan C, Duan Cet al. . Ammonia-fed reversible protonic ceramic fuel cells with Ru-based catalyst. Commun. Chem.. 2021, 4: 121.

[22]

Shimada H, Yamaguchi T, Kishimoto Het al. . Nanocomposite electrodes for high current density over 3 A cm–2 in solid oxide electrolysis cells. Nat. Commun.. 2019, 105432.

[23]

Kim YM, Kim S, Choi J. Adiabatic compressed air energy storage system combined with solid-oxide electrolysis cells. Energy Rep.. 2024, 111135-1146.

[24]

Baxter SJ, Rine M, Min Bet al. . Near 100% CO2 conversion and CH4 selectivity in a solid oxide electrolysis cell with integrated catalyst operating at 450 ℃. J. CO2 Util.. 2022, 59: 101954.

[25]

Zheng Y, Chen Z, Zhang J. Solid oxide electrolysis of H2O and CO2 to produce hydrogen and low-carbon fuels. Electrochem. Energy Rev.. 2021, 4508-517.

[26]

Liu F, Ding D, Duan C. Protonic ceramic electrochemical cells for synthesizing sustainable chemicals and fuels. Adv. Sci.. 2023, 10: 2206478.

[27]

Krammer A, Medved A, Peham Met al. . Dual pressure level methanation of Co-SOEC syngas. Energy Technol.. 2021, 92000746.

[28]

Li Z, Li M, Zhu Z. Perovskite cathode materials for low-temperature solid oxide fuel cells: fundamentals to optimization. Electrochem. Energy Rev.. 2022, 5263-311.

[29]

Si F, Liu S, Liang Yet al. . Fuel cell reactors for the clean cogeneration of electrical energy and value-added chemicals. Electrochem. Energy Rev.. 2022, 5: 25.

[30]

Biswas S, Kaur G, Giddey S. Steam electrolysis in solid oxide electrolytic cells using a cermet of copper and gadolinia doped ceria cathode. Electrochim. Acta. 2023, 468143150.

[31]

Zhao G, Kraglund MR, Frandsen HLet al. . Life cycle assessment of H2O electrolysis technologies. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 2020, 4523765-23781.

[32]

Vøllestad E, Strandbakke R, Tarach Met al. . Mixed proton and electron conducting double perovskite anodes for stable and efficient tubular proton ceramic electrolysers. Nat. Mater.. 2019, 18: 752-759.

[33]

Pei K, Zhou Y, Xu Ket al. . Surface restructuring of a perovskite-type air electrode for reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells. Nat. Commun.. 2022, 13: 2207.

[34]

Zhao Y, Niu Z, Zhao Jet al. . Recent advancements in photoelectrochemical water splitting for hydrogen production. Electrochem. Energy Rev.. 2023, 614.

[35]

Jolaoso LA, Duan C, Kazempoor P. Life cycle analysis of a hydrogen production system based on solid oxide electrolysis cells integrated with different energy and wastewater sources. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 2024, 52485-501.

[36]

Malavasi L, Fisher CAJ, Islam MS. Oxide-ion and proton conducting electrolyte materials for clean energy applications: structural and mechanistic features. Chem. Soc. Rev.. 2010, 39: 4370.

[37]

Hauch A, Küngas R, Blennow Pet al. . Recent advances in solid oxide cell technology for electrolysis. Science. 2020, 370eaba6118.

[38]

Ravi Kumar K, Krishna Chaitanya NVV, Sendhil Kumar N. Solar thermal energy technologies and its applications for process heating and power generation: a review. J. Clean. Prod.. 2021, 282125296.

[39]

Hong J, Xu C, Deng Bet al. . Photothermal chemistry based on solar energy: from synergistic effects to practical applications. Adv. Sci.. 2022, 92103926.

[40]

Takata T, Jiang J, Sakata Yet al. . Photocatalytic water splitting with a quantum efficiency of almost unity. Nature. 2020, 581411-414.

[41]

Yang S, Chen S, Mosconi Eet al. . Stabilizing halide perovskite surfaces for solar cell operation with wide-bandgap lead oxysalts. Science. 2019, 365: 473-478.

[42]

Li R, Takata T, Zhang Bet al. . Criteria for efficient photocatalytic water splitting revealed by studying carrier dynamics in a model Al-doped SrTiO3 photocatalyst. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.. 2023, 62: e202313537.

[43]

Li W, Luo JL. High-temperature electrochemical devices based on dense ceramic membranes for CO2 conversion and utilization. Electrochem. Energy Rev.. 2021, 4518-544.

[44]

Saqib M, Choi IG, Bae Het al. . Transition from perovskite to misfit-layered structure materials: a highly oxygen deficient and stable oxygen electrode catalyst. Energy Environ. Sci.. 2021, 14: 2472-2484.

[45]

Zhu B, Fan L, Mushtaq Net al. . Semiconductor electrochemistry for clean energy conversion and storage. Electrochem. Energy Rev.. 2021, 4: 757-792.

[46]

Irvine JTS, Neagu D, Verbraeken MCet al. . Evolution of the electrochemical interface in high-temperature fuel cells and electrolysers. Nat. Energy. 2016, 1: 15014.

[47]

Ding H, Wu W, Jiang Cet al. . Self-sustainable protonic ceramic electrochemical cells using a triple conducting electrode for hydrogen and power production. Nat. Commun.. 2020, 111907.

[48]

Zhang J, Shi Y, Cai N. An approximate analytical model of reduction of carbon dioxide in solid oxide electrolysis cell by regular and singular perturbation methods. Electrochim. Acta. 2014, 139190-200.

[49]

Ji HI, Lee JH, Son JWet al. . Protonic ceramic electrolysis cells for fuel production: a brief review. J. Korean Ceram. Soc.. 2020, 57: 480-494.

[50]

Yu J, Men HJ, Qu YMet al. . Performance of Ni-Fe bimetal based cathode for intermediate temperature solid oxide electrolysis cell. Solid State Ion.. 2020, 346: 115203.

[51]

Li M, Hou J, Fan Yet al. . Interface modification of Ru-CeO2 co-infiltrated SFM electrode and construction of SDC/YSZ bilayer electrolyte for direct CO2 electrolysis. Electrochim. Acta. 2022, 426140771.

[52]

Hou J, Wang Q, Li Jet al. . Rational design of an in situ co-assembly nanocomposite cathode La0.5Sr1.5MnO4+δ-La0.5Sr0.5MnO3−δ for lower-temperature proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells. J. Power. Sources. 2020, 466228240.

[53]

Xi X, Liu J, Luo Wet al. . Unraveling the enhanced kinetics of Sr2Fe1+xMo1−xO6−δ electrocatalysts for high-performance solid oxide cells. Adv. Energy Mater.. 2021, 112102845.

[54]

Jiang SP. Solid-state electrochemistry and solid oxide fuel cells: status and future prospects. Electrochem. Energy Rev.. 2022, 521.

[55]

Duan N, Yang J, Gao Met al. . Multi-functionalities enabled fivefold applications of LaCo0.6Ni0.4O3−δ in intermediate temperature symmetrical solid oxide fuel/electrolysis cells. Nano Energy. 2020, 77105207.

[56]

Kwon OH, Choi GM. Electrical conductivity of thick film YSZ. Solid State Ion.. 2006, 1773057-3062.

[57]

Bi L, Boulfrad S, Traversa E. Steam electrolysis by solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOECs) with proton-conducting oxides. Chem. Soc. Rev.. 2014, 43: 8255-8270.

[58]

Lv Z, Chen G, Wei Ket al. . Preparation and performance evaluation of low temperature SOEC using lithium compounds as electrodes. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 2024, 55: 386-393.

[59]

Kim D, Bae KT, Kim KJet al. . High-performance protonic ceramic electrochemical cells. ACS Energy Lett.. 2022, 7: 2393-2400.

[60]

Liu F, Deng H, Diercks Det al. . Lowering the operating temperature of protonic ceramic electrochemical cells to < 450 °C. Nat. Energy. 2023, 8: 1145-1157.

[61]

Duan C, Tong J, Shang Met al. . Readily processed protonic ceramic fuel cells with high performance at low temperatures. Science. 2015, 349: 1321-1326.

[62]

Fan Y, Xi X, Medvedev Det al. . Emerging anode materials architectured with NiCoFe ternary alloy nanoparticles for ethane-fueled protonic ceramic fuel cells. J. Power. Sources. 2021, 515: 230634.

[63]

Banu A, Bicer Y. Energy and exergy analysis of an integrated system with solar methane cracking and co-electrolysis of CO2/H2O for efficient carbon management. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 2024, 52580-593.

[64]

Wang Y, Du Y, Ni Met al. . Three-dimensional modeling of flow field optimization for co-electrolysis solid oxide electrolysis cell. Appl. Therm. Eng.. 2020, 172. 114959

[65]

Liu Z, Bai Y, Sun Het al. . Synergistic dual-phase air electrode enables high and durable performance of reversible proton ceramic electrochemical cells. Nat. Commun.. 2024, 15: 472.

[66]

Chen Y, Wu X, Hu Het al. . System level performance analysis and parameter optimization of hydrogen production based on solid oxide electrolytic cell. Appl. Energy. 2023, 347121329.

[67]

Lu B, Zhang Z, Zhang Zet al. . Control strategy of solid oxide electrolysis cell operating temperature under real fluctuating renewable power. Energy Convers. Manag.. 2024, 299117852.

[68]

Ni M, Leung M, Leung D. Parametric study of solid oxide steam electrolyzer for hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 2007, 322305-2313.

[69]

Fei Y, Li A, Zhang Cet al. . Performance optimization of solid oxide electrolysis cell for syngas production by high temperature co-electrolysis via differential evolution algorithm with practical constraints. Energy Convers. Manag.. 2024, 300: 117911.

[70]

Wang F, Wang L, Ou Yet al. . Thermodynamic analysis of solid oxide electrolyzer integration with engine waste heat recovery for hydrogen production. Case Stud. Therm. Eng.. 2021, 27101240.

[71]

Lang M, Raab S, Lemcke MSet al. . Long-term behavior of a solid oxide electrolyzer (SOEC) stack. Fuel Cells. 2020, 20690-700.

[72]

Ni M. Modeling of a solid oxide electrolysis cell for carbon dioxide electrolysis. Chem. Eng. J.. 2010, 164: 246-254.

[73]

Mohebali Nejadian M, Ahmadi P, Houshfar E. Comparative optimization study of three novel integrated hydrogen production systems with SOEC, PEM, and alkaline electrolyzer. Fuel. 2023, 336: 126835.

[74]

Mohammadi A, Mehrpooya M. Techno-economic analysis of hydrogen production by solid oxide electrolyzer coupled with dish collector. Energy Convers. Manag.. 2018, 173167-178.

[75]

Wang H, Kong H, Pu Zet al. . Feasibility of high efficient solar hydrogen generation system integrating photovoltaic cell/photon-enhanced thermionic emission and high-temperature electrolysis cell. Energy Convers. Manag.. 2020, 210: 112699.

[76]

Ebbesen SD, Mogensen M. Electrolysis of carbon dioxide in solid oxide electrolysis cells. J. Power. Sources. 2009, 193349-358.

[77]

Zhou M, Liu Z, Yan Xet al. . Simultaneous electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide and partial oxidation of methane in a solid oxide cell with silver-based cathode and nickel-based anode. J. Electrochem. Soc.. 2022, 169: 034502.

[78]

Xu H, Ma J, Tan Pet al. . Enabling thermal-neutral electrolysis for CO2-to-fuel conversions with a hybrid deep learning strategy. Energy Convers. Manag.. 2021, 230113827.

[79]

Liang H, Wang F, Yang Let al. . Progress in full spectrum solar energy utilization by spectral beam splitting hybrid PV/T system. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.. 2021, 141110785.

[80]

Liu Y, Wang F, Jiao Zet al. . Photochemical systems for solar-to-fuel production. Electrochem. Energy Rev.. 2022, 55.

[81]

Li Z, Zhang H, Xu Het al. . Advancing the multiscale understanding on solid oxide electrolysis cells via modelling approaches: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.. 2021, 141110863.

[82]

Tanaka Y, Hoerlein MP, Schiller G. Numerical simulation of steam electrolysis with a solid oxide cell for proper evaluation of cell performances. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 2016, 41752-763.

[83]

Menon V, Fu Q, Janardhanan VMet al. . A model-based understanding of solid-oxide electrolysis cells (SOECs) for syngas production by H2O/CO2 co-electrolysis. J. Power. Sources. 2015, 274: 768-781.

[84]

Li W, Shi Y, Luo Yet al. . Elementary reaction modeling of solid oxide electrolysis cells: main zones for heterogeneous chemical/electrochemical reactions. J. Power. Sources. 2015, 273: 1-13.

[85]

Nerat M, Juričić Đ. Modelling of anode delamination in solid oxide electrolysis cell and analysis of its effects on electrochemical performance. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 2018, 43: 8179-8189.

[86]

Banerjee A, Wang Y, Diercks Jet al. . Hierarchical modeling of solid oxide cells and stacks producing syngas via H2O/CO2 co-electrolysis for industrial applications. Appl. Energy. 2018, 230: 996-1013.

[87]

Ba L, Xiong X, Lei Zet al. . A study on solid oxide electrolyzer stack and system performance based on alternative mapping models. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 2022, 47: 12469-12486.

[88]

Hu T, Zhu F, Xia Jet al. . In situ engineering of a cobalt-free perovskite air electrode enabling efficient reversible oxygen reduction/evolution reactions. Adv. Funct. Mater.. 2023, 33: 2305567.

[89]

Luo Z, Zhou Y, Hu Xet al. . Highly conductive and durable Nb(Ta)-doped proton conductors for reversible solid oxide cells. ACS Energy Lett.. 2022, 72970-2978.

[90]

Murphy R, Zhou Y, Zhang Let al. . A new family of proton-conducting electrolytes for reversible solid oxide cells: BaHfxCe0.8xY0.1Yb0.1O3−δ. Adv. Funct. Mater.. 2020, 30: 2002265.

[91]

Yun BH, Kim KJ, Joh DWet al. . Highly active and durable double-doped bismuth oxide-based oxygen electrodes for reversible solid oxide cells at reduced temperatures. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2019, 720558-20566.

[92]

Zhou Y, Liu E, Chen Yet al. . An active and robust air electrode for reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells. ACS Energy Lett.. 2021.

[93]

Choi S, Davenport TC, Haile SM. Protonic ceramic electrochemical cells for hydrogen production and electricity generation: exceptional reversibility, stability, and demonstrated faradaic efficiency. Energy Environ. Sci.. 2019, 12: 206-215.

[94]

Wu W, Ding H, Zhang Yet al. . 3D self-architectured steam electrode enabled efficient and durable hydrogen production in a proton-conducting solid oxide electrolysis cell at temperatures lower than 600 °C. Adv. Sci.. 2018, 5: 1800360.

[95]

Li W, Guan B, Ma Let al. . High performing triple-conductive Pr2NiO4+δ anode for proton-conducting steam solid oxide electrolysis cell. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2018, 618057-18066.

[96]

Tang W, Ding H, Bian Wet al. . Understanding of A-site deficiency in layered perovskites: promotion of dual reaction kinetics for water oxidation and oxygen reduction in protonic ceramic electrochemical cells. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2020, 8: 14600-14608.

[97]

Tang C, Akimoto K, Wang Net al. . The effect of an anode functional layer on the steam electrolysis performances of protonic solid oxide cells. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2021, 9: 14032-14042.

[98]

Niu Y, Zhou Y, Zhang Wet al. . Highly active and durable air electrodes for reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cells enabled by an efficient bifunctional catalyst. Adv. Energy Mater.. 2022, 12: 2103783.

[99]

Zhu F, He F, Liu Det al. . A surface reconfiguration of a perovskite air electrode enables an active and durable reversible protonic ceramic electrochemical cell. Energy Storage Mater.. 2022, 53754-762.

[100]

Li P, Niu Y, Du Jet al. . Medium-entropy perovskite Pr0.4Ba0.2Ca0.2La0.2Co0.2Fe0.8O3 as a promising bifunctional electrocatalyst for electrochemical energy conversion device. Chem. Eng. Sci.. 2024, 293: 120034.

[101]

Li C, Deng Y, Yang Let al. . An active and stable hydrogen electrode of solid oxide cells with exsolved Fe–Co–Ni nanoparticles from Sr2FeCo0.2Ni0.2Mo0.6O6−δ double-perovskite. Adv. Powder Mater.. 2023, 2100133.

[102]

Sun C, Yang S, Lu Yet al. . Tailoring a micro-nanostructured electrolyte-oxygen electrode interface for proton-conducting reversible solid oxide cells. J. Power. Sources. 2020, 449227498.

[103]

Fang L, Liu F, Diercks Det al. . Boosting the performance of reversible solid oxide electrochemical cells with a novel hybrid oxygen electrode, Pr1.39Ba0.14Sr0.53Co1.48Fe0.76O6–δ-Ba0.66Sr0.34CoO3–δ. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2023, 1121251-21262.

[104]

Zhang S-L, Wang H, Lu MYet al. . Cobalt-substituted SrTi0.3Fe0.7O3–δ: a stable high-performance oxygen electrode material for intermediate-temperature solid oxide electrochemical cells. Energy Environ. Sci.. 2018, 11: 1870-1879.

[105]

Bae KT, Jeong I, Kim Det al. . Highly active cobalt-free perovskites with Bi doping as bifunctional oxygen electrodes for solid oxide cells. Chem. Eng. J.. 2023, 461: 142051.

[106]

Yu H, Im HN, Lee KT. Exceptionally high-performance reversible solid oxide electrochemical cells with ultrathin and defect-free free Sm0.075Nd0.075Ce0.85O2−δ interlayers. Adv. Funct. Mater.. 2022, 322207725.

[107]

Park JH, Jung CH, Kim KJet al. . Enhancing bifunctional electrocatalytic activities of oxygen electrodes via incorporating highly conductive Sm3+ and Nd3+ double-doped ceria for reversible solid oxide cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2021, 132496-2506.

[108]

Kim J, Im S, Oh SHet al. . Naturally diffused sintering aid for highly conductive bilayer electrolytes in solid oxide cells. Sci. Adv.. 2021, 7: eabj8590.

[109]

Li G, Gou Y, Cheng Xet al. . Enhanced electrochemical performance of the Fe-based layered perovskite oxygen electrode for reversible solid oxide cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2021, 1334282-34291.

[110]

Bian W, Wu W, Wang Bet al. . Revitalizing interface in protonic ceramic cells by acid etch. Nature. 2022, 604: 479-485.

[111]

An H, Lee HW, Kim BKet al. . A 5 cm × 5 cm protonic ceramic fuel cell with a power density of 1.3 W cm–2 at 600 °C. Nat. Energy. 2018, 3: 870-875.

[112]

Choi S, Kucharczyk CJ, Liang Yet al. . Exceptional power density and stability at intermediate temperatures in protonic ceramic fuel cells. Nat. Energy. 2018, 3: 202-210.

[113]

Navasa M, Graves C, Chatzichristodoulou Cet al. . A three dimensional multiphysics model of a solid oxide electrochemical cell: a tool for understanding degradation. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 2018, 43: 11913-11931.

[114]

Chatzichristodoulou C, Chen M, Hendriksen PVet al. . Understanding degradation of solid oxide electrolysis cells through modeling of electrochemical potential profiles. Electrochim. Acta. 2016, 189: 265-282.

[115]

Shao Q, Jin D, Lu Yet al. . Performance evolution analysis of solid oxide electrolysis cells operating at high current densities. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 2024, 57: 709-716.

[116]

Zhang Q, Chang Z, Fu Met al. . Thermal and electrochemical performance analysis of an integrated solar SOEC reactor for hydrogen production. Appl. Therm. Eng.. 2023, 229: 120603.

[117]

Mohammadpour M, Houshfar E, Ashjaee M. Performance evaluation and multi-objective optimization of an innovative solar-assisted multigeneration energy storage system for freshwater/O2/H2 generation. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess.. 2022, 53102755.

[118]

Ghaebi H, Ahmadi S. Energy and exergy evaluation of an innovative hybrid system coupled with HRSG and HDH desalination units. J. Clean. Prod.. 2020, 252119821.

[119]

Roy D, Samanta S. A solar-assisted power-to-hydrogen system based on proton-conducting solid oxide electrolyzer cells. Renew. Energy. 2024, 220119562.

[120]

Restrepo JC, Luis Izidoro D, Milena Lozano Násner Aet al. . Techno-economical evaluation of renewable hydrogen production through concentrated solar energy. Energy Convers. Manag.. 2022, 258115372.

[121]

Razmi AR, Hanifi AR, Shahbakhti M. Design, thermodynamic, and economic analyses of a green hydrogen storage concept based on solid oxide electrolyzer/fuel cells and heliostat solar field. Renew. Energy. 2023, 215118996.

[122]

Wang H, Guan C, Lu Yet al. . Investigation into the electrolysis performance of a novel directly solar irradiated solid oxide electrolysis cell. Chem. Eng. J.. 2024, 499156255.

[123]

Wang S, Wu X, Jafarmadar Set al. . Numerical assessment of a hybrid energy system based on solid oxide electrolyzer, solar energy and molten carbonate fuel cell for the generation of electrical energy and hydrogen fuel with electricity storage option. J. Energy Storage. 2022, 54105274.

[124]

Lin M, Suter C, Diethelm Set al. . Integrated solar-driven high-temperature electrolysis operating with concentrated irradiation. Joule. 2022, 62102-2121.

[125]

Schiller G, Lang M, Szabo Pet al. . Solar heat integrated solid oxide steam electrolysis for highly efficient hydrogen production. J. Power. Sources. 2019, 416: 72-78.

[126]

Cheknane A, Hilal HS, Charles JPet al. . Modelling and simulation of InGaP solar cells under solar concentration: series resistance measurement and prediction. Solid State Sci.. 2006, 8: 556-559.

[127]

Wang Y, Liu Q, Lei Jet al. . A three-dimensional simulation of a parabolic trough solar collector system using molten salt as heat transfer fluid. Appl. Therm. Eng.. 2014, 70: 462-476.

[128]

Song H, Wang H, Zheng Het al. . Analysis of cascade and hybrid processes for hydrogen production by full spectrum solar energy utilization. Energy Convers. Manag.. 2023, 291: 117289.

[129]

Shafiei Kaleibari S, Yanping Z, Abanades S. Solar-driven high temperature hydrogen production via integrated spectrally split concentrated photovoltaics (SSCPV) and solar power tower. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 2019, 442519-2532.

[130]

Deng G, Mei J, Xie Yet al. . Photoinduced mitigation of solid oxide electrolysis cell degradation: light healing effect on oxygen vacancies. ACS Appl. Energy Mater.. 2024, 7: 373-379.

[131]

Deng G, Xu C, Mei Jet al. . A novel solid oxide photoelectrolysis cell for solar-driven hydrogen production. Chem. Eng. J.. 2025, 504158794.

[132]

Khan MS, Lin Z, Lin Let al. . Techno-economic analysis of solar-driven co-electrolysis for renewable methanol production using SOEC. Energy Convers. Manag.. 2024, 302118129.

[133]

Zhang Q, Chang Z, Fu Met al. . Thermal performance analysis of an integrated solar reactor using solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOEC) for hydrogen production. Energy Convers. Manag.. 2022, 264115762.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China(52341602)

Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant(No. LQ24E060001)

Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant(No. LDT23E06014E06)

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities(2022ZFJH04)

Canada First Research Excellence Fund(CFRER-2015-00001)

University of Alberta's Future Energy Systems research initiative(FES-T02-P03)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

PDF

834

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/