In Situ and Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Study of Electrode Materials in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells

Abstract

Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) represent next-generation energy sources with high energy conversion efficiencies, low pollutant emissions, good flexibility with a wide variety of fuels, and excellent modularity suitable for distributed power generation. As an electrochemical energy conversion device, the SOFC’s performance and reliability depend sensitively on the catalytic activity and stability of electrode materials. To date, however, the development of electrode materials and microstructures is still based largely on trial-and-error methods because of the inadequate understanding of electrode process mechanisms. Therefore, the identification of key descriptors/properties for electrode materials or functional heterogeneous interfaces, especially under in situ/operando conditions, may provide guidance for the design of optimal electrode materials and microstructures. Here, Raman spectroscopy is ideally suited for the probing and mapping of chemical species present on electrode surfaces under operating conditions. And to boost the sensitivity toward electrode surface species, the surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) technique can be employed, in which thermally robust SERS probes (e.g., Ag@SiO₂ core–shell nanoparticles) are designed to make in situ/operando analysis possible. This review summarizes recent progresses in the investigation of SOFC electrode materials through Raman spectroscopic techniques, including topics of early stage carbon deposition (coking), coking-resistant anode modification, sulfur poisoning, and cathode degradation. In addition, future perspectives for utilizing the in situ/operando SERS for investigations of other electrochemical surfaces and interfaces are also discussed.

Keywords

SOFC / Raman spectroscopy / Surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) / In situ / Operando

References

[1] Haile SM Fuel cell materials and components. Acta Mater., 2003, 51: 5981-6000.

[2] Singhal SC Advances in solid oxide fuel cell technology. Solid State Ion., 2000, 135: 305-313.

[3] Yang L, Choi Y, Qin W, et al. Promotion of water-mediated carbon removal by nanostructured barium oxide/nickel interfaces in solid oxide fuel cells. Nat. Commun., 2011, 2: 357.

[4] Murray EP, Tsai T, Barnett SA A direct-methane fuel cell with a ceria-based anode. Nature, 1999, 400: 649.

[5] Zhan ZL, Barnett SA Use of a catalyst layer for propane partial oxidation in solid oxide fuel cells. Solid State Ion., 2005, 176: 871-879.

[6] Zha SW, Moore A, Abernathy H, et al. GDC-based low-temperature SOFCs powered by hydrocarbon fuels. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2004, 151: A1128-A1133.

[7] Liu M, Peng R, Dong D, et al. Direct liquid methanol-fueled solid oxide fuel cell. J. Power Sources, 2008, 185: 188-192.

[8] Murray EP, Harris SJ, Liu J, et al. Direct solid oxide fuel cell operation using isooctane. Electrochem. Solid State Lett., 2006, 9: A292-A294.

[9] Liu MF, Choi YM, Yang L, et al. Direct octane fuel cells: a promising power for transportation. Nano Energy, 2012, 1: 448-455.

[10] Williams MC, Strakey JP, Surdoval WA The U.S. Department of Energy, office of fossil energy stationary fuel cell program. J. Power Sources, 2005, 143: 191-196.

[11] Ikeda K, Hisatome N, Nagata K, et al. Development of 25 kW class SOFC module. ECS Trans., 2007, 7: 39-43.

[12] Day M, Swartz SL, Arkenberg G NexTech’s flexcell technology for planar SOFC stacks. ECS Trans., 2011, 35: 385-391.

[13] Badding M, Bouton W, Brown J, et al. Ultra-low mass planar SOFC design. ECS Trans., 2011, 35: 465-471.

[14] Krumpelt M, Krause TR, Carter JD, et al. Fuel processing for fuel cell systems in transportation and portable power applications. Catal. Today, 2002, 77: 3-16.

[15] Zha S, Moore A, Abernathy H, et al. GDC-based low-temperature SOFCs powered by hydrocarbon fuels. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2004, 151: A1128-A1133.

[16] Atkinson A, Barnett S, Gorte RJ, et al. Advanced anodes for high-temperature fuel cells. Nat. Mater., 2004, 3: 17.

[17] Lin YB, Zhan ZL, Liu J, et al. Direct operation of solid oxide fuel cells with methane fuel. Solid State Ion., 2005, 176: 1827-1835.

[18] Ray, E.R., Maskalick, N.J.: Contaminant effects in solid oxide fuel cells. In: Joint Contractors Meeting on Advanced Turbine Systems, Fuel Cells and Coal-Fired Heat, Morgantown, WV (1993)

[19] Zha S, Cheng Z, Liu M Sulfur poisoning and regeneration of Ni-based anodes in solid oxide fuel cells. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2007, 154: B201-B206.

[20] Wang JH, Liu M Computational study of sulfur–nickel interactions: a new S–Ni phase diagram. Electrochem. Commun., 2007, 9: 2212-2217.

[21] Badwal SPS, Deller R, Foger K, et al. Interaction between chromia forming alloy interconnects and air electrode of solid oxide fuel cells. Solid State Ion., 1997, 99: 297-310.

[22] Jiang SP, Zhang JP, Zheng XG A comparative investigation of chromium deposition at air electrodes of solid oxide fuel cells. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2002, 22: 361-373.

[23] Kurokawa H, Kawamura K, Maruyama T Oxidation behavior of Fe–16Cr alloy interconnect for SOFC under hydrogen potential gradient. Solid State Ion., 2004, 168: 13-21.

[24] Finsterbusch M, Lussier A, Schaefer JA, et al. Electrochemically driven cation segregation in the mixed conductor La_0.6Sr_0.4Co_0.2Fe_0.8O_3–δ. Solid State Ion., 2012, 212: 77-80.

[25] Harrison WA Origin of Sr segregation at La_1–xSr _xMnO₃ surfaces. Phys. Rev. B, 2011, 83: 155437.

[26] Nie LF, Liu MF, Zhang YJ, et al. La_0.6Sr_0.4Co_0.2Fe_0.8O_3–δ cathodes infiltrated with samarium-doped cerium oxide for solid oxide fuel cells. J. Power Sources, 2010, 195: 4704-4708.

[27] Lou XY, Wang SZ, Liu Z, et al. Improving La_0.6Sr_0.4Co_0.2Fe_0.8O_3–δ cathode performance by infiltration of a Sm_0.5Sr_0.5CoO_3–δ coating. Solid State Ion., 2009, 180: 1285-1289.

[28] Lynch ME, Yang L, Qin W, et al. Enhancement of La_0.6Sr_0.4Co_0.2Fe_0.8O_3–δ durability and surface electrocatalytic activity by La_0.85Sr_0.15MnO_3±δ investigated using a new test electrode platform. Energy. Environ. Sci., 2011, 4: 2249-2258.

[29] Guo JH, Xie C, Lee KT, et al. Improving the carbon resistance of Ni-based steam reforming catalyst by alloying with Rh: a computational study coupled with reforming experiments and EXAFS characterization. ACS Catal., 2011, 1: 574-582.

[30] Yang L, Wang S, Blinn K, et al. Enhanced sulfur and coking tolerance of a mixed ion conductor for SOFCs: BaZr_0.1Ce_0.7Y_0.2–xYb _xO_3–δ. Science, 2009, 326: 126-129.

[31] Nakamoto K Chalmers JM, Griffiths PR Infrared and Raman spectra of inorganic and coordination compounds, theory and applications in inorganic chemistry. Handbook of Vibrational Spectroscopy 2008 Hoboken Wiley

[32] Smith E, Dent G Modern Raman Spectroscopy: A Practical Approach 2013 Hoboken Wiley

[33] Weber WH, Merlin R Raman Scattering in Materials Science 2000 Berlin Springer

[34] McBride JR, Hass KC, Poindexter BD, et al. Raman and X-ray studies of Ce_1−xRE _xO_2−y, where RE = La, Pr, Nd, Eu, Gd, and Tb. J. Appl. Phys., 1994, 76: 2435.

[35] Ahn K, Yoo DS, Prasad DH, et al. Role of multivalent Pr in the formation and migration of oxygen vacancy in Pr-doped ceria: experimental and first-principles investigations. Chem. Mater., 2012, 24: 4261-4267.

[36] Peng C, Wang Y, Jiang K, et al. Study on the structure change and oxygen vacation shift for Ce_1–xSm _xO_2–y solid solution. J. Alloys Compd., 2003, 349: 273-278.

[37] Hernandez WY, Centeno MA, Romero-Sarria F, et al. Synthesis and characterization of Ce_1–xEu _xO_2–x/2 mixed oxides and their catalytic activities for CO oxidation. J. Phys. Chem. C, 2009, 113: 5629-5635.

[38] Mineshige A, Taji T, Muroi Y, et al. Oxygen chemical potential variation in ceria-based solid oxide fuel cells determined by Raman spectroscopy. Solid State Ion., 2000, 135: 481-485.

[39] Choi YM, Abernathy H, Chen HT, et al. Characterization of O₂–CeO₂ interactions using in situ Raman spectroscopy and first-principle calculations. ChemPhysChem, 2006, 7: 1957-1963.

[40] Efthimiopoulos I, Kunc K, Vazhenin GV, et al. Structural transformation and vibrational properties of BaC₂ at high pressures. Phys. Rev. B, 2010, 82: 134125.

[41] Blinn KS, Abernathy H, Li XX, et al. Raman spectroscopic monitoring of carbon deposition on hydrocarbon-fed solid oxide fuel cell anodes. Energy Environ. Sci., 2012, 5: 7913-7917.

[42] Cheng Z, Wang JH, Choi Y, et al. From Ni–YSZ to sulfur-tolerant anode materials for SOFCs: electrochemical behavior, in situ characterization, modeling, and future perspectives. Energy Environ. Sci., 2011, 4: 4380-4409.

[43] Cheng Z, Abernathy H, Liu M Raman spectroscopy of nickel sulfide Ni₃S₂. J. Phys. Chem. C, 2007, 111: 17997-18000.

[44] Pomfret MB, Owrutsky JC, Walker RA High-temperature Raman spectroscopy of solid oxide fuel cell materials and processes. J. Phys. Chem. B, 2006, 110: 17305-17308.

[45] Jeanmaire DL, Van Duyne RP Surface raman spectroelectrochemistry: part I. Heterocyclic, aromatic, and aliphatic amines adsorbed on the anodized silver electrode. J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem., 1977, 84: 1-20.

[46] Albrecht MG, Creighton JA Anomalously intense Raman spectra of pyridine at a silver electrode. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1977, 99: 5215-5217.

[47] Marotta NE, Barber JR, Dluhy PR, et al. Patterned silver nanorod array substrates for surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Appl. Spectrosc., 2009, 63: 1101-1106.

[48] McLellan JM, Siekkinen A, Chen JY, et al. Comparison of the surface-enhanced Raman scattering on sharp and truncated silver nanocubes. Chem. Phys. Lett., 2006, 427: 122-126.

[49] Baia L, Baia M, Popp J, et al. Gold Films deposited over regular arrays of polystyrene nanospheres as highly effective SERS substrates from visible to NIR. J. Phys. Chem. B, 2006, 110: 23982-23986.

[50] Mortazavi D, Kouzani AZ, Kaynak A, et al. Developing LSPR design guidelines. Prog. Electromagn. Res. Pier, 2012, 126: 203-235.

[51] Willets KA, Van Duyne RP Localized surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy and sensing. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 2007, 58: 267-297.

[52] Kerker M, Wang DS, Chew H Surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) by molecules adsorbed at spherical particles: errata. Appl. Opt., 1980, 19: 4159-4174.

[53] Stiles PL, Dieringer JA, Shah NC, et al. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem., 2008, 1: 601-626.

[54] Qian XM, Nie SM Single-molecule and single-nanoparticle SERS: from fundamental mechanisms to biomedical applications. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2008, 37: 912-920.

[55] Hu M, Chen J, Li ZY, et al. Gold nanostructures: engineering their plasmonic properties for biomedical applications. Chem. Soc. Rev., 2006, 35: 1084-1094.

[56] Li X, Blinn K, Fang Y, et al. Application of surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy to the study of SOFC electrode surfaces. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2012, 14: 5919-5923.

[57] Li XX, Blinn K, Fang YC, et al. Application of surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy to the study of SOFC electrode surfaces. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2012, 14: 5919-5923.

[58] Kim H, Lu C, Worrell WL, et al. Cu–Ni cermet anodes for direct oxidation of methane in solid-oxide fuel cells. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2002, 149: A247-A250.

[59] Li XX, Lee JP, Blinn KS, et al. High-temperature surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy for in situ study of solid oxide fuel cell materials. Energy Environ. Sci., 2014, 7: 306-310.

[60] Li X, Liu M, Lee JP, et al. An operando surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) study of carbon deposition on SOFC anodes. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015, 17: 21112-21119.

[61] Yang ML, Zhu YA, Fan C, et al. DFT study of propane dehydrogenation on Pt catalyst: effects of step sites. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2011, 13: 3257-3267.

[62] Liu HY, Yan RX, Zhang RG, et al. A DFT theoretical study of CH₄ dissociation on gold-alloyed Ni(111) surface. J. Nat. Gas Chem., 2011, 20: 611-617.

[63] Trimm DL Catalysts for the control of coking during steam reforming. Catal. Today, 1999, 49: 3-10.

[64] Lee WY, Hanna J, Ghoniem AF On the predictions of carbon deposition on the nickel anode of a SOFC and its impact on open-circuit conditions. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2013, 160: F94-F105.

[65] Siahvashi A, Chesterfield D, Adesina AA Propane CO₂ (dry) reforming over bimetallic Mo–Ni/Al₂O₃ catalyst. Chem. Eng. Sci., 2013, 93: 313-325.

[66] Asamoto M, Miyake S, Sugihara K, et al. Improvement of Ni/SDC anode by alkaline earth metal oxide addition for direct methane-solid oxide fuel cells. Electrochem. Commun., 2009, 11: 1508-1511.

[67] Gonzalez-Delacruz VM, Ternero F, Pereñíguez R, et al. Study of nanostructured Ni/CeO₂ catalysts prepared by combustion synthesis in dry reforming of methane. Appl. Catal. A Gen., 2010, 384: 1-9.

[68] Guo JJ, Lou H, Mo LY, et al. The reactivity of surface active carbonaceous species with CO₂ and its role on hydrocarbon conversion reactions. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem., 2010, 316: 1-7.

[69] Shishkin M, Ziegler T Coke-tolerant Ni/BaCe_1–xY _xO_3-δ anodes for solid oxide fuel cells: DFT plus U study. J. Phys. Chem. C, 2013, 117: 7086-7096.

[70] Bandura AV, Evarestov RA, Kuruch DD Hybrid HF–DFT modeling of monolayer water adsorption on (001) surface of cubic BaHfO₃ and BaZrO₃ crystals. Surf. Sci., 2010, 604: 1591-1597.

[71] Li XX, Liu MF, Lai SY, et al. In situ probing of the mechanisms of coking resistance on catalyst-modified anodes for solid oxide fuel cells. Chem. Mater., 2015, 27: 822-828.

[72] Li X, Liu M, Lai SY, et al. In situ probing of the mechanisms of coking resistance on catalyst-modified anodes for solid oxide fuel cells. Chem. Mater., 2015, 27: 822-828.

[73] Brightman E, Ivey DG, Brett DJL, et al. The effect of current density on H₂S-poisoning of nickel-based solid oxide fuel cell anodes. J. Power Sources, 2011, 196: 7182-7187.

[74] Cheng Z, Wang JH, Choi YM, et al. From Ni–YSZ to sulfur-tolerant anode materials for SOFCs: electrochemical behavior, in situ characterization, modeling, and future perspectives. Energy Environ. Sci., 2011, 4: 4380-4409.

[75] Gong MY, Liu XB, Trembly J, et al. Sulfur-tolerant anode materials for solid oxide fuel cell application. J. Power Sources, 2007, 168: 289-298.

[76] Lohsoontorn P, Brett DJL, Brandon NP Thermodynamic predictions of the impact of fuel composition on the propensity of sulphur to interact with Ni and ceria-based anodes for solid oxide fuel cells. J. Power Sources, 2008, 175: 60-67.

[77] Lee K, Song CS, Janik MJ Ab initio thermodynamics examination of sulfur species present on Rh, Ni, and binary Rh–Ni surfaces under steam reforming reaction conditions. Langmuir, 2012, 28: 5660-5668.

[78] Cheng Z, Wang JH, Choi Y, et al. From Ni–YSZ to sulfur-tolerant anode materials for SOFCs: electrochemical behavior, in situ characterization, modeling, and future perspectives. Energy Environ. Sci., 2011, 4: 4380-4409.

[79] Cheng Z, Liu M Characterization of sulfur poisoning of Ni–YSZ anodes for solid oxide fuel cells using in situ Raman microspectroscopy. Solid State Ion., 2007, 178: 925-935.

[80] Zha SW, Cheng Z, Liu ML Sulfur poisoning and regeneration of Ni-based anodes in solid oxide fuel cells. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2007, 154: B201-B206.

[81] Hansen JB Correlating sulfur poisoning of SOFC nickel anodes by a Temkin isotherm. Electrochem. Solid State Lett., 2008, 11: B178-B180.

[82] Tietz F, Haanappel VAC, Mai A, et al. Performance of LSCF cathodes in cell tests. J. Power Sources, 2006, 156: 20-22.

[83] Jiang SP, Zhen Y Mechanism of Cr deposition and its application in the development of Cr-tolerant cathodes of solid oxide fuel cells. Solid State Ion., 2008, 179: 1459-1464.

[84] Simner SP, Anderson MD, Engelhard MH, et al. Degradation mechanisms of La–Sr–Co–Fe–O₃ SOFC cathodes. Electrochem. Solid State Lett., 2006, 9: A478-A481.

[85] Benson SJ, Waller D, Kilner JA Degradation of La_0.6Sr_0.4Co_0.2Fe_0.8O_3–δ in carbon dioxide and water atmospheres. J. Electrochem. Soc., 1999, 146: 1305-1309.

[86] Lee SN, Atkinson A, Kilner JA Effect of Chromium on La_0.6Sr_0.4Co_0.2Fe_0.8O_3–δ solid oxide fuel cell cathodes. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2013, 160: F629-F635.

[87] Bucher E, Sitte W Long-term stability of the oxygen exchange properties of (La, Sr)(1-z)(Co, Fe)O3- _δ in dry and wet atmospheres. Solid State Ion, 2011, 192: 480-482.

[88] Tai LW, Nasrallah MM, Anderson HU, et al. Structure and electrical properties of La_1–xSr _xCo_1–yFe _yO₃. Part 2. The system La_1–xSr _xCo_0.2Fe_0.8O₃. Solid State Ion, 1995, 76: 273-283.

[89] Mitchell JF, Argyriou DN, Potter CD, et al. Structural phase diagram of La_1–xSr _xMnO_3+δ: relationship to magnetic and transport properties. Phys. Rev. B, 1996, 54: 6172-6183.

[90] Ding D, Liu MF, Liu ZB, et al. Efficient electro-catalysts for enhancing surface activity and stability of SOFC cathodes. Adv. Energy Mater., 2013, 3: 1149-1154.

[91] Lynch ME, Yang L, Qin WT, et al. Enhancement of La_0.6Sr_0.4Co_0.2Fe_0.8O_3–δ durability and surface electrocatalytic activity by La_0.85Sr_0.15MnO_3±δ investigated using a new test electrode platform. Energy Environ. Sci., 2011, 4: 2249-2258.

[92] Martín-Carrón L, de Andrés A, Martínez-Lope MJ, et al. Raman phonons as a probe of disorder, fluctuations, and local structure in doped and undoped orthorhombic and rhombohedral manganites. Phys. Rev. B, 2002, 66: 174303.

[93] Tai LW, Nasrallah MM, Anderson HU, et al. Structure and electrical-properties of La_1–xSr _xCO_1–yFe _yO_3.2. The system La_1–xSr _xCO_0.2Fe_0.8O₃. Solid State Ionics, 1995, 76: 273-283.

[94] Barbero BP, Gamboa JA, Cadus LE Synthesis and characterisation of La_1–xCa _xFeO₃ perovskite-type oxide catalysts for total oxidation of volatile organic compounds. Appl. Catal. B Environ., 2006, 65: 21-30.

[95] Weitz DA, Garoff S, Gersten JI, et al. The enhancement of Raman scattering, resonance Raman scattering, and fluorescence from molecules adsorbed on a rough silver surface. J. Chem. Phys., 1983, 78: 5324-5338.

[96] Everall N, Hahn T, Matousek P, et al. Picosecond time-resolved raman spectroscopy of solids: capabilities and limitations for fluorescence rejection and the influence of diffuse reflectance. Appl. Spectrosc., 2001, 55: 1701-1708.

[97] Matousek P, Towrie M, Ma C, et al. Fluorescence suppression in resonance Raman spectroscopy using a high-performance picosecond Kerr gate. J. Raman Spectrosc., 2001, 32: 983-988.

[98] McCain ST, Willett RM, Brady DJ Multi-excitation Raman spectroscopy technique for fluorescence rejection. Opt. Express, 2008, 16: 10975-10991.

[99] Li, Q., Wang, K.R., Wang, S.X.: A new approach for fluorescence subtraction in Raman spectroscopy. In: CLEO: 2011 - Laser Applications to Photonic Applications, OSA Technical Digest (CD), paper CFN7. OSA Publishing, Washington, D.C. (2011)

[100] Lieber CA, Mahadevan-Jansen A Automated method for subtraction of fluorescence from biological Raman spectra. Appl. Spectrosc., 2003, 57: 1363-1367.

[101] Ruan H, Dai LK Automated background subtraction algorithm for raman spectra based on iterative weighted least squares. Asian J. Chem., 2011, 23: 5229-5234.

Funding

U.S. Department of Energy(DENT-0006557)