Defective CeO2/Copper Phthalocyanine S-Scheme Heterojunctions With Molecular Copper Centers for Selective CO2-To-CO Photoconversion

Sharafat Ali , Sher Ali , Ahmed Ismail , Ahmad Iqbal , Yong Wang , Syedul Hasnain Bakhtiar , Shah Rahim , Amir Zada , Asad Ali , Fazal Raziq , Huabin Zhang , Jiabao Yi , Liang Qiao

Electron ›› 2026, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (3) : e70050

PDF (3079KB)
Electron ›› 2026, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (3) :e70050 DOI: 10.1002/elt2.70050
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Defective CeO2/Copper Phthalocyanine S-Scheme Heterojunctions With Molecular Copper Centers for Selective CO2-To-CO Photoconversion
Author information +
History +
PDF (3079KB)

Abstract

Simultaneously regulating charge carrier dynamics and catalytic selectivity remains a critical challenge in photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Here, we report a copper (II) phthalocyanine/oxygen-vacancy-rich (CuPc/CeO2) S-scheme heterojunction featuring atomically dispersed Cu–N4 sites. Ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy establishes a 0.24 eV work function difference between CeO2 and CuPc, generating a built-in electric field that drives S-scheme charge transfer. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy confirms oxygen vacancies in CeO2 (evidenced by Ce3+ states), enabling the energetic alignment that spatially separates reductive electrons (−1.05 V vs. NHE) at molecular Cu sites from oxidative holes (+2.44 V) in CeO2. Time-resolved photoluminescence spectroscopy confirmed that the reduction in carrier lifetime (from 7.42 to 6.57 ns) corroborates an efficient charge separation process. In situ diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier-transform spectroscopy demonstrates that the Cu–N4 centers preferentially stabilize the *COOH intermediate while facilitating rapid CO desorption from Cu(I) sites, thereby directing selective two-electron reduction and suppressing over-reduction to CH4. The optimized 20CuPc/CeO2 catalyst achieves a CO generation rate of 90.23 μmol g−1 h−1—representing a 16.96-fold enhancement over pristine CeO2—with 92.2% selectivity for CO versus CH4, and maintains robust stability over five consecutive photocatalytic cycles. This work establishes a unified design strategy integrating defect-engineered S-scheme charge separation with single-atom molecular catalysis to achieve selective solar-driven CO2-to-CO conversion.

Keywords

copper phthalocyanine / oxygen vacancies / photocatalytic CO2 reduction / S-scheme heterojunction / selective CO evolution

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Sharafat Ali, Sher Ali, Ahmed Ismail, Ahmad Iqbal, Yong Wang, Syedul Hasnain Bakhtiar, Shah Rahim, Amir Zada, Asad Ali, Fazal Raziq, Huabin Zhang, Jiabao Yi, Liang Qiao. Defective CeO2/Copper Phthalocyanine S-Scheme Heterojunctions With Molecular Copper Centers for Selective CO2-To-CO Photoconversion. Electron, 2026, 4 (3) : e70050 DOI:10.1002/elt2.70050

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

S. Ali, S. Ali, M. Z. Rahman, et al., “Preventing Molecular Catalyst Aggregation in Z-Scheme Photocatalyst for Unassisted CO2 Reduction,” Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 13, no. 6 (2025): 120038, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2025.120038.

[2]

J. Zhang, J. Jiang, Y. Lei, et al., “Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction Reaction: Influencing Factors, Reaction Pathways and Dominant Catalysts,” Separation and Purification Technology 328 (2024): 125056, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2023.125056.

[3]

Y. Yan, H. Wang, X. Bi, Y. Zhao, W. Wang, and M. Wu, “Tandem Catalysts CuSe/AuX for Increasing Local *CO Concentration to Promote the Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction to C2H4,” Electron 1, no. 1 (2023): e3, https://doi.org/10.1002/elt2.3.

[4]

S. Fang, M. Rahaman, J. Bharti, et al., “Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction,” Nature Reviews Methods Primers 3, no. 1 (2023): 61, https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-023-00243-w.

[5]

H. Akbar, M. S. Javed, S. T. Iqbal, et al., “A Review of Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction: Exploring Sustainable Carbon Emission Mitigation From Thermodynamics to Kinetics and Strategies for Enhanced Efficiency,” Journal of the Korean Ceramic Society 61, no. 3 (2024): 367–390, https://doi.org/10.1007/s43207-024-00365-1.

[6]

M. Han, M. Han, J. Ma, M. Du, Q. Zhu, and B. Qiu, “Photocatalytic Upcycling of Plastic Waste Into Value-Added Chemicals,” Electron 3, no. 2 (2025): e70005, https://doi.org/10.1002/elt2.70005.

[7]

H. Kumagai, Y. Tamaki, and O. Ishitani, “Photocatalytic Systems for CO2 Reduction: Metal-Complex Photocatalysts and Their Hybrids With Photofunctional Solid Materials,” Accounts of Chemical Research 55, no. 7 (2022): 978–990, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00705.

[8]

Y. Pu, T. Wang, C. Lin, et al., “Enhancement of Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction in BiOBr Through Chirality-Induced Electron Spin Polarization Regulation,” Chemical Communications 61, no. 12 (2025): 2580–2583, https://doi.org/10.1039/d4cc06009a.

[9]

C. Fu, Z. Wan, X. Yang, J. Zhang, and Z. Zhang, “Artificial CO2 Photoreduction: A Review of Photocatalyst Design and Product Selectivity Regulation,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A 12, no. 42 (2024): 28618–28657, https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ta04600e.

[10]

Z. Lv, T. Wu, Y. Qin, et al., “BiOBr/BNQDs Composites for Efficient Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction to Methanol,” Molecular Catalysis 595 (2026): 115870, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2026.115870.

[11]

X. Liu and W. Lin, “Mechanism of Urea Synthesis via Photocatalytic N2/CO2 Reduction on Heteronuclear Dual-Metal Loaded Crystalline Carbon Nitride,” Journal of Catalysis 457 (2026): 116812, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2026.116812.

[12]

Z. Wang, X.-F. Wang, T.-L. Hu, and Y.-H. Zhang, “Synergistic Modulation of Photoexcitation Dynamics and Catalytic Site Activation in Covalent Organic Frameworks Through Doebner Nonconjugated Modification for Boosting Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction,” Small (2026): e14818, https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202514818.

[13]

K. Wang, D. Huang, X. Li, et al., “Unconventional Strategies to Break Through the Efficiency of Light-Driven Water Splitting: A Review,” Electron 1, no. 1 (2023): e4, https://doi.org/10.1002/elt2.4.

[14]

S. Lu, S. Zhang, Q. Liu, et al., “Recent Advances in Novel Materials for Photocatalytic Carbon Dioxide Reduction,” Carbon Neutralization 3, no. 1 (2024): 142–168, https://doi.org/10.1002/cnl2.107.

[15]

Ž Kovačič, B. Likozar, and M. Huš, “Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction: A Review of Ab Initio Mechanism, Kinetics, and Multiscale Modeling Simulations,” ACS Catalysis 10, no. 24 (2020): 14984–15007, https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c02557.

[16]

X. Liu, X. Peng, T. Fu, et al., “A Comprehensive Review of S-Scheme Heterojunction Photocatalysts for CO2 Reduction: Design Principles, Mechanisms, and Material Classification,” Journal of CO2 Utilization 95 (2025): 103087, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2025.103087.

[17]

Q. Xiang, J. Yu, and M. Jaroniec, “Graphene-Based Semiconductor Photocatalysts,” Chemical Society Reviews 41, no. 2 (2012): 782–796, https://doi.org/10.1039/c1cs15172j.

[18]

W. Jin, M. Chen, H. Wu, et al., “Surface Reconstruction-Promoted Alkaline Overall Water Splitting on Fe-Doped Ni2P/NiMoO4 Composite Structure,” Electron (2026): e70033, https://doi.org/10.1002/elt2.70033.

[19]

S. Ali, P. M. Ismail, M. Khan, et al., “Charge Transfer in TiO2-Based Photocatalysis: Fundamental Mechanisms to Material Strategies,” Nanoscale 16, no. 9 (2024): 4352–4377, https://doi.org/10.1039/d3nr04534j.

[20]

A. Balapure, J. Ray Dutta, and R. Ganesan, “Recent Advances in Semiconductor Heterojunctions: A Detailed Review of the Fundamentals of Photocatalysis, Charge Transfer Mechanism and Materials,” RSC Applied Interfaces 1 (2024): 43–69, https://doi.org/10.1039/d3lf00126a.

[21]

Q. Xu, L. Zhang, B. Cheng, J. Fan, and J. Yu, “S-Scheme Heterojunction Photocatalyst,” Chem 6, no. 7 (2020): 1543–1559, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2020.06.010.

[22]

J. Lu, S. Gu, H. Li, Y. Wang, M. Guo, and G. Zhou, “Review on Multi-Dimensional Assembled S-Scheme Heterojunction Photocatalysts,” Journal of Materials Science & Technology 160 (2023): 214–239, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2023.03.027.

[23]

X. Wu, M. Sayed, G. Wang, W. Yu, and B. Zhu, “COF-Based S-Scheme Heterojunction Photocatalyst,” Advanced Materials 38, no. 2 (2026): e11322, https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202511322.

[24]

L. Zhang, J. Zhang, J. Yu, and H. García, “Charge-Transfer Dynamics in S-Scheme Photocatalyst,” Nature Reviews Chemistry 9, no. 5 (2025): 328–342, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-025-00698-3.

[25]

J. Fu, Q. Xu, J. Low, C. Jiang, and J. Yu, “Ultrathin 2D/2D WO3/g-C3N4 Step-Scheme H2-Production Photocatalyst,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 243 (2019): 556–565, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.11.011.

[26]

S. Ali, S. Ali, S.-L. Li, et al., “Electron-Rich Sulfur Sites and Dual Interfacial Bonds in S-Scheme Heterojunction Enable High Quantum Yield and Stable Hydrogen Production,” Chemical Engineering Journal 528 (2026): 172029, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2025.172029.

[27]

C.-C. Chen, C.-W. Chen, J. Shaya, et al., “A Novel S-Scheme Heterojunction Photocatalyst, Yb6Te5O19.2/g-C3N4: Synthesis, Characterization, Photocatalytic Activity, and Mechanism,” Scientific Reports 15, no. 1 (2025): 22132, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-04935-z.

[28]

C. Karaca, M. Karaca, H. Dulkadir, Ö Açışlı, Z. Eroğlu, and S. Karaca, “Engineering a Double S-Scheme Heterojunction Using Nd-Based N-GQDs/ZnO for Superior Photocatalytic Performance,” ACS Applied Energy Materials 8, no. 17 (2025): 12800–12814, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.5c01926.

[29]

Y. Li, X. Kong, R. Bao, et al., “Robust Oxygen Vacancy Surfaces Induce Chemical Bonding Interfaces of Bi2Sn2O7/Bi2MoO6 S-Scheme Heterojunction With Asymmetric Adsorption Sites for Efficient Photocatalytic Nitrogen Fixation,” Chemical Engineering Journal 531 (2026): 173870, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2026.173870.

[30]

H. Han, X. Wang, Y. Qiao, et al., “Construction of S-Scheme Heterojunction for Enhanced Photocatalytic Conversation of NO Over Dual-Defect CeO2−x/g-C3N4−x,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds 933 (2023): 167819, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.167819.

[31]

F. Li, G. Zhu, J. Jiang, et al., “A Review of Updated S-Scheme Heterojunction Photocatalysts,” Journal of Materials Science & Technology 177 (2024): 142–180, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2023.08.038.

[32]

C. Wang, Y. Zhao, C. Cheng, Q. Li, C. Guo, and Y. Hu, “S-Scheme Heterojunction Photocatalysts: Mechanism, Challenges and Opportunities,” Coordination Chemistry Reviews 521 (2024): 216177, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2024.216177.

[33]

W. Chen, M. Bao, F. Meng, et al., “Designer Topological-Single-Atom Catalysts With Site-Specific Selectivity,” Nature Communications 16, no. 1 (2025): 574, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-55838-6.

[34]

P. M. Ismail, S. Ali, S. Ali, et al., “Photoelectron “Bridge” in Van Der Waals Heterojunction for Enhanced Photocatalytic CO2 Conversion Under Visible Light,” Advanced Materials 35, no. 38 (2023): 2303047, https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202303047.

[35]

S. Ali, S. Ali, P. M. Ismail, et al., “Synthesis and Bader Analyzed Cobalt-Phthalocyanine Modified Solar UV-Blind β-Ga2O3 Quadrilateral Nanorods Photocatalysts for Wide-Visible-Light Driven H2 Evolution,” Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 307 (2022): 121149, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121149.

[36]

X. Zhang, Z. Wu, X. Zhang, et al., “Highly Selective and Active CO2 Reduction Electrocatalysts Based on Cobalt Phthalocyanine/Carbon Nanotube Hybrid Structures,” Nature Communications 8, no. 1 (2017): 14675, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14675.

[37]

J. Wang, S. Fu, P. Hou, et al., “Construction of TiO2/CuPc Heterojunctions for the Efficient Photocatalytic Reduction of CO2 With Water,” Molecules 29, no. 8 (2024): 1899, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29081899.

[38]

C. Chu, Z. Jia, Y. Yu, K. Ding, and S. Wu, “3D Macroporous CUPC/g-C3N4 Heterostructured Composites for Highly Efficient Multifunctional Solar Evaporation,” Nanoscale 14, no. 37 (2022): 13731–13739, https://doi.org/10.1039/d2nr03289a.

[39]

S. Ali, S. Ali, I. Khan, et al., “Molecular Modulation of Interfaces in a Z-Scheme van der Waals Heterojunction for Highly Efficient Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 663 (2024): 31–42, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2024.02.081.

[40]

J. Bian, J. Feng, Z. Zhang, et al., “Dimension-Matched Zinc Phthalocyanine/BiVO4 Ultrathin Nanocomposites for CO2 Reduction as Efficient Wide-Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalysts via a Cascade Charge Transfer,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition 58, no. 32 (2019): 10873–10878, https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201905274.

[41]

A. Hezam, K. Namratha, Q. A. Drmosh, et al., “CeO2 Nanostructures Enriched With Oxygen Vacancies for Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction,” ACS Applied Nano Materials 3, no. 1 (2020): 138–148, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.9b01833.

[42]

J. Cai, D. Li, L. Jiang, J. Yuan, Z. Li, and K. Li, “Review on CeO2-Based Photocatalysts for Photocatalytic Reduction of CO2: Progresses and Perspectives,” Energy & Fuels 37, no. 7 (2023): 4878–4897, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c00120.

[43]

M. Wang, M. Shen, X. Jin, et al., “Mild Generation of Surface Oxygen Vacancies on CeO2 for Improved CO2 Photoreduction Activity,” Nanoscale 12, no. 23 (2020): 12374–12382, https://doi.org/10.1039/d0nr00717j.

[44]

B. Li, X. Liu, H. Zhu, H. Guan, and R. Guo, “Oxygen Vacancy Engineering Driven NiAl-LDH/CeO2 Z-Type Heterojunction Achieve Efficient Round the Clock Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction,” Separation and Purification Technology 379 (2025): 135121, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2025.135121.

[45]

Z. Zhang, Y. Wang, M. Wang, et al., “An Investigation of the Effects of CeO2 Crystal Planes on the Aerobic Oxidative Synthesis of Imines From Alcohols and Amines,” Chinese Journal of Catalysis 36, no. 9 (2015): 1623–1630, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1872-2067(15)60869-5.

[46]

Z. Liu, C. Li, Z. Zhang, et al., “Ni-MOF-74 Templated Growth of N-Doped ZnIn2S4 S-Scheme Heterojunction Photocatalyst for Bifunctional Hydrogen Evolution and H2O2 Generation,” Chemical Engineering Journal 531 (2026): 173946, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2026.173946.

[47]

K. M. A. Fauzia, M. Chaman, and A. Azam, “Antibacterial and Sunlight-Driven Photocatalytic Activity of Graphene Oxide Conjugated CeO2 Nanoparticles,” Scientific Reports 14, no. 1 (2024): 6606, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54905-0.

[48]

R. D. Singh, P. B. Koli, B. S. Jagdale, and A. V. Patil, “Effect of Firing Temperature on Structural and Electrical Parameters of Synthesized CeO2 Thick Films,” SN Applied Sciences 1, no. 4 (2019): 315, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-0246-5.

[49]

A. Ismail, M. Zahid, S. Ali, et al., “Engineering of Oxygen Vacancy Defect in CeO2 Through Mn Doping for Toluene Catalytic Oxidation at Low Temperature,” Environmental Research 226 (2023): 115680, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.115680.

[50]

X. Chen, X. Chen, E. Yu, et al., “In Situ Pyrolysis of Ce-MOF to Prepare CeO2 Catalyst With Obviously Improved Catalytic Performance for Toluene Combustion,” Chemical Engineering Journal 344 (2018): 469–479, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.03.091.

[51]

Z. Feng, F. Guo, Y. Zhang, T. Ichikawa, and J. Zheng, “Oxygen Vacancies Rich CeO2 Supported Ru Catalyst for Efficient Hydrogenation of N-Ethylcarbazole at Mild Temperature,” Applied Catalysis B: Environment and Energy 366 (2025): 125059, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2025.125059.

[52]

Z. Wang, R. Wei, and X. Liu, “Dielectric Properties of Copper Phthalocyanine Nanocomposites Incorporated With Graphene Oxide,” Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics 28, no. 10 (2017): 7437–7448, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-017-6433-5.

[53]

K. Yuan, T. Hu, Y. Xu, et al., “Nitrogen-Doped Porous Carbon/Graphene Nanosheets Derived From Two-Dimensional Conjugated Microporous Polymer Sandwiches With Promising Capacitive Performance,” Materials Chemistry Frontiers 1, no. 2 (2017): 278–285, https://doi.org/10.1039/c6qm00012f.

[54]

R. Li, W. Zhang, and K. Zhou, “Metal–Organic-Framework-Based Catalysts for Photoreduction of CO2,” Advanced Materials 30, no. 35 (2018): 1705512, https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201705512.

[55]

T. L. Thompson, O. Diwald, and J. T. Yates, “CO2 as a Probe for Monitoring the Surface Defects on TiO2(110) Temperature-Programmed Desorption,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B 107, no. 42 (2003): 11700–11704, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp030430m.

[56]

A. Ismail, M. Zahid, B. Ahmad, et al., “Tailoring g-C3N4 Properties Through P and K Co-Doping: Advancing Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction to CH4,” Chemical Engineering Journal 513 (2025): 163023, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2025.163023.

[57]

R. Zhang, H. Wang, S. Tang, et al., “Photocatalytic Oxidative Dehydrogenation of Ethane Using CO2 as a Soft Oxidant Over Pd/TiO2 Catalysts to C2H4 and Syngas,” ACS Catalysis 8, no. 10 (2018): 9280–9286, https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.8b02441.

[58]

Z. Ma, P. Li, L. Ye, L. Wang, H. Xie, and Y. Zhou, “Selectivity Reversal of Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction by Pt Loading,” Catalysis Science & Technology 8, no. 20 (2018): 5129–5132, https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cy01656a.

[59]

Q. Liang, J. Fan, J. Ding, et al., “Concerted Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer by Mo5+/Mo6+ Reversible Transformation for CO2 Photoreduction With Nearly 100% CH4 Selectivity,” ACS Catalysis 14, no. 22 (2024): 17191–17200, https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.4c04994.

[60]

S. Karmakar, S. Barman, F. A. Rahimi, D. Rambabu, S. Nath, and T. K. Maji, “Confining Charge-Transfer Complex in a Metal-Organic Framework for Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction in Water,” Nature Communications 14, no. 1 (2023): 4508, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40117-z.

Rights & permissions

2026 The Author(s). Electron published by Harbin Institute of Technology and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

PDF (3079KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/

〈 〉