The importance of precise and suitable descriptors in data-driven approach to boost development of lithium batteries: A perspective

Zehua Wang , Li Wang , Hao Zhang , Hong Xu , Xiangming He

Electron ›› 2024, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (4) : e41

PDF
Electron ›› 2024, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (4) : e41 DOI: 10.1002/elt2.41
PERSPECTIVE

The importance of precise and suitable descriptors in data-driven approach to boost development of lithium batteries: A perspective

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Conventional approaches for developing new materials may no longer be adequate to meet the urgent needs of humanity’s energy transition. The emergence of machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) has led materials scientists to recognize the potential of using AI/ML to accelerate the creation of new battery materials. Although fixed material properties have been extensively studied as descriptors to establish the link between AI and materials chemistry, they often lack versatility and accuracy due to a lack of understanding of the underlying mechanisms of AI/ML. Therefore, materials scientists need to have a comprehensive understanding of the operational mechanisms and learning logic of AI/ ML to design more accurate descriptors. This paper provides a review of previous research studies conducted on AI, ML, and descriptors, which have been used to address challenges at various levels, ranging from materials development to battery performance prediction. Additionally, it introduces the basics of AI and ML to assist materials and battery developers in comprehending their operational mechanisms. The paper demonstrates the significance of precise and suitable ML descriptors in the creation of new battery materials. It does so by providing examples, summarizing current descriptors and ML algorithms, and examining the potential implications of future AI advancements for the sustainable energy industry.

Keywords

artificial intelligence / data-driven / descriptors / lithium batteries / machine-learning

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Zehua Wang, Li Wang, Hao Zhang, Hong Xu, Xiangming He. The importance of precise and suitable descriptors in data-driven approach to boost development of lithium batteries: A perspective. Electron, 2024, 2(4): e41 DOI:10.1002/elt2.41

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

BlainL. Chinese scientists push lithium batteries up to a record 711 Wh/kg. Accessed March 15, 2024.

[2]

PlackeT, Kloepsch R, DühnenS, WinterM. Lithium ion, lithium metal, and alternative rechargeable battery technologies: the odyssey for high energy density. J Solid State Electrochem. 2017;21(7):1939-1964.

[3]

ZhangH, RenD, MingH, et al. Digital twin enables rational design of ultrahigh-power lithium-ion batteries. Adv Energy Mater. 2023;13(1):2202660.

[4]

MaromR, Amalraj SF, LeiferN, JacobD, Aurbach D. A review of advanced and practical lithium battery materials. J Mater Chem. 2011;21(27):9938-9954.

[5]

LombardoT, Duquesnoy M, El-BouysidyH, et al. Artificial intelligence applied to battery research: hype or reality? Chem Rev. 2021;122(12):10899-10969.

[6]

E Commision. Li-ion cell materials and transport modelling. 2023. Accessed June 08, 2023.

[7]

LiangJ, WuT, WangZ, et al. Accelerating perovskite materials discovery and correlated energy applications through artificial intelligence. Energy Mat. 2022;2(3):200016.

[8]

WalshA. The quest for new functionality. Nat Chem. 2015;7(4):274-275.

[9]

OngsuleeP. Artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning. In:2017 15th international conference on ICT and knowledge engineering (ICT&KE). IEEE;2017:1-6.

[10]

AgrawalA, Choudhary A. Perspective: materials informatics and big data: realization of the “fourth paradigm” of science in materials science. Apl Mater. 2016;4(5):053208.

[11]

WeiJ, ChuX, SunX, et al. Machine learning in materials science. InfoMat. 2019;1(3):338-358.

[12]

ZhouT, SongZ, SundmacherK. Big data creates new opportunities for materials research: a review on methods and applications of machine learning for materials design. Engineering. 2019;5(6):1017-1026.

[13]

YangKK, WuZ, ArnoldFH. Machine-learning-guided directed evolution for protein engineering. Nat Methods. 2019;16(8):687-694.

[14]

JoseR, Ramakrishna S. Materials 4.0: materials big data enabled materials discovery. Appl Mater Today. 2018;10:127-132.

[15]

ChenA, ZhangX, ZhouZ. Machine learning: accelerating materials development for energy storage and conversion. InfoMat. 2020;2(3):553-576.

[16]

GuGH, NohJ, KimI, JungY. Machine learning for renewable energy materials. J Mater Chem A. 2019;7(29):17096-17117.

[17]

LvC, ZhouX, ZhongL, et al. Machine learning: an advanced platform for materials development and state prediction in lithium-ion batteries. Adv Mater. 2022;34(25):2101474.

[18]

AlanaziAM, Muhiuddin G, Al-BalawiDA, SamantaS. Different DNA sequencing using DNA graphs: a study. Appl Sci. 2022;12(11):5414.

[19]

IliyasuMA, Abisoye OA, BashirSA, OjeniyiJA. A review of DNA cryptograhic approaches. In:2020 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Cyberspac (CYBER NIGERIA). IEEE;2021:66-72.

[20]

GingoldH, PilpelY. Determinants of translation efficiency and accuracy. Mol Syst Biol. 2011;7(1):481.

[21]

ChmielaS, Sauceda HE, MüllerK-R, TkatchenkoA. Towards exact molecular dynamics simulations with machine-learned force fields. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):3887.

[22]

SchüttKT, Arbabzadah F, ChmielaS, MüllerKR, Tkatchenko A. Quantum-chemical insights from deep tensor neural networks. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):13890.

[23]

BartókAP, PayneMC, KondorR, CsányiG. Gaussian approximation potentials: the accuracy of quantum mechanics, without the electrons. Phys Rev Lett. 2010;104(13):136403.

[24]

KocerE, MasonJK, ErturkH. A novel approach to describe chemical environments in high-dimensional neural network potentials. J Chem Phys. 2019;150(15).

[25]

BaskinI, Ein-Eli Y. Electrochemoinformatics as an emerging scientific field for designing materials and electrochemical energy storage and conversion devices—an application in battery science and technology. Adv Energy Mater. 2022;12(48):2202380.

[26]

GuoC, ZhangF, HanX, et al. Intrinsic descriptor guided noble metal cathode design for Li-CO2 battery. Adv Mater. 2023;35(33):2302325.

[27]

WangX, XiaoR, LiH, ChenL. Quantitative structure-property relationship study of cathode volume changes in lithium ion batteries using ab-initio and partial least squares analysis. J Materiomics. 2017;3(3):178-183.

[28]

ChengJ, FongKD, PerssonKA. Materials design principles of amorphous cathode coatings for lithium-ion battery applications. J Mater Chem A. 2022;10(41):22245-22256.

[29]

WarburtonRE, YoungMJ, LetourneauS, Elam JW, GreeleyJ. Descriptor-based analysis of atomic layer deposition mechanisms on spinel LiMN2O4 lithium-ion battery cathodes. Chem Mater. 2020;32(5):1794-1806.

[30]

BölleFT, Bhowmik A, VeggeT, Maria Garcia LastraJ, Castelli IE. Automatic migration path exploration for multivalent battery cathodes using geometrical descriptors. Batt Supercaps. 2021;4(9):1516-1524.

[31]

BarbielliniB, SuzukiK, OrikasaY, et al. Identifying a descriptor for d-orbital delocalization in cathodes of Li batteries based on x-ray Compton scattering. Appl Phys Lett. 2016;109(7).

[32]

AdamsS, RaoRP. Transport pathways for mobile ions in disordered solids from the analysis of energy-scaled bond-valence mismatch landscapes. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2009;11(17):3210-3216.

[33]

AdamsS. Bond valence analysis of structure–property relationships in solid electrolytes. J Power Sources. 2006;159(1):200-204.

[34]

AdamsS, Swenson J. Bond valence analysis of transport pathways in RMC models of fast ion conducting glasses. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2002;4(14):3179-3184.

[35]

AdamsS. Relationship between bond valence and bond softness of alkali halides and chalcogenides. Acta Crystallogr Sect B Struct Sci. 2001;57(3):278-287.

[36]

WeiD, XuF, XuJ, et al. A critical electrochemical performance descriptor of ferrites as anode materials for Li-ion batteries: inversion degree. Ceram Int. 2019;45(18):24538-24544.

[37]

GaoY, LiZ, WangP, et al. Highly pseudocapacitive storage design principles of heteroatom-doped graphene anode in calcium-ion batteries. Adv Funct Mater. 2023;33(50):2305610.

[38]

LiuY, WangYM, YakobsonBI, Wood BC. Assessing carbon-based anodes for lithium-ion batteries: a universal description of charge-transfer binding. Phys Rev Lett. 2014;113(2):028304.

[39]

RangarajanSP, Barsukov Y, MukherjeePP. Plating energy as a universal descriptor to classify accelerated cell failure under operational extremes. Cell Rep Phys Sci. 2022;3(1):100720.

[40]

RangarajanSP, Barsukov Y, MukherjeePP. Preventing lithium plating under extremes: an untold tale of two electrodes. J Mater Chem. 2021;9(32):17249-17260.

[41]

NumazawaH, Igarashi Y, SatoK, ImaiH, OakiY. Experiment-oriented materials informatics for efficient exploration of design strategy and new compounds for high-performance organic anode. Adv Theory Simul. 2019;2(10):1900130.

[42]

LiP, LiZ, YangJ. Rational design of two-dimensional anode materials: B2S as a strained graphene. J Phys Chem Lett. 2018;9(17):4852-4856.

[43]

ArtrithN, UrbanA, CederG. Constructing first-principles phase diagrams of amorphous LixSi using machine-learning-assisted sampling with an evolutionary algorithm. J Chem Phys. 2018;148(24).

[44]

SadeghiA, Ghasemi SA, SchaeferB, MohrS, LillMA, GoedeckerS. Metrics for measuring distances in configuration spaces. J Chem Phys. 2013;139(18).

[45]

SchüttKT, GlaweH, BrockherdeF, Sanna A, MüllerK-R, GrossEK. How to represent crystal structures for machine learning: towards fast prediction of electronic properties. Phys Rev B. 2014;89(20):205118.

[46]

FaberF, Lindmaa A, Von LilienfeldOA, ArmientoR. Crystal structure representations for machine learning models of formation energies. Int J Quant Chem. 2015;115(16):1094-1101.

[47]

Von LilienfeldOA, Ramakrishnan R, RuppM, KnollA. Fourier series of atomic radial distribution functions: a molecular fingerprint for machine learning models of quantum chemical properties. Int J Quant Chem. 2015;115(16):1084-1093.

[48]

IshikawaA, Sodeyama K, IgarashiY, NakayamaT, Tateyama Y, OkadaM. Machine learning prediction of coordination energies for alkali group elements in battery electrolyte solvents. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2019;21(48):26399-26405.

[49]

PandeV, Viswanathan V. Descriptors for electrolyte-renormalized oxidative stability of solvents in lithium-ion batteries. J Phys Chem Lett. 2019;10(22):7031-7036.

[50]

WuY, HuQ, LiangH, et al. Electrostatic potential as solvent descriptor to enable rational electrolyte design for lithium batteries. Adv Energy Mater. 2023;13(22):2300259.

[51]

WangD, HeT, WangA, et al. A thermodynamic cycle-based electrochemical windows database of 308 electrolyte solvents for rechargeable batteries. Adv Funct Mater. 2023;33(11):2212342.

[52]

KraftMA, CulverSP, CalderonM, et al. Influence of lattice polarizability on the ionic conductivity in the lithium superionic argyrodites Li6PS5X (X= Cl, Br, I). J Am Chem Soc. 2017;139(31):10909-10918.

[53]

MuyS, Bachman JC, GiordanoL, et al. Tuning mobility and stability of lithium ion conductors based on lattice dynamics. Energy Environ Sci. 2018;11(4):850-859.

[54]

LeeSH, KwonKY, ChoiBK, Yoo HD. A kinetic descriptor to optimize Co-precipitation of Nickel-rich cathode precursors for Lithium-ion batteries. J Electroanal Chem. 2022;924:116828.

[55]

EreminRA, Zolotarev PN, IvanshinaOY, BobrikovIA. Li(Ni, Co, Al)O2 cathode delithiation: a combination of topological analysis, density functional theory, neutron diffraction, and machine learning techniques. J Phys Chem C. 2017;121(51):28293-28305.

[56]

WeiZ, HeQ, ZhaoY. Machine learning for battery research. J Power Sources. 2022;549:232125.

[57]

BerecibarM. Machine-Learning Techniques Used to Accurately Predict Battery Life. Nature Publishing Group; 2019.

[58]

AykolM, Herring P, AnapolskyA. Machine learning for continuous innovation in battery technologies. Nat Rev Mater. 2020;5(10):725-727.

[59]

CarneiroG, ChanAB, MorenoPJ, Vasconcelos N. Supervised learning of semantic classes for image annotation and retrieval. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2007;29(3):394-410.

[60]

NewmanME. Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks. Phys Rev. 2004;69(6):066133.

[61]

TshitoyanV, Dagdelen J, WestonL, et al. Unsupervised word embeddings capture latent knowledge from materials science literature. Nature. 2019;571(7763):95-98.

[62]

EngelY. Algorithms and Representations for Reinforcement Learning. Dissertation. Jerusalem: Hebrew University; 2005.

[63]

Vázquez-CanteliJR, NagyZ. Reinforcement learning for demand response: a review of algorithms and modeling techniques. Appl Energy. 2019;235:1072-1089.

[64]

SzepesváriC. Algorithms for Reinforcement Learning. Springer Nature; 2022.

[65]

DongH, DongH, DingZ, Zhang S. Chang, Deep Reinforcement Learning. Springer; 2020.

[66]

HearstMA, DumaisST, OsunaE, Platt J, ScholkopfB. Support vector machines. IEEE Intell Syst Their Appl. 1998;13(4):18-28.

[67]

NobleWS. What is a support vector machine? Nat Biotechnol. 2006;24(12):1565-1567.

[68]

MauludD, Abdulazeez AM. A review on linear regression comprehensive in machine learning. J Appl Sci Technol Trends. 2020;1(4):140-147.

[69]

RongS, Bao-Wen Z. The research of regression model in machine learning field. In: MATEC Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences;2018;176:01033.

[70]

HopeTM. Linear regression. In: Machine Learning. Elsevier;2020:67-81.

[71]

SinagaKP, YangM-S. Unsupervised K-means clustering algorithm. IEEE Access. 2020;8:80716-80727.

[72]

LikasA, Vlassis N, VerbeekJJ. The global k-means clustering algorithm. Pattern Recogn. 2003;36(2):451-461.

[73]

PetersonLE. K-nearest neighbor. Scholarpedia. 2009;4(2):1883.

[74]

ChenM, Challita U, SaadW, YinC, DebbahM. Artificial neural networks-based machine learning for wireless networks: a tutorial. IEEE Comm Surv Tutorials. 2019;21(4):3039-3071.

[75]

TravassosXL, AvilaSL, IdaN. Artificial neural networks and machine learning techniques applied to ground penetrating radar: a review. Appl Comput Inform. 2020;17(2):296-308.

[76]

AggarwalCC. In: Neural networks and deep learning. Springer;2018:3.

[77]

ZhouZ, DuanB, KangY, et al. An efficient screening method for retired lithium-ion batteries based on support vector machine. J Clean Prod. 2020;267:121882.

[78]

SuX, YanX, TsaiCL. Linear regression. Wiley Interdiscipl Rev Comput Stat. 2012;4(3):275-294.

[79]

GriffithD, ChunY, LiB. Spatial Regression Analysis Using Eigenvector Spatial Filtering. Academic Press; 2019.

[80]

VilsenSB, StroeD-I. Battery state-of-health modelling by multiple linear regression. J Clean Prod. 2021;290:125700.

[81]

NaS, XuminL, YongG. Research on k-means clustering algorithm: an improved k-means clustering algorithm. In:2010 Third International Symposium on intelligent information technology and security informatics. IEEE;2010:63-67.

[82]

CoverT, HartP. Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Trans Inf Theor. 1967;13(1):21-27.

[83]

ZhangZ. Introduction to machine learning: k-nearest neighbors. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4(11):218.

[84]

GuoG, WangH, BellD, Bi Y, GreerK. KNN model-based approach in classification. In: On The Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2003: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE: OTM Confederated International Conferences, CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE 2003, Catania, Sicily, Italy, November 3-7, 2003. Proceedings. Springer;2003:986-996.

[85]

XingW, BeiY. Medical health big data classification based on KNN classification algorithm. IEEE Access. 2019;8:28808-28819.

[86]

ZhangS, LiX, ZongM, Zhu X, WangR. Efficient kNN classification with different numbers of nearest neighbors. IEEE Transact Neural Networks Learn Syst. 2017;29(5):1774-1785.

[87]

JainAK, MaoJ, MohiuddinKM. Artificial neural networks: a tutorial. Computer. 1996;29(3):31-44.

[88]

SaritasMM, YasarA. Performance analysis of ANN and Naive Bayes classification algorithm for data classification. Int J Intell Syst Appl Eng. 2019;7(2):88-91.

[89]

VijayaraniS, Dhayanand S, PhilM. Kidney disease prediction using SVM and ANN algorithms. Int J Comput Bus Res. 2015;6(2):1-12.

[90]

QuinlanJR. Induction of decision trees. Mach Learn. 1986;1:81-106.

[91]

CharbutyB, Abdulazeez A. Classification based on decision tree algorithm for machine learning. J Appl Sci Technol Trends. 2021;2(1):20-28.

[92]

ShandizMA, GauvinR. Application of machine learning methods for the prediction of crystal system of cathode materials in lithium-ion batteries. Comput Mater Sci. 2016;117:270-278.

[93]

WangG, FearnT, WangT, Choy K-L. Machine-learning approach for predicting the discharging capacities of doped lithium nickel–cobalt–manganese cathode materials in Li-ion batteries. ACS Cent Sci. 2021;7(9):1551-1560.

[94]

SarkarT, SharmaA, DasAK, Deodhare D, BharadwajMD. A neural network based approach to predict high voltage li-ion battery cathode materials. In:2014 2nd International Conference on Devices, Circuits and Systems (ICDCS). IEEE;2014:1-3.

[95]

JoshiRP, Eickholt J, LiL, FornariM, BaroneV, PeraltaJE. Machine learning the voltage of electrode materials in metal-ion batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(20):18494-18503.

[96]

ZhangQ, ZhouC, ZhangD, Kramer D, PengC, XueD. Data-driven discovery and intelligent design of artificial hybrid interphase layer for stabilizing lithium-metal anode. Matter. 2023;6(9):2950-2962.

[97]

HennigP, KiefelM. Quasi-Newton methods: a new direction. J Mach Learn Res. 2013;14(1):843-865.

[98]

AllamO, ChoBW, KimKC, Jang SS. Application of DFT-based machine learning for developing molecular electrode materials in Li-ion batteries. RSC Adv. 2018;8(69):39414-39420.

[99]

XuW, WangJ, DingF, et al. Lithium metal anodes for rechargeable batteries. Energy Environ Sci. 2014;7(2):513-537.

[100]

GaoY-C, YaoN, ChenX, Yu L, ZhangR, ZhangQ. Data-driven insight into the reductive stability of ion–solvent complexes in lithium battery electrolytes. J Am Chem Soc. 2023;145(43):23764-23770.

[101]

SodeyamaK, Igarashi Y, NakayamaT, TateyamaY, OkadaM. Liquid electrolyte informatics using an exhaustive search with linear regression. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2018;20(35):22585-22591.

[102]

KhetanA, PitschH, ViswanathanV. Identifying descriptors for solvent stability in nonaqueous Li–O2 batteries. J Phys Chem Lett. 2014;5(8):1318-1323.

[103]

ManthiramA, YuX, WangS. Lithium battery chemistries enabled by solid-state electrolytes. Nat Rev Mater. 2017;2(4):1-16.

[104]

FamprikisT, CanepaP, DawsonJA, Islam MS, MasquelierC. Fundamentals of inorganic solid-state electrolytes for batteries. Nat Mater. 2019;18(12):1278-1291.

[105]

NolanAM, LiuY, MoY. Solid-state chemistries stable with high-energy cathodes for lithium-ion batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 2019;4(10):2444-2451.

[106]

NolanAM, ZhuY, HeX, BaiQ, MoY. Computation-accelerated design of materials and interfaces for all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries. Joule. 2018;2(10):2016-2046.

[107]

YanC, XuR, XiaoY, et al. Toward critical electrode/electrolyte interfaces in rechargeable batteries. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;30(23):1909887.

[108]

ZhengY, YaoY, OuJ, et al. A review of composite solid-state electrolytes for lithium batteries: fundamentals, key materials and advanced structures. Chem Soc Rev. 2020;49(23):8790-8839.

[109]

ZhengF, Kotobuki M, SongS, LaiMO, LuL. Review on solid electrolytes for all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries. J Power Sources. 2018;389:198-213.

[110]

JalemR, Nakayama M, KasugaT. An efficient rule-based screening approach for discovering fast lithium ion conductors using density functional theory and artificial neural networks. J Mater Chem A. 2014;2(3):720-734.

[111]

IbrahimS, JohanMR. Conductivity, thermal and neural network model nanocomposite solid polymer electrolyte S LiPF6. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2011;6(11):5565-5587.

[112]

MishraAK, RajputS, KaramtaM, Mukhopadhyay I. Exploring the possibility of machine learning for predicting ionic conductivity of solid-state electrolytes. ACS Omega. 2023;8(18):16419-16427.

[113]

JoJ, ChoiE, KimM, MinK. Machine learning-aided materials design platform for predicting the mechanical properties of Na-ion solid-state electrolytes. ACS Appl Energy Mater. 2021;4(8):7862-7869.

[114]

GuoH, WangQ, StukeA, Urban A, ArtrithN. Accelerated atomistic modeling of solid-state battery materials with machine learning. Front Energy Res. 2021;9:695902.

[115]

Sanchez-LengelingB, Aspuru-Guzik A. Inverse molecular design using machine learning: generative models for matter engineering. Science. 2018;361(6400):360-365.

[116]

JainA, Bollinger JA, TruskettTM. Perspective: inverse methods for material design. arXiv. Preprint posted online May 16, 2014.

[117]

WangX, ZhangG, YangL, Sharman E, JiangJ. Material descriptors for photocatalyst/catalyst design. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci. 2018;8(5):e1369.

[118]

LinM-H, TsaiJ-F, YuC-S. A review of deterministic optimization methods in engineering and management. Math Probl Eng. 2012;2012.

[119]

SpallJC. Introduction to Stochastic Search and Optimization: Estimation, Simulation, and Control. John Wiley & Sons; 2005.

[120]

ChenX, LiuX, ShenX, Zhang Q. Applying machine learning to rechargeable batteries: from the microscale to the macroscale. Angew Chem. 2021;133(46):24558-24570.

[121]

LiowCH, KangH, KimS, et al. Machine learning assisted synthesis of lithium-ion batteries cathode materials. Nano Energy. 2022;98:107214.

[122]

PuW, HeX, LiJ, YingJ, JiangC, Wan C. Controlled crystallization of spherical active cathode materials for NiMH and Li-ion rechargeable batteries. J N Mater Electrochem Syst. 2005;8(3):235.

[123]

LiJ, Fleetwood J, HawleyWB, KaysW. From materials to cell: state-of-the-art and prospective technologies for lithium-ion battery electrode processing. Chem Rev. 2021;122(1):903-956.

[124]

DaiF, CaiM. Best practices in lithium battery cell preparation and evaluation. Commun Materials. 2022;3(1):64.

[125]

JiangX, ChenY, MengX, et al. The impact of electrode with carbon materials on safety performance of lithium-ion batteries: a review. Carbon. 2022;191:448-470.

[126]

LiNW, YinYX, XinS, LiJY, GuoYG. Methods for the stabilization of nanostructured electrode materials for advanced rechargeable batteries. Small Methods. 2017;1(6):1700094.

[127]

ReynoldsCD, SlaterPR, HareSD, Simmons MJ, KendrickE. A review of metrology in lithium-ion electrode coating processes. Mater Des. 2021;209:109971.

[128]

YangM, ChengH, GuY, et al. Facile electrodeposition of 3D concentration-gradient Ni-Co hydroxide nanostructures on nickel foam as high performance electrodes for asymmetric supercapacitors. Nano Res. 2015;8:2744-2754.

[129]

NiriMF, Reynolds C, RamírezLAR, KendrickE, MarcoJ. Systematic analysis of the impact of slurry coating on manufacture of Li-ion battery electrodes via explainable machine learning. Energy Storage Mater. 2022;51:223-238.

[130]

CooperS, Eastwood D, GelbJ, et al. Image based modelling of microstructural heterogeneity in LiFePO4 electrodes for Li-ion batteries. J Power Sources. 2014;247:1033-1039.

[131]

KabraV, BirnB, KambojI, Augustyn V, MukherjeePP. Mesoscale machine learning analytics for electrode property estimation. J Phys Chem C. 2022;126(34):14413-14429.

[132]

DuquesnoyM, Lombardo T, ChouchaneM, PrimoEN, FrancoAA. Data-driven assessment of electrode calendering process by combining experimental results, in silico mesostructures generation and machine learning. J Power Sources. 2020;480:229103.

[133]

IshikawaS, LiuX, NohTH, et al. Simulation to estimate the correlation of porous structure properties of secondary batteries determined through machine learning. J Power Sources Adv. 2022;15:100094.

[134]

WanS, LiangX, JiangH, Sun J, DjilaliN, ZhaoT. A coupled machine learning and genetic algorithm approach to the design of porous electrodes for redox flow batteries. Appl Energy. 2021;298:117177.

[135]

ShodievA, Duquesnoy M, ArcelusO, ChouchaneM, LiJ, FrancoAA. Machine learning 3D-resolved prediction of electrolyte infiltration in battery porous electrodes. J Power Sources. 2021;511:230384.

[136]

TianJ, XiongR, ShenW, Lu J. Data-driven battery degradation prediction: forecasting voltage-capacity curves using one-cycle data. EcoMat. 2022;4(5):e12213.

[137]

LinC, XuJ, JiangD, et al. A comparative study of data-driven battery capacity estimation based on partial charging curves. J Energy Chem. 2024;88:409-420.

[138]

HuX, CheY, LinX, OnoriS. Battery health prediction using fusion-based feature selection and machine learning. IEEE Trans Transport Electrification. 2020;7(2):382-398.

[139]

LiY, LiuK, FoleyAM, et al. Data-driven health estimation and lifetime prediction of lithium-ion batteries: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2019;113:109254.

[140]

RichardsonRR, Osborne MA, HoweyDA. Battery health prediction under generalized conditions using a Gaussian process transition model. J Energy Storage. 2019;23:320-328.

[141]

JafariS, Shahbazi Z, ByunY-C. Lithium-ion battery health prediction on hybrid vehicles using machine learning approach. Energies. 2022;15(13):4753.

[142]

LiuX, PengH, LiB, et al. Untangling degradation chemistries of lithium-sulfur batteries through interpretable hybrid machine learning. Angew Chem. 2022;134(48):e202214037.

[143]

HoqueMA, NurmiP, KumarA, et al. Data driven analysis of lithium-ion battery internal resistance towards reliable state of health prediction. J Power Sources. 2021;513:230519.

[144]

HuX, CheY, LinX, DengZ. Health prognosis for electric vehicle battery packs: a data-driven approach. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron. 2020;25(6):2622-2632.

[145]

KhaleghiS, FirouzY, Van MierloJ, Van Den BosscheP. Developing a real-time data-driven battery health diagnosis method, using time and frequency domain condition indicators. Appl Energy. 2019;255:113813.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Authors. Electron published by Harbin Institute of Technology and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

148

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/