PDF
(2641KB)
Abstract
Hydrophobicity of the cathode catalyst layers (CCLs) crucially determines the performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) by affecting the transports of oxygen and liquid water. In this regard, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) is usually used as a hydrophobic additive to facilitate the oxygen and water transports in CCLs. So far, there remains lacking systematic effort to optimize the addition methods of PTFE in CCLs and the mechanisms behind. In this work, the effects of the approaches for PTFE addition and the distribution of PTFE on the mass transport of oxygen and the proton conduction in CCLs were studied by using a number of electrochemical characterization methods and contact angle tests. It was found that direct adding PTFE molecules is a better way than adding the PTFE-modified carbons to improve the electrochemical properties of CCLs, since the latter causes an increase in the proton transport resistance, whereas the direct molecule addition results in the obviously improved oxygen transport without affecting the proton conduction. In addition, the gradient distribution of PTFE in CCLs, more specifically, adding PTFE near the interface between CCL and gas diffusion layer (GDL), yielded higher catalyst utilization than the homogeneous distribution of PTFE due to the lower oxygen transport resistance.
Keywords
Proton exchange membrane fuel cells
/
Cathode catalyst layer
/
Hydrophobicity
/
Polytetrafluoroethylene
/
Oxygen transport resistance
Cite this article
Download citation ▾
Hao-Jie Chen, Mei-Hua Tang, Sheng-Li Chen.
Hydrophobicity Optimization of Cathode Catalyst Layer for Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell.
Journal of Electrochemistry, 2023, 29(9): 2207061 DOI:10.13208/j.electrochem.2207061
| [1] |
Alaswad A, Baroutaji A, Achour H, Carton J, Al Makky A, Olabi A G. Developments in fuel cell technologies in the transport sector[J]. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2016, 41(37): 16499-16508.
|
| [2] |
Chen W H, Chen S L. Effect of ink solvents on low-Pt loading proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance[J]. Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin., 2019, 35(5): 517-522.
|
| [3] |
Liu Q S, Lan F C, Chen J Q, Zeng C J, Wang J F. A review of proton exchange membrane fuel cell water management: Membrane electrode assembly[J]. J. Power Sources, 2022, 517: 230723.
|
| [4] |
Wu C W, Zhang W, Han X, Zhang Y X, Ma G J. A systematic review for structure optimization and clamping load design of large proton exchange membrane fuel cell stack[J]. J. Power Sources, 2020, 476: 228724.
|
| [5] |
Wang Y, Diaz D F R, Chen K S, Wang Z, Adroher X C. Materials, technological status, and fundamentals of PEM fuel cells - A review[J]. Mater. Today, 2020, 32: 178-203.
|
| [6] |
Wang X R, Ma Y, Gao, J, Li T, Jiang G Z, Sun Z Y. Review on water management methods for proton exchange membrane fuel cells[J]. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2021, 46(22): 12206-12229.
|
| [7] |
Avcioglu G S, Ficicilar B, Bayrakceken A, Eroglu I. High performance PEM fuel cell catalyst layers with hydrophobic channels[J]. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2015, 40(24): 7720-7731.
|
| [8] |
Chi B, Hou S Y, Liu G Z, Deng Y J, Zeng J H, Song H Y, Liao S J, Ren J W. Tuning hydrophobic-hydrophilic balance of cathode catalyst layer to improve cell performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) by mixing polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)[J]. Electrochim. Acta, 2018, 277: 110-115.
|
| [9] |
Chi B, Ye Y K, Lu X Y, Jiang S J, Du L, Zeng J H, Ren J W, Liao S J. Enhancing membrane electrode assembly performance by improving the porous structure and hydrophobicity of the cathode catalyst layer[J]. J. Power Sources, 2019, 443: 227284.
|
| [10] |
Wang M, Chen M, Yang Z Y, Liu G C, Lee J K, Yang W, Wang X D. High-performance and durable cathode catalyst layer with hydrophobic C@PTFE particles for low-Pt loading membrane assembly electrode of PEMFC[J]. Energy Conv. Manag., 2019, 191: 132-140.
|
| [11] |
Cai X, Lin R, Wang H, Liu S C, Zhong D. One simple method to improve the mass transfer of membrane electrode assembly to realize operation under wide humidity[J]. J. Power Sources, 2021, 506: 230185.
|
| [12] |
Roh C W, Choi J, Lee H. Hydrophilic-hydrophobic dual catalyst layers for proton exchange membrane fuel cells under low humidity[J]. Electrochem. Commun., 2018, 97: 105-109.
|
| [13] |
Qiu Y L, Zhang H M, Zhong H X, Zhang F X. A novel cathode structure with double catalyst layers and low Pt loading for proton exchange membrane fuel cells[J]. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 2013, 38 (14): 5836-5844.
|
| [14] |
Deng R Y, Xia Z X, Sun R L, Wang S L, Sun G Q. Nanostructured ultrathin catalyst layer with ordered platinum nanotube arrays for polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells[J]. J. Energy Chem., 2020, 43: 33-39.
|
| [15] |
Yakovlev Y V, Lobko Y V, Vorokhta M, Nováková J, Mazur M, Matolínová I, Matolín V. Ionomer content effect on charge and gas transport in the cathode catalyst layer of proton-exchange membrane fuel cells[J]. J. Power Sources, 2021, 490: 229531.
|
| [16] |
Xue Q, Li J K, Yang Z Y. Synergistically improving the activity, antipoisonous ability, and long-term stability of Pt to methanol oxidation through developing favorable graphene-based supports[J]. Langmuir, 2017, 33(4): 872-880.
|