Characterization of commercial honey samples based on melissopalynological, physicochemical, biochemical, and antimicrobial analysis

Maria-Evangelia Giannoulou , Eirini Intzirtzi , Dimitrios G. Lazaridis , Maria Simoni , Sofia Karabournioti , Nikolaos D. Andritsos , Katerina Katerinopoulou , Ioannis K. Karabagias

Exploration of Foods and Foodomics ›› 2026, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (1) : 1010180

PDF (1650KB)
Exploration of Foods and Foodomics ›› 2026, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (1) :1010180 DOI: 10.37349/eff.2026.1010180
Original Article
research-article
Characterization of commercial honey samples based on melissopalynological, physicochemical, biochemical, and antimicrobial analysis
Author information +
History +
PDF (1650KB)

Abstract

Aim: In the present study, commercial heather, orange, and fir honey samples obtained from three different producers were studied using melissopalynological, physicochemical, biochemical, and antimicrobial analysis to confirm the declaration of the botanical origin of the precursor on the packing label of honey samples. Methods: The research study aimed to characterize their botanical origin based on physicochemical parameters such as pH, moisture, electrical conductivity, ash, total sugars, vitamin C, free acidity, Pfund color, biochemical parameters such as HMF, hydrogen peroxide, total phenolic content, antioxidant activity, phenolic index, as well as the study of their antimicrobial activity against common pathogenic microorganisms such asStaphylococcus aureus,Escherichia coli O157:H7 andSalmonella Typhimurium. In addition, melissopalynological analysis was carried out. Results: Results showed that the heather honey samples were adulterated with conifer tree honey, and only one sample was pure heather honey. In addition, the moisture content in one falsified heather honey sample was outside the regulated range, whereas the HMF content in two citrus honey samples was also outside the regulated range. Heather honey showed the highest vitamin C content (7.3 mg/100g–8.1 mg/100g), hydrogen peroxide (up to 30 mg/L), and total phenolic content (120 mg GAE/L–160 mg GAE/L). Finally, all samples showed antibacterial activity against the tested pathogens, with the higher concentration of honey (20%w/v) being the most influential. Conclusions: The novelty of the study lies in the combination of different groups of parameters to evaluate the quality of commercial honey samples sold in the market in real market analysis research.

Keywords

honey / sampling / adulteration / antioxidant activity / hydrogen peroxide / antimicrobial activity

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Maria-Evangelia Giannoulou, Eirini Intzirtzi, Dimitrios G. Lazaridis, Maria Simoni, Sofia Karabournioti, Nikolaos D. Andritsos, Katerina Katerinopoulou, Ioannis K. Karabagias. Characterization of commercial honey samples based on melissopalynological, physicochemical, biochemical, and antimicrobial analysis. Exploration of Foods and Foodomics, 2026, 4 (1) : 1010180 DOI:10.37349/eff.2026.1010180

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Kuropatnicki AK, Kłósek M, Kucharzewski M. Honey as medicine: historical perspectives. J Apic Res. 2018;57:113—18.

[2]

European Union. Directive 2014/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 2001/110/EC relating to honey. Off J Eur Union. 2014;164:1-5.

[3]

Karabagias IK, Badeka A, Kontakos S, Karabournioti S, Kontominas MG. Characterisation and classification of Greek pine honeys according to their geographical origin based on volatiles, physicochemical parameters and chemometrics. Food Chem. 2014;146:548-57.

[4]

Von Der Ohe W, Persano Oddo L, Piana ML, Morlot M, Martin P. Harmonized methods of melissopalynology. Apidologie. 2004;35:S18-25.

[5]

Escuredo O, Seijo MC. Authenticity of Honey: Characterization, Bioactivities and Sensorial Properties Series II. Foods. 2024;13:2079.

[6]

Pyrzynska K, Biesaga M. Analysis of phenolic acids and flavonoids in honey. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 2009;28:893-902.

[7]

Xagoraris M, Lazarou E, Kaparakou EH, Alissandrakis E, Tarantilis PA, Pappas CS. Botanical origin discrimination of Greek honeys: physicochemical parametersversus Raman spectroscopy . J Sci Food Agric. 2020;101:3319—27.

[8]

Almasaudi S. The antibacterial activities of honey. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021;28:2188-96.

[9]

Becerril—Sánchez AL, Quintero—Salazar B, Dublán—García O, Escalona—Buendía HB. Phenolic Compounds in Honey and Their Relationship with Antioxidant Activity, Botanical Origin, and Color. Antioxidants. 2021;10:1700.

[10]

Suran J. Beehives as a Natural Source of Novel Antimicrobials. In: Rai M, Kosalec I, editors. Promising Antimicrobials from Natural Products. Berlin: Springer; 2022. pp. 373-95.

[11]

Feás X, Iglesias A, Rodrigues S, Estevinho LM. Effect of Erica sp. Honey against Microorganisms of Clinical Importance: Study of the Factors Underlying this Biological Activity. Molecules. 2013;18:4233-46.

[12]

Wadi MA. In Vitro Antibacterial Activity of Different Honey Samples against Clinical Isolates . BioMed Res Int.2022;2022:1560050.

[13]

Tsadila C, Nikolaidis M, Dimitriou TG, Kafantaris I, Amoutzias GD, Pournaras S, et al. Antibacterial Activity and Characterization of Bacteria Isolated from Diverse Types of Greek Honey against Nosocomial and Foodborne Pathogens. Appl Sci. 2021;11:5801.

[14]

Bose D, Padmavati M. Honey Authentication: A review of the issues and challenges associated with honey adulteration. Food Biosci. 2024;61:105004.

[15]

Alimoradian A, Khansari N, Abdollahi M, Asl BA, Asadi S, Maghool AY, et al. Comparative analysis of conventional and IRMS techniques for honey adulteration detection in accordance with ISIRI standards. BMC Res Notes. 2025;18:226.

[16]

Bogdanov S, Lüllmann C, Martin P, von der Ohe W, Russmann H, Vorwohl G, et al. Honey quality and international regulatory standards: review by the International Honey Commission. Bee World. 2015;80:61-9.

[17]

Ferreira CFI, Aires E, Barreira J, Estevinho ML. Antioxidant activity of Portuguese honey samples: Different contributions of the entire honey and phenolic extract. Food Chem. 2009;114:1438—43.

[18]

Bogdanov S, Martin P, Lullmann C, Borneck R, Ivanov T. Harmonised methods of the European Honey Commission. Apidologie. 1997;28:1-59.

[19]

Karabagias IK, Maia M, Karabagias VK, Gatzias I, Badeka AV. Characterization of Eucalyptus, Chestnut and Heather Honeys from Portugal Using Multi—Parameter Analysis and Chemo—Calculus. Foods. 2018;7:194.

[20]

Karabagias VK, Karabagias IK, Gatzias I, Badeka AV. Prickly Pear Seed Oil by Shelf—Grown Cactus Fruits: Waste or Maste? Processes. 2020;8:132.

[21]

Karabagias IK, Dimitriou E, Kontakos S, Kontominas MG. Phenolic profile, colour intensity, and radical scavenging activity of Greek unifloral honeys. Eur Food Res Technol. 2016;242:1201-10.

[22]

Thrasyvoulou A, Manikis J. Some physicochemical and microscopic characteristics of Greek unifloral honeys. Apidologie. 1995;26:441-52.

[23]

Pita—Calvo C, Vázquez M. Differences between honeydew and blossom honeys: A review. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2017;59:79-87.

[24]

Waś E, Rybak—Chmielewska H, Szczesna T, Teper D. Characteristics of Polish unifloral honeys. III. Heather honey (Calluna vulgaris L.) . J Apic Sci. 2011;55:129-36.

[25]

Kasiotis KM, Baira E, Iosifidou S, Bergele K, Manea—Karga E, Theologidis I, et al. Characterization of Ikaria Heather Honey by Untargeted Ultrahigh—Performance Liquid Chromatography—High Resolution Mass Spectrometry Metabolomics and Melissopalynological Analysis. Front Chem. 2022;10:924881.

[26]

Dalla E, Mazarakioti EC, Karabagias VK, Karabournioti S, Katerinopoulou K, Zotos A, et al. Quality characterization and botanical origin delineation of Greek honeydew and nectar honey based on poly—parametric determinations and chemoinformatics. Food Control. 2025;178:111510.

[27]

Massous A, Ouchbani T, Lo Turco V, Litrenta F, Nava V, Albergamo A, et al. Monitoring Moroccan Honeys: Physicochemical Properties and Contamination Pattern. Foods. 2023;12:969.

[28]

Thrasyvoulou A, Tananaki C, Goras G, Karazafiris E, Dimou M, Liolios V, et al. Legislation of honey criteria and standards. J Apic Res. 2018;57:88-96.

[29]

Alygizou A, Grigorakis S, Gotsiou P, Loupassaki S, Calokerinos AC. Quantification of Hydrogen Peroxide in Cretan Honey and Correlation with Physicochemical Parameters. J Anal Methods Chem.2021;2021:5554305.

[30]

Terrab A, Recamales AF, Hernanz D, Heredia FJ. Characterisation of Spanish thyme honeys by their physicochemical characteristics and mineral contents. Food Chem. 2004;88:537—42.

[31]

Grabek—Lejko D, Miłek M, Dżugan M. The comparison of the antioxidant, antibacterial and antiviral potential of Polish fir honeydew and Manuka honeys. Sci Rep. 2024;14:31170.

[32]

Rivera—Mondragón A, Marrone M, Bruner—Montero G, Gaitán K, de Núñez L, Otero—Palacio R, et al. Assessment of the Quality, Chemometric and Pollen Diversity of Apis mellifera Honey from Different Seasonal Harvests. Foods. 2023;12:3656.

[33]

El Sohaimy S, Masry S, Shehata M. Physicochemical characteristics of honey from different origins. Ann Agric Sci. 2015;60:279-87.

[34]

Turkut GM, Degirmenci A, Yildiz O, Can Z, Cavrar S, Yaylaci Karahalil F, et al. Investigating 5—hydroxymethylfurfural formation kinetic and antioxidant activity in heat treated honey from different floral sources. J Food Meas Charact. 2018;12:2358-65.

[35]

Núñez—Gómez V, San Mateo M, Sánchez—Martínez L, Periago MJ. Antibacterial Effect of Spanish Honeys of Different Botanical Origins against Staphylococcus epidermidis. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:6590.

[36]

Escuredo O, Rodríguez—Flores MS, Rojo—Martínez S, Seijo MC. Contribution to the Chromatic Characterization of Unifloral Honeys from Galicia (NW Spain). Foods. 2019;8:233.

[37]

Combarros—Fuertes P, Estevinho LM, Dias LG, Castro JM, Tomás—Barberán FA, Tornadijo ME, et al. Bioactive Components and Antioxidant and Antibacterial Activities of Different Varieties of Honey: A Screening Prior to Clinical Application. J Agric Food Chem. 2018;67:688-98.

[38]

Alshammari GM, Ahmed MA, Alsulami T, Hakeem MJ, Ibraheem MA, Al—Nouri DM. Phenolic Compounds, Antioxidant Activity, Ascorbic Acid, and Sugars in Honey from Ingenious Hail Province of Saudi Arabia. Appl Sci. 2022;12:8334.

[39]

Ferrassi H, Elouafy Y, Eddine OJ, Badaoui B, Abdelmoumen H, Gmouh S, et al. Antioxidant properties, phytochemical characterization and quantification of sugars, HMF, pesticides by liquid chromatography in Moroccan monofloral honey. J Food Meas Charact. 2025;19:9822—37.

[40]

Gomes T, Feás X, Iglesias A, Estevinho LM. Study of Organic Honey from the Northeast of Portugal. Molecules. 2011;16:5374-86.

[41]

Osés SM, Rodríguez C, Valencia O, Fernández—Muiño MA, Sancho MT. Relationships among Hydrogen Peroxide Concentration, Catalase, Glucose Oxidase, and Antimicrobial Activities of Honeys. Foods. 2024;13:1344.

[42]

Khataybeh B, Jaradat Z, Ababneh Q. Anti—bacterial, anti—biofilm and anti—quorum sensing activities of honey: A review. J Ethnopharmacol. 2023;317:116830.

[43]

Faúndez X, Báez ME, Martínez J, Zúñiga—López MC, Espinoza J, Fuentes E. Evaluation of the generation of reactive oxygen species and antibacterial activity of honey as a function of its phenolic and mineral composition. Food Chem. 2023;426:136561.

[44]

Brudzynski K. A current perspective on hydrogen peroxide production in honey. A review. Food Chem. 2020;332:127229.

[45]

Ogwu MC, Izah SC. Honey as a Natural Antimicrobial. Antibiotics. 2025;14:255.

[46]

Mandal MD, Mandal S. Honey: its medicinal property and antibacterial activity. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2011;1:154—60.

[47]

Ahmad RS, Hussain MB, Saeed F, Waheed M, Tufail T. Phytochemistry, metabolism, and ethnomedical scenario of honey: A concurrent review. Int J Food Prop. 2017;20:S254-69.

[48]

Tan W, Tian Y, Zhang Q, Miao S, Wu W, Miao X, et al. Antioxidant and antibacterial activity of Apis laboriosa honey against Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Front Nutr. 2023;10:1181492.

[49]

Luca L, Pauliuc D, Ursachi F, Oroian M. Physicochemical parameters, microbiological quality, and antibacterial activity of honey from the Bucovina region of Romania. Sci Rep. 2025;15:4358.

PDF (1650KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/