Investigating foodborne pathogen outbreaks: an integrated framework for tracing, detection, and risk assessment in food systems

Alfi Sophian , Wendry Yulianto , Farah Umaiyah Syahadat

Exploration of Foods and Foodomics ›› 2026, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (1) : 1010140

PDF (834KB)
Exploration of Foods and Foodomics ›› 2026, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (1) :1010140 DOI: 10.37349/eff.2026.1010140
Review
research-article
Investigating foodborne pathogen outbreaks: an integrated framework for tracing, detection, and risk assessment in food systems
Author information +
History +
PDF (834KB)

Abstract

Foodborne pathogen outbreaks impose a substantial and escalating burden on global public health, food systems, and economies, with the World Health Organization estimating over 600 million illness episodes and 420,000 deaths annually. Effective outbreak investigation requires harmonizing microbiological detection, molecular source tracing, and quantitative risk assessment within a single, coherent analytical architecture—a capacity that current fragmented approaches consistently fail to deliver. This review presents a novel, food-system-centered integrated framework for foodborne pathogen outbreak investigation that, for the first time, explicitly unifies conventional microbiology, molecular and whole-genome sequencing (WGS)-based typing, foodomics (metagenomics, proteomics, metabolomics), artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI/ML)-driven source prediction, geographic information systems (GIS)-based spatial epidemiology, and iterative quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) within a single investigative architecture. The framework is further differentiated by a three-tiered adaptive implementation model designed explicitly for resource-limited settings and by dedicated protocols for informal food supply chains—two critical gaps absent from existing WHO/FAO and CDC/EFSA guidelines. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science (1997–2025), with emphasis on evidence published between 2021 and 2025. The framework addresses three structural limitations of current practice: investigative fragmentation, under-integration of risk assessment, and inapplicability in low- and middle-income country (LMIC) contexts. By anchoring investigation in food and production environments rather than in clinical surveillance alone, and by embedding iterative risk assessment from the earliest investigative stage, the proposed framework supports more rapid, accurate, and equitable outbreak responses. Limitations of the review and directions for future validation research are discussed.

Keywords

foodborne pathogen outbreak / artificial intelligence / geographic information systems / source attribution / resource-limited settings / informal food supply chain

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Alfi Sophian, Wendry Yulianto, Farah Umaiyah Syahadat. Investigating foodborne pathogen outbreaks: an integrated framework for tracing, detection, and risk assessment in food systems. Exploration of Foods and Foodomics, 2026, 4 (1) : 1010140 DOI:10.37349/eff.2026.1010140

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

World Health Organization. WHO estimates of the global burden of foodborne diseases: Foodborne Disease Burden Epidemiology Reference Group 2007—2015. Geneva: World Health Organization ; 2015.

[2]

Havelaar AH, Kirk MD, Torgerson PR, Gibb HJ, Hald T, Lake RJ, et al.; World Health Organization Foodborne Disease Burden Epidemiology Reference Group. World Health Organization Global Estimates and Regional Comparisons of the Burden of Foodborne Disease in 2010. PLoS Med. 2015;12:e1001923.

[3]

Scallan E, Hoekstra RM, Angulo FJ, Tauxe RV, Widdowson MA, Roy SL, et al. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States——major pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:7-15.

[4]

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA); European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). The European Union One Health 2022 Zoonoses Report. EFSA J. 2023;21:e8442.

[5]

Suzzi G, Corsetti A. Food Microbiology: The Past and the New Challenges for the Next 10 Years. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:237.

[6]

Todd EC. Epidemiology of foodborne diseases: a worldwide review. World Health Stat Q. 1997; 50:30-50.

[7]

Swaminathan B, Gerner—Smidt P. The epidemiology of human listeriosis. Microbes Infect. 2007;9:1236-43.

[8]

CDC. Foodborne Illness Source Attribution Estimates—United States, 2022[Internet]. [cited 2026 Mar 24]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/ifsac/php/data—research/annual—report—2022.html

[9]

Allard MW, Strain E, Melka D, Bunning K, Musser SM, Brown EW, et al. Practical Value of Food Pathogen Traceability through Building a Whole—Genome Sequencing Network and Database. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54:1975-83.

[10]

den Bakker HC, Allard MW, Bopp D, Brown EW, Fontana J, Iqbal Z, et al. Rapid whole—genome sequencing for surveillance of Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20:1306-14.

[11]

Ronholm J, Nasheri N, Petronella N, Pagotto F. Navigating Microbiological Food Safety in the Era of Whole—Genome Sequencing. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2016;29:837-57.

[12]

Cifuentes A. Food analysis and foodomics. J Chromatogr A. 2009;1216:7109.

[13]

Hu C, Xu G. Mass—spectrometry—based metabolomics analysis for foodomics. Trends Analyt Chem. 2013;52:36-46.

[14]

Manning L, Morris W, Birchmore I. Organisational forgetting: The food safety risk associated with unintentional knowledge loss. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2021;118:242-51.

[15]

Jagadeesan B, Gerner—Smidt P, Allard MW, Leuillet S, Winkler A, Xiao Y, et al. The use of next generation sequencing for improving food safety: Translation into practice. Food Microbiol. 2019;79:96-115.

[16]

Nasheri N, Vester A, Petronella N. Foodborne viral outbreaks associated with frozen produce. Epidemiol Infect. 2019;147:e291.

[17]

Pires SM, Fischer—Walker CL, Lanata CF, Devleesschauwer B, Hall AJ, Kirk MD, et al. Aetiology—Specific Estimates of the Global and Regional Incidence and Mortality of Diarrhoeal Diseases Commonly Transmitted through Food. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0142927.

[18]

Codex Alimentarius Commission. Principles and Guidelines for the Conduct of Microbiological Risk Assessment (CAC/GL 30—1999). Rome: FAO/WHO; 2014.

[19]

Nauta MJ. Microbiological risk assessment models for partitioning and mixing during food handling. Int J Food Microbiol. 2005;100:311—22.

[20]

EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (EFSA BIOHAZ Panel), Koutsoumanis K, Allende A, Alvarez—Ordóñez A, Bolton D, Bover—Cid S, Chemaly M, et al. Whole genome sequencing and metagenomics for outbreak investigation, source attribution and risk assessment of food—borne microorganisms. EFSA J. 2019;17:e05898.

[21]

Grace D. Food Safety in Low and Middle Income Countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12:10490—507.

[22]

Hedberg CW. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:1338:1339—40.

[23]

Painter JA, Hoekstra RM, Ayers T, Tauxe RV, Braden CR, Angulo FJ, et al. Attribution of foodborne illnesses, hospitalizations, and deaths to food commodities by using outbreak data, United States, 1998—2008. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19:407—15.

[24]

ICMSF. Microorganisms in Foods 7: Microbiological Testing in Food Safety Management. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2018.

[25]

Carpentier B, Cerf O. Review——Persistence of Listeria monocytogenes in food industry equipment and premises. Int J Food Microbiol. 2011;145:1-8.

[26]

ISO 11290—1: 2017. Microbiology of the food chain. Horizontal method for the detection and enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes and of Listeria spp.—Part 1: Detection method. Geneva: ISO; 2017.

[27]

Law JW, Ab Mutalib NS, Chan KG, Lee LH. Rapid methods for the detection of foodborne bacterial pathogens: principles, applications, advantages and limitations. Front Microbiol. 2015;5:770.

[28]

Malorny B, Tassios PT, Rådström P, Cook N, Wagner M, Hoorfar J. Standardization of diagnostic PCR for the detection of foodborne pathogens. Int J Food Microbiol. 2003;83:39-48.

[29]

Allard MW, Bell R, Ferreira CM, Gonzalez—Escalona N, Hoffmann M, Muruvanda T, et al. Genomics of foodborne pathogens for microbial food safety. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2018;49:224—9.

[30]

Quince C, Walker AW, Simpson JT, Loman NJ, Segata N. Shotgun metagenomics, from sampling to analysis. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35:833—44.

[31]

Harvey DJ. Analysis of Protein Glycosylation by Mass Spectrometry. In: Analysis of Protein Post—Translational Modifications by Mass Spectrometry. Hoboken: Wiley; 2016. pp. 89-159.

[32]

Munck N, Njage PMK, Leekitcharoenphon P, Litrup E, Hald T. Application of Whole—Genome Sequences and Machine Learning in Source Attribution of Salmonella Typhimurium. Risk Anal. 2020;40:1693-705.

[33]

Besser J, Carleton HA, Gerner—Smidt P, Lindsey RL, Trees E. Next—generation sequencing technologies and their application to the study and control of bacterial infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24:335-41.

[34]

Stavropoulou E, Bezirtzoglou E. Predictive Modeling of Microbial Behavior in Food. Foods. 2019;8:654.

[35]

Todd EC, Greig JD, Bartleson CA, Michaels BS. Outbreaks where food workers have been implicated in the spread of foodborne disease. Part 3. Factors contributing to outbreaks and description of outbreak categories. J Food Prot. 2007;70:2199-217.

[36]

Kirby R, Teixeira P. Consumer food trends and food safety: Challenges in modern food systems. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2025;166:105398.

[37]

Haas CN, Rose JB, Gerba CP. Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment. 2nd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2014.

[38]

Buchanan R, Whiting R, Damert W. When is simple good enough: a comparison of the Gompertz, Baranyi, and three—phase linear models for fitting bacterial growth curves. Food Microbiol. 1997;14:313—26.

[39]

Chattaway MA, Greig DR, Gentle A, Hartman HB, Dallman TJ, Jenkins C. Whole—Genome Sequencing for National Surveillance ofShigella flexneri . Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1700.

[40]

Koutsoumanis KP, Aspridou Z. Individual cell heterogeneity in Predictive Food Microbiology: Challenges in predicting a “noisy” world. Int J Food Microbiol. 2017;240:3-10.

[41]

Covello VT, Sandman PM. Risk communication: evolution and revolution. In: Wolbarst A, ed. Solutions to an Environment in Peril. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2001. pp. 164-78.

[42]

FAO and WHO. Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) System and Guidelines for its Application [Annex to General principles of food hygiene (CXC 1—1969)][Internet]. Rome: FAO/WHO; c2023 [cited 2026 Mar 24]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4060/cc6125en

[43]

Fischhoff B, Brewer NT, Downs JS, editors. Communicating Risks and Benefits: An Evidence—Based User’s Guide. Silver Spring: FDA; 2011.

[44]

Van Asselt MBA, Vos E. The Precautionary Principle and the Uncertainty Paradox. J Risk Res. 2006;9:313-36.

[45]

Thakur S, Gray GC. The Mandate for a Global “One Health” Approach to Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019;100:227—8.

[46]

Franz E, Gras LM, Dallman T. Significance of whole genome sequencing for surveillance, source attribution and microbial risk assessment of foodborne pathogens. Curr Opin Food Sci. 2016;8:74-9.

[47]

Ribot EM, Fair MA, Gautom R, Cameron DN, Hunter SB, Swaminathan B, et al. Standardization of pulsed—field gel electrophoresis protocols for the subtyping of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella, and Shigella for PulseNet. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2006;3:59-67.

[48]

Njage PMK, Henri C, Leekitcharoenphon P, Mistou MY, Hendriksen RS, Hald T. Machine Learning Methods as a Tool for Predicting Risk of Illness Applying Next—Generation Sequencing Data. Risk Anal. 2019;39:1397-413.

[49]

Deng X, den Bakker HC, Hendriksen RS. Genomic Epidemiology: Whole—Genome—Sequencing—Powered Surveillance and Outbreak Investigation of Foodborne Bacterial Pathogens. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. 2016;7:353-74.

[50]

Loman NJ, Pallen MJ. Twenty years of bacterial genome sequencing. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015;13:787-94.

PDF (834KB)

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/