Standardization of methodologies for detecting helminth eggs in fresh produce enteral formulations intended for patients with special dietary needs

Abstract

Aim: Enteral nutrition (EN) improves patient health. However, the use of fresh produce may increase the risk of parasitic contamination. Recovery of parasites from enteral formulations is challenging and no studies have yet addressed this issue. The primary goal of this study was to standardize methodologies for detecting helminth eggs in different enteral formulations prepared with fresh produce, aiming to establish a reproducible protocol for food safety assessments. Methods: Two homemade enteral preparations (HEP) with mixed raw fresh fruits or vegetables were produced and artificially contaminated with two doses ofAscarissuum eggs (1=207 and 2=76 eggs). HEP 1 contained cabbage, orange juice, lettuce, watercress, and filtered water, while HEP 2 consisted of strawberries and filtered water. To estimate the egg recovery rate, four protocols per preparation/dose were analyzed in triplicate (48 trials total). The following variables were evaluated: homogenization (manual or using a magnetic stirrer) and dispersion solution (1 M glycine, pH 5.5 or 0.1% Alconox^®). All protocols shared the following steps: sedimentation, centrifugation, and total sediment analysis. Results: The highest recovery efficiency for HEP 1 was achieved with Protocol 2 (glycine + magnetic stirrer), with averages of 66% (Dose 1) and 55% (Dose 2). For HEP 2, Protocol 4 (Alconox^® + magnetic stirrer) performed best, yielding 66% (Dose 1) and 52% (Dose 2). Viable eggs ofToxocara sp., and hookworm were naturally detected in HEP 1 and 2, respectively. Conclusions: This is the first study to standardize and measure the detection sensitivity of a methodology for detecting parasites in enteral formulations. Since most patients receiving these types of food require intensive care, strict quality control is essential, including evaluation of the parasitological quality of EN to avoid exacerbating their already compromised health.

Keywords

enteral nutrition / vegetables / berries / parasites / food safety

References

[1] Bechtold ML, Brown PM, Escuro A, Grenda B, Johnston T, Kozeniecki M, et al.; ASPEN Enteral Nutrition Committee. When is enteral nutrition indicated? JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2022;46:1470-96.

[2] Xavier de Melo V, Mezzomo TR, Aristides Dall'igna AL, de Araújo Marques Dengo V, Stangarlin—Fiori L, Madalozzo Schieferdecker ME, et al. Does the nutritional composition and category of administered enteral nutrition affect the nutritional status of patients receiving home nutritional therapy? Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2022;49:270-7.

[3] Mohamed Elfadil O, Patel A, Joly F, Lal S, Bozzetti F, Cuerda C, et al. Patients’ and caregivers’ perspective on challenges and outcomes with tube feeding: Analysis of home enteral nutrition survey data. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2024;61:94-100.

[4] Baxter YC, Dias MC, Maculevicius J, Cecconello I, Cotteleng B, Waitzberg DL. Economic study in surgical patients of a new model of nutrition therapy integrating hospital and home vs the conventional hospital model. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2005;29:S96-105.

[5] Galindo CO, Beux MR, da Costa RL, Uniat KC, Leobet J, Ferreira SMR, et al. Home—Prepared Enteral Tube Feeding: Evaluation of Microbiological Contamination, Hygiene, and the Profile of the Food Handler. Nutr Clin Pract. 2021;36:704—17.

[6] Machado de Sousa LR, Rodrigues Ferreira SM, Madalozzo Schieferdecker ME. Physicochemical and nutritional characteristics of handmade enteral diets. Nutr Hosp. 2014;29:568-74.

[7] Bischoff SC, Austin P, Boeykens K, Chourdakis M, Cuerda C, Jonkers—Schuitema C, et al. ESPEN practical guideline: Home enteral nutrition. Clin Nutr. 2022;41:468-88.

[8] Vieira MMC, Santos VFN, Bottoni A, Morais TB. Nutritional and microbiological quality of commercial and homemade blenderized whole food enteral diets for home—based enteral nutritional therapy in adults. Clin Nutr. 2018;37:177-81.

[9] Ojo O, Adegboye ARA, Ojo OO, Wang X, Brooke J. The Microbial Quality and Safety of Blenderised Enteral Nutrition Formula: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:9563.

[10] Milton DL, Johnson TW, Johnson K, Murphy B, Carter H, Hurt RT, et al. Accepted Safe Food—Handling Procedures Minimizes Microbial Contamination of Home—Prepared Blenderized Tube—Feeding. Nutr Clin Pract. 2020;35:479-86.

[11] Santos DCD, Ataide CDG, Mota da Costa N, Oliveira Junior VP, Egea MB. Blenderized formulations in home enteral nutrition: a narrative review about challenges in nutritional security and food safety. Nutr Rev. 2022;80:1580-98.

[12] Kozow JFC, Rabito EI, Kruger JF, Medeiros CO, da Costa RL, Beux MR, et al. Microbiological contamination present in enteral tube feeding prepared in hospitals and/or at home: a systematic review. Nutr Rev. 2024;82:1226—38.

[13] Martins ECS, Medeiros CO, Costa RLD, Karbiak L, Beux MR, Leal DAG, et al. Evaluation of food safety in the handling of home enteral nutrition based on a new contamination risk classification: A cross—sectional study. Nutr Clin Pract. 2025;[Epub ahead of print].

[14] Pan American Health Organization. CD55/15—Plan of Action for the Elimination of Neglected Infectious Diseases and Post—elimination Actions 2016—2022[Internet]. c2016 [cited 2025 Jul 17]. Available from: https://iris.paho.org/handle/10665.2/31434

[15] WHO estimates of the global burden of foodborne diseases: foodborne diseases burden epidemiology reference group 2007—2015 [Internet]. World Health Organization; c2026 [cited 2025 Jul 17]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565165

[16] World Health Organization & Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/ World Health Organization. Multicriteria—based ranking for risk management of food—borne parasites: report of a Joint FAO/WHO expert meeting. In: Microbiological risk assessment series; 23. 2012 Sep 3—7; FAO Headquarters. Rome, Italy: FAO, World Health Organization ; 2014.

[17] Robertson LJ, Temesgen TT, Tysnes KR, Eikås JE. An apple a day: an outbreak of cryptosporidiosis in Norway associated with self—pressed apple juice. Epidemiol Infect. 2019;147:e139.

[18] Laoraksawong P, Bunkasem U, Pradidthaprecha A. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic contamination in fresh vegetables in Bangkok, Thailand, and surrounding areas: A cross—sectional survey. Parasite Epidemiol Control. 2025;29:e00416.

[19] Silveira J, Anjos JV, Karbiak L, Souza GF, Prox LB, Cerezo IAR, et al. Do cultivo à comercialização: avaliação da qualidade sanitária de diferentes estágios da cadeia produtiva de vegetais orgânicos no sul do Brasil. Vigil Sanit Debate. 2025;13:e02415. Portuguese.

[20] Jourdan PM, Lamberton PHL, Fenwick A, Addiss DG. Soil—transmitted helminth infections. Lancet. 2018;391:252-65.

[21] Mewara A, Sharma N, Pandiarajan V, Dhooria S, Dhir V, Prakash G, et al. High Seropositivity for Helminths in Immunosuppressed Patients with Peripheral Eosinophilia. Acta Parasitol. 2026;71:16.

[22] Oliveira JJ, Silva EKA, Sano MID, Schieferdecker MEM, Kopruszynski CP. Livro de receitas: Nutrição Enteral com alimentos[Internet]. Curitiba: Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR); c2022 [cited 2025 Jul 18]. Available from: https://www.prppg.ufpr.br/site/ppgnutricao/wp—content/uploads/sites/52/2026/03/imprimir—ebook—of——14—8—cm——21—cm—1.pdf

[23] Pineda CO, Leal DAG, Lima R, Ribeiro PP, Rodrigues A, Martini MH, et al. Parasites in Fresh Produce: a Brazilian Inter—laboratory Evaluation of a Standardized Methodology for the Detection ofAscaris sp. in Leafy Vegetables . Food Anal Methods. 2021;14:989-96.

[24] Matosinhos FC, Valenzuela VC, Silveira JA, Rabelo EM. Standardization of a method for the detection of helminth eggs and larvae in lettuce. Parasitol Res. 2016;115:1827—34.

[25] de Victorica J, Galván M. Preliminary testing of a rapid coupled methodology for quantitation/viability determination of helminth eggs in raw and treated wastewater. Water Res. 2003;37:1278-87.

[26] Altman SA, Randers L, Rao G. Comparison of trypan blue dye exclusion and fluorometric assays for mammalian cell viability determinations. Biotechnol Prog. 1993;9:671—4.

[27] Elbehiry A, Marzouk E, Alzaben F, Almuaither A, Abead B, Alamri M, et al. Emerging Technologies and Integrated Strategies for Microbial Detection and Control in Fresh Produce. Microorganisms. 2025;13:1447.

[28] Silveira J, Alfredo NAC, Beux MR, Ferreira SMR, Leal DAG. Evaluation of a propolis hydroalcoholic solution with glycine in the joint reduction of microorganisms and helminth eggs from leafy green vegetables. Braz J Food Technol. 2023;26.

[29] Robertson LJ. Transmission of parasites to people via food: how can we determine their impact and why do we need to know? Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2025;39:e00258.

[30] Ryan U, Hijjawi N, Feng Y, Xiao L. Giardia: an under—reported foodborne parasite. Int J Parasitol. 2019;49:1-11.

[31] FAO. Parasites in foods: An invisible threat. Bangkok, Thailand: FAO; 2020.

[32] Cook N, Nichols RA, Wilkinson N, Paton CA, Barker K, Smith HV. Development of a method for detection of Giardia duodenalis cysts on lettuce and for simultaneous analysis of salad products for the presence of Giardia cysts and Cryptosporidium oocysts. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:7388—91.

[33] Saelens G, Robertson L, Gabriël S. Diagnostic tools for the detection of taeniid eggs in different environmental matrices: A systematic review. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2022;26:e00145.

[34] Collender PA, Kirby AE, Addiss DG, Freeman MC, Remais JV. Methods for Quantification of Soil—Transmitted Helminths in Environmental Media: Current Techniques and Recent Advances. Trends Parasitol. 2015;31:625—39.

[35] Waindok P, Raulf MK, Strube C. Potentials and challenges in the isolation and detection of ascarid eggs in complex environmental matrices. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2022;28:e00174.

[36] Wang W, Wu Z, Dai Z, Yang Y, Wang J, Wu G. Glycine metabolism in animals and humans: implications for nutrition and health. Amino Acids. 2013;45:463-77.

[37] Shields JM, Lee MM, Murphy HR. Use of a common laboratory glassware detergent improves recovery of Cryptosporidium parvum and Cyclospora cayetanensis from lettuce, herbs and raspberries. Int J Food Microbiol. 2012;153:123—8.

[38] Chandra V, Torres M, Ortega YR. Efficacy of wash solutions in recovering Cyclospora cayetanensis, Cryptosporidium parvum, and Toxoplasma gondii from basil. J Food Prot. 2014;77:1348-54.

[39] Kleine A, Janecek E, Waindok P, Strube C. Flotation and adherence characteristics of Toxocara canis and T. cati and a reliable method for recovering Toxocara eggs from soil. Vet Parasitol. 2016;227:35-41.

[40] Chen J, Liu Q, Liu GH, Zheng WB, Hong SJ, Sugiyama H, et al. Toxocariasis: a silent threat with a progressive public health impact. Infect Dis Poverty. 2018;7:59.

[41] Crowley LC, Marfell BJ, Christensen ME, Waterhouse NJ. Measuring Cell Death by Trypan Blue Uptake and Light Microscopy. Cold Spring Harb Protoc.2016;2016.

[42] Traub RJ, Zendejas—Heredia PA, Massetti L, Colella V. Zoonotic hookworms of dogs and cats—lessons from the past to inform current knowledge and future directions of research. Int J Parasitol. 2021;51:1233—41.

[43] Redmond EC, Griffith CJ. Consumer food handling in the home: a review of food safety studies. J Food Prot. 2003;66:130-61.

[44] Eslahi AV, Olfatifar M, Zaki L, Saryazdi AK, Barikbin F, Maleki A, et al. Global prevalence of intestinal protozoan parasites among food handlers: A systematic review and meta—analysis. Food Control. 2023;145:109466.