From data to nutrition: the impact of computing infrastructure and artificial intelligence

Abstract

This article explores the significant impact that artificial intelligence (AI) could have on food safety and nutrition, with a specific focus on the use of machine learning and neural networks for disease risk prediction, diet personalization, and food product development. Specific AI techniques and explainable AI (XAI) are highlighted for their potential in personalizing diet recommendations, predicting models for disease prevention, and enhancing data-driven approaches to food production. The article also underlines the importance of high-performance computing infrastructures and data management strategies, including data operations (DataOps) for efficient data pipelines and findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (FAIR) principles for open and standardized data sharing. Additionally, it explores the concept of open data sharing and the integration of machine learning algorithms in the food industry to enhance food safety and product development. It highlights the METROFOOD-IT project as a best practice example of implementing advancements in the agri-food sector, demonstrating successful interdisciplinary collaboration. The project fosters both data security and transparency within a decentralized data space model, ensuring reliable and efficient data sharing. However, challenges such as data privacy, model interoperability, and ethical considerations remain key obstacles. The article also discusses the need for ongoing interdisciplinary collaboration between data scientists, nutritionists, and food technologists to effectively address these challenges. Future research should focus on refining AI models to improve their reliability and exploring how to integrate these technologies into everyday nutritional practices for better health outcomes.

Keywords

Food / food contaminants / computing infrastructure / data analysis / machine learning / artificial intelligence / microbiome / health risks

References

[1] Stahl BC, Antoniou J, Bhalla N, Brooks L, Jansen P, Lindqvist B, et al. A systematic review of artificial intelligence impact assessments. Artif Intell Rev. 2023; 12799-831.

[2] Jacobs DR, Tapsell LC. Food synergy: the key to a healthy diet. Proc Nutr Soc. 2013; 72: 200-6.

[3] Martin—Gallausiaux C, Marinelli L, Blottière HM, Larraufie P, Lapaque N. SCFA: mechanisms and functional importance in the gut. Proc Nutr Soc. 2021; 80: 37-49.

[4] Novielli P, Romano D, Magarelli M, Bitonto PD, Diacono D, Chiatante A, et al. Explainable artificial intelligence for microbiome data analysis in colorectal cancer biomarker identification. Front Microbiol. 2024; 15: 1348974.

[5] Jadhav EB, Sankhla MS, Bhat RA, Bhagat DS. Microplastics from food packaging: An overview of human consumption, health threats, and alternative solutions. Environ Nanotechnology Monit Manag. 2021; 16: 100608.

[6] Elizabeth L, Machado P, Zinöcker M, Baker P, Lawrence M. Ultra—Processed Foods and Health Outcomes: A Narrative Review. Nutrients. 2020; 12: 1955.

[7] Gibney MJ, Forde CG, Mullally D, Gibney ER. Ultra—processed foods in human health: a critical appraisal. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017; 106: 717—24.

[8] Menichetti G, Barabási A, Loscalzo J. Decoding the Foodome: Molecular Networks Connecting Diet and Health. Annu Rev Nutr. 2024; 44: 257-88.

[9] Farm to Fork strategy[Internet]. [cited 2024 Nov 13]. Available from: https://food.ec.europa.eu/horizontal—topics/farm—fork—strategy_en

[10] Consumer trust in the food chain: exploring barriers and motivations[Internet]. [cited 2024 Nov 13]. Available from: https://eit.europa.eu/sites/default/files/18199_citizen_participation_forum_report.pdf

[11] Luthra S, Mangla SK, Garg D, Kumar A. Internet of Things (IoT) in Agriculture Supply Chain Management: A Developing Country Perspective. In: Dwivedi YK, Rana NP, Slade EL, Shareef MA, Clement M, Simintiras AC, editors. Emerging Markets from a Multidisciplinary Perspective: Challenges, Opportunities and Research Agenda. Cham: Springer; 2018. pp. 209—20.

[12] Rejeb A, Keogh JG, Zailani S, Treiblmaier H, Rejeb K. Blockchain Technology in the Food Industry: A Review of Potentials, Challenges and Future Research Directions. Logistics. 2020; 4: 27.

[13] Sorbo A, Pucci E, Nobili C, Taglieri I, Passeri D, Zoani C. Food Safety Assessment: Overview of Metrological Issues and Regulatory Aspects in the European Union. Separations. 2022; 9: 53.

[14] Wood B, Robinson E, Baker P, Paraje G, Mialon M, van Tulleken C, et al. What is the purpose of ultra—processed food? An exploratory analysis of the financialisation of ultra—processed food corporations and implications for public health. Global Health. 2023; 19: 85.

[15] Ataei P, Litchfield AT. Big data reference architectures, a systematic literature review[Internet]. c2020 [cited 2024 Nov 13]. Available from: https://aisel.aisnet.org/acis2020/30

[16] How to achieve smart data sharing[Internet]. Gartner, Inc.; c2024 [cited 2024 Nov 13]. Available from: https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/how—to—achieve—smart—data—sharing

[17] Hashemi SK, Mirtaheri SL, Greco S. Fraud detection in banking data by machine learning techniques. IEEE Access. 2022; 11: 3034-43.

[18] Sliusar V, Akulyonok M, Andrianov A, Sliusar M, Tikhonov M. Algorithmic support for risk assessment in electronic production management. Proceedings of 2021 IEEE Conference of Russian Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (ElConRus); 2021 Jan 26—29; St. Petersburg, Moscow, Russia. IEEE; 2021. pp. 2262—5.

[19] Olaoye F, Potter K. Business intelligence (bi) and analytics software: Empowering data—driven decision—making[Internet]. EasyChair; c 2012—2024 [cited 2024 Nov 13]. Available from: https://easychair.org/publications/preprint/cR8v

[20] Otto B. A federated infrastructure for european data spaces. Commun. 2022; 65: 44-5.

[21] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Policy and Global Affairs, Board on Research Data and Information; Committee on Toward an Open Science Enterprise. Open Science by Design: Realizing a Vision for 21st Century Research. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2018.

[22] Murray—Rust P. Open data in science. Ser Rev. 2008; 34: 52-64.

[23] Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJ, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A, et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data. 2016; 3: 160018.

[24] Barker M, Chue Hong NP, Katz DS, Lamprecht AL, Martinez—Ortiz C, Psomopoulos F, et al. Introducing the FAIR Principles for research software. Sci Data. 2022; 9: 622.

[25] Simmonds EG, Adjei KP, Andersen CW, Hetle Aspheim JC, Battistin C, Bulso N, et al. Insights into the quantification and reporting of model—related uncertainty across different disciplines. iScience. 2022; 25: 105512.

[26] Smith B, Ashburner M, Rosse C, Bard J, Bug W, Ceusters W, et al. The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration. Nat Biotechnol. 2007; 25: 1251—5.

[27] Abouakil D, Heurix J, Neubauer T. Data models for the pseudonymization of dicom data. Proceedings of 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences; 2011 Jan 4—7; Kauai, HI, USA. IEEE; 2011. pp. 1-11.

[28] Russell RK, Hartnett E, Caron JL. Netcdf—4: Software implementing an enhanced data model for the geosciences. Proceedings of 22nd International Conference on Interactive Information Processing Systems for Meteorology, Oceanography, and Hydrology; 2006 Jan 31.

[29] Folk M, Heber G, Koziol Q, Pourmal E, Robinson D. An overview of the hdf5 technology suite and its applications. In: Baumann P, Howe B, Orsborn K, Stefanova S. Proceedings of the EDBT/ICDT 2011 workshop on array databases; 2011 Mar 25; New York, United States. ACM; 2011. pp. 36-47.

[30] Ledoux H, Arroyo Ohori K, Kumar K, Dukai B, Labetski A, Vitalis S. CityJSON: a compact and easy—to—use encoding of the CityGML data model. Open Geospatial Data Softw Stand. 2019; 4: 4.

[31] Moody DL, Shanks GG. Improving the quality of data models: empirical validation of a quality management framework. Inf Systems. 2023; 28: 619—50.

[32] Hinrichs H, Aden T. An iso 9001: 2000 compliant quality management system for data integration in data warehouse systems. In: Theodoratos D, Hammer J, Jeusfeld M, Staudt M, editors. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Design and Management of Data Warehouses (DMDW’2001); 2001 Jun 4; Interlaken, Switzerland. 2001. pp. 1-12.

[33] Papoutsoglou G, Tarazona S, Lopes MB, Klammsteiner T, Ibrahimi E, Eckenberger J, et al. Machine learning approaches in microbiome research: challenges and best practices. Front Microbiol. 2023; 14: 1261889.

[34] Singh AV, Varma M, Rai M, Singh SP, Bansod G, Laux P, et al. Advancing predictive risk assessment of chemicals via integrating machine learning, computational modeling, and chemical/nano—quantitative structure—activity relationship approaches. Adv Intell Syst. 2024; 6: 2300366.

[35] Singh AV, Shelar A, Rai M, Laux P, Thakur M, Dosnkyi I, et al. Harmonization Risks and Rewards: Nano—QSAR for Agricultural Nanomaterials. J Agric Food Chem. 2024; 72: 2835-52.

[36] Badillo S, Banfai B, Birzele F, Davydov II, Hutchinson L, Kam—Thong T, et al. An Introduction to Machine Learning. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2020; 107: 871-85.

[37] Monaco A, Pantaleo E, Amoroso N, Lacalamita A, Lo Giudice C, Fonzino A, et al. A primer on machine learning techniques for genomic applications. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2021; 19: 4345-59.

[38] Nasteski V. An overview of the supervised machine learning methods. Horizons. b. 2017; 4: 56.

[39] Shutaywi M, Kachouie NN. Silhouette Analysis for Performance Evaluation in Machine Learning with Applications to Clustering. Entropy (Basel). 2021; 23: 759.

[40] van Engelen JE, Hoos HH. A survey on semi—supervised learning. Mach Learn. 2020; 109: 373-440.

[41] Bellotti R, Cerello P, Tangaro S, Bevilacqua V, Castellano M, Mastronardi G, et al. Distributed medical images analysis on a grid infrastructure. Futur Gener Comput Syst. 2007; 23: 475-84.

[42] Magarelli M, Novielli P, De Filippis F, Magliulo R, Di Bitonto P, Diacono D, et al. Explainable artificial intelligence and microbiome data for food geographical origin: the Mozzarella di Bufala Campana PDO Case of Study. Front Microbiol. 2024; 15: 1393243.

[43] Magarelli M, Di Bitonto P, De Filippis F, Novielli P, Magliulo R, Diacono D. Securing origin integrity through machine learning analysis of mozzarella di bufala pdo microbiome. Proceedings of 2024 IEEE International Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 & IoT (MetroInd4.0 & IoT); 2024 May 29—31; Firenze, Italy. IEEE; 2024. pp. 38-42.

[44] Singh AV, Bhardwaj P, Upadhyay AK, Pagani A, Upadhyay J, Bhadra J, et al. Navigating regulatory challenges in molecularly tailored nanomedicine. Explor BioMat—X. 2024; 1: 124-34.

[45] Singh AV, Bansod G, Mahajan M, Dietrich P, Singh SP, Rav K, et al. Digital Transformation in Toxicology: Improving Communication and Efficiency in Risk Assessment. ACS Omega. 2023; 8: 21377—90.