In-tube extraction dynamic headspace coupled to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for the sensitive analysis of volatile compounds in aqueous samples

Abstract

Aim: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are often human-made contaminants used and generated in the manufacturing of numerous products, presenting notable environmental and health hazards. Therefore, the development of sensitive and reliable analytical methods is crucial for their detection with accuracy, timeliness, and automation capabilities. The objective of this study is to demonstrate the suitability of the in-tube extraction dynamic headspace (ITEX-DHS) sampling method for the gas chromatographic/mass spectrometric (GC/MS) analysis of BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes) compounds in aqueous matrices. It emphasizes the method’s metrological reliability and innovative approach to precisely determining VOCs in aqueous environments providing a tool to prevent contamination of the agrifood sector. Methods: Following the optimization of various experimental parameters, including salt incorporation and adjustments of both dry purging and desorption conditions. The method’s performance was evaluated for repeatability, reproducibility, and robustness. Results: Limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were for all substances determined lower than 50 and 100 ng/L, respectively. Average relative standard deviations below 5% were achieved for all analytes, with recovery rates ranging between 93% and 101%. Subsequently, the method was applied for the determination of BTEX in one hundred groundwater samples. The findings revealed that the BTEX levels were below the LOD in 84.2% of samples. However, in the remaining samples, more than one compound was detected at concentrations higher than the LOQ. Conclusions: The ITEX method emerges as a highly favorable alternative to both solid phase microextraction (SPME) and purge and trap (P & T) methods for determining BTEX in aqueous samples, providing significant advantages. Its strengths lie in its increased robustness, extended trap lifespan, and enhanced sensitivity, underscoring its superior performance in VOC analysis. The total analytical method allows the sensitive and robust determination of VOC.

Keywords

BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes) / water analysis / agrifood sector / in tube extraction / gas chromatography / mass spectrometry

References

[1] Yu B, Yuan Z, Yu Z, Xue—song F. BTEX in the environment: An update on sources, fate, distribution, pretreatment, analysis, and removal techniques. Chem Eng J. 2022; 435: 134825.

[2] Moreau J, Rinnert E. Fast identification and quantification of BTEX coupling by Raman spectrometry and chemometrics. Analyst. 2015; 140: 3535-42.

[3] Fakhari AR, Hasheminasab KS, Baghdadi M, Khakpour A. A simple and rapid method based on direct transfer of headspace vapor into the GC injector: application for determination of BTEX compounds in water and wastewater samples. Anal Methods. 2012; 4: 1996-2001.

[4] Chen P, Tseng Y, Chuang Y, Chen J. Determination of volatile organic compounds in water using headspace knotted hollow fiber microextraction. J Chromatogr A. 2015; 1395: 41-7.

[5] Es’haghi Z, Ebrahimi M, Hosseini M. Optimization of a novel method for determination of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes in hair and waste water samples by carbon nanotubes reinforced sol—gel based hollow fiber solid phase microextraction and gas chromatography using factorial experimental design. J Chromatogr A. 2011; 1218: 3400-6.

[6] Pascale R, Bianco G, Calace S, Masi S, Mancini IM, Mazzone G, et al. Method development and optimization for the determination of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes in water at trace levels by static headspace extraction coupled to gas chromatography—barrier ionization discharge detection. J Chromatogr A. 2018; 1548: 10-8.

[7] Wittkamp BL, Tilotta DC. Determination of BTEX Compounds in Water by Solid—Phase Microextraction and Raman Spectroscopy. Anal Chem. 1995; 67: 600—5.

[8] Faraji H, Feizbakhsh A, Helalizadeh M. Modified dispersive liquid—liquid microextraction for pre—concentration of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes prior to their determination by GC. Microchim Acta. 2013; 180: 1141—8.

[9] Sarafraz—Yazdi A, Amiri AH, Es’haghi Z. BTEX determination in water matrices using HF—LPME with gas chromatography—flame ionization detector. Chemosphere. 2008; 71: 671—6.

[10] Pastor—Belda M, Viñas P, Campillo N, Hernández—Córdoba M. Headspace sorptive extraction coupled to gas chromatography—mass spectrometry for the determination of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes in finger paints. Microchem J. 2019; 145: 406-11.

[11] Berezkin VG, Makarov ED, Stolyarov BV. Needle—type concentrator and its application to the determination of pollutants. J Chromatogr A. 2003; 985: 63-5.

[12] Wang A, Fang F, Pawliszyn J. Sampling and determination of volatile organic compounds with needle trap devices. J Chromatogr A. 2005; 1072: 127-35.

[13] Saito Y, Ueta I, Kotera K, Ogawa M, Wada H, Jinno K. In—needle extraction device designed for gas chromatographic analysis of volatile organic compounds. J Chromatogr A. 2006; 1106: 190-5.

[14] Laaks J, Jochmann MA, Schilling B, Schmidt TC. Optimization strategies of in—tube extraction (ITEX) methods. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2015; 407: 6827—38.

[15] Jochmann MA, Yuan X, Schilling B, Schmidt TC. In—tube extraction for enrichment of volatile organic hydrocarbons from aqueous samples. J Chromatogr A. 2008; 1179: 96-105.

[16] Flórez Menéndez JC, Fernández Sánchez ML, Sánchez Urı́a JE, Fernández Martı́nez E, Sanz—Medel A. Static headspace, solid—phase microextraction and headspace solid—phase microextraction for BTEX determination in aqueous samples by gas chromatography. Anal Chim Acta. 2000; 415: 9-20.

[17] Yilmazcan O, Tümay Özer E, Izgi B, Gucer S. Optimization of Static Head—Space Gas Chromatography—Mass Spectrometry—Conditions for the Determination of Benzene, Toluene, Ethyl benzene, Xylene, and Styrene in Model Solutions. Ekoloji. 2013; 22: 76-83.

[18] Kupska M, Jeleń HH. In—tube extraction for the determination of the main volatile compounds in Physalis peruviana L. J Sep Sci. 2017; 40: 532—41.

[19] Laaks J, Jochmann MA, Schilling B, Schmidt TC. In—tube extraction of volatile organic compounds from aqueous samples: an economical alternative to purge and trap enrichment. Anal Chem. 2010; 82: 7641—8.

[20] Ueta I, Saito Y, Teraoka K, Miura T, Jinno K. Determination of volatile organic compounds for a systematic evaluation of third—hand smoking. Anal Sci. 2010; 26: 569-74.

[21] Jurdáková H, Kubinec R, Jurcisinová M, Krkosová Z, Blasko J, Ostrovský I, et al. Gas chromatography analysis of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes using newly designed needle trap device in aqueous samples. J Chromatogr A. 2008; 1194: 161-4.

[22] Kubinec R, Adamuscin J, Jurdáková H, Foltin M, Ostrovský I, Kraus A, et al. Gas chromatographic determination of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes using flame ionization detector in water samples with direct aqueous injection up to 250 microl. J Chromatogr A. 2005; 1084: 90—4.

[23] Wu Z, Fung YS. Isolation and Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds from Water by Dynamic Purge—and—Trap Technique Coupled with Capillary Gas Chromatography. Int J Environ Anal Chem. 2002; 82: 431—42.

[24] Güzel B, Canli O. Method validation and measurement uncertainty of possible thirty volatile organic compounds (VOCs) presented in the polyethylene present in bottled drinking waters sold in Turkey. J Anal Sci Technol. 2020; 11: 44.