Toward Safer and Sustainable Lithium Metal Batteries: Fluorine-Free Solid Polymer Electrolytes
David Fraile-Insagurbe , Leire Meabe , Brigette Althea Fortuin , Itsaso Segura-Laparra , Elene Sasieta-Barrutia , Rosalía Cid , Javier Carrasco , Władysław Wieczorek , Maria Forsyth , Michel Armand , María Martínez-Ibañez
Energy & Environmental Materials ›› 2026, Vol. 9 ›› Issue (5) : e70271
Fluorinated compounds have long played a key role in solid-state lithium metal polymer batteries (SSLMPBs). Yet, growing environmental and safety concerns associated with fluorine have intensified the search for safer and more sustainable alternatives. Cyano-substituted imidazoles have recently emerged as promising candidates to replace conventional sulfonyl imide-based anions, offering efficient charge delocalization and the potential to form fluorine-free anions. In this work, we introduce lithium 2,4,5-tricyanoimidazolide (LiTIM), a fluorine-free lithium salt, as a component of a solid polymer electrolyte (SPE) based on poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and as a catholyte in LiFePO4 (LFP)-based cathodes. To assess the impact of fluorine, LiTIM is compared to its fluorinated analogues: lithium 4,5-dicyano-2-(trifluoromethyl)imidazole (LiTDI) and lithium 4,5-dicyano-2-(pentafluoroethyl)imidazole (LiPDI). In-depth physicochemical and electrochemical characterization reveals that LiTIM exhibits competitive lithium diffusion coefficient (DLi+, at 40 °C, DLi+ (LiTIM) = 5.2 × 10−9 cm2 s−1 > DLi+ (LiPDI/PEO) = 1.7 × 10−9 cm2 s−1 > DLi+ (LiTDI/PEO) = 1.4 × 10−9 cm2 s−1) and full cell performance (capacity retention at C/5, after 200 cycles (LiTIM/PEO = 92% > LiTDI/PEO = 88% > LiPDI/PEO = 82%)) comparable to that of its fluorinated counterparts. This is primarily attributed to its restricted anion mobility (Danion (LiTIM/PEO) = 1.1 × 10−8 cm2 s−1 < Danion (LiPDI/PEO) = 1.6 × 10−8 cm2 s−1 ≈ Danion (LiTDI/PEO) = 1.7 × 10−8 cm2 s−1) and competitive LiCN-based solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer formation. These findings highlight the viability of LiTIM as a nonfluorinated salt for SSLMPBs, offering a pathway toward more sustainable, environmentally friendly, and safer battery technologies.
fluorine-free lithium salt / lithium metal batteries / solid polymer electrolytes / sustainability
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) - ECHA, https://echa.europa.eu/hot-topics/perfluoroalkyl-chemicals-pfas (accessed: April 2025). |
| [36] |
Media briefing: proposal to restrict PFAS chemicals in the EU – YouTube, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXAZ3ath3To (accessed: April 2025). |
| [37] |
All news - ECHA, https://echa.europa.eu/es/-/echa-publishes-pfas-restriction-proposal (accessed: April 2025). |
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
RECHARGE, RECHARGE's Technical Contribution for the ECHA PFAS Restriction Consultation, RECHARGE, Belgium 2023. |
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
|
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
|
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
|
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
|
| [85] |
|
| [86] |
|
2026 The Author(s). Energy & Environmental Materials published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Zhengzhou University.
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |