Research on the Cognitive Characteristics of U.S. Think Tanks Regarding China’s Artificial Intelli- gence and Its Implications

Abstract

[Purpose/Significance] Artificial intelligence, as a key driver of the new wave of technological revolution, has become a focal point in global strategic competition. This study analyzes strategic reports published by U.S. think tanks regarding China’s AI development to explore their cognitive characteristics and developmental trends, providing insights for China to formulate response strategies.[Method/Process] 78 representative re- ports from nine U.S. think tanks were selected as samples. By employing topic modeling methods (LDA and DTM) and textual analysis, the core themes of the reports were categorized and their evolution analyzed. The study systematically examined the U.S. think tanks’ AI strategies regarding China from three dimensions: in- novation drivers, security governance frameworks, and the construction of international discourse power. It also compared the differences in strategic characteristics between the Trump and Biden administrations.[Result/ Conclusion] The study found that U.S. think tanks’ AI strategies concerning China exhibit comprehensiveness and interdisciplinarity, with a focus on innovation development in areas such as education, technology re- search, economic markets, and national security, as well as on security governance frameworks including eth- ics, legal regulations, and social impacts. While think tanks during the Trump administration were guided by Cold War thinking, those under the Biden administration shifted toward technological governance and global rule competition. Based on the cognitive characteristics of U.S. think tanks, it is recommended that China enhance intelligence analysis, strengthen independent technological innovation, and promote international dia- logue and cooperation to safeguard its technological advantages and global discourse power.

Keywords

China-related Artificial Intelligence / U.S. Think Tanks / Cognitive Characteristics

References

[1] Allen G. C. (2019). Understanding China’s AI strategy: Clues to Chinese strategic thinking on ar- tificial intelligence and national security. Center for a New American Security.

[2] Barry P., Ivana K., Michael S., et al. (2023, November 3). How Might AI Affect the Rise and Fall of Nations? RAND Corporation.

[3] Benjamin J., Yasir A., Jose M. (2024, June 10). Algorithmic Stability: How AI Could Shape the Fu- ture of Deterrence. Center for Strategic and International Studies.

[4] Beauchamp-Mustafaga N. (2024). Exploring the implications of generative AI for Chinese military cyber-enabled influence operations. RAND Corporation.

[5] Cary D. (2023). China's CyberAI talent pipeline. Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET).

[6] Chen C. (2023). The stigmatization of China’s foreign aid by the United States since the 21st century: Motivations, strategies, and impacts [Master’s thesis]. China Foreign Affairs University

[7] Daifeng L., et al. (2012). Adding community and dynamic to topic models. Journal of Informetrics, 6(2), 237-253.

[8] Dong W., Dong S., Wang C., et al. (2022). Topic analysis of online learning communities based on the TF-IDF algorithm and DTM model. Modern Educational Technology, 32(2), 90-98.

[9] Huang J., & Zhu H. (2024). A thematic evolution study of 30 years of tax-sharing reform: Based on LDA and DTM models. Tax Economics Research, 29(1), 11-23.

[10] Engelke P., & Weinstein E. (2019). A coherent framework for technological competition with China. Atlantic Council.

[11] Jones S. G., Harding E., Doxsee C., Harrington J., & McCabel R. (2023). China's strategy of po- litical warfare. Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).

[12] Konaev M., Fedasiuk R., Corrigan J., et al. (2023). U.S. and Chinese military AI purchases. Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET).

[13] Luong N. (2024). Current and emerging technologies in U.S. -China economic and national security competition: Testimony before the U.S. -China Economic and Security Review Commission. Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET).

[14] Luong N., Lee C., & Konaev M. (2023). Chinese AI investment and commercial activity in South- east Asia. Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET).

[15] Mariano W., Beauchamp-Mustafaga, N., Kerrigan, A., et al. ( 2023). The rise of generative AI and the coming era of social media manipulation 3.0. RAND Corporation.

[16] O’Neil, H. (2024). How innovative is China in AI? Information Technology and Innovation Founda- tion.

[17] Schuerger C., Venkatram V., & Quinn K. (2024). China and medical AI implications of big biodata for the bioeconomy. Center for Security and Emerging Technology (CSET).

[18] SCSP Staff. (2023). Generative AI: The future of innovation power. Special Competitive Studies Proj- ect.

[19] Sheehan M. (2024). China's AI regulations and how they get made. Carnegie Endowment for Inter- national Peace.

[20] Sheehan M. (2024). Tracing the roots of China’s AI regulations. Carnegie Endowment for Interna- tional Peace.

[21] The State Council of China. (2017). Development plan for a new generation of artificial intelli- gence.

[22] Webster G., & Hass R. (2024). A roadmap for a US-China AI dialogue. Brookings Institution.

[23] Wu R., Li Y., Liu S., et al. (2023). Analysis of hotspot themes and their evolution in the U.S. artifi- cial intelligence strategy based on the DTM model. Journal of Intelligence, 42(12), 134-143.

[24] Xiao Q., Chen Q., Zhu Q., et al. (2024, August 30). Glossary of artificial intelligence terms. Brook- ings Institution.

[25] Xia L., & Ma Y. (2022). A comparative study of the AI strategies of the Biden and Trump adminis- trations. Pacific Journal, 30(8), 72-83.