Beyond megawatts: Structural configurations and project ecologies in global utility-scale solar

Hairong Wang , Chengyi Hong , Jun Sun

Energy, Ecology and Environment ›› : 1 -13.

PDF
Energy, Ecology and Environment ›› :1 -13. DOI: 10.1007/s40974-026-00428-5
Original Article
research-article
Beyond megawatts: Structural configurations and project ecologies in global utility-scale solar
Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Cross-national comparisons of utility-scale solar development typically rely on aggregate capacity or project counts, yet these volumetric indicators can mask structural differences in how national solar portfolios are organized internally. Using phase-level data from the February 2026 Global Solar Power Tracker, we develop a size–status framework that characterizes each country through 16 predefined size–status modes, formed by crossing four capacity bins with four retained development statuses. Row-normalizing the resulting country–mode profiles attenuates the volumetric dominance of head countries, placing all countries within a structurally commensurate space for comparison. This framework yields two complementary views: a capacity view that identifies six system-weighted national camps, and a count view that identifies five project-frequency ecologies, with only partial alignment between the two. Rather than collapsing onto a single aggregate continuum, global utility-scale solar development differentiates along distinct structural combinations of operating stock, pre-construction buildup, and announcement-heavy capacity structure. A mode-distinction audit further shows that cross-national differentiation is driven disproportionately by a limited subset of key size–status modes—a finding supported by degree-preserving null comparisons and sensitivity checks under alternative specifications. Rather than re-ranking countries by aggregate solar volume, the principal contribution of this study is to identify their underlying structural profiles, showing that similar megawatt totals can correspond to materially different project-frequency structures and implementation-relevant structural differences that future work can validate against land-use, permitting, grid, and policy data.

Keywords

Utility-scale solar / Size–status framework / Structural configurations / Project-frequency structure / System weight / Solar deployment typologies

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Hairong Wang, Chengyi Hong, Jun Sun. Beyond megawatts: Structural configurations and project ecologies in global utility-scale solar. Energy, Ecology and Environment 1-13 DOI:10.1007/s40974-026-00428-5

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Aitchison J. The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data. J Roy Stat Soc: Ser B (Methodol), 1982, 44(2): 139-160

[2]

Altaye A, Tadesse P, Vı́g. The Assessment of the Potential and Development of Photovoltaic Technology in Energy Production: Review. Energy Sci Eng, 2025, 13(10): 5030-5050

[3]

Ardani K, Denholm P, et al. . Solar Futures Study. Natl Renew Energy Lab, 2021

[4]

Blondel VD, Guillaume J-L, Lambiotte R (2008) and Etienne Lefebvre. Fast Unfolding of Communities in Large Networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2008 (10): P10008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008

[5]

Chen J, Feng H. Support for Utility-Scale Solar: Effects of Information and Heterogeneity Among Public Officials, the General Population, and Landowners. J Environ Manage, 2025, 377: 124574

[6]

Clò S, Martellozzo F. The Solar Geography: Understanding Divergent Drivers of Distributed and Utility-Scale PV Deployment. Energy Policy, 2025, 206: 114757

[7]

Gielen D, Boshell F, Saygin D, Bazilian MD, Wagner N. The Role of Renewable Energy in the Global Energy Transformation. Energy Strategy Reviews, 2019, 24: 38-50

[8]

Global Energy Monitor (2026b) Global Solar Power Tracker Methodology. Https://www.gem.wiki/Global_Solar_Power_Tracker_Methodology

[9]

Global Energy Monitor (2026a) Global Solar Power Tracker. Https://globalenergymonitor.org/projects/global-solar-power-tracker/

[10]

Gorman W, Kemp JM, Rand J, et al. . Grid Connection Barriers to Renewable Energy Deployment in the United States. Joule, 2025, 9(2): 101791

[11]

Hagberg AA, Daniel A, Schult (2008) and Pieter J. Swart. Exploring Network Structure, Dynamics, and Function Using NetworkX. In Proceedings of the 7th Python in Science Conference (SciPy2008), edited by Gaël Varoquaux, Travis Vaught, and Jarrod Millman

[12]

Hao F. What Really Drives the Deployment of Renewable Energy? A Global Assessment of 118 Countries. Energy Res Social Sci, 2021, 72: 101880

[13]

Hernandez RR, Stephen B, Easter ML, Murphy-Mariscal, et al. . Environmental Impacts of Utility-Scale Solar Energy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2014, 29: 766-779

[14]

Hernandez RR, Madison K, Hoffacker ML, Murphy-Mariscal GC, Wu, Allen MF (2015) Solar Energy Development Impacts on Land Cover Change and Protected Areas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112 (44): 13579–84. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517656112

[15]

Hubert L. Comparing Partitions. J Classif, 1985, 2(1): 193-218

[16]

Hunt LC, Kipouros P. The Drivers of Renewable Energy: A Global Empirical Analysis of Developed and Developing Countries. Energies, 2024, 17(12): 2902

[17]

Joshi P, Rao AB. Review of Solar PV Deployment Trends, Policy Instruments, and Growth Projections in China, the United States, and India. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2025, 213: 115436

[18]

Kazim M, Pirim H, Yadav OP, Le C. Analysis of Multilayer Energy Networks: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Appl Energy, 2025, 398: 126357

[19]

Li X, Hernandez RR, Armstrong A, Liu P. Global Land and Solar Energy Relationships for Sustainability. Joule, 2026, 10(2): 102236

[20]

Marques AntónioC, Fuinhas JoséA. Drivers Promoting Renewable Energy: A Dynamic Panel Approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2011, 15(3): 1601-1608

[21]

Maslov S. Specificity and Stability in Topology of Protein Networks. Science, 2002, 296(5569): 910-913

[22]

Meneguzzo F, Ciriminna R, Albanese L, Pagliaro M. The Great Solar Boom: A Global Perspective into the Far Reaching Impact of an Unexpected Energy Revolution. Energy Sci Eng, 2015, 3(6): 499-509

[23]

Mulvaney D. Identifying the Roots of Green Civil War over Utility-Scale Solar Energy Projects on Public Lands Across the American Southwest. J Land Use Sci, 2017, 12(6): 493-515

[24]

O’Shaughnessy E, Ardani K, Denholm P, et al. . Policy-Driven Solar Innovation and Deployment Remains Critical for US Grid Decarbonization. Joule, 2022, 6(9): 1965-1968

[25]

Omri A. On the Determinants of Renewable Energy Consumption: International Evidence. Energy, 2014, 72: 554-560

[26]

Owusu-Obeng P, Yaw SR, Miller SB, Mills, Craig MT. Optimizing Utility-Scale Solar Siting for Local Economic Benefits and Regional Decarbonization. Energy Policy, 2025, 207: 114834

[27]

Papież M. Determinants of Renewable Energy Development in the EU Countries. A 20-Year Perspective. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2018, 91: 918-934

[28]

Rekik S. Unlocking Renewable Energy Potential: A Case Study of Solar and Wind Site Selection in the Kasserine Region, Central-Western Tunisia. Energy Sci Eng, 2024, 12(3): 771-792

[29]

Salim RA. Why Do Some Emerging Economies Proactively Accelerate the Adoption of Renewable Energy?>. Energy Econ, 2012, 34(4): 1051-1057

[30]

Sareen S, Shokrgozar S, McCarthy J. The Dawn of Solar Photovoltaics: Emergent Political Economies at the Solar–Agri–Land Nexus. Sustain Sci, 2025, 20(4): 1271-1276

[31]

Shivakumar A, Dobbins A, Fahl U, Singh A. Drivers of Renewable Energy Deployment in the EU: An Analysis of Past Trends and Projections. Energy Strategy Reviews, 2019, 26: 100402

[32]

Wang H (2026) and Chengyi Hong. A Stock-Based Framework for Monitoring Fossil Persistence and Renewable Expansion in Global Power Systems. Energy Ecology and Environment, ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40974-026-00425-8

[33]

Zhang P, Yue C, Li Y, Tang X, et al. . Revisiting the Land Use Conflicts Between Forests and Solar Farms Through Energy Efficiency. J Clean Prod, 2024, 434: 139958

Funding

Carnegie Mellon University

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

PDF

0

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/