Bayesian assessment of ecological footprint drivers in Finland: a model averaging approach under structural and model uncertainty

Irina Georgescu , Jani Kinnunen

Energy, Ecology and Environment ›› : 1 -27.

PDF
Energy, Ecology and Environment ›› :1 -27. DOI: 10.1007/s40974-026-00420-z
Original Article
research-article
Bayesian assessment of ecological footprint drivers in Finland: a model averaging approach under structural and model uncertainty
Author information +
History +
PDF

Keywords

Bayesian model averaging / Bayesian regression / Ecological footprint / Model uncertainty / Posterior inclusion probability / Finland / Sustainable development / Urbanization / Renewable energy / Foreign direct investment

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Irina Georgescu, Jani Kinnunen. Bayesian assessment of ecological footprint drivers in Finland: a model averaging approach under structural and model uncertainty. Energy, Ecology and Environment 1-27 DOI:10.1007/s40974-026-00420-z

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Adebayo TS. Analyzing the environmental impact of financial innovation and financial globalization in Finland: A time–frequency approach. Financ Innov, 2026, 12: 41

[2]

Aiello L, Fontana M, Guglielmi A. Bayesian functional emulation of CO2 emissions on future climate change scenarios. Environmetrics, 2023, 34: e2821

[3]

Akhtar M, Xu J, Kashif U, Ali K, Naveed HM, Haris M. Bayesian neural network modelling for estimating ecological footprints and blue economy sustainability across G20 nations. Humanit Soc Sci Commun, 2025, 12: 83

[4]

Apergis N, Payne JE. Renewable energy consumption and growth in Eurasia. Energy Econ, 2010, 32: 1392-1397

[5]

Clyde MA, Ghosh J, Littman ML. Bayesian adaptive sampling for variable selection and model averaging. J Comput Graph Stat, 2011, 20: 80-101

[6]

Cole MA. Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve: Examining the linkages. Ecol Econ, 2004, 48: 71-81

[7]

Devianto D, Saputra R, Yollanda M, Maiyastri M, Asdi Y, Permana D, Herdiani ET. The BVAR model for analyzing CO₂ emissions on renewable energy, economic growth, and forest area. Emerg Sci J, 2025, 9: 1158-1173

[8]

Dima B, Canepa A (2024) Environmental performance and institutions quality in Europe: A Bayesian model averaging approach. Working Paper No 202421, Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis, University of Turin. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5182009

[9]

Dinda S. Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: A survey. Ecol Econ, 2004, 49: 431-455

[10]

Dogan M, Georgescu I, Çeştepe H, Sarıgül SS, Tatar HE. Renewable energy consumption and the ecological footprint in Denmark: Assessing the influence of financial development and agricultural contribution. Agriculture, 2025, 15: 835

[11]

Eskeland GS, Harrison AE. Moving to greener pastures? Multinationals and the pollution haven hypothesis. J Dev Econ, 2003, 70: 1-23

[12]

Fatakdawala Z, Doshi H, Dash A, Patil P (2025) A Bayesian network to model the influence of energy consumption on greenhouse gases in Italy. In: Ghonge MM, Liu H, Khan M, Tran TA (eds) Advances in emerging technologies and computing innovations: ICETCI 2025. Springer, pp 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-92854-3_1

[13]

Gabry J, Simpson D, Vehtari A, Betancourt M, Gelman A. Visualization in Bayesian workflow. J R Stat Soc Ser Stat Soc, 2019, 182: 389-402

[14]

Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Dunson DB, Vehtari A, Rubin DB (2013) Bayesian data analysis, 3rd edn. CRC

[15]

Gelman A, Rubin D. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Stat Sci, 1992, 7: 457-472

[16]

Georgescu I, Kinnunen J. Nonlinear effects of GDP regimes, renewable energy, and urbanization on Finland’s ecological footprint: An MT-NARDL approach. World Dev Sustain, 2025, 7: 100235

[17]

Georgescu, I., & Kinnunen, J. (2026). Nonlinear and regime-dependent dynamics of Finland’s ecological footprint: A Bayesian approach. Next Research, 5, 101372 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexres.2026.101372

[18]

Georgescu I, Oprea SV, Kinnunen J, Bâra A (2025) Exploring the nonlinear and dynamic effects of economic growth, urbanization and renewables on Finland’s ecological footprint using ARDL and KRLS. Kybernetes. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-10-2024-2916

[19]

Global Footprint Network (2023) National footprint and biocapacity accounts. Available at: https://data.footprintnetwork.org

[20]

Górajksi M, Kacprzyk A, Kuchta Z. A Bayesian perspective on the environmental Kuznets curve. Energy Econ, 2026, 157: 109267

[21]

Grossman GM, Krueger AB. Economic growth and the environment. Q J Econ, 1995, 110: 353-377

[22]

Grubler A, Bai X, Buettner T, Dhakal S, Fisk DJ, Ichinose T, Keirstead JE, Sammer G, Satterthwaite D, Schulz NB, Shah N, Steinberger JK, Weisz H, Ahamer G, Baynes T, Curtis D, Doherty M, Eyre N, Fujino J, Hanaki K, Kainuma M, Kaneko S, Lenzen M, Meyers J, Nakanishi H, Novikova V, Rajan KS, Seo S, Shrestha RM, Shukla PR, Sverdlik A, Sathaye JJohansson TB, Patwardhan A, Nakicenovic N, Gomez-Echeverri L. Urban energy systems. Global energy assessment, 2012CambridgeCambridge University Press1307-1400

[23]

Guliyev H. Determinants of ecological footprint in European countries: Fresh insight from Bayesian model averaging for panel data analysis. Sci Total Environ, 2024, 912: 169455

[24]

Huang H, Hammerling D, Li B, Smith R (2020) Combining interdependent climate model outputs in CMIP5: A spatial Bayesian approach (Version 2). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2001.00074. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.00074

[25]

Huang X, Chen R, Zhuang EHH, Kong S, Zhiquan Y, Kong Y. Environmental footprint in specific industries: Intellectual base and research status. Carbon Footprints, 2025, 4: 18

[26]

Jänicke M. Ecological modernisation: New perspectives. J Clean Prod, 2008, 16: 557-565

[27]

Kass RE, Raftery AE. Bayes factors. J Am Stat Assoc, 1995, 90: 773-795

[28]

Liang F, Paulo R, Molina G, Clyde MA, Berger JO. Mixtures of g-priors for Bayesian variable selection. J Am Stat Assoc, 2008, 103: 410-423

[29]

Lütkepohl H (2005) New introduction to multiple time series analysis. Springer

[30]

Lyytimäki J, Kentala-Lehtonen J, Halme M, Linnanen L, Mönkkönen M, Raitinen I, Salonen AO, Soini K, Soininen N, Teperi A-M, Toivanen R. Assessing the effectiveness of Finland’s sustainable development policy to facilitate a sustainability transition. Discover Sustain, 2025, 6: 751

[31]

Martínez-Zarzoso, I., & Maruotti, A. (2011). The impact of urbanization on CO₂ emissions: Evidence from developing countries. Ecological Economics, 70(7), 1344–1353 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.02.009

[32]

Massoud EC, Lee HK, Terando A, et al.. Bayesian weighting of climate models based on climate sensitivity. Commun Earth Environ, 2023, 4: 365

[33]

Moral-Benito E. Model averaging in economics: An overview. J Econ Surv, 2013, 27: 82-107

[34]

Neal RM (2011) MCMC using Hamiltonian dynamics. In: Brooks S, Gelman A, Jones G, Meng X-L (eds) Handbook of Markov chain Monte Carlo. CRC, pp 113–162

[35]

Ngoc Thach N. Bayesian hierarchical modeling of individual effects: Renewables and non-renewables on global economic growth. SAGE Open, 2024, 14: 21582440241268739

[36]

Nguyen Quoc H, Nguyen Van H, Le Quoc D. Exploring the determinants of renewable energy consumption: A Bayesian Monte Carlo simulation analysis of technology, economic growth, CO₂ emissions, and digital financial inclusion. Int J Energy Econ Policy, 2025, 15: 103-113

[37]

Ning Y, Sun R, Hitchcock D, Comert G, Chen Y. Bayesian modeling of traffic-related air pollutants: A case study of urban transportation and air quality dynamics in Columbia, South Carolina. Atmos Environ X, 2025, 26: 100328

[38]

Oprea S-V, Bâra A, Georgescu IA. Assessing the dynamics of ecological footprint in relation to economic and energy factors: A comparative analysis of Finland and Japan. J Knowl Econ, 2025, 16: 11162-11197

[39]

Peters GP, Hertwich EG. CO₂ embodied in international trade with implications for global climate policy. Environ Sci Technol, 2008, 42: 1401-1407

[40]

Prempeh KB. Do renewable energy and fiscal policy impede or promote carbon emissions in Ghana? Empirical evidence from Bayesian and quantile-on-quantile regression approaches. Cogent Econ Finance, 2025, 13: 2507133

[41]

Raftery AE, Madigan D, Hoeting JA. Bayesian model averaging for linear regression models. J Am Stat Assoc, 1997, 92: 179-191

[42]

Ramli N, Abdul Hamid H, Yahaya AS, Ul-Saufie AZ, Mohamed Noor N, Abu Seman NA, Kamarudzaman AN, Deák G. Performance of Bayesian model averaging (BMA) for short-term prediction of PM₁₀ concentration in Peninsular Malaysia. Atmosphere, 2023, 14: 311

[43]

Robin Y, Vrac M, Ribes A, Barbaux O, Naveau P. A Bayesian statistical method to estimate the climatology of extreme temperature under multiple scenarios: The ANKIALE package. EGUsphere Preprints, 2025

[44]

Salonen AO, Siirilä J, Valtonen M. Sustainable living in Finland: Combating climate change in everyday life. Sustainability, 2018, 10: 104

[45]

Sim S, Jeong S. Constraining urban fossil fuel CO₂ emissions in Seoul using combined ground and satellite observations with Bayesian inverse modelling. Atmos Chem Phys, 2025, 25: 18509-18526

[46]

Stan Development Team (2023) Stan user’s guide. Available at: https://mc-stan.org

[47]

Torras M, Boyce JK. Income, inequality, and pollution: A reassessment of the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol Econ, 1998, 25: 147-160

[48]

Vashold L, Crespo Cuaresma J. A unified modelling framework for projecting sectoral greenhouse gas emissions. Commun Earth Environ, 2024, 5: 139

[49]

Vehtari A, Gelman A, Gabry J. Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC. Stat Comput, 2017, 27: 1413-1432

[50]

Vehtari A, Gelman A, Simpson D, Carpenter B, Bürkner P-C. Rank-normalization, folding, and localization: An improved R̂ for assessing convergence of MCMC. Bayesian Anal, 2021, 16: 667-718

[51]

Wackernagel M, Rees WE (1996) Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on the Earth. New Society

[52]

Watanabe S. Asymptotic equivalence of Bayes cross-validation and WAIC in singular learning theory. J Mach Learn Res, 2010, 11: 3571-3594

[53]

Wiedmann T, Lenzen M. Environmental and social footprints of international trade. Nat Geosci, 2018, 11: 314-321

[54]

World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) (2024) Fair finnish footprint: Finland’s pathway to consumption aligned with global sustainability boundaries. WWF Finland & Bain & Company. Available at: https://wwf.fi/app/uploads/c/z/a/g489zowam6yx02m6vz3mia/wwf_fair_finnish_footprint_report_final_june2024.pdf

[55]

Xia Z, Xie F, Xu Y, Li Y, Zheng Z, Dong R, Wu J (2026) Bayesian inversion of urban sectoral scale anthropogenic CO₂ emissions coupled with weather research and forecasting (WRF) and stochastic time-inverted Lagrangian transport (STILT) models in Chengdu–Chongqing economic circle. Carbon Manag 17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2026.2627657

[56]

York R, Rosa EA. Key challenges to ecological modernization theory. Organ Environ, 2003, 16: 273-288

[57]

Zellner A, Siow A. Posterior odds ratios for selected regression hypotheses. Trabajos Estad Investig Oper, 1980, 31: 585-603

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s)

PDF

8

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/