High temperature aquifer thermal energy storage system: current status of research and future prospects
Changsheng Zhang , Zuoji Qin , Yibin Jin , Wei Huang , Huagang He , Yan Ding
Energy, Ecology and Environment ›› : 1 -14.
High Temperature Aquifer Thermal Energy Storage (HT-ATES) is a promising sustainable energy storage solution, capitalizing on the stable and continuous nature of geothermal energy. Research has advanced significantly since the pioneering field tests in the 1970s. Existing field studies demonstrated high storage capacity and heat recovery efficiency (> 60%). Recent well-defined laboratory-scale experiments enhanced our understanding of thermal behavior and storage efficiency utilizing advanced techniques. Numerical simulations are now crucial, evolving from single-physics models to comprehensive multi-physics coupling frameworks (Thermal-Hydraulic-Mechanical (THM), Thermal-Hydraulic-Chemical (THC) or even Thermal-Hydraulic-Mechanical-Chemical (THMC)), which are essential for simulating heat transfer, fluid flow, rock deformation, and chemical reactions. High-performance computing platforms boosted the efficiency and accuracy of simulations, especially for the characterization of dynamic reservoir permeability and porosity changes. Furthermore, integrating machine learning with these multi-physics models contributed to effectively improving predictive accuracy and optimizing HT-ATES system design. Despite these advances, challenges remain, particularly in accurately capturing complex fractured reservoirs, mitigating thermal losses, ensuring long-term stability, and reducing high operational costs. Moving forward, overcoming these challenges through continued advancements in experimentation, in sophisticated multi-physics modeling, and in technological innovation is vital for establishing HT-ATES as a key component of global sustainable energy storage solutions. This review uniquely synthesizes advances in multi-physics coupling models and machine learning for HT-ATES, addressing gaps in previous reviews that overlooked system optimization and fractured reservoir studies.
High temperature aquifer thermal energy storage / Geothermal energy / Fractured reservoir / Multi-physics coupling model / Field experiment
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
Dorian JP, Franssen HT, Simbeck DR (2006) Global challenges in energy. Energy policy 34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.03.010. :1984-91 |
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
Green S, Mclennan J, Panja P et al (2021) Geothermal battery energy storage. Renewable Energy 164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.09.083. :777 – 90 |
| [27] |
Guglielmetti L, Alt-Epping P, Birdsell D et al (2020) HEATSTORE SWITZERLAND: New opportunities of geothermal district heating network sustainable growth by high temperature aquifer thermal energy storage development. Proceedings of the World Geothermal Congress. Reykjavik, Iceland: University of Geneva. https://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:151670 |
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
Hoyer M, Hallgren J, Lauer J et al (1991) University of Minnesota aquifer thermal energy storage (ATES) project report on the second long-term cycle. Richland, WA (United States): Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL). https://www.osti.gov/biblio/5627755 |
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
Hu X, Bai NS, Han B et al (2025) Three-dimensional inversion algorithm of magnetotelluric data based on solution space dimensionality reduction technique. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2024-0252.1. GEOPHYSICS |
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
International Renewable Energy Agency (2024) Renewable Capacity Statistics 2024. Abu Dhabi: International Renewable Energy Agency. https://www.irena.org/publications/ |
| [38] |
Jin W, Podgorney R, Mcling T (2020) THM coupled numerical analysis on the geothermal energy storage & extraction in porous fractured reservoir. Proceedings of the 54th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium. Golden, CO: American Rock Mechanics Association (ARMA). https://onepetro.org/ARMAUSRMS/proceeding/ARMA20/All-ARMA20/447432 |
| [39] |
Jin Y, Ding Y, Li C et al (2025) Heat recovery efficiency optimization of High-Temperature Aquifer Thermal Energy Storage system in naturally fractured reservoirs: A combined multi-physics modeling and regression prediction method. Case Stud Therm Eng 67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2025.105856 |
| [40] |
Kannberg L (1982) Underground Energy Storage Program: 1981 annual report. Volume II. Technical summaries. Richland, WA (United States): Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL). https://www.osti.gov/biblio/5230970 |
| [41] |
Kiran R, Salehi S (2020) Assessing the relation between petrophysical and operational parameters in geothermal wells: a machine learning approach. Proceedings, 45th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford University. Stanford, CA: Stanford Geothermal Program. https://pangea.stanford.edu/ERE/db/GeoConf/papers/SGW/2020/Kiran.pdf |
| [42] |
Klepikova M, Wildemeersch S, Hermans T et al (2016) Heat tracer test in an alluvial aquifer: Field experiment and inverse modelling. J Hydrol 540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.06.066. :812 – 23 |
| [43] |
Koh J, Roshan H, Rahman SS (2011) A numerical study on the long term thermo-poroelastic effects of cold water injection into naturally fractured geothermal reservoirs. Comput Geotech 38:669 – 82 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2011.03.007 |
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
Molz FJ, Warman JC, Jones TE (1978) Aquifer storage of heated water: part I—a field experiment. Groundwater 16:234 – 41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1978.tb03230.x |
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
| [58] |
|
| [59] |
|
| [60] |
|
| [61] |
|
| [62] |
|
| [63] |
|
| [64] |
|
| [65] |
|
| [66] |
|
| [67] |
|
| [68] |
|
| [69] |
|
| [70] |
|
| [71] |
Stoeckhert F, Molenda M, Brenne S et al (2015) Fracture propagation in sandstone and slate–Laboratory experiments, acoustic emissions and fracture mechanics. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 7:237 – 49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2015.03.011. |
| [72] |
|
| [73] |
|
| [74] |
|
| [75] |
|
| [76] |
Walton M, Hoyer M, Eisenreich S et al (1991) The University of Minnesota aquifer thermal energy storage (ATES) field test facility–system description, aquifer characterization, and results of short-term test cycles. Richland, WA (United States): Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL). https://www.osti.gov/biblio/5287262 |
| [77] |
|
| [78] |
|
| [79] |
|
| [80] |
|
| [81] |
|
| [82] |
|
| [83] |
|
| [84] |
|
| [85] |
|
| [86] |
|
| [87] |
Zhao J, Tso C (1993) Heat transfer by water flow in rock fractures and the application to hot dry rock geothermal systems. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstracts;(United Kingdom) 30(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(94)90541-x |
The Author(s), under exclusive licence to the International Society of Energy and Environmental Science
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |