Factors affecting CO2 emissions in the global power sector: a spatial-temporal analysis

Qian Luo , Ya Wang , Shaohui Zhang , Bowen Yi

Energy, Ecology and Environment ›› 2025, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (6) : 745 -757.

PDF
Energy, Ecology and Environment ›› 2025, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (6) :745 -757. DOI: 10.1007/s40974-025-00387-3
Original Article
research-article

Factors affecting CO2 emissions in the global power sector: a spatial-temporal analysis

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

The power sector plays a crucial role in promoting global carbon neutrality. This study investigates the key drivers behind the low-carbon transition of the power sector in 78 countries from 1990 to 2022, using a comprehensive analytical framework that integrates both temporal and spatial index decomposition methods. From a temporal perspective, the primary driver of carbon emission trends is the growing electricity consumption in developing nations. Mitigation strategies have evolved from improving the efficiency of thermal power generation to restructuring the energy mix. Spatially, differences in carbon intensity are primarily influenced by variations in energy composition, particularly the distribution and types of thermal and non-fossil energy sources. Our findings highlight that Europe has made significant progress in reducing its carbon intensity, while Asia faces considerable challenges, largely due to its continued reliance on fossil fuels. The pathway to low-carbon development varies across countries, depending on factors such as resource endowments, technological capabilities, and social acceptance. Nations rich in hydropower typically prioritize its use, while only a limited number have adopted nuclear energy, influenced by both technical feasibility and public trust in nuclear safety. In countries with limited hydropower and nuclear resources, wind and solar power often emerge as the primary alternatives, though their adoption is heavily influenced by local climatic and weather conditions. These findings lead to three key policy implications: first, using carbon intensity as a relative measure offers a more equitable and meaningful way to assess the progress of developing countries, balancing their development needs with global decarbonization goals; second, national strategies for low-carbon transitions should be tailored to each country’s unique context. More emphasis should be placed on transforming the overall energy structure, rather than focusing solely on improving thermal power efficiency; third, for developing countries with limited hydropower and nuclear resources, international cooperation through technology sharing, financial support and capacity building is crucial to eliminating development barriers and promoting sustainable energy development.

Keywords

Carbon dioxide emissions / Power sector / Temporal decomposition / Spatial decomposition / Energy transition

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Qian Luo, Ya Wang, Shaohui Zhang, Bowen Yi. Factors affecting CO2 emissions in the global power sector: a spatial-temporal analysis. Energy, Ecology and Environment, 2025, 10(6): 745-757 DOI:10.1007/s40974-025-00387-3

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Aboumahboub T, Schaber K, Wagner U, Hamacher T. On the CO2 emissions of the global electricity supply sector and the influence of renewable power-modeling and optimization. Energy Policy, 2012, 42: 297-314

[2]

Al-Shetwi AQ. Sustainable development of renewable energy integrated power sector: trends, environmental impacts, and recent challenges. Sci Total Environ, 2022, 822153645

[3]

Ang BW. The LMDI approach to decomposition analysis: a practical guide. Energy Policy, 2005, 33(7): 867-871

[4]

Ang BW. LMDI decomposition approach: a guide for implementation. Energy Policy, 2015, 86: 233-238

[5]

Ang BW, Liu N. Handling zero values in the logarithmic mean divisia index decomposition approach. Energy Policy, 2007, 35(1): 238-246

[6]

Ang BW, Su B. Carbon emission intensity in electricity production: a global analysis. Energy Policy, 2016, 94: 56-63

[7]

Ang BW, Xu XY, Su B. Multi-country comparisons of energy performance: the index decomposition analysis approach. Energy Econ, 2015, 47: 68-76

[8]

Anwar MN, Fayyaz A, Sohail NF, Khokhar MF, Baqar M, Yasar A, Nizami AS. CO2 utilization: turning greenhouse gas into fuels and valuable products. J Environ Manage, 2020, 260110059

[9]

Bianco V, Cascetta F, Nardini S. Analysis of the carbon emissions trend in European Union. A decomposition and decoupling approach. Sci Total Environ, 2024, 909168528

[10]

Bistline J, Blanford G, Brown M, Burtraw D, Domeshek M, Farbes J, Zhao A. Emissions and energy impacts of the inflation reduction act. Science, 2023, 380(6652): 1324-1327

[11]

Cansino JM, Sánchez-Braza A, Rodríguez-Arévalo ML. Driving forces of Spain׳ s CO2 emissions: a LMDI decomposition approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2015, 48: 749-759

[12]

Chen J, Wang P, Cui L, Huang S, Song M. Decomposition and decoupling analysis of CO2 emissions in OECD. Appl Energy, 2018, 231: 937-950

[13]

Chen J, Xie Q, Shahbaz M, Song M, Li L. Impact of bilateral trade on fossil energy consumption in BRICS: an extended decomposition analysis. Econ Model, 2022, 106105698

[14]

Cheng S, Fan W, Meng F, Chen J, Liang S, Song M, Casazza M. Potential role of fiscal decentralization on interprovincial differences in CO2 emissions in China. Environ Sci Technol, 2020, 55(2): 813-822

[15]

Chong CH, Tan WX, Ting ZJ, Liu P, Ma L, Li Z, Ni W. The driving factors of energy-related CO2 emission growth in malaysia: the LMDI decomposition method based on energy allocation analysis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2019, 115109356

[16]

De Freitas LC, Kaneko S. Decomposition of CO2 emissions change from energy consumption in Brazil: challenges and policy implications. Energy Policy, 2011, 39(3): 1495-1504

[17]

De Jesus O-D. Effect of generation capacity factors on carbon emission intensity of electricity of Latin America & the Caribbean, a Temporal IDA-LMDI analysis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2019, 101: 516-526

[18]

De Souza Mendonça AK, Barni GDAC, Moro MF, Bornia AC, Kupek E, Fernandes L. Hierarchical modeling of the 50 largest economies to verify the impact of GDP, population and renewable energy generation in CO2 emissions. Sustain Prod Consum, 2020, 22: 58-67

[19]

Deng Z, Zhu B, Davis SJ, Ciais P, Guan D, Gong P, Liu Z. Global carbon emissions and decarbonization in 2024. Nat Rev Earth Environ, 2025, 6(4): 231-233

[20]

Guan D, Hubacek K, Weber CL, Peters GP, Reiner DM. The drivers of Chinese CO2 emissions from 1980 to 2030. Glob Environ Change, 2008, 18(4): 626-634

[21]

IEA (2025) Electricity 2025, IEA, Paris https://www.iea.org/reports/electricity-2025

[22]

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate change 2006: fourth assessment report, 2006, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press

[23]

Karmellos M, Kopidou D, Diakoulaki D. A decomposition analysis of the driving factors of CO2 (Carbon dioxide) emissions from the power sector in the European union countries. Energy, 2016, 94: 680-692

[24]

Li H, Zhao Y, Qiao X, Liu Y, Cao Y, Li Y, Weng J. Identifying the driving forces of National and regional CO2 emissions in china: based on temporal and spatial decomposition analysis models. Energy Econ, 2017, 68: 522-538

[25]

Liao C, Wang S, Zhang Y, Song D, Zhang C. Driving forces and clustering analysis of provincial-level CO2 emissions from the power sector in China from 2005 to 2015. J Clean Prod, 2019, 240118026

[26]

Liu N, Ma Z, Kang J. A regional analysis of carbon intensities of electricity generation in China. Energy Econ, 2017, 67: 268-277

[27]

Malla S. CO2 emissions from electricity generation in seven Asia-Pacific and North American countries: a decomposition analysis. Energy Policy, 2009, 37(1): 1-9

[28]

Mousavi B, Lopez NSA, Biona JBM, Chiu AS, Blesl M. Driving forces of Iran’s CO2 emissions from energy consumption: an LMDI decomposition approach. Appl Energy, 2017, 206: 804-814

[29]

Moutinho V, Moreira AC, Silva PM. The driving forces of change in energy-related CO2 emissions in Eastern, Western, Northern and Southern Europe: the LMDI approach to decomposition analysis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2015, 50: 1485-1499

[30]

Nagashima F. The sign reversal problem in structural decomposition analysis. Energy Econ, 2018, 72: 307-312

[31]

Ozdemir AC. Decomposition and decoupling analysis of carbon dioxide emissions in electricity generation by primary fossil fuels in Turkey. Energy, 2023, 273: 127264

[32]

Peng X, Tao X, Feng K, Hubacek K. Drivers toward a low-carbon electricity system in China’s provinces. Environ Sci Technol, 2020, 54(9): 5774-5782

[33]

Plessmann G, Blechinger P. How to meet EU GHG emission reduction targets? A model based decarbonization pathway for europe’s electricity supply system until 2050. Energy Strategy Rev, 2017, 15: 19-32

[34]

Qudrat-Ullah H. A review and analysis of renewable energy policies and CO2 emissions of Pakistan. Energy, 2022, 238: 121849

[35]

Rahman MM. Environmental degradation: the role of electricity consumption, economic growth and globalisation. J Environ Manage, 2020, 253109742

[36]

Rodrigues JF, Wang J, Behrens P, de Boer P. Drivers of CO2 emissions from electricity generation in the European union 2000–2015. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2020, 133: 110104

[37]

Román-Collado R, Morales-Carrión AV. Towards a sustainable growth in Latin America: a multiregional spatial decomposition analysis of the driving forces behind CO2 emissions changes. Energy Policy, 2018, 115: 273-280

[38]

Shrestha RM, Anandarajah G, Liyanage MH. Factors affecting CO2 emission from the power sector of selected countries in Asia and the Pacific. Energy Policy, 2009, 37(62375-2384

[39]

van der Zwaan B, Fattahi A, Dalla Longa F, Dekker M, van Vuuren D, Pietzcker R, Usher W. Electricity-and hydrogen-driven energy system sector-coupling in net-zero CO2 emission pathways. Nat Commun, 2025, 16(11368

[40]

Wang S, Wang J, Li S, Fang C, Feng K. Socioeconomic driving forces and scenario simulation of CO2 emissions for a fast-developing region in China. J Clean Prod, 2019, 216: 217-229

[41]

Wang Y, Yan Q, Li Z, Baležentis T, Zhang Y, Gang L, Streimikiene D. Aggregate carbon intensity of China’s thermal electricity generation: the inequality analysis and nested spatial decomposition. J Clean Prod, 2020, 247119139

[42]

Xie P, Gao S, Sun F. An analysis of the decoupling relationship between CO2 emission in power industry and GDP in China based on LMDI method. J Clean Prod, 2019, 211: 598-606

[43]

Yan Q, Zhang Q, Zou X. Decomposition analysis of carbon dioxide emissions in China’s regional thermal electricity generation, 2000–2020. Energy, 2016, 112: 788-794

[44]

Yang J, Cai W, Ma M, Li L, Liu C, Ma X, Chen X. Driving forces of china’s CO2 emissions from energy consumption based on Kaya-LMDI methods. Sci Total Environ, 2020, 711134569

[45]

Zha D, Yang G, Wang Q. Investigating the driving factors of regional CO2 emissions in China using the IDA-PDA-MMI method. Energy Econ, 2019, 84104521

[46]

Zhang C, Zhou K, Yang S, Shao Z. On electricity consumption and economic growth in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2017, 76: 353-368

[47]

Zhang X, Zhu H, Cheng Z, Shao J, Yu X, Jiang J. A review of carbon emissions accounting and prediction on the power grid. Electr Eng, 2025

[48]

Zhao L, Wang K, Yi H, Cheng Y, Zhen J, Hu H. Carbon emission drivers of China’s power sector and its transformation for global decarbonization contribution. Appl Energy, 2024, 376124258

[49]

Zhuo Z, Du E, Zhang N, Nielsen CP, Lu X, Xiao J, Kang C. Cost increase in the electricity supply to achieve carbon neutrality in China. Nat Commun, 2022, 13(13172

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China(72374018)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s), under exclusive licence to the International Society of Energy and Environmental Science

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

128

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/