The impact of the wind farm on the vegetation and the microclimate via remote sensing: a case study in Hebei Province, China

Tingting Fei , Dangui Lu , Yan Li , Danlin Li , Shuo Tian , Akbar Amar , Xiuchun Yang , Zhouyuan Li

Energy, Ecology and Environment ›› : 1 -18.

PDF
Energy, Ecology and Environment ›› :1 -18. DOI: 10.1007/s40974-025-00386-4
Original Article
research-article

The impact of the wind farm on the vegetation and the microclimate via remote sensing: a case study in Hebei Province, China

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Wind energy, a green and sustainable clean energy source, has been rapidly developing worldwide. However, its complex impacts on ecosystems remain unclear. The timing of wind farm construction and the spatial scope of their effects on vegetation and microclimates are poorly understood. To address this gap, we conducted our study from a vegetation-climate coupling perspective. First, we introduced a change detection method based on the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) to identify the construction years of wind farms; second, we explored the ecological impacts by integrating vegetation index, albedo, land surface temperature (TS), and evapotranspiration (ET) within multi-layer buffer zones. Representative wind farms in Hebei Province, China, were selected as a case study. Using Landsat imagery and a global wind power dataset, we quantified changes before and after construction. The results indicate that the number of wind farms increased continuously from 2001 to 2020, with peak construction years in 2006, 2008, and 2013 respectively. Wind farm construction led to a decline in vegetation greenness, reduced surface roughness, increased temperature, and decreased humidity, with these effects varying across buffer zones. The maximum changing ratio for the indices were − 21.73% of ΔNDVI, 6.59% of Δalbedo, 6.29% of ΔTS and − 19.22% of ΔET, with the most significant impacts observed on vegetation and evapotranspiration. The thresholds of these impacts were concentrated within 300–400 m of the buffer zones, providing a basis for categorizing the impact levels of wind farm construction. These innovations address critical gaps in assessing wind energy’s ecological footprint. To summarize, this study makes three key advances: (1) proposing a sliding-window NDVI differencing method to detect construction timing without relying on official records; (2) integrating multi-dimensional indicators (NDVI, albedo, TS, ET) to reveal coupled vegetation-microclimate impacts; and (3) quantifying nonlinear impact thresholds through spatial buffer analysis, offering actionable guidance for wind farm zoning. The findings offer valuable insights for balancing wind energy development with grassland ecosystem sustainability.

Keywords

Wind farms / Normalized difference vegetation index / Albedo / Surface temperature / Evapotranspiration / Microclimate

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Tingting Fei, Dangui Lu, Yan Li, Danlin Li, Shuo Tian, Akbar Amar, Xiuchun Yang, Zhouyuan Li. The impact of the wind farm on the vegetation and the microclimate via remote sensing: a case study in Hebei Province, China. Energy, Ecology and Environment 1-18 DOI:10.1007/s40974-025-00386-4

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Al FahelN, ArcherCL. Observed onshore precipitation changes after the installation of offshore wind farms. Bull Atmos Sci Technol, 2020, 1: 179-203.

[2]

BaiJ, ZhaoM, QinX, XuY, LiuY. Can combined wind and solar power meet the increased electricity load on heatwave days in China after the carbon emission peak? A case study in Southern Hebei. J Clean Prod, 2024, 478. 143828

[3]

Baidya RoyS, TraiteurJJ. Impacts of wind farms on surface air temperatures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2010, 107(42): 17899-17904.

[4]

Baidya RoyS, PacalaSW, WalkoR. Can large wind farms affect local meteorology?. J Geophys Res Atmos, 2004, 109. D19

[5]

BartoldM, KluczekM. Estimating of chlorophyll fluorescence parameter fv/fm for plant stress detection at peatlands under Ramsar convention with Sentinel-2 satellite imagery. Ecol Inf, 2024, 81. 102603

[6]

Ben AbbesA, BounouhO, FarahIR, De JongR, MartínezB. Comparative study of three satellite image time-series decomposition methods for vegetation change detection. Eur J Remote Sens, 2018, 51(1): 607-615.

[7]

BhandariR, KumarB, MayerF. Life cycle greenhouse gas emission from wind farms in reference to turbine sizes and capacity factors. J Clean Prod, 2020, 277. 123385

[8]

CoppinP, JonckheereI, NackaertsK, MuysB, LambinE. Review articledigital change detection methods in ecosystem monitoring: a review. Int J Remote Sens, 2004.

[9]

Dabrowska-Zielinska K, Budzynska M, Tomaszewska M, Bartold M, Gatkowska M (2015) The study of multifrequency microwave satellite images for vegetation biomass and humidity of the area under Ramsar convention. 2015 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 5198–5200. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2015.7327005

[10]

Dabrowska-ZielinskaK, MalinskaA, BochenekZ, BartoldM, GurdakR, ParadowskiK, LagiewskaM. Drought model DISS based on the fusion of satellite and meteorological data under variable climatic conditions. Remote Sens, 2020, 1218. Article 18

[11]

Da̧browska-ZielińskaK, BudzynskaM, KowalikW, MałekI, GatkowskaM, BartoldM, TurlejK. Biophysical parameters assessed from microwave and optical data. Int J Electron Telecommun, 2012, 58: 99-104.

[12]

FuP, WengQ. A time series analysis of urbanization induced land use and land cover change and its impact on land surface temperature with Landsat imagery. Remote Sens Environ, 2016, 175: 205-214.

[13]

GaoL, WuQ, QiuJ, MeiY, YaoY, MengL, LiuP. The impact of wind energy on plant biomass production in China. Sci Rep, 2023, 13122366.

[14]

GurdakR, BartoldM. Remote sensing techniques to assess chlorophyll fluorescence in support of crop monitoring in Poland. Miscellanea Geogr, 2021, 25(4): 226-237.

[15]

HladkyR, LastovickaJ, HolmanL, StychP. Evaluation of the influence of disturbances on forest vegetation using Landsat time series; a case study of the low Tatras National park. Eur J Remote Sens, 2020.

[16]

ImtiazF, FarooqueAA, RandhawaGS, WangX, EsauTJ, AcharyaB, Hashemi GarmdarehSE. An inclusive approach to crop soil moisture estimation: leveraging satellite thermal infrared bands and vegetation indices on Google Earth engine. Agric Water Manage, 2024, 306. 109172

[17]

KeithDW, DeCarolisJF, DenkenbergerDC, LenschowDH, MalyshevSL, PacalaS, RaschPJ. The influence of large-scale wind power on global climate. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2004, 101(46): 16115-16120.

[18]

LaguëMM, QuetinGR, BoosWR. Reduced terrestrial evaporation increases atmospheric water vapor by generating cloud feedbacks. Environ Res Lett, 2023, 187. 074021

[19]

LiZ, LiuX, NiuT, KejiaD, ZhouQ, MaT, GaoY. Ecological restoration and its effects on a regional climate: the source region of the Yellow River, China. Environ Sci Technol, 2015, 49(10): 5897-5904.

[20]

LiY, KalnayE, MotesharreiS, RivasJ, KucharskiF, Kirk-DavidoffD, BachE, ZengN. Climate model shows large-scale wind and solar farms in the Sahara increase rain and vegetation. Science, 2018, 361(6406): 1019-1022.

[21]

LiQ, DuanH, XieM, KangP, MaY, ZhongR, GaoT, ZhongW, WenB, BaiF, VuppaladadiyamArunK.. Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost analysis of a 40 MW wind farm with consideration of the infrastructure. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2021, 138. 110499

[22]

LiZ, MaT, CaiY, FeiT, ZhaiC, QiW, DongS, GaoJ, WangX, WangS. Stable or unstable? Landscape diversity and ecosystem stability across scales in the forest–grassland ecotone in Northern China. Landscape Ecol, 2023, 38(12): 3889-3902.

[23]

LiD, MaC, YueC, LinN, ZhuY, WuJ. Windfarm construction alters soil multinutrient cycling by destabilizing microfauna community in a mountain ecosystem. J Environ Manage, 2025, 373. 123758

[24]

LiuL, WangZ, WangY, WangJ, ChangR, HeG, TangW, GaoZ, LiJ, LiuC, ZhaoL, QinD, LiS. Optimizing wind/solar combinations at finer scales to mitigate renewable energy variability in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2020.

[25]

LiuP, LiuL, XuX, ZhaoY, NiuJ, ZhangQ. Carbon footprint and carbon emission intensity of grassland wind farms in Inner Mongolia. J Clean Prod, 2021, 313. 127878

[26]

LiuN, ZhaoX, ZhangX, ZhaoJ, WangH, WuD. Remotely sensed evidence of the divergent climate impacts of wind farms on croplands and grasslands. Sci Total Environ, 2023, 905. 167203

[27]

LiuL, LiuP, YuJ, FengG, ZhangQ, SvenningJ-C. Wind farms increase land surface temperature and reduce vegetation productivity in the inner Mongolia. Geogr Sustain, 2024, 5(3): 319-328

[28]

LuoL, ZhuangY, DuanQ, DongL, YuY, LiuY, ChenK, GaoX. Local Climatic and environmental effects of an onshore wind farm in North China. Agric for Meteorol, 2021, 308–309108607.

[29]

MengL, LiuP, ZhouY, MeiY. Blaming the wind? The impact of wind turbine on bird biodiversity. J Dev Econ, 2025, 172. 103402

[30]

QinY, LiY, XuR, HouC, ArmstrongA, BachE, WangY, FuB. Impacts of 319 wind farms on surface temperature and vegetation in the United States. Environ Res Lett, 2022, 172. 024026

[31]

TefferaB, AssefaB, BjörklundA, AssefaG. Life cycle assessment of wind farms in Ethiopia. Int J Life Cycle Assess, 2021, 26: 76-96.

[32]

VerbesseltJ, HyndmanR, NewnhamG, CulvenorD. Detecting trend and seasonal changes in satellite image time series. Remote Sens Environ, 2010, 114(1): 106-115.

[33]

WengQ, FuP, GaoF. Generating daily land surface temperature at Landsat resolution by fusing Landsat and MODIS data. Remote Sens Environ, 2014, 145: 55-67.

[34]

WuN, HeR, JinC, XuY, PanG, QiL. Research on the resource-allocation-optimization strategy for offshore wind power construction considering complex influencing factors. Energies, 2024, 1723. Article 23

[35]

XieY, WengQ. Spatiotemporally enhancing time-series DMSP/OLS nighttime light imagery for assessing large-scale urban dynamics. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens, 2017, 128: 1-15.

[36]

XuK, HeL, HuH, LiuS, DuY, WangZ, LiY, LiL, KhanA, WangG. Positive ecological effects of wind farms on vegetation in China’s Gobi Desert. Sci Rep, 2019, 916341.

[37]

YangJ, DongJ, XiaoX, DaiJ, WuC, XiaJ, ZhaoG, ZhaoM, LiZ, ZhangY, GeQ. Divergent shifts in peak photosynthesis timing of temperate and alpine grasslands in China. Remote Sens Environ, 2019, 233. 111395

[38]

YangJ, RuanZ, YangX, LiC, BianS, LuX, HeK. International comparative study on the dynamic changes of carbon footprint in onshore wind power. Strategic Study CAE, 2024, 26(04): 152-163.

[39]

ZhangL, WengQ. Annual dynamics of impervious surface in the Pearl River Delta, China, from 1988 to 2013, using time series Landsat imagery. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens, 2016, 113: 86-96.

[40]

ZhangL, WengQ, ShaoZ. An evaluation of monthly impervious surface dynamics by fusing Landsat and MODIS time series in the Pearl River Delta, China, from 2000 to 2015. Remote Sens Environ, 2017, 201: 99-114.

[41]

ZhangH, MaJ, ChenC, TianX. Ndvi-net: a fusion network for generating high-resolution normalized difference vegetation index in remote sensing. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens, 2020, 168: 182-196.

[42]

ZhaoX, LiF, YuanY, AriG, YanY, ZhangQ, OlhnuudA, LiuP. Wind farms reduce grassland plant community diversity and lead to plant community convergence. BMC Ecol Evol, 2025, 251. 10

[43]

ZhengQ, WengQ, WangK. Developing a new cross-sensor calibration model for DMSP-OLS and Suomi-NPP VIIRS night-light imageries. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens, 2019, 153: 36-47.

[44]

Zhu R, Shi W, Wang Y, Wang W, Huang Q (2018) Research suggestions on the ecological and climate environmental effects of wind power development and utilization in China. China Eng Sci 20(3). https://doi.org/10.15302/J-SSCAE-2018.03.006

Funding

National College Students Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program(X202310022374)

National Natural Science Foundation of China(32101324)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

The Author(s), under exclusive licence to the International Society of Energy and Environmental Science

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

400

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/